Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Curriculum Reform
Curriculum Reform
Curriculum Reform
1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................2
2. The concept of curriculum.....................................................................................................3
2.1. Curriculum reform in the history of Korea.....................................................................3
2.2. Korean curriculum reform Vs. Mozambican curriculum reform....................................5
3. References.............................................................................................................................6
1
1.Introduction
Objectives
General objective
Specifics objectives
Methodology
The methodologies used to write this assignment were to relay on the different sources,
which some of this sources were found in the internet and the other were provided by
the lecturer.
2
2.1.Curriculum reform in the history of Korea
3
colonialism however, this liberation was incomplete because regardless of the Korean
people’s will, the Potsdam declaration said that Korea was going to be under the
trusteeship of the U.S. and Russia. From the U.S military captain F.L. Lockard were
appointed to become the education administrator (LEE, 1995)
Specifically, he was a professor in College of Chicago, and he created Korean
committee on education, where, 10 members or this council were Korean. They had as a
priority to replace the Japanese people who were working in education department.
Those teachers and people who were fluent in English or studied in U.S. had a priority
to be chosen as a worker. In addition, in this period the Korean teachers had the freedom
of choosing what they wanted to transmitted to their students as there were not external
curriculums.
In this period, the curriculum was also revised and defined as structure of the
discipline. In this new curriculum, J.Brouner’s theory of the structure of knowledge
4
and J. Piaget ˈpsychological achema were accepted, this author also explained that
this curriculum has to be composed by certain stepsː
The most noticeable feactures between the curriculum reform in Mozambique and
the curriculum reform in Korea are:
1. Political changes
It is proved that both countries faced curriculum reforms after a major changes on the
politics, In addition, Lee (1995, p. 34) Argues that “ One of the most noticeable
features in the history of curricular reform in Korea is that the reforms always followed
major changes in the political situation. This is especially conspicuous after 1945.
2. External influence
The both countries curriculum reform was also influence by outsider, as for Korea since
they have declared themselves as republic, their curriculum has been always influenced
by foreign theories and for that reason, some scholars discussed that it was necessary to
5
have their own indigenous theory or local theory which were going to help the country
to create a better curriculum. Lee (1995, p.37 )
Mozambique is not that different, as it had its curriculum reform influence bu the
Conclusion
Curriculum have been differently defined by many other. Some for instance as Albert Oliver,
define “curriculum as the educational program of the school “ where those authors explain
that the curriculum have as the Basic elements three program: the program of the studies,
the program of service, program of experience and hidden program. Each of this program Will
help the students to achieve the nevel of knowledge requered by the society he is in.
6
In addition, some as smith, Stanley and shores who difines curriculum as a “sequence of
potential experience set up in school for the purpose of disciplining the children and youth in
group ways of thinking and acting “ and others like Caswell and Campbell who viewed
curriculum as “all experiences that children have under the guidance of the teacher “ what i
also agree with, because i do not think that students just learn in the classroom.
Therefore curriculum reform are the process where a certain society update the education
system which was being used before, so that they adjust to the society needs in the moment.
3.References
7
8