Report Apar Didi

Residential Building
at …………….
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Jitendra Silwal
Nec No: 463
KMC No:
Contents
1. Project Detail..........................................................................................4
1.1 Building Design Parameters.........................................................................................5
1.2 Materials.......................................................................................................................5
1.2.1 Concrete................................................................................................................5
1.2.2 Reinforcement.......................................................................................................5
1.3 Load Calculations.........................................................................................................5
1.3.1 Dead Load.............................................................................................................5
1.3.2 Superimposed Dead Loads....................................................................................5
1.3.3 Live Loads.............................................................................................................6
1.3.4 Seismic Loads.......................................................................................................6
1.4 Load Combination........................................................................................................8
1.5 Mass Source..................................................................................................................8
1.6 Torsional Irregularity Check........................................................................................8
2. Structural Analysis.................................................................................9
2.1 3D modelling of the building.....................................................................................10
3. Design of Elements:..............................................................................20
3.1.1 Sample Design of Column..................................................................................27
3.1.2 Sample Design of Beam......................................................................................29
3.1.3 Sample Design of Footing...................................................................................31
3.1.4 Design of Stair.....................................................................................................39
3.1.5 Sample Design of Slab........................................................................................41
Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building.................................................................................................4
Figure 2: 3D Modeling of the building.................................................................................................10
Figure 3: Elevation of the building.......................................................................................................11
Figure 4: Plan of the building...............................................................................................................12
Figure 5: Story Displacement along X-Direction ULS State<0.00625*h.............................................14
Figure 6: Story Displacement along Y-Direction ULS State<0.00625*h.............................................14
Figure 7: Story Drift along X-Direction ULS State <0.00625..............................................................15
Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction ULS State <0.00625..............................................................15
Figure 5: Story Displacement along X-Direction SLS State<0.006*h..................................................16
Figure 6: Story Displacement along Y-Direction SLS State<0.006*h..................................................16
Figure 7: Story Drift along X-Direction SLS State <0.006...................................................................17
Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction SLS State <0.006...................................................................17
Figure 9: Bending Moment Diagram....................................................................................................18
Figure 10: Shear Force Diagram...........................................................................................................19
Figure 11: Reinforcement Details.........................................................................................................24
Figure 16: Column Beam Capacity Ratio>1.2......................................................................................26
Table 1: Auto Seismic - NBC 105:2020.................................................................................................7

Table 2: Modal Participating Mass Ratios:...........................................................................................13
Table 3: Centers of Mass and Rigidity..................................................................................................13

1. Project Detail
Name of the Project: Residential Building at ………….
Location …………..
Type of Building: The Building covers a total plinth area of ground floor 747.3 sq
ft. The building has been designed for three storeys and stair
cover.
This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and design of
buildings.
Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building

1.1 Building Design Parameters
The building consists of an RCC framed structure, which is essentially an assembly of cast-in-
situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof consist of cast-in-place concrete slabs.
Lateral load resisting system consists of bare frame and Shear wall elements only and the
system has been designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 13920 - 2016.
For the design of the building, the Nepal Standard criteria for earthquake resistant NBC 105:
2020 have been referred to. All other factors related with the seismic design were also adopted
as for Nepal of NBC 105:2020.
1.2 Materials
Following loads have been considered for the analysis and design of the building based on the
relevant Indian Standards.
1.2.1 Concrete
Concrete is to conform to IS 456:2000 Structural use of concrete. Unless noted otherwise
concrete is to be normal-weight, with a typical dry density of 2400 kg/m3. Concrete is to
achieve the 28-day cube strength as 20 N/mm2and 25 N/mm2.
Grade of Concrete : M20
1.2.2 Reinforcement
Reinforcement bars are to be in accordance with IS 456:2000 specification for carbon
steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete is to be in accordance with IS 1786:2008
specification for high deformed steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.
The following design strengths are to be used for the design of concrete and
reinforcement.
Grade of steel : High Yield Fe 500 N/mm2
1.3 Load Calculations

