Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Using CoRT Based Program to Improve Creative writing

Skills of EFL Secondary Stage Students


Asmaa medhat Mohamed El-sherbeny

Abstract
The present study aimed at investigating the impact of using CoRT program
to develop secondary stage students' creative writing skills. The targeted creative
writing sub- skills were (flexibility, fluency, accuracy, and originality) the study
adopted the quasi-experimental design. Using 60 1st year secondary stage students
divided into two groups: an experimental group received the CoRT program and a
control group that was taught in the regular method. Instruments designed and
used in the study were a creative writing test and a rubric for scoring the students'
creative writing performance. The experimental treatment was conducted during
the second semester of the academic year 2017-2018 the results showed that there
was statistically significant difference between the control and experimental
groups on both instruments in favor of the experimental group. In addition, there
were statistically significant differences between pre-and post-administration of
both instruments on the experimental group in favor of the post administration. The
results indicate that The CoRT program led to developing students' EFL creative
writing skills.
Key words: EFL creative writing skills, the CoRT program.
Introduction
English is an international their thinking and creativity skills
language that is spoken in many using several language processes
countries as a first, second or such as, relating, commenting,
foreign language. It has established connecting, predicting, recalling,
itself in recent decades as the comprehending, applying,
common language of international associating, analyzing,
communication. English language synthesizing, evaluating and
has become the language of solving problem. Among these
knowledge since most of the skills, writing skills is considered a
human innovations in research, thinking tool for language and
science, medicine, literature, and creativity development.
all other fields are written and Writing skill is the way with
documented in English In the which individuals and institutions
context of education, English can communicate all over the
language skills have an essential world, and it is a great instrument
role in helping learners develop for helping people to know more
about others' way of thinking, in particularly that learning is viewed
addition, creative writing skills as a creative process that involves
consolidate concepts and ideas that students making information
allow peoples to write down their relevant by linking prior knowledge
ideas and innovations. It helps to and new knowledge in a
determine how to arrange actions in meaningful format. Shorofat (2007)
the innovative works. Throughout pointed out that writing could be
writing, one can translate his classified into two kinds: functional
concepts and be able to logically and creative. Creative writing is
persuade others. It is easier to test that kind through which individuals
and evaluate the development of can convey what they have in their
the individual's level when the minds to others in an attractive
person achieves noticed progress in literary style. It includes several
written context. genres such as writing stories,
In describing creative writing, poems, plays and essays. Musa
Sak, (2010) asserted that creative (2002) also, noted that creative
writing classes provide an writing is a distinguished academic
opportunity to develop confidence activity and one of the complex
in presenting one's own work and mental processes which writers
critiquing others. Adults can express their feelings and reactions.
explore interests while Ibnian (2009) defined creative
experimenting with self- expression writing as that kind of writing
and taking personal risks. Three through which students express
elements of the topic (presentation, thoughts, opinions, solutions etc...
action, and interaction) were in an attractive literary style, taking
developed through which into account mechanics of writing.
individual assessment, Fortunately, a number of
collaboration, and creativity could approaches, methods, and programs
be. Mely (2009) asserted that have been used to improve
teachers, as well as learners, language learning in general and
should engage with extensive the creative writing skill in
reading. He argued also that particular. One of the promising
there are significant benefits to programs to develop creative
teachers if they participate in writing is CoRT program .The
creative writing. CoRT program is considered the
Haroon (2014) stated that most famous among the thinking
creativity is an essential element programes across the world.
that is obviously involved in the (CoRT) stands for (Cognitive
teaching learning process; Research Trust) an institution

