Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 4-Stramaa
Lesson 4-Stramaa
Lesson 4-Stramaa
Distribution
Quality Advertising Level
channels
Features and Distribution
Personal selling Discounts
options coverage
services carriers
d) https://globaledge.msu.edu/industries/
e) http://www.morningstar.com
b) Factiva: https://new.dowjones.com/products/factiva
c) S&P NetAdvantage:
https://standardandpoors.com/products-services/industry_surveys/en/us
d) Onesource: http://www.avention.com/OneSource
Table 4.8 (continued)
Excellent Websites to Obtain Strategic Information (Including Financial Ratios) on
Companies and Industries
Liquidity Ratios
Current assets The extent to which a firm can meet
Current Ratio A math object reads current assets over current liabilities.
Leverage Ratios
Debt-to-Total-Assets Total debt A math object reads total debt over total assets.
The percentage of total funds
Ratio Total assets provided by creditors
Total debt The percentage of total funds
Debt-to-Equity Ratio A math object reads total debt over total stockholders’ equity.
Activity Ratios
Profitability Ratios
Gross profit The total margin available to cover
Gross Profit Margin A math object reads sales minus cost of goods sold over sales.
Growth Ratios
Sales
( Sales 2023 − Sales 2022 ) left parenthesis sales 2023 minus sales 2022 right parenthesis over sales 2022
Net Income
(Net Income 2023 − Net Income 2022 )
left parenthesis net income 2023 minus net income 2022 right parenthesis over net income 2022
(Div. per Share 2023 − Div. per Share 2022) Firm’s annual growth rate in dividends
Dividends per Share left parenthesis div. per share 2023 minus dividend per share 2022 right parenthesis over dividends per share 2022
COGS = cost of goods sold; EBIT = earnings before interest and taxes; Div. = dividends
Finance/Accounting Audit Checklist
1. Where is the firm financially strong and weak as indicated
by financial ratio analyses?
2. Can the firm raise needed short-term capital?
3. Can the firm raise needed long-term capital through debt
or equity?
4. Does the firm have sufficient working capital?
5. Are capital budgeting procedures effective?
Finance/Accounting Audit Checklist
(continued)
6. Are dividend payout policies reasonable?
7. Does the firm have excellent relations with its investors
and stockholders?
8. Are the firm's financial managers experienced and well
trained?
9. Is the firm's debt situation excellent?
Management Information Systems
• Management Information System
• Receives raw material from both external and internal
evaluation of an organization.
• Improves the performance of an enterprise by
improving the quality of managerial decisions.
• Collects, codes, stores, synthesizes, and presents
information in such a manner that it answers important
operating and strategic questions.
Business Analytics
• A business technique that involves using software to mine
huge volumes of data to help executives make decisions.
• Also called predictive analytics, machine learning, or
data mining.
The Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE)
Matrix
1. List key internal factors as identified in the internal-audit
process.
2. Assign a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to
1.0 (all-important) to each factor.
3. Assign a 1-to-4 rating to each factor to indicate whether
that factor represents a strength or weakness.
4. Multiply each factor's weight by its rating to determine a
weighted score for each variable.
5. Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine
the total weighted score for the organization.
The Actionable-Quantitative-
Comparative-Divisional (AQCD) Test
When identifying and prioritizing key internal factors in
strategic planning, make sure the factors selected meet the
following four criteria to the extent possible:
1. Actionable (i.e., meaningful and helpful in ultimately
deciding what actions or strategies a firm should consider
pursuing);
2. Quantitative (i.e., include percentages, ratios, dollars,
and numbers to the extent possible);
3. Comparative (i.e., reveals changes over time), and;
4. Divisional (relates to the firm’s products or regions (rather
than consolidated) so inferences can be drawn regarding
what products and regions are doing well or not).
Steps in Developing an IFE Matrix
An internal strategic management audit includes
development of an Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix.