1.3.1 Dead Load
Dead loads are calculated on the basis of unit weights of the specified construction
materials in accordance with NBC 102:1994.
Reinforced concrete: 25 KN / m3
Brick work with plaster: 19.2 KN/m3
Sand/ cement screed: 20 KN/m2
1.3.2 Superimposed Dead Loads

Based on architectural drawing of the building, dead loads due to partition walls, floor
finish and other special purpose services has been calculated.
1.3.3 Live Loads
The Live Load for building has been adopted as given NBC 103:1994 Loads for
residential buildings.
Room 2 kN/m2
For passage, staircase, balconies 3 kN/m2
For Roof 1.5 kN / m2
1.3.4 Seismic Loads

CALCULATION OF SEISMIC CO-EFFICENT AS PER NBC 105 :2020
Input:
Location of Building : Kathmandu
Type of Structure: Moment resisting concrete
frame
Type of Building : Reinforced Moment
Resisting Frame
Seismic Zoning Factor (Table 4.5 NBC 105-2020) Z= 0.35
Importance Factor : (Table 4.6 NBC 105-2020) I= 1
Height of Building : h= 11.37
Method of Analysis: Equivalent Static Method
Soil Type D

Period of Vibration :
For Reinforced Moment Resisting Frame T1 = 1.25*kt h 0.75
0.58Sec
Lower Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Ta = 0
Upper Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Tc = 2
Peak Spectral Acceleration Normalized by PGA α= 2.25
Coefficient to control the descending branch of the Spectrum K= 0.8

Ref Table 5.2 NBC 105 :2020
Ductility Factor for ULS State Ru = 4
Overstrength Factor for ULS State Ωu = 1.5
Overstrength Factor for SLS State Ωs = 1.25

Calculation of Spectral Shape Factor : Ch (T)
Since Ta<=T1<=Tc Ch (T) = 2.250

Elastic Site Spectra for the Horizontal Loading (Clause 4.1.1 C(T) = Ch(T) Z I 0.788
NBC 105-2020) =

Elastic Site Spectra for the Vertical Loading (Clause 4.2 NBC Cv = 2/3*Z 0.233
105-2020)


Elastic Site Spectra for the SLS State (Clause 4.2 NBC 105- Cs = 0.2 * C(T) = 0.158
2020)

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient for Equivalent Static Method :
Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at the ULS State
Cdu = C(T)/ (Ru Ωu) = 0.131

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient at the SLS State
Cds = Cs/ Ωs = 0.126

Exponent related to the structural period k 1.0

ETABS utilizes the following procedure to generate the lateral seismic loads.
 User provides seismic zone co-efficient and desired seismic load command.
 The structural period (T) is calculated manually and input in the software.
 W is obtained from the weight data provided by the user.
The total lateral seismic load (base shear) is then distributed by the program among
different levels of the structure
Table 1: Auto Seismic - NBC 105:2020

Name Ecc Ratio Top Story Bottom Story C K Weight Used Base Shear
kN kN
EQx SLS(1/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.126 1 3256.2913 410
EQx SLS(2/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.126 1 3256.2913 410
EQx ULS(1/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.131 1 3256.2913 427
EQx ULS(2/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.131 1 3256.2913 427
EQy SLS(1/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.126 1 3256.2913 410
EQy SLS(2/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.126 1 3256.2913 410
EQy ULS(1/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.131 1 3256.2913 427
EQy ULS(2/2) 0.1 Top GF 0.131 1 3256.2913 427

1.4 Load Combination
The load combination has been taken as given NBC 105: 2020. The said code has
recommended the following load combination
 1.2DL + 1.5LL
 DL +0.3 LL ± EQx/y
 DL +0.3 LL + RSx/y

The concrete has been designed using limit state method based on IS 456 –2000. The detailing
of reinforcement has been based on IS 13920 –2016 and where required Uniform Building
Code of USA has been also referred to for detailing of reinforcement. The design has been
based on the most critical load combination mentioned above.
1.5 Mass Source