44
of cognitive research which was ,Combination, Requirements ,and
established by De Bono, a evaluation . The essence of the
theorist, at Cambridge . It is an CoRT Thinking Method is to
educational curriculum for direct focus attention directly on
teaching of thinking skills, divided different aspects of thinking and
into six modules each consists of to translate these aspects into
ten lesson. definite concepts tools that can be
The CoRT 1 is Breadth which used deliberately .
helps students broaden their The CoRT program features
perception. They should know ways to help students with
more about each thinking situation different abilities to use them
after using the tools than they knew effectively in academic and
before they started. The CoRT 2 is personal situations. In other
Organization that gives students a words, The program helps all
variety of tools to organize their students including students with
thinking. In addition ,the CoRT 3 is special needs and at-risk students
Interaction that helps students (De Bono, 1998). After over 38
observe the thinking involved in years of widespread use, the
arguments, how a point of view is CoRT program is now
presented or defended, and the considered a universal tool that
value and types of evidence. The is widely used in different
CoRT 4 is Creativity in which cultures, situations, ages, and
students learn tools to generate abilities. This program is being
fresh new solutions to challenges. used in Australia, USA,
The CoRT 5 is Information and Singapore, South Africa, UK,
Feeling tool to separate emotions Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia,
from facts. Finally,the CoRT 6 is Brazil, Canada, France, India,
Action which begins with the Malta, New Zealand, Philippines,
purpose and ends with specific Russia, and Venezuela.
action steps for the implementation The CoRT consists of 60
of the outcome .(Debono ,2009) lessons divided into six parts.
The tools in the CoRT 4 Each part comprises 10 lessons
program are selected for (Al Zyoudi, 2009; Jarwan., 2007).
improving creative writing sills for However, in the CoRT program
the first grade for secondary stage the focus is on evolving the
students .They include :Yes, no, po easy use of thinking skills by
( possible ),Stepping stone, frequent exercise; thus,
Random input, Dominant idea argumentation does not seem to
,Define the problem ,Remove faults be a major issue for evolving

45
thinking skills. Therefore, it is established at Cambridge, England
shortened (Moseley, Elliott, et (Dingli, 2001), in 1976, his book
al., 2005). Nevertheless, Dingli ‘Teaching Thinking’ was published
(2001) pointed out that learning (one of 41 books which he has
the CoRT skills helps students published on the topic, in 26
with different abilities to learn in languages). (Murphy, Michelle,
order to gain suitable principles for Bourne, Briggs, 1995)''The
long term education and also to cognitive research trust (CoRT)
deal with rapid changes in the program has been in use for over
twenty-first century. twelve years in a wide variety of
The CoRT program helps schools in the wold
students to collect, select and (DeBono,1976). The notion of the
evaluate information. later, program generally is practical
Moseley, Elliott, et al. (2005) thinking at the cognitive research
reported that the CoRT trust to encourage the use of
program teaches a set of material with applicability in a
thinking “processes” defined wide variety of situations.
by abbreviations for "creative Therefore, this program considers
and critical thinking"; thinking is a basic process that can
processes that target the breadth be taught and used across a wide
in knowledge, organizing thinking variety of ages and abilities
and addressing them with proper (Debonno,1985)
knowledge .However, a few studies The idea that creative abilities
have used CoRT in the field of are trainable emerged in the 1950s
TEFL . This study attempts to when a few psychologists and
investigate the effectiveness of creativity scholars such as.
using CoRT based program to Guilford, Parne and Torrance
improve creative writing Skills for disagreed with their colleagues who
the first grade secondary stage thought that creativity is a
students. characteristic fixed at birth and
The CoRT program which could not be increased
The CoRT program is one of deliberately. Instead, they viewed
creativity as a common
the promising programs to improve
characteristic of all human beings
creative writing skills which was
rather than being a trait reserved to
designed by Edward de Bono and
a few gifted individuals
was first published in 1973. The
(Casanovas,2015 ).
name CoRT stands for Cognitive
Research Trust which was

