‘The Austrian School
and Its Opponents—
Historicists, Socialists,
and PositivistsCHAPTER 1
Menger’s Principles of Economics
Prelude—Carl Menger Gets a Chair
‘Becaise very tory must begin somevhere, tart my account ofthe origins
ofthe Austrian schoo ats particular time and place, The time and pace
Vien, s¢71—will ot surprise those who know something about the Aas
tran schol but perhaps the choice of protagonist wl.
In the spring of, Albert hile surrendered his professorship atthe
University of Vienna to become the Austrian minister of wade in the cabinet
‘2 Count Hohenwart. This was not tobe the mos propitious of carer dees
sions, Before the year was out the counts goverment had cllapsed, ead
Shifle was out fb, Schile di not return tothe university and, need,
‘ss never again to holds poston in ether academe or the government
‘hough hisew months f servic to the tt did gin him atime pension,
History has not tested Scie particulsrly wel He virtually enonng
‘smong sconomiss today, ad, when heis mentioned, he wsuallyis dims,
‘The conclusion of the brie entry nthe New Purves bot yal vad
‘uuboca: "Schaleinluence a theorist and teacher of econsmice wus
his own dy rather limite, I seems tobe of litle importance for our tine”
(Recktenwald 987,256)!
‘We ae interested in the now obscure Hert Doktor Scbife, not for his
ides, but for his decision to accepts goverment potion, a dernion thet
Ida diet efecton the fortunes ofthe founder ofthe Ausitan schol, Cast
Sith nat not nt strap by vee The Anko alg Ai
Sal hugh hi suficerymportastn inch abbott. og
{onine sp) sition ofthe ible of ane of Sale soap eae ny
st Gera Scio (Sul oor mnteon She nthe
‘Mutation o.208) Sir soy), and Heninger 46-0 oh
twMenger Itwas Menger who, flea somewhat dificult Habiiaton procs,
was appointed to Scie chara the university
‘Menger had studi aw ecsiving hie degree in 1867, Ove the next four
years, he worked briefly s journal forthe leading Viennese newspaper,
the Wiener Zeitung, then entered the pres section ofthe prime minister’
office, where he was responsible fo epomting on economic news! Over the
sme period, he wrote the Principles of Eaoamsis (Grunt der Volswith-
‘chaser and submited its his Habiavion pape.
In Germaa speaking countries athe time, the atsinment ofan advanced
Aegre was nly one step along along rad leading toa university appoint-
‘ment. Next ane was required to find a sponsor (labibtaionnete) among,
the profsors. Then one could apply for one's Habla by submitting a
orginal place of esearch, usualy book, for assessment by faulty al he uni
serity where one wised ro teach. The Habitation defense followed a for
‘mal orl presentation before the professors during which one’s arguments
were cross-examined, (Cro examined i an appropri term bee what
‘we now cll econ was, in the Austro-Hungarian Empire that time,
taht within the fact of me)
one research was deemed acceptable, then by faculty decree one was
recommended the minister ofeduction, who was empowered to grant the
‘Vania gen, of “right to lecture” Right lecture i precise description,
{or if no university postion wae availble, the best one could do was to Be-
‘on Privatdozent.APrvatdovent cold collec fees forletures a students,
‘otthe postion was not formal university appoitment and carried nosal-
ary. One erveda salar only fone wasabeto fille vacant postion and ob
tain the tile of Dosen or asrordentliche Profesor literally “extraordinary
profesor," which sounds impressive but roughly equivalent tothe ark of
soit professor)? Menger Prizpes was published in (ste Menger
90] 3978) he passe his Habitation in 82 and in 873he was appointed
to Schafle chair as a Dozen.
Tt was gute «coup tobe appointed at age thity-hre toa profsorhip
in the university ofthe Austin imperial city, end afer this serendipitous
2 foe 68-69) repres Menger cncecommente ocho Wet
siatheping ch oft cons forthe newpaper ll hin orca ot
ean in reo.