Mass Source has been adopted as per NBC 105:2020 which suggest to take factor 1 for Dead
load and 0.3 factor for normal live load and 0.6 factor for live load used for storage purpose.
1.6 Torsional Irregularity Check

Along X Direction
Minimum Displacement of joint at another End 19
Maximum Displacement of joint at one End 21
Ratio 1.1
<1.5 ok

Along Y Direction
Minimum Displacement of joint at another End 18
Maximum Displacement of joint at one End 20
Ratio 1.11
<1.5 ok

2. Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called ETABS v20.3, which is a
special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures. It provides
the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify, analyze, design, and
optimize the structural elements in a building model. The building geometry based on
architectural drawings been generated using above named software. The dead load, live load
and lateral loads were supplied to the digital models as per standard code of practices. Several
analysis runs were performed to achieve the best result to meet the design and service
requirements.
For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:
i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs
ii. Floor finishing dead loads
iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings
iv. Staircase load
v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.
vi. Live loads

2.1 3D modelling of the building
i. 3D model of the building
ii. Plan of the building
iii. Elevation of the building
Figure 2: 3D Modeling of the building

Figure 3: Elevation of the building

Figure 4: Plan of the building

Table 2: Modal Participating Mass Ratios:
Case Mode Period UX UY SumUX SumUY
sec
Modal 1 0.668 0.1596 0.4715 0.1596 0.4715
Modal 2 0.64 0.6457 0.1882 0.8053 0.6597
Modal 3 0.528 0.0315 0.1852 0.8368 0.8449
Modal 4 0.234 0.0607 0.0145 0.8974 0.8594
Modal 5 0.226 0.0242 0.0632 0.9217 0.9226
Modal 6 0.169 0.0134 0.0196 0.9351 0.9422
Modal 7 0.152 0.0426 0.0045 0.9778 0.9467
Modal 8 0.148 0.0007 0.0335 0.9785 0.9802
Modal 9 0.129 0.0001 0.0002 0.9786 0.9804
Modal 10 0.11 0.002 0.0107 0.9806 0.9911
Modal 11 0.106 0.0192 0.0018 0.9998 0.9928
Modal 12 0.095 0.0002 0.0072 1 1
Table 3: Centers of Mass and Rigidity

Diaphrag
Story m Mass X Mass Y XCCM YCCM XCR YCR
kg kg m m m m
TOP D1 9362.98 9362.98 2.044 1.2573 2.9209 1.88
3F D1 50044.05 50044.05 4.2523 2.4281 5.184 3.1544
2F D1 90295 90295 4.7911 3.0557 5.2935 3.1232
1F D1 89245.49 89245.49 4.7266 3.0365 5.5037 3.0657

Figure 5: Story Displacement along X-Direction ULS State<0.00625*h
Figure 6: Story Displacement along Y-Direction ULS State<0.00625*h

Figure 7: Story Drift along X-Direction ULS State <0.00625
Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction ULS State <0.00625

Figure 9: Story Displacement along X-Direction SLS State<0.006*h
Figure 10: Story Displacement along Y-Direction SLS State<0.006*h

Figure 11: Story Drift along X-Direction SLS State <0.006
Figure 12: Story Drift along Y-Direction SLS State <0.006

Figure 13: Bending Moment Diagram

Figure 14: Shear Force Diagram

1. Design of Elements:
The design of all structural elements is done using ‘Limit State Method’. All relevant Limit
State is considered in design to ensure adequate safety and serviceability.
The design includes design for durability, construction and use in service should be
considered as a whole. The realization of design objectives requires compliance with clearly
defined standards for materials, production, workmanship, and also maintenance and use of
structure in service.
This section includes all the design process of sample calculation for a single element as
column, beam, slab and foundation.