46
CoRT4''creativity'' program: Method is to focus attention
The target program in this directly on different aspects of
the study is CoRT 4 ''creativity'' is thinking and to crystalline these
concerning with creative thinking aspects into definite concepts
for improving creative writing tools that can be used
skills including lateral thinking deliberately. This section is
which are Yes, no, po (possible concerned with creative thinking
),Stepping stone, Random input, including element of lateral
Dominant idea ,Define the problem thinking which students learn
,Remove faults ,Combination, tools to generate fresh new
Requirements ,and evaluation . The solutions to challenges.
essence of the CoRT Thinking
The following lessons are emphasized
Lessons The CoRT4 program
Yes, No, Po A way of looking at things, used to judge ideas creatively (Po
= Possibly)
Stepping To use an idea creatively, as a stepping stone to other ideas.
Stone Say/do something unlikely or outrageous as a way to move
beyond the current situation
Random Input Bringing in something random/unconnected to the situation in
order to trigger new idea.
Concept A way of not taking things for granted. Looking at the A
Challenge accepted ideas and refuting/challenging them. (It does not
matter if the original idea remains the best at the end of this
process)
Dominant Recognizing the main ideas behind a situation in order to not
Idea be restricted by them
Define the An effort to define a problem exactly may lead to it being
Problem easier to solve. What is the real problem here? How is best
defined? Not just by linguistics or semantics but by purpose
them. Faults may be obvious or they may be a matter of
omission.
Remove faults Pick out all the faults in a given idea and remove is a limited
form of creativity to improve thinking
combination Put to gather things that have existed separately to create
something that have a value more than the sums of its part.
Requirements Considering requirements at the beginning of the process will
shape the ideas in a creative way
Evaluation Look at the value of the idea, not so much in itself but in
relation to the situation. How does it fit the requirements?
What are the disadvantages?
Figure (1) lessons based on the CoRT4 program

47
The CoRT based program is The results of this study approved
proper for helpining learners to use that there were significant effect of
their thinking and imagination to a training program on the fluency,
write creatively. It would be flexibility, and elaboration in favor
appropriate to use this type of of the experimental group
program in order to help student The study of Al-Muhtaseb
imagine and practice thinking so (2010) examined the impact of
that it helps students improve their integrating thinking skills in
writing. Therefore, the purpose of science textbooks on achievement
this study was to investigate the in science, scientific skills and
impact of using CoRT based decision making ability among 7th
program to improve creative graders in Palestine. The results
writing skills of EFL 1st year verified that the integration of
Secondary stage students thinking skills in science content
Review of literature& studies was effective in developing 7th
female students' achievement in
A few numbers of studies
science, scientific skills and
have been carried out to evaluate,
decision-making ability.
discuss or measure the value of
CoRT based program in teaching The study of Abewickrama
and learning. (2011) aimed at investigating the
Nofel (2006) studied the creativity of the learners of English
as a second language at a state
effect of using CoRT 1 “Breadth”,
university in Sri Lanka. The sample
2 “Organization” and “Creativity”
consisted of 20 intermediate level
on developing the creative thinking
second year undergraduates who
of the fourth year students in
were following the Core English
UNRWA Educational Sciences
Language (CEL) Level 4 course.
College in Amman, the results
The findings of the study showed
confirmed that teaching CoRT
that the respondents were
developed the students’ originality,
sufficiently competent to create a
flexibility and fluency cited in Al-
higher number of responses and a
Faoury, (2014).
considerable number of novel
Alzyuadi (2009) aimed at solutions on all the sub-tasks of the
examining the effect of a creativity creativity test.
training program on the creativity
In Al-Edwan (2011), it was
thinking skills of students with
studied that the effectiveness of a
learning disability of the fifth grade
training program based on CoRT
in Al Ain District. The sample of
strategies to develop the critical
this study involve (32) students.

