Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ramadevi On Modernist Fiction
Ramadevi On Modernist Fiction
The essay explores the bounds of the modernist novel, where fictional possibilities are tested,
reframed and recast. The import of memory as a crucial aspect of modernist fiction is focused
subject matter of the novel in ways that unlock its political, social and historical scope toward
the psychical, the lived and the experiential, establishing literary art as an important
Keywords: modernist novel, Marcel Proust, memory, the madeleine moment, Swann's Way.
Modernist novels display an extreme keenness to reject and turn back upon the traditional
narrative modes in order to voice more authentically and affirmatively, the need to focus on
race and class. Modernism, which is both philosophical and artistic in orientation, took its
birth from a varied and wide range of radical changes in the Western society during the late
nineteenth and early twentieth century, making evident an unquenchable thirst for newer
trends in art, writing, philosophy, psychology and social and industrial set ups, gave way to a
great deal of experimentation in matters not just of themes and content but also to revised
The term, ‘avant-garde’, was the initially applied qualifier to denote and describe modernism
which stuck with it and goes on to explain many other movements such as vorticism,
surrealism, expressionism, impressionism etc., associated with the dethroning of the existing
norms in its endeavour to experiment and ring in the new forms and newer responses. The
trend is quite clearly discernible in the works of the high modern novelists like Marcel Proust,
James Joyce, Thomas Mann, Virginia Woolf, and William Carlos Williams to name some.
The major influences and instrumental impetuses which facilitated and furthered the progress
of Modernism can be listed as advancements achieved in the fields of Cultural and Social
Anthropology, Historiography, Physics, Psychology, Philosophy under the aegis and theories
Around this period of time in Europe, the focus in literary studies began to shift from the
literary works engaged in the author’s artistic endeavour to discover his/her individualism
and artistic intentions and transposing them on to their texts to further an understanding of the
relationship between the author and the text. Their findings became part of national literary
histories. And soon in the late 1920s the focus began to shift to the text per se with
researchers and critics paying greater attention to how texts came into being and to their
intertextuality thus rejecting any kind of hints or assistance from the author and making a
comprehending the text. This tendency in a way sowed the first seeds of the reader-centric
approach to literary texts. It was around the same point of time the German psychologist,
Hermann Ebbinghaus was making inroads into empirical research in ‘memory’ and had
uncovered certain important facts and patterns about memory retention and also about the
process of forgetting. His findings left his contemporaries, Sigmund Freud and Francis
Galton with the task of establishing a remarkable tradition in Memory Studies and Research
It is important to acknowledge the fact that the shift in interest from the text to the reader
coincided with a similar shift that happened from encoding and storage to recall with the
Barlett in this area further strengthened the pursuit of research in this area. Added to this were
the formal and technical requirements, a multitude of other connected and unconnected
factors at the personal level - the disillusionment and frustrations embodying an intense sense
of loss, futility, death and decay in the aftermath of the two World Wars - clubbed with the
serious intent of the thinkers and writers of the Bloomsbury Group to explore the limits of
and gender related issues and a fast developing research in human psychology. The list of
writers who tended to grab the themes related to human psyche in consonance with the intent
to achieve technical finesse thus and to provide an alternative to the mundane, quotidian
detailing of the “materialist” writers includes the names of such European writers as Marcel
Proust, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, D H Lawrence, Dorothy Richardson etc., who may be
credited with the honours of launching the “Stream of Consciousness,” novel. Also roughly
referred to as the psychological novel, arrived with immense possibilities for further
explorations into the human psyche and the writers who practised this form of writing to be
The stylistic scope of the psychological novel suited perfectly the experimental tendencies of
the Modernists and their themes related to the internal world of human psyche. Thus
experimentation in literary writing and other art forms had their heyday in the 1920s and 30s