Figure 15: Reinforcement Details

Figure 16: Column Beam Capacity Ratio>1.2

1.1.1 Sample Design of Column
ETABS Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design (Summary)
Column Element Details

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF Type
1F C22 9 C-14*14 DL+0.3LL+RSy 0 2844.8 1 Ductile Frame
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
355.6 355.6 56 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
63.0514 -108.8762 -33.8952 1.261 1.261 2344 1.85
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.670384 2387.6 -16.5113 0 1.261
Minor Bend(M2) 0.629811 2387.6 -51.8038 0 1.261
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 25.6351 73.2883 42.6146 25.6351 394.16

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Minor, Vu3 59.7384 73.2883 42.6146 57.0839 394.16
Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N
(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/N N/N
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1264.5 23.4 2017.1738 476.0854 63.0514 1
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.839 355.6 4.501 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.839 355.6 4.229 12 No 0
Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

1.1.2 Sample Design of Beam
ETABS Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Beam Section Design (Summary)
Beam Element Details

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF Type
1F B38 24 B-9*14 DL+0.3LL+RSy 3860.8 4038.6 1 Ductile Frame
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 35 35
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-5.7992 13.3655 44.7126 -0.0375
Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-5.7992 20.0919 14.2927 -49.871
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -49.871 418 4.31E-02 418 157
Bottom (-2 Axis) 14.2927 209 106 0 209
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
62.5143 0 156.0609 30.4487 1348.9
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
13.3655 44.7126 178.6 305.6 876.61

1.1.3 Sample Design of Footing
Strap Footing for Grid -E12
N/
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20.0 mm2
N/
Grade of steel used (σy) = 500.0 mm2
Allowable bearing capacity of Site = 95 kN/m2
Size of Columns = 0.3 m
Span between two Columns = 3.20 m
Load on Edge Column = 200.00 kN

Load on Center Column = 195.00 kN
Total Column Loads = 395

Area of Footing Required = 4.57 m2
Cg of loads from edge column = 1.656 m
Adopt width of footing (B) = 5.5 ft 1.68 m
Total length of footing (L1+L2) = 2.73

Provide L2 centre = 2 ft 11 in
6 ft 1
Provide L1 edge = 1.8526 in
Design of Footing Slab
Upward Reaction = 217.23 KN/m
Width of Footing beam assumed = 0.3 m
0.6884
Length of cantilever footing = 1 m
Maximum bending moment = 51.47 KNm
Maximum shear force = 43.84 KN

Depth of Slab required according to BM = 139.11 mm
Depth of Slab required according to SF = 115.37 mm
Provide d= 350 mm
D= 400 mm
as main
Use 12 mm bar @ 125 mm c/c bar
Use 12 mm bar @ 125 mm c/c as distribution bar
Percentage of bar % = 0.29

τc for 0.29% = 0.380 N/mm2
τv = 0.125 OK

Design of Beam
Upward Reaction = 123.44 KN/m
Hogging Moment 63.20 KNm
Adopted b= 355 mm
Required d= 259 mm
Trial Ast 522 mm2
Final Ast 522 mm2
Provide 3-16mm top bar

Provide 2 legged 8 dia ring 100mm c/c
Sagging Moment = 52.67 KNm
Adopted d = 315 mm
Adopted D = 355 mm
Trial Ast 425 mm2
Final Ast 425 mm2
Provide 3-16 mm bottom bar

Design of Combined Foundation

Material Strength Properties
Grade of Concrete fck= 20 MPa
Grade of Rebar fy = 500 MPa
Soil Safe Bearing Capacity = 95 kN/m2

Loading on Footing
Grid Joint FZ (KN) x y Mx (KNm)
B1 1 355 0.00 0.00 0
B2 2 478 2.51 0.00 1200
B3 3 319 6.25 0.00 1994
Total 1,152.00 9.99 3,193.5