48
thinking of seventh grade students that stands for Cognitive Research
in history. The sample of this study Trust. The researcher aimed at
included 163 seventh male and teaching creative and critical
female students in Amman Second thinking, to the gifted students’
directorate. The study results creative abilities in writing through
approved that there are statistical wordless books. The experimental
differences in the critical thinking group consisted of 36 gifted
of seventh grade students in history students in Ein El-Basha Center of
that are related to teaching Gifted Students. The findings
methodology and the method of the approved that the CoRT Program
training program which used CoRT developed the gifted learners’
strategies. creative abilities in writing English
Melhem et al (2013) aimed at short stories (Cited in Abdel Haq &
enhancing the critical thinking Al-Mashaqba , 2015).
skills among sixth grade students Tarqe (2014) investigated The
with learning difficulties in CoRT program to measure its
mathematics in Jordan by using the effects on enhancing critical
CoRT program. The findings thinking (CT) and improving
indicated that the training program motivation to learn for sixth grade
had a very large-sized effect on the student with Learning (LDs) in
participants' critical thinking. mathematics in Jordan. The
Furthermore, Hanan (2014) experimental group consisted of 93
identified the effect of utilizing sixth-grade students from schools
CoRT program on developing in First Amman Educational
creative thinking skills in Directorate in Jordan. The results
mathematics for 6th grade students. verified that the training program
The sample consisted of two had a very large -sized effect on the
classrooms of 6th grade students participants' CT and MTL.
with a total number of 70 students Cupta (2014) investigated the
divided equally into two group, effect of De Bono’s CoRT
experimental and control from Abu Thinking Program on the
Tamam High Basic School for Concept Map Performance of
females. The findings revealed that Senior Secondary School students
there were post-tests in favor of the of grade IX and X in relation
post-test. to their level of intelligence.
Al Faoury (2014) investigated Two identical groups comprised of
the effect of teaching CoRT 51 respondents in each . The
Program 4 entitled “Creativity”, results observed that CoRT
Thinking Program has significant

49
effects on concept map In the study of ALshurman,
performance. Level of (2017) aimed to enhance the first
intelligence has also been found part of the CoRT program for
to have significant effect on teaching thinking development of
some component of concept map communication skills among a
performance. Mustafa (2015) sample of students from Al al-
reported on a study which Bayat University in Jordan. The
examined the use of creative sample included all the students
thinking skills in academic essay enrolled in the training session. The
writing at an Islamic higher findings showed that there were
learning institution. Two (2) groups statistically significant differences
of undergraduate students were between the pre and post
involved in the study whereby one measurements for members of the
(1) group was given the treatment experimental group on the
of Cognitive Research Trust communication skills scale in favor
(CoRT) program while another was of the post measurement.
taught academic writing Reviewing the literature, it is
conventionally. The results found that students were a weak in
recommend that the aspect of creative writing skills therefore,
academic writing process could CoRT program are very beneficial
benefit from the use of creative for teaching EFL and may help
writing skills. students on improving creative
Hamidat (2016) this study writing skills.
aims to investigate the Pilot study
effectiveness of CoRT training In order to provide evidence
program on the creativity of the for the problem of the study, the
Jordanian English language pilot study was conducted to a first
learners. Results: it revealed that year secondary stage students
there was a statistically significant current level of EFl creative writing
difference at the level (α =0.05) in skills .A selected sample was taken
the mean scores between the from Bohut secondary school in
experimental group and the control Nabaroo City to check students
group in favor of the experimental creative writing performance on
group. Interestingly, the current the first term exam, 2016 the
study adopted the experimental sample included 30 students.
design.

50
Table(1) Students' performance in creative writing+
Creative writing sub skills Mean Std. Deviation
Fluency 2.48 1.53
Flexibility 2.40 1.23
Accuracy 4.36 1.47
Originality 1.63 1.49
Total 10.88 4.21
st
This table shows that of the 1 year secondary
students' total mean in creative students?
writing skill was 10.88 out of 30  What is the effectiveness of
and their total standard deviation training on CoRT program in
was 4.21 which in turn indicated improving the 1st year
that the students' level in English secondary students' creative
creative writing in general. The writing skills?
highest mean score was 4.36 in the Purpose
accuracy sub-skill while the lowest
The present study aimed at:
mean was 1.63 in the originality
sub-skills this level may be due to a  Identifying creative writing
number of variables that include skills of the first year secondary
the lack of training in using stage students.
appropriate learning strategies that  Designing a CoRT based
improve creative writing skills. program to improve creative
Problem of the study: writing skills of the second year
Based on the literature preparatory female students.
review, and results of the pilot  Determining the effectiveness
study, second year secondary of CoRT based program in
students were not doing well in improving creative writing
creative writing skill .They needed skills.
to develop their skills in creative Hypotheses
writing. So, the current study The study verified the following
investigated the effect of CoRT4 hypotheses:
based program to develop their
creative writing skills.  There is statistically significant
difference at 0.05 level between
Question the mean of the score of
 What are the component of experimental group student and
CoRT based program to control group students in the
develop creative writing skills post – administration of the

