PC-IURI111.

Requirements for this paper/Benodighede vir hierdie vraestel: Resources/Hulpmiddels:

Answer Scripts/ Multi-choice cards (A4)/

Antwoordskrifte: X Multikeusekaarte (A4) X
Attendance Slips (Fill-in Paper)/ Graph Paper/
Presensiestrokies (Invulvraestel): GrafiekPapier
Scrap Paper/ Calculators/
Rofwerkpapier Sakrekenaars
Multi-choice cards (A5)/ Laptop (Power not provided)/
Multikeusekaarte (A5) Skootrekenaar (Krag word nie voorsien nie)

Type of Assessment/ Duration/ 3 Hrs 00 Min

Tipe Assessering:
Exam Opportunity:1 Tydsduur:

Paper Number/ Maximum Marks/ 100

1
Vraestel Nommer: Maksimum Punte:

Module Code/ Module Description/

IURI111 LAW OF PERSONS
Modulekode: Module Beskrywing:

Examiner(s)/ Robbie Robinson-MC;WD Lubbe-PC;E Date/ 2019/06/19

Eksaminator(e): Gresse-VTC; Datum:

Time/
Tyd: 09:00
Internal/Interne
N Reddy-VTC;
Moderator(s): Qualification/
Kwalifikasie: LLB, BA, Bcom
External Moderator(s)/
Eksterne Moderator(s):

Submission of answer scripts/Inhandiging van antwoordskrifte: ORDINARY

Section B [60]

Question 2 [10]

Mrs Oliver, an expectant mother, was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Her child was subsequently born
with cerebral palsy. As a result of the brain damage, the child will never be able to take care of herself. The
accident was caused by the sole negligence of the driver of the other motor vehicle and Mrs Oliver had no
contributing negligence in the accident.

IURI 111: Paper / Vraestel 1 | Exam 1st opp/Eksamen 1e gel | Full-time/Voltyds 7/18
Answer the following questions:
2.1 What do you understand the nasciturus fiction to be? (3)
2.2 Name the requirements for the operation of the nasciturus fiction. (2)
2.3 Can the nasciturus fiction be applied in this case? Discuss with reference to relevant authority. (5)
_______________________________________________________________________________

Question 3 [10]

Provide the definitions for the following terms:

3.1 Ex post facto 3.6 Onus

3.2 Postea 3.7 Prima facie
3.3 In fine 3.8 Quasi
3.4 Ipso facto 3.9 Quaere
3.5 Mutatis mutandis 3.10 Viva voce
_______________________________________________________________________________

Question 4 [10 x 2 = 20]

1962 3 SA 954 (O).

4.9 In South African law there is, in the case of commorientes, an irrefutable presumption that both persons
died simultaneously.
4.10 In South African law, there is, in the case of commorientes, a presumption that the older person died
first and the younger person died last.
_______________________________________________________________________________

IURI 111: Paper / Vraestel 1 | Exam 1st opp/Eksamen 1e gel | Full-time/Voltyds 8/18
Question 5 [20]

X is 12 years old. He concludes a personal loan contract with M, who is 32 years old, for the amount of
R10 000. He uses R2 000 of the money to buy himself a bicycle, which is stolen within a few days. R1 000 of
the money he uses to pay school fees and a further R2 000 to purchase school books and a school uniform.
He further donates R3 000 of the money to the SPCA.

5.1 What is the status of this contract as seen from X’s side? (1)
5.2 What can X do as a result of his position in terms of this contract? (3)
5.3 What is the status of this contract as seen from M’s side? (2)
5.4 Should X not perform in terms of the contract, what can M do? (2)
5.5 What can M claim with this action? Explain why. (8)
5.6 Can any other party be held responsible for the amount or part of the amount that M can claim from X if
he is no longer in possession of the money? Explain. (3)
5.7 Would M be able to hold X liable as a fraudulent minor? Explain. (1)

TOTAL: 100

IURI 111: Paper / Vraestel 1 | Exam 1st opp/Eksamen 1e gel | Full-time/Voltyds 9/18
Afdeling B [60]

Vraag 2 [10]

Me. Olivier word beseer in ʼn motorongeluk. Ten tyde van die ongeluk is sy swanger. Haar kind word gebore
met serebrale verlamming. As gevolg van die breinskade van die kind sal die kind nooit na haarself kan omsien
nie. Die motorongeluk is veroorsaak deur die nalatigheid van die ander bestuurder en Me. Olivier het geen
bydraende nalatigheid tot die ongeluk gehad nie.

Beantwoord die volgende vrae:

2.1 Wat is die nasciturus fiksie? (3)
2.2 Wat is die vereistes vir die toepassing van die fiksie? (2)
2.3 Kan die fiksie in hierdie feitestel toegepas word? Bespreek met verwysing na relevante gesag. (5)
_______________________________________________________________________________

IURI 111: Paper / Vraestel 1 | Exam 1st opp/Eksamen 1e gel | Full-time/Voltyds 16/18
Vraag 3 [10]

Gee die definisies van die volgende terme:

3.1 Ex post facto 3.6 Onus

3.2 Postea 3.7 Prima facie
3.3 In fine 3.8 Quasi
3.4 Ipso facto 3.9 Quaere
3.5 Mutatis mutandis 3.10 Viva voce

Vraag 5 [20]

X is 12 jaar oud. Hy gaan sonder ouerlike toestemming ’n leenooreenkoms met M, wat 32 jaar oud is, ten
bedrae van R10 000 aan. Hy gebruik R2 000 van die bedrag om ’n fiets te koop, wat binne ’n paar dae gesteel
word. Hy gebruik R1 000 van die geld om sy skoolfonds te betaal en ’n verdere R2 000 om skoolboeke en ’n
skooluniform te koop. Verder skenk hy R3 000 van die geld aan die DBV.

5.1 Wat is die status van hierdie kontrak vanuit X se perspektief? (1)
5.2 Wat kan X doen as gevolg van sy posisie ingevolge hierdie kontrak? (3)
5.3 Wat is die status van hierdie kontrak uit M se perspektief? (2)

IURI 111: Paper / Vraestel 1 | Exam 1st opp/Eksamen 1e gel | Full-time/Voltyds 17/18
5.4 Indien X nie ooreenkomstig die kontrak presteer nie, wat staan M te doen? (2)
5.5 Wat kan M hiermee eis? Verduidelik hoekom. (8)
5.6 Kan enige ander party verantwoordelik gehou word vir die bedrag of ’n gedeelte daarvan as X nie meer
in besit is van die volle bedrag wat M kan eis nie? Verduidelik. (3)
5.7 Sou M vir X as ’n bedrieglike minderjarige aanspreeklik kon hou? Verduidelik. (1)

TOTAAL: 100

File reference: 8.1.7.2.2

IURI 111: Paper / Vraestel 1 | Exam 1st opp/Eksamen 1e gel | Full-time/Voltyds 18/18