Par mare ke incase ofthe German yt of ihr ecm Ringe
(en 39-38.
awoan’s raiwcirut oF aconomics [19
stat, things only got bette In 875, the emperor chose Menger tobe the
‘eghlen year-old crow prince’ privat tutor For the next vo eas hee
‘companied Rodolfo a umber of European tours. Not surprisingly, by de
‘ad's end Menge had rien tothe rank of fall profesor atthe University of
Vieana.
{As the profesor af the chai of poll economy, Menger had consider-
shle power He made recommendations othe fat forthe salaried Pr
‘ozent postions and smiley advised the emperor about whom 0 ap-
point tothe sled chairs. He was let as the senioe academic in the eld
when the venerable Lorenz von Stein, who occupied the other chain eo
nomics, departedi.885.Andhealso motor less contelled who could er
_anadvanced degre in economic, The public bares in Vienna wert put
it gently es than complete, ano use chem one bad to adhere oa hos of
ggravatingand time-consuming regulations (Seager 69, 36. To 30d ha:
ing to deal with the bibliobureaueracy, favored stodens were permitted 19
‘work inthe private libraries of their profeszors. Menger personal collection
‘of books on political economy was the most complet in Ausra If young
‘man wanted to pursue an academic cae in esonamics an nvitton to use
Menger’ brary was very neatly a necessary step (Steer 1984 197)
‘Wisin the economics eld ofthe kw facutis ofthe Ausro Hungarian Em.
ire, Carl Menger was, without question, heb enchilada (to use 3 phrase
ade famous ducing the Watergate hearings) Let us now tuen to the book
‘hat earned him tht tat.
Menge’ Principles of zonomic isthe founding document ofthe Avs
tran schol of economics, yt, a its name impli, is basicaly textbook.
ltmay seem strange today tat a textbook could serve to found a school of
‘thought, but, in contrast with current scholarly practice, professors inthe
‘Austro-Hungarian and German Empires typically wrote textbooks rather
‘than articles or monographs. The motivation was economic profesor ia-
«comes largely depended on thee suces a eter, 0 the incentive to de>
velop atertbook to accompany one's lectures was strong, Monographs were
sometimes writen by young men applying for thei Habitation but oter-
wise were produced ony by thase outside the academy, as was the cse with
the famous outsiders H.H. Gosten and J. H. von Thinen (Steeler 19908,
62-64)
Before we undertake a moe thorough explorton of themes in the Pin-
Cis, it may help to provide a brief outline of te contets, The book has a
preface and eight chapters. In chapter, four conditions that mst be present.fora thing tobe considered a good a listed. In chapter 2, Menge notes tha,
‘when human requirements fora good exceed the avaiable quantity, the good
‘becomes subjet to economizing activi tbecomesan conme ood, Value
‘theory is taken up in chapter the value of any nit of an economic good
‘sequal tothe value of the marginal unit tothe ecnomizing agent. In chap
ter 4, Menger explains tat exchange aries when individuals place dif.
nt valuations on the marginal unit. Chapter s concern price formation In
it Menger contrasts the ranges of prices that merge under biaeral monop
‘ol, staght monopoly, and competition and offers a welfare comparison
between the last two. In chapter 6, he discuses the venerable distinction be
tween use and exchange value and describes when each wl dominate de
termining the value of «good. Chapter 7 contains Menger theory ofthe
commodity: commodities are goods intended forsale, and make is
their most essential aspect. Menger utes the notion ofthe marketabity of
commodity in chapter 8 on the theory of money, where he ages that the
most marketable commodity gradually becomes scepted a ger me
dium of exchange, or money.
“These are the major threads of Menge’ argument. In the next seston,
some important themes of the book ar highlighted.