51
creative writing skill test in control group receiving the regular
favor of the experimental group teaching.
students Design:
 There is statistically significant The study adopted the quasi
difference at 0.05 level between experimental design of the two
the mean of score of pre-and groups of a sample of 1st grade
post -administration of the secondary students.
creative writing skills test of the The frist group was
experimental group in favor of Experimental group who studied
the post administration. the content of the target units in
The Methodology of the study: light of the CoRT program. The
Methodology of the current other group was Control group
study includes the participants, who studied the same content of the
instruments, design and procedures target unit using the regular
followed to carry out the teaching approach.
Participants This design included the
The participants of the study following variables: the
are two 1st year secondary classes independent variables which was
from Bohut secondary school in The CoRT Based program and a
Nabaroo city .One class of dependent variable which was
30student represents the creative writing. The following
experimental group receiving the figure shows the design of this
CoRT program Training. The other study:
class of 30 students serves as the

Pre- Experimental Applying


Post
creative group CoRT4
creative
writing program
writing
test
test
Control group Regular
teaching
Figure (2) the quasi experimentalapproach
design of the study
Instruments

52
 A Creative writing test the light of the theoretical back
assessing 1st grade ground and related studies. Results
secondary student's creative of the study were separated
writing before and after according to the hypotheses.
administrating the treatment. Results related to the first
 A rubric for scoring the hypotheses
creative writing test. 1. Verifying the first
The Delimitations of the study: hypothesis: The first hypothesis
stated that "There is a statistically
The present study is delimited to:
significant difference at the 0.01
 Some creative writing skills level between the mean score of the
necessary for first year for experimental group students and
secondary stage students. that of the control group on the
 A sample of the 1st grades of post administration of the creative
secondary school students. writing test in favor of
 CoRT4 program which in experimental group students"
creativity The T-test was used to
Results and discussions compare the difference between the
mean score of the students in the
Results were statistically creative writing test in the
analyzed in terms of the experimental and the control group
hypotheses. they were discussed in
Table (3) Comparing the writing performance of the two groups on the
creative writing post -test.
Experimental group Control group
Skills T-value
Mean Sd. Devi. Mean Sd. Devi.
Fluency 6.82 2.04 4.02 2.23 5.05*
Flexibility 6.37 2.70 3.20 2.26 5.14*
Accuracy 8.96 2.44 6.66 2.54 4.45*
Originality 5.73 2.91 2.93 1.76 4.51*
Total Skills 27.89 8.46 16.82 6.92 4.53*
Significant at 0.01 level *
The Results in table (3) statistically significance difference
illustrate that the mean score of the at 0.01 level between the mean
experimental group was greater score of the experimental group
than that of the control group. It and that of the control group on the
was clear that there was a post-administration of the

53
creative.Also, the table shows that include discussions, reporters' note
the students mean score in the book, questioning, and thoughtful
overall post creative writing test in interaction during lessons.
the experimental group was 27.89 Results related to the second
compared to(16.82) for the control hypotheses
group. This indicates that the CoRT The second hypothesis stated
program helped to improve the that ''There is statistically
experimental group creative writing significant difference at the0.01
performance. level between the mean score of the
The increase of the students' experimental group students on the
level in experimental group can be pre and Post-administration of the
interpreted that students in the creative writing test''
experimental group were active in In order to verifying the
using the CoRT specially questions second hypothesis, the t-test was
led to their thinking. Activities used to show the difference
associated with the CoRT4 between the main score of the
programs led to this increase and experimental group students on the
made this difference. pre and post administration of the
Group work and pair work creative writing test.
made the students more cooperative
with each other. These activities
Table (4) Creative writing performance of the experimental groups
students on the pre and post-administration of the creative
writing test.
Skills Pre experimental group Post experimental group
T-value
Mean Std. Devi. Mean Std. Devi.
Fluency 4.02 2.23 6.82 2.04 *5.68
Flexibility 3.14 1.98 6.37 2.70 *6.24
Accuracy 6.75 1.56 8.00 1.92 *3.10
Original 2.82 1.74 5.73 2.91 *4.95
Total Skills 17.35 6.34 26.94 7.96 *5.85
* Significant at 0.01 level
Table (4) indicates that there administration in the creative writing
was a statistically significant sub skills and the total score of the
difference at 0.01 level between experimental group. Results in Table
the attained mean score of the (4) show that the students' mean
experimental group in the pre-post score of creative writing sub skill of
the experimental group in the post-