with the above mentioned writers not just exploring the limits of language by reinventing the
potential and range of the efficacy of language to fit their requirements for capturing action in
the depths of human consciousness including the thoughts, sensations, memories etc., And it
is against this backdrop ‘Memory’ came as a possible subject and entity to be explored,
studied, and exploited as a means to retrieve the inexplicable, palatable and unpalatable,
known and unknown truths about human nature as well as to gain a sense of control over the
past, the moments transpired and gone, thus bringing into the frame of work, the entity of
‘Time’ which again was put to a great deal of experimentation. Thus ‘Memory Studies,’ as it
later came to be known has radically transformed the lay out and the preoccupations of the
modernist writers for more than a century now and continues to have its sway given the
important role it has come to play in the recent and upcoming research in the area of Medical
Humanities. ‘Memory’, to the modernist writer is much more than just a theme, it is a means,
a door-way into an altogether dark, hitherto inaccessible and unexplored zone in the human
mind, the unconscious workings of the subconscious mind full of untapped possibilities for
Art uses reality as raw material to redefine, refine, and re-present it in the process of which it
‘defamiliarizes’ reality to challenge and intrigue the reader/consumer and thus sharpen
his/her artistic imagination and aesthetic sensibilities as well as the intellectual faculties. That
is to say the modernist writer creates conundrums not just to puzzle the reader but also to
challenge his own artistic self and brace himself up to groom himself into a shrewd retriever-
observer-narrator of what goes on within the depths of human psyche wading through its
fogginess, blurred outlines and help others in having a glimpse of the kernel of meaning
Memory aids the modernist writer in having a partial grasp of the past events in the form of
flitting vignettes and not as fully done painting. It facilitates in changing and recasting the
understanding of the reader, the world, people, language and what it can do and does. It
transforms the reader’s perspective into that of an impressionist – on ‘how’ the perception
happens rather than ‘what', is perceived, deviating from apparent objectivity into a
preoccupation with ‘self’ and its world, one’s inner life. As memories come from the
historical past comprising of the social, cultural, political, religious events in the lives of the
people, and in this case both the flat and round characters of the text. ‘Memory’ is used to
establish the validity and importance of a text if it is based on expertise. The modernist
novelist, on the other hand, uses it as a means to instil a feeling of nostalgia and also as a
Skopljanac, in his paper, “Literature Through Recall: Ways of Connecting Literary Studies
and Memory Studies,” studies the interfaces of common interest between literary studies and
memory and dwells at length on the studies conducted by Frederic Barlett (Barlett: 1932)
who advanced the concept that memories of past events and experiences are actually ‘mental
reconstructions’ that are coloured by cultural attitudes, and personal eccentricities rather than
being direct and voluntary memorization of events happened at a point of time. Norman
Holland who followed Barlett with a different aim and concludes that memory is important as
a medium for conscious expression even as it resorts to varied means to encode and recall the
text, as per the preferences of the individual natures of the readers and what is situated in an
individual memory: “In reality each reader reads only what is already within himself. The
book is only a kind of an optical instrument which the writer offers to the reader to enable
him to discover in himself what he could not have found but for the aid of a book” (as quoted
in Skopljanac: 1932, pp 203-204), which one can easily notice happening and manipulated
with skill in case of the “witness narratives” and ‘trauma tales’ based on such gory events as
the holocaust, the partition, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It has been quite interesting and fetching for both the Western Literary Studies and the
psychoanaytic Studies to have been in collaboration right from the beginning of the 20th
century. With Freud having chosen to study select literary texts for his research into the
workings of human psyche, which he found to be the churning centre of all mental ailments
and abnormalities and a little later the modernists too getting interested in the goings on of
the inner world rather than the external world the foundation for the collaborative work
between the literary and scientific worlds got buttressed around the same time with these
