1. The document provides a summary and analysis of the play "The Caretaker" by Harold Pinter. It explores themes of power struggles between three characters - two brothers and a tramp.
2. It then analyzes scenes from the play using Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson's four strategies of politeness: bald on record, off record, positive politeness, and negative politeness. Examples of each strategy are provided from pages 49-56 of the play.
3. The conclusion states that while radical honesty is harsh, the face view of politeness suggests using appropriate language to maintain good social relations, and the four strategies help with this.
1. The document provides a summary and analysis of the play "The Caretaker" by Harold Pinter. It explores themes of power struggles between three characters - two brothers and a tramp.
2. It then analyzes scenes from the play using Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson's four strategies of politeness: bald on record, off record, positive politeness, and negative politeness. Examples of each strategy are provided from pages 49-56 of the play.
3. The conclusion states that while radical honesty is harsh, the face view of politeness suggests using appropriate language to maintain good social relations, and the four strategies help with this.
1. The document provides a summary and analysis of the play "The Caretaker" by Harold Pinter. It explores themes of power struggles between three characters - two brothers and a tramp.
2. It then analyzes scenes from the play using Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson's four strategies of politeness: bald on record, off record, positive politeness, and negative politeness. Examples of each strategy are provided from pages 49-56 of the play.
3. The conclusion states that while radical honesty is harsh, the face view of politeness suggests using appropriate language to maintain good social relations, and the four strategies help with this.
1. The document provides a summary and analysis of the play "The Caretaker" by Harold Pinter. It explores themes of power struggles between three characters - two brothers and a tramp.
2. It then analyzes scenes from the play using Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson's four strategies of politeness: bald on record, off record, positive politeness, and negative politeness. Examples of each strategy are provided from pages 49-56 of the play.
3. The conclusion states that while radical honesty is harsh, the face view of politeness suggests using appropriate language to maintain good social relations, and the four strategies help with this.
Course: Discourse Analysis Assignment Topic: Face View of Politeness. Teacher Name: ma’am Humaira Summary of Comedy: "The Caretaker" is a darkly comic play by Harold Pinter. It tells the story of an encounter between two brothers, Aston and Mick, and a tramp named Davies, whom Aston has taken in to be his caretaker. The play explores themes of power, identity, and the human condition. As the story progresses, the three characters engage in a power struggle, with each trying to assert their dominance over the others. The play is known for its complex characters, sharp wit, and ambiguous ending, which leaves the audience to conclude the fate of the characters. Application of Four Strategies of Politeness: The idea of politeness, as defined by Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson, is focused on efforts to correct insults to a person's self-esteem or to effectively assert good societal ideals in social interactions. Brown and Levinson expanded the theory of Goffman and said that the idea of face-saving or politeness is culturally universal. The four strategies are briefly defined and analyzed in the comedy. The comedy has been divided among the group members and my task is to study final pages (pages 49-56) of part 3 and analyze and locate the 4 strategies of politeness. 1. Bald on Record: Bald on the record means to say something without an apology, any adornment, or hedging. In simple terms, it means to say something without beating about the bush. Or in other meaning it means brutal honesty or radical transparency. For example, being a guest of someone who has cooked something (Mutton karahi) that you don’t like, but, one is proud of one’s cooking skills. The least polite way of saying this is that the beef never tastes good. Succeeding statements showcase bald on Record Politeness. MICK. I don’t want you to pick it up. I want a first-class experienced interior decorator. I thought you were one. DAVIES. Me? Now wait a minute— wait a minute—you got the wrong man. MICK. You mean you wouldn’t know how to it teal-blue, copper and parchment linoleum squares and have those colours re-echoed in the walls? MICK. You’re a bloody impostor, mate! MICK. You got two names. What about the rest? Eh? Now come on, why did you tell me all this dirt about you being an interior decorator? MICK. What a strange man you are. Aren’t you? You’re really strange. Ever since you come into this house there’s been nothing but trouble. Honest. I can take nothing you say at face value. Every word you speak is open to any number of different interpretations. Most of what you say is lies. You’re violent, you’re erratic, you’re just completely unpredictable. You’re nothing else but a wild animal, when you come down to it. You’re a barbarian. And to put the old tin lid on it, you stink from arse-hole to breakfast time. Look at it. You come here recommending yourself as an interior decorator, whereupon I take you on, and what happens? You make a long speech about all the references you’ve got down at Sidcup, and what happens? I haven’t noticed you go down to Sidcup to obtain them. It’s all most regrettable but it looks as though I’m compelled to pay you off for your caretaking work. Here’s half a dollar. ASTON. Anyway, I’m going to be busy. I’ve got that shed to get up. If I don’t get it up now it’ll never go up. ASTON. You better go. 2. Off Record: It means we don’t say the face-threatening act directly but hint at the face-threatening act. We allow people to understand what we make inferences about. Here we are paying respect to the listener. Keeping our previous example in mind, to act politely one would reply that I have never eaten Mutton Karhai before. Here only an intelligent mind would understand my dislikes of the dish. 3. Positive Politeness: While interacting with a person having a positive face, the use of language would aim to bolster the confidence of the hearer to get him connected to a group. For instance, by asking an office colleague for a letter of recommendation, I would use positive politeness to get things done. For this reason, I would use words that would result in increasing his self-esteem, i.e. I am asking you for a letter of recommendation, as you are an expert in the field, you are very much familiar with my work, and you would be a perfect person to write a letter of recommendation. Following statements are taken from comedy indicating positive politeness. DAVIES. But listen. I’m with you, I’ll be here, I’ll do it for you! Pause. We’ll do it together! ASTON. You make too much noise. 4. Negative Politeness: To protect the negative face or try to lessen the threatening act, one would try not to impose anything on the person who wants to be independent. For instance, by asking for a letter of recommendation from a person who is having a negative face, I would use my words wisely. You are free to say no, I know the deadline may not work for you, and I am sure you are very busy, but if you had the time, it would be great of you to write a letter of recommendation of the letter for me. DAVIES. What? What I’m saying is, you got ideas for this place, all this … all this decorating, see? I mean, he’s got no right to order me about. I take orders from you, I do my caretaking for you, I mean, you look upon me … you don’t treat me like a lump of dirt … we can both … we can both see him for what he is. MICK. Well, you say you’re an interior decorator, you’d better be a good one. ASTON. Any time he stays here. This is my bed. It’s the only bed I can sleep in. DAVIES. No, no, not me, man. I’m not an interior decorator. I been too busy. Too many other things to do, you see. But I … but I could always turn my hand to most things … give me … give me a bit of time to pick it up. Conclusion: It takes just a few years to learn any language, however, it takes decades to use them appropriately in order to be considered as some who is poised and safe to interact with. The idea of face and politeness help us in choosing words fittingly so as to be considered as a polite member of any social group. Radical Honesty, though very harsh and cruel, suggest to speak truth, come what may. This radical honesty would result in impolite view of the speaker. However the concept of face view of politeness suggest to use your language in a proper way. One can conclude that in a society where we live, one should study and apply these four strategies of politeness. This would help us maintain good relations with whom we interact.