54
test were increased (26.94) between the mean score of the
compared to(17.35) in the pre- experimental group student in the
test. This indicates that the CoRT pre and post- creative writing test
program helped to improve the was statistically significant at< 0.001
experimental group creative level in favor of the post
writing sub-skills. administration which, in turn,
The increase in the mean indicates the effectiveness of the
score of the experimental group in CoRT program training in enhancing
the post-test implies that the the creative writing skills of the
student’ level in overall creative students. Estimating the effect size
writing has been developed due to (η2 ):
the training. In order to determine the effect
The paired t-test results size of the CoRT based program the
indicate that the differences Eta square was used.
Table (4) The effect size of using CoRT based program
Skills Level of effect size Eta square
Fluency High 0.53*
Flexibility High 0.57*
Accuracy Mid 0.38*
Originality High 0. 46*
Total High 0.49*
Significant at 0.01 level *

Eta square was used to total score except the mid effect
measure the effect size of the size of the accuracy. This indicated
experimental treatment (CoRT that the CoRT based program had
program). Results in this table high effect in improving the
illustrate the eta square value for experimental group creative writing
each creative writing sub-skills and and its sub-skills.
the total of these sub-skills. It is Results of the study
obvious that all of these values Within the limitation of the
ranged from (0.38 to 0.57) which study and on the basis of the results
refer to a high effect size for all the obtained, the following conclusion
creative writing sub-skills and the have been reached

55
1- The obtained results showed as a work in progress rather
that the creative writing skills is than as a finished product.
a complex activity that require 4- The lessons of CoRT4 program
much time and practice on "creativity" necessary for first
learners' part and a lot of year secondary students'
experience and guidance on the creative writing skills.
teachers 'part .pupils should 5- The experimental group students
know that the CoRT4based outperformed their counterparts
program is not a waste of time. of the control group in the
Each lesson of CoRT 4 writing skill test. This was
contributes to effective creative indicated by the significant
writing. differences between the mean
2- While providing CoRT 4 lessons scores of the two groups.
by teacher, students could not 6-The experimental group students’
understand all of written mean scores in the post
comments, which could be due application of the writing test
to illegibility. The results were better than their mean
showed that the most teachers' scores in the pre-application of
written feedback was teacher- the test. So, the CoRT4 based
centered. It made student program (creativity) were
passive and dependent on effective on improving first
teacher. year secondary students
3- There is more need to help creative writing skills.
students fully utilize the CoRT Suggestions for further research:
based program given to achieve Further investigation is
improvements in their creative needed to determine other lessons
writing. Teacher need to of CoRT program that could help in
response and judge on students

56
improving students' creative 6- Administering the CoRT based
writing skills and sub- skills program-based learning to
1- Providing students with CoRT4 different stages (i.e., primary
and other learning strategies of and preparatory). Applying the
thinking that promote their experimental treatment on
thinking and encourage them to larger
better creative writing References
2- Encouraging teachers to Abeywickrama, K. R. W. K. H.
reinforce their skills by using (2011). Learner creativity-a
various strategies to make their potential facilitator for oral
students as enjoyable as task performance? (Doctoral
possible. dissertation),7(8) 307-323,
3- Investigating other techniques University of Sabaragamuwa
and methods to teach creative
Abed-Aziz&Hanan,M, (2014).
writin
Effect of utilizingCoRT
4- Teacher should prepare students
program in developing creative
to reach a deeper level of
thinking skills in mathematics f
thinking to write creatively
or 6th grade students.
unlike the traditional methods
Unpublished MA Thesis.
of writing.
College of Education at the
5- Conducting a follow-up study on
Islamic
this research in order to see
Al-Jallad, M. (2006). The
whether the CoRT program
effectiveness of using the CoRT
training has the same influence
program on developing the
on other language skills
creative thinking skills among
(reading, listening and
the female students of the
speaking).
Arabic language and the
Islamic studies at Ajman