writers also keenly following the progress in the field of physics as well in matters of Time
and duration of time. Holland and Freud both suggest in their own way that memories and
recollections from the past, (which are neither long-term nor readily available) can be used as
psychoanalytic researchers used certain extracts from literary texts in their experiments for
reading and recalling from them on the basis of which they psychoanalysed the personalities
of individuals, Marcel Proust too initiated an experimental technique of the evolution and
Search of Lost Time). It has been the most acclaimed novel for its profound use of memory
and which, to this day, remains, more than any other text, the most impacted and indelibly
impressed novel on the modern mind. The concept of “involuntary memory” in which cues
gathered in everyday life evoke unconscious recollection of the past as against the deliberate
and conscious recall of the memories, the voluntary memory is considered as the most
For Proust, ‘memory’ is not just the means and method to unfold the contents of his novel but
it is through the narrator’s journey down the memory lanes, into the inner landscape of his
mind at different phases of his life he succeeds in attaining an identity formation for himself
as well as for the others who play important roles in his life. ‘Enigmatic’ is the word to
describe or estimate the nature, status, age, location and the mental state of the protagonist at
any point of time in this novel. It is from the conscious mind of the half-awakened narrator at
night in his bedroom that the plot, characters evolve and gain palpability through the
unfolding movements and incidents from his childhood at Combray and his interactions with
Aunt Leonie, other maids at home and above all his subtle encounters with Mr Swann, his
rival to start with but who becomes an alter-ego later on when the narrator himself grows up
into an adult himself and who in fact is instrumental in his identity formation. Memory as a
stylistic device makes possible a transportation into the past which, of course, is not adequate
to gain control of the past and perceive the truth as in itself it really is, is made clear by
Proust’s illustration. Proust strives to perceive the truth by situating himself in the past and
find or discover his own self in the present through Marcel, the narrator in Swann’s Way.
Memory plays a crucial part in recreating the pictures, in re-drawing the lines and thus re-
constructs the past in order to link it with the present where the narrator is to re-position
himself. The narrator endeavours to anchor himself in the present moment by writing about
the past in the present and understand the significance of past events and moments in relation
to the present moment. The need to orient and re-orient oneself time and again to the past and
the present brings to the fore another important theme that closely needs to be worked out and
inalienably linked to memory- ‘Time', and how the narrator highlights its importance in his
struggle against the ravages of time and also in the words with which the novel begins and
ends: “For a long time” and “time” respectively, referring to the times during which Proust
lived and wrote about love and ‘Time’ is also the enemy the narrator defeats by finishing the
novel. The novel reads like a virtual obsession with time – as to how it brings about changes
in time, in the beauty of the body, character, attitude, stability of human personality. It
becomes a kind of a heroic battle against time, which is invariably won by ‘Time’ all the time
as is suggested in the elegiac tone of the novel. All the same it is also about a search for the
absolute truth- something stable enough to fight against the ravages of time. As the
translation of the French title suggests, it is a search for the Lost time – to retrieve it and
preserve it in an invincible form to achieve which the narrator protagonist is seen trying many
things like friendship, romantic love, political, philosophical, philological ideas but none
seem to work as they are all subject to time. Even the self, the ‘I’ is not really the same as the
protagonist finds out – with some elements of his personality getting strengthened and some
others weakened, the passionate self experiencing disillusionment – all these notions forming
the mental furniture not just of the protagonist but that of the ‘age’ itself- due to the influence
of the Bergsonian (1859-1941) ideas of time and duration. With the self constantly
undergoing changes at all levels giving way to the formation of successive selves, the next
questions to pop up are: Where do all these successive selves go? Do they get destroyed over
time? And Proust himself has said, quite affirmatively, that they live on, never go away, can
be contacted with, in our dreams, and if lucky, even when we are wakeful.