3

Calculation of Eccentricity and Moments
Unfactored axial load from column (P) = 1,152 kN
Area of Footing (A) = 15.63 m 2
P/A = 73.7 kN/m²
Centroid (Xarea) = 3.08 m C.G. (Xload) = 2.77 m
Eccentricity along x-axis (ex) = -0.30 m
Moments of inertia along y-axis (Iy) = d * b/12 =
3
62.878 m4
My = P x ex = -348.87 kN-m My/Iy = -5.5 kN/m³

Stress Calculations at different Column Location
σ (kN/m2)= P/A ± My/Iy * X ± Mx/Ix * Y
Grid Joint X (m) σ(kN/m2) Remarks
B1 1 -3.08 90.76 OK
B2 2 -0.57 76.83 OK
B3 3 3.18 56.08 OK
Average Stress σ = 74.56 kN/m2

Check for Bending Moment
Maximum Bending Moment between two column 156.44 kN m
Effective depth from Moment d= 242.51 mm
Factor of Safety = 1.50

Check for Shear
Shear strength of concrete t'c for M20 grade =0.25√(fck) = 0.25√(20)= 1.12 kN/m²
1. For face column
bo = 2d+3c = 2d +710
column load = 355 KN
Vu = 532500
a= 2 Coeff of d
b= 710 value of 3c
c= -476282.4792
d= 341.78 mm
2. For central column
bo = 4d+4c = 4d +
1420
column load = 478 KN
Vu = 717000 N
a= 4 Coeff of d
b= 1420 value of 4c
c= -641304.2959

d= 260.49 mm
Required effective depth d= 341.78 mm
Required overall depth (d+clear cover)= 391.78 mm
Provide overall Depth D= 406 mm ok

Calculation of Reinforcemnet
Minimum Area of Steel Required =0.12*1000*D/100 = 487.20 mm2
Max Dia of bar Spacing
Ast required Ast Provided Remarks
BM Provided Provided

156.4
37 1,094.28 12 100 1130.97 ok
COMBINED FOOTING BC
1. DESIGN DATA
Axial Load of Column A (smaller one) = 294 kN

Axial Load of Column B= 461 kN
Size of Column A = 350 mm X 350 mm
Size of Column B = 350 mm X 350 mm
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20.0 N/mm²
500.0
Grade of steel used (σy) = N/mm²
Distance of column A From Property Line= 0.175 m
C/C Distance Between Two Columns= 2.51 m
Bearing Capacity of Soil (SBC) 95 kN/m²
2. LENGTH AND WIDTH OF FOOTING
Centre of Gravity of load from Property Line =

294 x 0.175 + 461 x 2.685 =
x= 1.71 m 11.2 ft
294+ 461
Length of Footing Provided = 3.81 m 12.5 ft
Projection From CLof Column B 1.13 m
Wt. of footing = 831 kN
Width of Footing = 830.5 / (3.81 x 95 ) = 2.29 m 7.51 ft

Provided Width of Footing = 2.36 m 7.75 ft
3. LONGITUDIONAL BM AND SF
Load on Column A = 294 = 294 kN

Load on Column B = 461 = 461 kN
Factored Load on Column A = 294 x 1.5
= 441 kN
Factored Load on Column B = 461 x 1.5
= 692 kN
Net Upward Soil Pressure = 126 kN/m²
Net Upward Soil Pressure per Unit Length = 297 kN/m
Maximum Shear force at CL of Column A
V1= -52 kN
V2= 389 kN
Maximum Shear force at CL of Column B
V1= -335 kN
V2= 357 kN
Point of Zero Shear from CL of Column A = 388.96/x = 357/( 2.51-x) =
x= 1.31 m
Maximum BM Computed From Left Side
= -249.8 kNm
Maximum BM Computed From Right Side = -26.1 kNm
We Know for Fe500

