ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING

GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

REGION: ___IX______________

DIVISION: ___Pagadian City_____

DISTRICT: ___South___________

BARANGAY: ___Buenavista_______

SCHOOL: ___Norberta Guillar Memorial National High School___

Instruction: Use the matrix on the next page as a guide in assessing the gap between your Division Targets (A) and school performance (B). In particular, you
can fill out the matrix by answering the following questions for each Division Target:

B1. Data needed – What data do we need to assess our school performance against this Division Target?

B2. Currently contributing – Is our current school performance contributing to the attainment of this Division Target? How is it contributing or not contributing?
Explain.

B3. Inhibiting Factors – If contributing, what are the factors that prevent us from contributing further to this Division Target? If not contributing, what are the
factors that prevent us from contributing to this Division Target? Include the most pressing needs or problems from available data.

B4. Projects implemented – What school projects being implemented are geared towards the attainment of this Division Target? If no such projects are being
implemented, leave it blank.

B5. Groups that require attention – Are there groups in our school that require specific attention concerning the attainment of this Division Target? (e.g.,
considering gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity).

________________________________
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template

DATE ACCOMPLISHED
 ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template

B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B2. CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING B5. GROUPS
A. DIVISION TARGETS B3. INHIBITING B4. PROJECTS THAT
B1. DATA NEEDED YES/
EXPLANATION FACTORS IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE
NO
ATTENTION
ACCESS
High dropout rates due 1. New strategy on
Dropout rates over the last to the following: Attendance monitoring
Disadvantaged
Zero Dropout 2.81% Yes there years have been - financial matters 2. Teacher counseling
students
greater than 2%. - health problems of students
- child labor 3. Home visitation

Over all promotion rates

over the last 3 years have Some students retained  Conduct remediation
Promotion Rate: 100% 93.48% No Male students
been around 7% less than in the same grade level  Home visitation
the target.
 Home
visitation
 Advocacy
Some students  Home visitation
on
The Cohort Survival Rate transferred out due to  Advocacy on
importance
Cohort Survival Rate: over the last four (4) years transfer of residency importance of
89.07% No of
100% has been around 11% less while others stopped Education or
Education
than the target going to school due to Staying in school
or
lack of interest
Staying in
school

EQUITY
100% of the schools have Report of Yes The school have identified 5 Not determined Home visitation Students with
mechanism for enrolment enrolment of learners with disability as disabilities
of Learners with Learners with follows: (PWD)
Disabilities disabilities 1 – nearsightedness
1 – speech and language
 ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template

1 – difficulty in
concentrating
1 – low vision
1 – mental illness due to
stress/depression
Over aged
Over aged students were Close monitoring by the
Encourage over aged Fifteen out of thirty PEPT student for
50% Yes closely monitored by the class advisers/PEPT
students to take PEPT takers passed the test. every grade
PEPT coordinator coordinator
level
QUALITY

C.1 Proportion of students at the of Junior and Senior High School achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in NAT

Low NAT Results due to

the following:
G7-G10
- No F2F classes for 2
Learners under
C.1.1 75% NAT & RAT NAT and RAT result of years
2021 NAT Result No Magbasa at Magsaya frustration
MPS of Grade 10 Grade 10 is lower than 75% - Limited interaction with
level of
teachers
comprehension
- Less or No TA provided
by parents

One Male student was

One male and one female failed and one female Students at
C.1.2 100% Completion Home visitation
98.42% No student had been dropped student had been risk of
Rate
during the school year dropped due to transfer dropping out
of residence

One student was not able Students at

C.1.3 100% Graduation
97% No to enroll during the second Transfer of residence Home visitation risk of
Rate
semester of the school year dropping out
 ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template

The following are factors

affecting students’ level
of reading:
100% of students in all 1. Magbasa at
Many students are under A. Undeveloped study Grade 9 and
schools can read and Phil-IRI result NO Magsaya program
frustration level habits 10 students
comprehend 2. Phil-IRI
B. Poverty
C. Peer influence
D. Gadgets
RESILIENCY AND WELL-BEING
- All school heads
were involved in the
1. WINS wins Online Course 1. Construction of
100% of the schools WINS have been
evaluation result - Schools are monitored Wash Stands
implemented WINS Yes implemented over the past All learners
2. Accomplishment on its implementation 2. Repair of Comfort
Program 2 years
report - Evaluation on WINS Rooms
implementation was
conducted
1. Conduct symposium
1. Anecdotal
Decrease bullying and Bullying and violence cases - Schools are monitored on VAWC Disadvantaged
records from YES
violence cases reported is only 1.55% on VAWC implementation 2. Teacher counseling students
guidance office
of students
- Physical structures are
There were no reported 1. Allocate budget from
Ensure safe learning 1. School well- planned
YES major injuries among MOOE and other All students
environment inventory report - The school provides
students. resources
signage for safety
Alarming health issues of
There is an alarming 1. Gulayan sa
students were due to the
increase of the total Paaralan
following reasons:
100% of students in all Nutritional Status number of students from 2. Allocate budget Students with
NO  Poverty
schools are well-nourished Data overweight, wasted, from school health issues
 Lack of attention
severely wasted and obesity resources to procure
from parents
up to 20% vitamins
 Addiction to gadget

GOVERNANCE
At least SBM Level 2 for all
schools
100% of teachers attained
a very satisfactory rating
Maintain costumer’s
satisfaction
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template
- Lack of orientation
- Not guided on what
- Outsourcing
Result of SBM The school has reached documents to prepare Teachers
- Regular meetings with
Validation No level 1 only during the - limited time of Learners
the persons involved
(Level 1) validation. preparation
(quarterly)
- keeping of records is
not well practiced
There are 12 teachers with
- Orientation on the
Summary of IPCRF very satisfactory rating and
YES preparation of MOVs - Input during SLAC Teachers
rating of teachers 11 teachers with
was implemented
outstanding rating.
Record of parents,
stakeholders’ The school has not yet
- No instruction from the
response to NO implemented survey on - Input during SLAC Teachers
authority
customer costumer’s satisfaction.
satisfaction survey