An illustration of the modernist artistic preoccupations could be seen in the very opening
Way describes a literal awakening of the narrator very similar to the kind of awakening each
one of us experience when we wake up every day, leaving the state of unconsciousness for a
state of consciousness. For Proust, every morning, every waking up was a recovery of an
When a man is asleep, he has in a circle round him the chain of the hours, the sequence of the
years, the order of the heavenly host. Instinctively, when he awakes, he looks to these, and
in an instant reads off his own position on the earth’s surface and the amount of time that has
elapsed during his slumbers, but this ordered procession is apt to grow confused, and to break
its ranks. Suppose that, towards morning, after a night of insomnia, sleep descends upon him
while he is reading, in quite a different position from that in which he normally goes to sleep,
he has only to lift his arm to arrest the sun and turn it back in its course, and, at the moment
of waking, he will have no idea of the time, but will conclude that he has just gone to bed. Or
suppose that he gets drowsy in some even more abnormal position; sitting in an arm-chair,
say, after dinner: then the world will fall topsy-turvy from its orbit, the magic chair will carry
him at full speed through time and space, and when he opens his eyes again he will imagine
that he went to sleep months earlier and in some far distant country. But for me it was enough
if, in my own bed, my sleep was so heavy as completely to relax my consciousness; for then I
lost all sense in which had gone to sleep, and when I awoke at midnight, not knowing where I
was, I could not be sure at first who I was; I had only the most rudimentary sense of
existence, such as may lurk and flicker in the depths of an animal’s consciousness. (Swann’s
Way 3)
Voluntary memory, which is associated with intellect and is deliberate, rational, deductive
and calculated and involves a wilful recollection of events and is good at refreshing routine
events as in this case: the narrator’s memory of his aunt taking him for regular walks after
dinner in the small town of Combray, the regular visits of their neighbour, Mr Swann in the
evening, the details of architecture of the Combray Church, his mother’s reading out the
novel by George Sand, the nightly ritual of his mother’s good-night kiss to put him to sleep
each night. Voluntary memory is also effective in recalling traumatic events. One such
traumatic memory is to do with his being whisked away to the upstairs one evening on the
arrival of Mr Swann, which makes him uneasy and extremely unhappy because he thinks that
he might have to forego the good night kiss of his mother and which makes him send a
hurried note to his mother through the maid in panic. The fear of probable punishment, for
the same, of getting banished to some military academy keeps him on tenterhooks for long,
till his father, quite unexpectedly allows him to sleep in his mother’s company for the night.
All this is to do with the voluntary memory which is highly selective and omits a large part of
the details. In that half-awakened state he could recall only these things about Combray and
asks himself:
…as though all Combray had consisted of but two floors joined by a slender staircase, and as
though there had been no time there but seven o’clock at night. I must own that I could have
assured any questioner that Combray did include other scenes and did exist at other hours
than these. But since the facts which I should have recalled would have been prompted only
by an exercise of the will, by my intellectual memory, and since the pictures which that kind
of memory shews us of the past preserve nothing of the past itself, I should never have had
any wish to ponder over this residue of Combray. To me it was in reality all dead.
Proust makes the narrator revive the remaining Combray experiences through the use of what
he christens as the “Involuntary memory”, which is distinct from the voluntary memory in
not being associated with deliberate and intellectual effort but something that emerges out of
memory has been described as “instances in which memories come to mind spontaneously,
termed as “Proustian rush,” which again has been classified into three varieties, “those which
occur in everyday mental life, those which occur during the process of voluntary recall or
involuntary recall, and those which occur as part of a psychiatric syndrome.” (Mace 2) the
first of these varieties is what gives way to the depiction of the most important moment of not
just Proust’s magnum opus but the entire terrain of Modern fiction, the “madeleine episode,”
that has changed the course of modern writing for many decades to come. It enabled Proust to
present the Combray experiences in all their freshness as they were happening and in no way
close to the intellectual, packaged and pigeon-holed version in which the realist novels would
have delivered them to us. Proust always believed that realistic art was always in pursuit of
the external and confined itself to the outlines, only the surface of things whereas the true
reality existed elsewhere, in the essence of objects, not visible to the naked eye. Proust’s
protagonist discovers the true essence of life’s freshness and its invincibility in the
“Madeleine episode” and it further took him 3000 more pages to sustain it.
spontaneous memory may be too basic for Marcel and his own definition of involuntary
memory has a crucial feature that Bergson overlooks: chance. Marcel claims, “The past is
hidden outside the realm of our intelligence… in some material object it depends on chance
whether we encounter this object before we die, or do not encounter it” (Swann’s Way 39).