‘Themes in the Principles of Economies
‘The Compostve Method in Menger Principles
In the second paragraph of is preface, Menger sae; “Never was the need
‘ofa scienifc foundation for exnomic fairs felt more generally more
acutely” (95) 1976, 45). Hs intent is clear the riper textbook that
wil provide a ie and theoretical foundation for economics. And even
‘though his books beret ofthe mathematical formalisms that economists of
‘the twentieth century usual asociate wth the word theory it des possess
ctsin other atrbutes of scene testis,
(One is struck first of by how systematic the athoris—inded almost
anf so. Hayek once remarked on the book’ "perntent low approach
to ts main object (igs2b 100). Eewhere,inaless charitable mood, he said:
“Menger exposition is genealy characterized more by painstaking deal
and relents pursuit of the important points than by elegance orth wse of
‘raphe terms to expres his conclusions. Though vay lea, itis bored”
figgan, 48).
‘Menger useshiss)stematie reasoning “ta contest the opinion of those who
‘question the exitenceof ls of economic behavior” (Menger [930] 1976,
49) His primary goal so discover the invariant principles o laws govern.
ing conomic phenomena. Ad time and agai, he fal that he hasbeen sc
‘esful—which we sein the at tht his chaper sections carry such head
ings as “The Laws Governing Goods-Charatr” "The Las Governing the
Valu of Goods of Higher Onder," and “The Principles of Monopoly Ta
ing” (The ist section discusses how things become goods when they ac
publ of satisfying human needs, the second how the value of inputs what
‘Menger lls "goods of higher odes,” depends on thee ability to produce
“lower order” consumer goods, andthe third how a monopolist can sete
‘her price or quantity but not bath and willchoote to seta aleve! ha wil
allow him to reap he best return.)
iow does Menger establish hit “priacipes” Many of them, afte all may
seme imple common sesetoamodernrader—hardly the tf el
science ts here that t becomes evident why Menger belived tht he was
‘making cient contribution everyone of his "ws" iui up (stp by
‘sinful step) fom a aalyithat begins with the lation between persons
needsand those goods that are capabeofaisfying ther, When the quantity
of such goods es than a person requites, economizing ati begins OF,
in the jargon of modern economists, inatempting to maxiize aly i=
‘mans encounter scarcity, and scarcity requires that coe be made Al the
other ls governing such things as the valuation of goods and their prices
under various market strutaes a wellasthe emergence of ich insittions
‘trad and money, follow fom the logic of economicing atv.
Labeling Menger porticular approach has posed problems for tr writ
Ins preface Menger uses the term enpircal to describe ls methodol
0g But, because this term might better be applied vo the methods that were
4: Aug he nord sre ape i the ph tnition of te Prices oe
Mango) sary nape ottobe edinerhe nplihotie
‘Geran wen (Haye ph 7) Thee Gra o "rin wy” ale
beet Aled Marshal (luo) 0, 9) ela ht “re-n" wt ed by
‘Wien ais tention the Eg non Wim Sey Jor
minal lity finale of i Magna ily aly ape in Engi in 88
In Ply Wiad The Alpha of amon, Weleda sg ane
"ane! Wir em ey 19604 5-4 See (986,97) ts tht Wine
‘leappesto hae bee the it Assan athe ea Kop thine er
‘um tion of Natura Vee Wie),to be advocated by his vas inthe German historical chooks confusing
‘tomodern senile,
Another candidates casa There i some support fortis inthe tera-
ure In 1932 the Viennese economist Hans Majer wed the term cna
sete o describe the Austin approsch to pric formation, wich be con
trated with de functionalist theories of Wala, Pat, aa ober (ayer
(oss] 994). Mayer denon get ata important dtinction, Austins
Jae aways been more intrested in the (ea) proceses by which prices
scl ge formed than with ensmerating conditions for cgiiuny The
Phrase sta geetc cou thus, accurately be used in referee to Menger
method.
‘There te dangers here to, however. The Princpes begins with the se
fence “AI thing are subject fo the bw of case and ec," and Menger
Wik fellows this with the assertion that goods re when “asf thingy"
ae brought into casa elation with a persons needs (see Merc {95
1976, 50-52. This se ofthe term causal x quit liferent fom Mayer As
rank Knight noted inhi introduction to the fist eiton of the Engh
translation ofthe Principe, the relation been goods andthe satisfction
of needs is not best vewed a ents one (Knight igo 23)
aight was surely right tis better 1oconccve ofthe relation that Menger