Competition drives innovation but can also bring out the worst in people. A 2011 survey found that 80% of CEOs believe innovation leads to competitive advantages. However, while competition spurs technological progress, it can also motivate unethical behavior. Robert Fortune disguised himself as a Chinese merchant in the 1800s to smuggle tea plants beyond allowed areas on behalf of the British East India Company, undermining China's tea monopoly against their laws at the time. While advancing British tea culture, his deceitful methods leave an example of how competition can justify unsavory tactics.
Competition drives innovation but can also bring out the worst in people. A 2011 survey found that 80% of CEOs believe innovation leads to competitive advantages. However, while competition spurs technological progress, it can also motivate unethical behavior. Robert Fortune disguised himself as a Chinese merchant in the 1800s to smuggle tea plants beyond allowed areas on behalf of the British East India Company, undermining China's tea monopoly against their laws at the time. While advancing British tea culture, his deceitful methods leave an example of how competition can justify unsavory tactics.
Original Description:
Original Title
Competition brings out the best in products and worst in people
Competition drives innovation but can also bring out the worst in people. A 2011 survey found that 80% of CEOs believe innovation leads to competitive advantages. However, while competition spurs technological progress, it can also motivate unethical behavior. Robert Fortune disguised himself as a Chinese merchant in the 1800s to smuggle tea plants beyond allowed areas on behalf of the British East India Company, undermining China's tea monopoly against their laws at the time. While advancing British tea culture, his deceitful methods leave an example of how competition can justify unsavory tactics.
Competition drives innovation but can also bring out the worst in people. A 2011 survey found that 80% of CEOs believe innovation leads to competitive advantages. However, while competition spurs technological progress, it can also motivate unethical behavior. Robert Fortune disguised himself as a Chinese merchant in the 1800s to smuggle tea plants beyond allowed areas on behalf of the British East India Company, undermining China's tea monopoly against their laws at the time. While advancing British tea culture, his deceitful methods leave an example of how competition can justify unsavory tactics.
In 2011, a survey by PwC asked over 1200 industry leaders
about their thoughts and opinions on the concept of innovation. Out of those over a thousand CEOs, 80% believed innovation drives efficiencies and leads to a competitive advantage. (The survey itself: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/pdf/14th- annual-global-ceo-survey.pdf)
However, while the competition to innovate can truly be
the reason for why our everyday lives are made easier, at the very same time it can truly be responsible for some of the most underhanded tactics used. Case and point: Robert Fortune. Commissioned by the Horticultural Society of London to undertake a three-year plant collection expedition to southern China, Fortune’s mission had less to do with the exploration of the wide world of tea and more to do with the British empire wanting to strike down China’s then monopoly on different types of the warm drink. On behalf of the British East India Company, Fortune disguised himself as a Chinese merchant during several, but not all, of his journeys beyond the newly established treaty port areas. Not only was Fortune's purchase of tea plants reportedly forbidden by the Chinese government of the time, but his travels were also beyond the allowable day's journey from the European treaty ports. While he admittedly left a massive mark on British history (to the point their tea drinking has become a national stereotype) his methods of doing so truly leave just as big of a mark on his, and his employees’ actions.