According to Marcel's account of the encounter, he discovers the madeleine crumbs in his tea
by coincidence and, after tasting it, obtains information from both his thoughts and his
senses. Then he attempts to figure out what the flavour is and what it means: “I can just
barely perceive the neutral glimmer in which the elusive eddying of stirred-up colors is
blended; but I cannot distinguish the form, cannot ask it, as the one possible interpreter, to
translate for me the evidence of its contemporary, its inseparable companion…” (Swann’s
Way 40). Marcel is anxious for this memory to surface so he can mould it and build
something from it, but no matter how hard he tries, he can't seem to identify it. He can't
reconcile the taste with its one possible interpreter, the shape, the image of the past that the
flavour evokes. After repeated efforts at distinguishing the flavour, Marcel has a much more
And once again I had recognized the taste of the crumb of madeleine soaked in her decoction
of lime-flowers which my aunt used to give me (although I did not yet know and must long
postpone the discovery of why this memory made me so happy) immediately the old gray
house upon the street… and the whole of Combray and of its surroundings, taking their
proper shapes and growing solid, sprang into being, town and gardens alike, from my cup of
The limited ability of the mind to recall gives way to a free-flowing stream of pictures that
grows on itself and spreads across the expanse of a childhood memory for Marcel. Marcel's
involuntary memory not only fills in the blanks, but also colours the pictures that were
initially provided by his active voluntary memory, resulting in a full picture in his mind.
However, as will be seen, memory does not have the capacity to get created on its own.
Marcel can only genuinely create something that does not exist through Art, implying that
memory is less of a goal in itself for Marcel than as a means to Art, an artistic tool.
The Madeleine moment in the novel illustrates Proust’s use of language to the full in order to
convey that the strength of a memory, however little and intangible, overpowers the forces of
time and place. Initially, Proust had suggested that Marcel had talked about only select
memories of Combray based on his limited ability to recollect and the rest, which were left
out were dead to him, but the madeleine episode proves that to be wrong by laying stress on
the long lastingness of the sense of the smell and taste. A memory is a method of loosely
revisiting the past, though it is true that it is just what is left behind after the death of
something. The taste of madeleine crumbs in lime-blossom tea renders palpability to the
impalpability resulting from his inability to understand the importance of the flavour and his
attempts to bring it to the surface, and give it a form in his thoughts. The act of recognizing
history, forgetting. Recognition is that which coats the otherness of what has passed away
with presence. Memory is, if nothing else, a reminder that what was once present is no longer
there – a site demolished, a person dead, moment passed – and that which was once present is
no longer present and thus making it an elusive entity sans a clear existence. Proust, through
the madeleine episode, drives home the importance of memory, in particular, the power of the
senses of taste and smell to revive visions of the past. And when memory becomes associated
with longing, a longing to possess and fulfil the experience, to recall, and to reformulate it
that motivates him to write. Proust chooses to write the novel about his own memories in the
stream of consciousness mode and what emerges is a memory of Combray from his cup of
Many years had elapsed during which nothing of Combray...had an existence for me, when
one day in winter, as I came home, my mother, seeing that I was cold, offered me some tea, a
thing I did not ordinarily take. ... She sent out for one of those short, plump liitle cakes called
“petite madeleines,” which look as though they had been molded in the fluted scallop of a
pilgrim’s shell. And soon …, I raised to my lips a spoonful of the tea in which I had soaked a
morsel of the cake. No sooner had the warm liquid, and the crumbs with it, touched my palate
than a shudder ran through my whole body, and stopped, intent upon the extraordinary
changes that were taking place. An exquisite pleasure had invaded my senses, but individual,
detached, with no suggestion of its origin. And once the vicissitudes of life had become
indifferent to me, its disasters innocuous, its brevity illusory and I- this new sensation having
had on me the effect which love had of filling me with a precious essence; or rather this
essence was not in me, it was myself. I had ceased now to feel mediocre, accidental, mortal.