57
university network of science CoRT Program No.(4) Entitled"
and technology. Journal of Creativity" on the Gifted
Umm Al-Qura University of Learners' Writings in Ein El-
Educafional, Social and Basha Center for Gifted
Humanitarian Sciences, 18(2), Students. Theory & Practice in
147-180. Language Studies, 4(11).
Al-Sobh, M. A., & Al-Abed Al- Al-Edwan, Z. S. M. (2011). The
Haq, F. (2012). Online Effectiveness of a Training
linguistic messages of the Program Based on Cognitive
Jordanian secondary students Research Trust Strategies to
and their opinions toward a Develop Seventh Grade
web-based writing instructional Students' Critical Thinking in
EFL program (Special History Course. Journal of
issue). International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 436.
Humanities and Social Al-Muhaqba, N. J. A., & Al-Haq,
Science, 2(6), 288-299. F. A. A. (2015). The Effect of a
Alshurman, W. M. (2017). The Pictorial Story-Based
Effects of the First Part of the Instructional Writing Program
CoRT Program for Teaching on Enhancing the English
Thinking (BREADTH) on the Writing Performance of
Development of Jordanian Secondary
Communication Skills among a Students. US-China Foreign
Sample of Students from Al al- Language, 44.
Bayt University in Al-Muhtaseb, S. (2010). The
Jordan. Educational Research Impact of Integration of Three
and Reviews, 12(2), 73-82. Parts of CoRT Program for
Al-Faoury, O. H., & Khwaileh, F. Teaching Thinking in Science
(2014). The Effect of Teaching Textbooks on Achievement,

58
Scientific Skills & Decision 'Debono,E.(2009)''CoRT1 Breadth
Making Ability among 7th thinkingtools , Retrieved from
Graders in Palestine. An-Najah www.deBonoFor Schools.com
University Journal for Lib DeBono, E. (1995). Parallel
Research, 24(8), 2311-2334. thinking (from socratic to the
Al Zyoudi, M (2009). Effects of a debono).London:Penguin
creativity training program for Books.
Breadth and Organization on De Bono, E. 1985. Six hinking
the creativity thinking skills of HatsLondon: Penguin Books.
students with learning bono, E. (2004). Edward De
disability'' Issue NO. 26. Bono Authorized Website.
Journal of Faculty of Retrieved February from
Education. UAE http://www.edwdebono.com\de
Bakr, S. (2004): The Efficacy of bono\index.html
some Proposed Activities for De Bono, E. (2004). Edward de
Developing Bono biography. Retrieved
Thinking of English Learners at July, 22, 2004 retrieved from:
the Preparation Stage. http://www.edwarddebono.co.
Unpublished M.A. De Bono, E. (1976). Teaching
Thesis,University of Ayn Al- thinking. London: Penguin
Shams. Books
Dingli, S. (2001). Brief literature De Bono E (1998). CoRT Program
review. Action Research Final f or Teaching Thinking.
report. The Edward de Bono (Translatedby Nadia AlSrur et.
Institute for the Design and Al.), Amman. Al FKR house of
Development of Thinking. publication.
University of Malta. DeBono, E. (1995). Parallel
Pridobljeno, 2(5), 2011. thinking (from socratic to the