0.133σck
BM = bd²
d= 196 m
For Shear Criteria Adopt Overall Depth

= 300 mm
4. MAIN NEGATIVE LONGITUDIONAL REINFORCEMENT
Bending Moment
= 0.87*σy*At (d-(σyAt/(σck*b))
At= 2579 mm² 1093 mm²/m
Use 12 mm bar @ 100 mm c/c 1131 mm²/m
Development Length of 12φ bar = 58φ = 696 mm

5. CHECK FOR ONE WAY SHEAR
Column A
Shear at Distance d from the face of Support =
Vu = 388.96 -(0.35/2 +0.25)* 297.36 = 263 kN
Nominal Shear Stress Ʈv = Vu/(bd) = 0.45 N/mm²
Percent Tensile Steel (Pt) = 0.45
Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.45% steel tc = 0.46 N/mm²
OK
Column B
Shear at Distance d from the face of Support =
Vu = 357 -(0.35/2 +0.25)* 297.36 = 208 kN
Percent Tensile Steel (Pt) = 0.45
#REF
! 0.5 N/mm²
OK
6. CHECK FOR TWO WAY SHEAR
Ks = (0.5 +βc) and βc =1

Ks = 0.5+1 < 1 = 1
Ʈ'c =Ʈc = √σck √20 1.12 N/mm²
Column A
Shear Force Vu = 441 - (0.35 * 0.35* 126) = 426 kN
OK
Column B
Shear Force Vu = 691.5 - (0.35 * 0.35* 126) = 676 kN
OK
7. POSITIVE LONG. BAR AT BOTTOM
Bending Moment at face of column A = (297.36*0²)/2 = 0.0 kNm

Bending Moment at face of column B = (297.36*0.95²)/2 = 134.2 kNm
Bending Moment = 0.87*σy*At (d-(σyAt/(σck*b))
At= 1306 mm² 575 mm²/m
Minm Steel = 0.12%*b*d = 850 mm² 375 mm²/m
Use 12 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c 754 mm²/m
Development Length of 12φ bar = 58φ = 696 mm
8. TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT
.12% OF Bd = 300 mm²/m

12 mm bar
Use @ 300 mm c/c
GRID -C-1-3
N/
Grade of Concrete used (σck) = 20.0 mm2
N/
Grade of steel used (σy) = 500.0 mm2
Allowable bearing capacity of Site = 95 KN/m2
Size of Column 0.4 m
Span Between Column B1-B2 = 2.52 m
Span Between Column B2-B3 = 3.74 m
Column Loads in KN
Load on Left Edge Column = 233 kN
Load on Center Column = 291 kN
Load on Right Edge Column = 238 kN
Total Column Loads = 762 kN
Area of Footing Required = 8.82 m2

Cg of loads from edge column = 3.0 m
Adopt width of footing (B) = 5.8 ft 1.8 m
L1+L2+L3 = 5.0 m
L2 1.7 m
Provide L2 = 5.8 ft 1.8 m
a= 0.5
b= -6.26
c= 9.90
L1+L3= 3.3 m
Provide L3 = 1.4 m

Provide L1 = 1.9 m
Design of Footing Slab
Upward Reaction = 228.37 KN/m2

Width of Footing beam assumed = 0.35 m
0.70609756
Length of cantilever footing = 1 m
Maximum bending moment = 56.93 KNm
Maximum shear force = 46.15 KN
Depth of Slab required according to BM = 146.29 mm
Depth of Slab required according to SF = 128.19 mm

Provide d= 350 mm
D= 400 mm
Use 12 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c as main bar
Use 12 mm bar @ 150 mm c/c as distribution bar
Percentage of bar % = 0.25

τc for 0.25% = 0.360 N/mm2
τv = 0.132 OK
Design of Beam
121.7
Upward Reaction = 3 KN/m
Hogging Moment 85.13 KNm
Adopted b= 406 mm
Required d= 281 mm
Trial Ast 594 mm2
Final Ast 594 mm2
Provide 3-16 mm top bar

