Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coline Mark Differentiation Integration
Coline Mark Differentiation Integration
INTEGRATION
• “Want to be dux”
Teaching / Learning Resources
A total of 24 Credits
Student Numbers / Proportion
• Y13 Mathematics class:
3 of the 12 students elected to take Differentiation
Math with
Statistics
Statistics
Entry: Y12 Mathematics with Calculus
• At HOD’s discretion
Differentiation
6 credits, assessed externally
Derivatives of power, exponential, logarithmic (base e) and
trig functions
Optimisation
Equations of normals (tangents at Level 2)
Maxima, minima and points of inflection
Related rates of change
Derivatives of parametric functions
Chain, product and quotient rules
Properties of graphs (limits, differentiability, continuity,
concavity)
No longer assessed
• Differentiation from first principals
• Implicit differentiation
Achieved Level Exemplar (2013)
In 2013 a student achieved the standard by:
In Question 1
Correctly differentiating y = tan x 2
+1( )
NOTE:
Areas under or between graphs has been moved from
Level 2 to Level 3
Achieved Level Exemplar (2013)
In 2013 a student achieved the standard by:
In Question 1
• Integrating
∫( )
π − e2 x dx
In Question 3:
• Calculating an area:
Rationale for Achieved Grade
• Availability of teacher
• MATH141 Calculus
• mathematics or statistics in 2015
• ENGR121
• NCEA differentiation, integration, trig or
complex numbers: direct entry to MATH142
Calculus
VUW Calculus
• MATH132 Intro to Mathematical Thinking
• basic ideas of calculus
• MATH141 Calculus 1A
• main start point for math majors
• MATH142 Calculus 1B
• start point if good calculus background
• ENGR121 Engineering Maths Foundations
• ENGR122 Engineering Maths with Calculus
• MATH177 Probability & Decision Modelling
MATH141
sample: differentiation
rate of change
slope of f(x)
?
2014: a Pilot Year for ENGR
math
• pass rates 80%
• more A’s than before
• more students say it’s their favourite course
• labs need to be better integrated with math
Success at VUW?
• lifestyle can be a challenge
• lack of engagement:
• ~10% failure: no evidence of any work
• bimodal grade distribution
• good students do well reliably
• others teeter near failure
• various help is available