59
debono).London:Penguin Basha Center for Gifted
Books Students
Haroon, S., (2014) The Effect of Hmeadat,S,.R. (2016).The Effect of
using the Problem the Cognitive Research Trust
SolvingStrategy on developing Program for Development of
the Creative Writing Skills and Thinking Skills on the
Interest of preparatory pupils Achievement of the Jordanian
towards EFL, MA.Institute of English Language Learners.
Educational Studies, The Arab Journal of Sciences &
Curriculum and Instruction Research Publishing, 2 (1).
Dept., Cairo University cited in Ibnian, S. (2009) The
Tawfik,W,E.(2016) The Effect Effectiveness of a Program
of Critical Reading on based on Problem Solving to
Developing 1st Year enhance the tenth grade
Preparatory Students' English students Creative Writing skills
Creative writing skills, Ain and attitudes, the Educational
Shams University, Faculty of Studies Institute, Cairo
Education University.
Hinnant, B. (1993).A study of Jarwan, F. (2007). Teaching
Debono’s PMI Thinking Tool thinking concepts and
as a Means of Enhancing applications (3 ed.).Amman
Student Writing Performance. Dar Al-Fakr of Publishers and
Retrieved from http://www. DistributorsJennifer W. Waring
eric. ed. Gov,cited in ELfoary, (20 Jarwan., F. (2007).
o.A The Effect of Teaching Teaching thinking concepts and
CoRT Program No. (4) Entitled applications (3 ed.). Amman
"Creativity" on the Gifted Dar Al-Fakr of Publishers and
Learners' Writings in Ein El- Distributors. Jarwan, F. (1999).

60
Teaching thinking: Concepts teaching and learning.
and applications. Al Ain, UAE: Cambridge University Press.
University Book House. Martínez Casanovas, M.
Kumari, S., & Gupta, K. (2014). (2015). Improving Creativity
Effectiveness of Creativity Training. An examination of the
Training Program on Concept effects of delivery method and
Map Performance of Secondary problem realism on creative
School Students. Int. J. performance in post-training
Interdisciplinary ideation(Doctoral dissertation,
Multidisciplinary Stud, 1(5), Universitat Ramon Llull).
127-131. Melhem, T. Y., & Isa, Z. M.
Khetab N (2004). The effect of the (2013). Enhancing critical
First Part of CoRT (the field of thinking skills among students
cognition) and the second part with learning difficulties.
(organization) on Developing International Journal of
the Creative thinking and the Academic Research in
Self-Concept among a Progressive Education and
Jordanian Sample of Students Development, 2(4), 151-
with Learning Difficulties Mansoor, A. (2010) Teaching
(Unpublished PhD thesis). The Creative Writing to University,
University of Jordan, Amman, Second Level Language
Jordan Learners in Pakistan University
Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, of Sussex, English, Essex
J., Higgins, S., Newton, D. P., House, University of Sussex,
Miller, J., & Gregson, M. Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QQ
(2005). Frameworks for United Kingdom.
thinking: A handbook for Maley, A. (2009). Creative writing
for language learners (and

61
teachers). Teaching English— Al- Mutafawegeen
British Council & BBC. tahseelianFee Kulliat Al-
Retrievedfromhttps://www.teac Oloom Al-Tarbaweah Al-
hingenglish.org.uk/article/creati Jame’ah. (The Effect of CoRT
ve-writing-language-learners- Program on Developing the
teachers Creative thinking for aSample
Musa, M. (2002) the effect of a of Excellent Students in
proposed program in Educational Sciences College).
developing some creative Paper presented at the First
writing skills in the fields of Arab Conference for CoRT
story and narrative awareness Experts,Meredian Hotel,
for 5the primary pupils, studies Amman, 19-20, July, 6-48.
in curriculum and instruction, Shorofat, A. (2007). The effect of
the Egyptian council for using the brainstorming
curriculum and instruction, Ain strategy on developing ninth
Shams University, Cairo grade students' creative writings
Murphy, Patricia. & Michelle, skills in Arabic
Selinger. & Bourne, Jill. & language. Unpublished doctoral
Briggs, Marry. (1995). Subjects dissertation). The University of
learning in the primary Jordan
curriculum: Issues in English, Sak, U., & Oz, O. (2010). The
science and mathemati, The effectiveness of the Creative
Open University, Routledge Reversal Act (CREACT) on
students’ creative
Nofel, M. (2006). Athar Barnamaj
thinking. Thinking Skills and
CoRT fee Tanmeat Al- Tafkeer
Creativity, 5(1), 33-39
Al-Ebda’ee Lada AienahMen

62

You might also like