Sagging Moment = 70.94 KNm

Adopted d = 366 mm
Adopted D = 406 mm
Trial Ast 485 mm2
Final Ast 485 mm2
Provide 3-16 mm bottom

bar

1.1.4 Design of Stair
Design of Stair
Input Design Parameters
Grade of Concrete (Fck)= 20 N/mm2
Grade of Steel (Fy) = 500 N/mm2
Tread(b)= 0.28 m
Riser(h)= 0.15 m
Length of step(l)= 0.32 m
Thickness of Waist Slab(t)= 0.13 m
Width of Landing(W)= 1.07 m
Length of Front Landing(L1)= 0.00 m
Length of Flight(L2)= 1.68 m
Length of End Landing(L3)= 1.07 m

Load Calculation
Dead load
Flight
Effective Thickness of Flight= 0.2 mm
Dead Load of Inclined Flight = 5.00 KN/m2

Landing
Dead Load of Landing Slab= 3.125 KN/m2

Live Load
Live Load = 3 KN/m2
Finish = 1.35 KN/m2

Total Load of Landing = 7.48 KN/m2
Factored Load of Landing = 11.96 KN/m

Total Load on Flight = 9.35 KN/m2
Factored Load of Flight = 14.97 kN/m

Depth and Rebar Calculation
14.966
11.965 11.96

A B
0.00 1.68 1.07

Reaction
Reaction at Support A (RA) 19.91 kN
Reaction at Support B (RB) 17.95 kN
For Max moment, Point of zero shear from A ia at Distance x
Then, -5.19
x= 1.33 m

Maximum Bending Moment (Mmax) = 13.24 kNm kNm
BM = 0.131*fck*b*d2
Required Effective Depth (d) = 69 mm
Required Depth(D) = 90 mm
Provided Depth(D) = 125 mm
Main Bar
Area of Rebar req. (Ast)= 341 mm2
Dia of rebar used = 12 mm
Spacing Provided (s) = 150 mm
Number of Rebar (N)= 8
Area of Rebar pro. (Ast) = 904 mm2
Safe
Distribution Bar
Ast Required=0.12%*bd 133 mm²
Dia of rebar used = 8
Spacing Provided (s) = 150
Number of Rebar (N)= 8
Area of Rebar pro. (Ast) = 402 mm2
Safe

Check for shear
Rebar Percentage(pt) = 0.77%
Shear Strength of concrete (tc) = 0.57 N/mm2
k= 1.30
Design Shear Strength of concrete(tc') =(ktc)= 0.741 N/mm2
Maximum Shear Strength of concrete (tcmax) = 1.8 N/mm2
Nominal Shear Strength (tv) = 0.17 Safe
Nominal Shear Strength (tv) < tcmax/2 Safe

Check for Deflection (As per IS 456:2000 ,Cl. 23.2)
fs =0.58x fy x Ast, re / Ast, pr (Cl.23.2.c & Fig.4) 109
Effective span (L) = 2744 mm
Effective depth (d) = 90 mm
Mu/bd2 = 1.15
Mf = 2
Modification factor
For Continuous Section (α) 20
For Less than 10m (β)= 1
γ 1
Actual (L/d) Ratio= 26.4
Permissible L/D Ratio = 40 Safe
Provide overall Depth 125mm with 12mm Main bar @ 150mm Spacing
& 8mm distribution bar @ 150mm Spacing

1.1.5 Sample Design of Slab
TWO WAY SLAB (IS 456 2000)
Material Strength Properties
Grade of Concrete = 25 MPa
Grade of Rebar 500 MPa

Geometric Properties of the slab
Longer Span of the critical Slab (Ly) = 4.03 m
Shorter Span of the critical Slab (Lx)= 3.78 m
Width of strip of Slab used (b) = 1000 mm
Assume Thickness of Slab (D) = 125 mm
Clear Cover of the Slab = 20 mm
Effective depth of slab d= 101 mm