Whence could it have come to me, this all-powerful joy?... What did it signify? How could I
Proust’s novel also illustrates the use of “memory’ as a device to analyse identity formation.
the reader many characters who matter to him in life through his memories. Through his
memories we get to know his caring, affectionate, educated, high-class Jewish mother who
initiates the desire for books in the narrator very early in life, his professionally very
successful and eminent father who in the narrator’s initial memories meets us as a highly
disciplining father but suddenly ends up with an unexpectedly humane and kind side to his
personality in one of the casually shared memories of Marcel, Aunt Leonie, his
hypochondriac, overly inquisitive aunt who seems to have a markedly strong influence on the
narrator who the reader can notice to be a similarly hychondriac and with a tendency to be
inquisitive in matters related to neighbours, and some other minor characters as the cook,
Francoise who reveals herself as a bipolar personality, betraying completely opposite natures
and attitudes towards different times and people in her life. Marcel arrives at these identity
formations not in just one or two encounters but in a series of encounters in which these
people reveal their varied, simultaneous selves, all of which don’t exist at the same point of
time and also do not disappear or get replaced completely with the others one after the other
but seem to exist in some remnant form only to pop up suddenly with the onset of a
corresponding external stimulation. Thus it is not only the town of Combray but each and
every character in the novel acquires a life-likeness exuding a refreshing attribute about them.
More importantly, it is the portrait of the eponymous character of Mr Swann. The narrator’s
initial memories of Mr Swann depict him as an intruding and unwanted evening guest in their
house as the child Marcel’s only worry seemed to be his obsession with his mother’s good-
night kiss that would put him to sleep every night. And as Marcel grows up Mr Swann’s
personal life, his artistic interests not only begin to interest him but also tend to shape his
preferences and interests in art and life, and love life too. He arrives at a realization of his
own identity and personality and sees in Mr Swann, his own second-self. The earlier
frustrations and sense of dislike and discomfort give way to an acceptance of him as a
Freudian father-figure in matters pertaining to art and love. What appears in an embryonic
form in “Overture”, continues elaborately in the final section, “Swann in Love” in which the
narrator relies completely on the memories retrieved from oral resources to attain the
necessary textual authority because of the simple reason that he was not born when Swann
was in love with Odette. Nevertheless, memory aids him in depicting a clear picture of the
unusually dark and complex Romance in Swann’s love story with an endearing delicateness
artistic end – that of capturing the refreshing aspects of life’s experiences as they happen in a
given moment thus defeating the ravages of the passage of time - brings to the fore a cultural
activity which is dependent on both personal and cultural memory in the writer’s artistic
creation and the reader/interpreter’s act of re-creation and gets an identity also through the
identity of a cultural memory through an interplay with other texts of varied contours and
forms. And the act of interpretation and re-creation of new texts through new readings lives
embedded in the recesses of human consciousness since time immemorial right from the
aspects of human history. But the credit of visualising it in all its potential and reshaping
metamorphose memories into stories of perennial value and relevance and to finally have the
last laugh in the contest with the all-destroying passage of time goes to Proust who himself
became a marker in the history of art of fiction., and in creating a bridge between the
Works Cited
Bergson, Henri. Matter and Memory. Trans. Nancy Margaret Paul and William Scott Palmer.
Lighthouse.’” Comparative
Perspectives in
Way.” The Journal
of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 30, no. 3, American Society for Aesthetics, 1972
Ricœur, Paul. Memory, History, Forgetting. Trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer.
Chicago
Skopljanac, Lovro. “Literature Through Recall: Ways of Connecting Literary Studies and
Memory
University, 2012.