Loading on Slab
Dead load of the Slab = 3.125 kN/m2
Load of Floor finish on Slab = 1.35 kN/m2
Super imposed dead load on Slab = 2.5 kN/m2
Live load on Slab = 2 kN/m2
Super imposed live load on Slab = 0 kN/m2
Factored Design Load per meter = 13.5 kN/m

Bending Moment Coefficient
Type of slab Panel = 2 Adjacent Edge Discontinuous
Aspect Ratio of slab Ly/Lx = 1.066
Bending Moment Coefficient for 1.0 for 1.1 for 1.066
Coeff for -ve moment, βx = 0.0470 0.0530 0.051
Coeff for +ve moment, βx = 0.0350 0.0400 0.038
Coeff for -ve moment, βy = 0.0470 0.047
Coeff for +ve moment, βy = 0.0350 0.035

Moment Calculation
Design -ve moment for short span, Mx 9.8 kN-m
Design +ve moment for short span, Mx 7.4 kN-m
Design -ve moment for long span, My 9.0 kN-m
Design +ve moment for long span, My 6.7 kN-m

Calculation of Reinforcement
Design for -ve Reinforcement =
Along Short span = 224 mm² Along Long span = 206 mm²

Design for +ve Reinforcement =
Along Short span = 167 mm² Along Long span = 152 mm²
Minimum reinforcement required (Ast)= 188 mm²
Spacing
Bar dia. Area Required Spacing Required Area
Direction Provided
Provided mm mm2 mm provided mm2
mm
Shorter Support 8 224 250.00 150 371.96
Shorter Mid 8 188 333.33 150 371.96
Longer Support 8 206 250.00 150 371.96
Longer Mid 8 188 333.33 150 371.96

Check for Shear
Shear coefficient
= 0.60
Design Shear Force Vu = 30.53 kN
Nominal shear stress (tv) = 0.30 N/mm2
Percent tension steel (Pt) = 0.37 N/mm2
Shear strength of M20 Concrete and 0.37% steel tc
= 0.43 N/mm2
Shear Strength Coefficient for(d<=150) ks = 1.30 N/mm2
Shear strength in slab t'c = 0.56 N/mm2
Maximum Shear stress for M20 Grade Concrete tc, max = 2.80 N/mm2
ok

Check for Deflection
Required Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.19
Provided Tension reinforcement % for short span Pt= 0.37
Basic value of span to effective depth (L/d) ratio α = 26
Modification factor for span < 10m β = 1
Mu/bd2= 0.67
Steel stress of service fs= 174.82
Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.44
Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement =γ 2.00
Allowable short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 52.00
Calculated short span to effective depth ratio Lx/d = 37.43
ok
Summary
Grade of Concrete = 25 MPa Grade of Steel = 500 MPa
Provide 125mm thick slab with 8φ main bar @ 150mm c/c & 8φ dist. Bar @ 150mm c/c

Report Apar Didi

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Report Apar Didi

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report Apar Didi

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Residential Building

Structural Analysis and Design Report

Nec No: 463

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Table 1: Auto Seismic - NBC 105:2020.................................................................................................7

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Name of the Project: Residential Building at ………….

Figure 1: Architectural Plan of Building

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

1.3 Load Calculations

1.3.2 Superimposed Dead Loads

1.3.4 Seismic Loads

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Table 1: Auto Seismic - NBC 105:2020

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

1.5 Mass Source

1.6 Torsional Irregularity Check

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Staircase load

v. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.

vi. Live loads

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Figure 2: 3D Modeling of the building

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Table 3: Centers of Mass and Rigidity

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Figure 6: Story Displacement along Y-Direction ULS State<0.00625*h

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Figure 8: Story Drift along Y-Direction ULS State <0.00625

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Figure 10: Story Displacement along Y-Direction SLS State<0.006*h

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Figure 12: Story Drift along Y-Direction SLS State <0.006

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Column Element Details

Design Code Parameters

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Joint Shear Check/Design

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Structural Analysis and Design Report for Residence at ……………. Page

Beam Element Details

Design Code Parameters