The five steps in developing an IFE Matrix are:
1. Develop a full and narrow list of key internal factors.
2. Assign weights to key internal factors.
3. Assign ratings to key internal factors.
4. Obtain weighted scores.
5. Obtain a total weighted score.
Table 4.10
Guidelines for Developing an IFE Matrix
1. Use the Narrow (Not Broad) Industry in Which the Firm Competes
Example: Burger King (owned by Restaurant Brands International)
competes in the fast-food industry (as opposed to the more general
restaurant industry). Therefore, for Burger King, if including a weakness
regarding the lack of healthy options on their menu, this factor should
likely receive a low weight because healthy menu options are not as vital
to the fast-food industry, whose customer base mostly desire quick
service, good taste, cheap prices, and filling food. Similarly, Burger King’s
weakness related to low-quality meats should not receive a high weight
either because quality meats are not that important in the fast-food
industry; customers simply are not willing to pay for them. Similarly,
Burger King’s strength of providing low-priced coffee would receive a high
weight if the analyst views coffee as being especially important for
success in the fast-food industry. If, however, the analyst views coffee not
to be especially important for success in the fast-food industry, then this
strength of Burger King should receive a relatively low weight.
Table 4.10 (continued)
Guidelines for Developing an IFE Matrix
2. State Factors so They Pass the AQCD Test
Example: A firm’s revenues may have decreased 15 percent from
1 year to the next, but stated in this manner, this “weakness” is not
actionable because it does not reveal the reason, or reasons, why
revenues declined; the reason(s) could range from competition
driving down prices to raw materials being unavailable for one
product or division of the firm. Nonactionable factors could lead
managers astray if they make false assumptions regarding what to
do about the factor. Therefore, state the “revenue decline factor”
perhaps as follows: Revenues in the chocolate segment of the
firm declined 21 percent in the most recent quarter because of
factory recall problems. Now the factor passes the AQCD test in
providing insightful, relevant, useful, information for formulating
strategies.
Table 4.11
Sample IFE Matrix for a Retail Computer Store (Strengths)
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score
1. Revenues from repair/service in the store up 0.15
Zero decimal one five
3 0.45
Zero decimal four five
16%.
2. Employee morale is excellent. 0.10
Zero decimal one zero
3 0.30
Zero decimal three zero
$97 to $128.
4. In-store promotions resulted in 20% increase 0.05
Zero decimal zero five
3 0.15
Zero decimal one five
in sales.
5. In-store technical support personnel have 0.05
Zero decimal zero five
4 0.20
Zero decimal two zero
3 0.15
Zero decimal one five
2 0.06
Zero decimal zero six
increased 10%.
9. Revenues per employee up 19%. 0.02
Zero decimal zero two
3 0.06
Zero decimal zero six
Table 4.11 (continued)
Sample IFE Matrix for a Retail Computer Store (Weaknesses)
Key Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score
1. Location of store negatively impacted by 0.15
Zero decimal one five
4 0.60Zero decimal six zero
down 12%.
3. Often customers wait 15 minutes to check 0.05
Zero decimal zero five
1 0.05
Zero decimal zero five
out.
4. Store has no website. 0.05
Zero decimal zero five
2 0.10
Zero decimal one zero
days.
7. Carpet and paint in store somewhat in 0.02
Zero decimal zero two
3 0.06Zero decimal zero six
disrepair.
8. Bathroom in store needs refurbishing. 0.02
Zero decimal zero two
4 0.08
Zero decimal zero eight
Blank
Total 1.00
One decimal zero zero
2.73
Two decimal seven three
Table 4.12
An Actual IFE Matrix for Shell Corporation
Strengths Weight Rating Weighted
Score
Zero decimal one two Zero decimal three six
1. Shell’s Oil Products Segment generates more revenue than all other 0.12 3 0.36
segments combined but there was a huge drop in relative revenues in this
segment in 2020 compared to the other segments.
Zero decimal zero seven Zero decimal one four
2. Shell is investing around $900 million annually in renewables. A few notable 0.07 2 0.14
accomplishments, in the UK, 900 thousand homes are supplied with natural
gas and smart home technology mostly in European homes.
Zero decimal zero six Zero decimal one eight
3. Shell’s Integrated Gas, Renewables, & Energy Solutions segment 0.06 3 0.18
generates the second most revenue than all other segments with the best
profit margin of all divisions at over 20%.
Zero decimal zero six Zero decimal zero six
4. Shell is in the process of transforming its business more toward biofuels, 0.06 1 0.06
hydrogen charging for electric automobiles, and focusing increasingly on
solar and wind technology. This is a slow process for Shell though as the
firm has a stated goal of increasing biofuels and hydrogen in transportation
from 3% to 10% by 2030.
Zero decimal zero five Zero decimal two zero
5. LNG Canada is a huge Shell natural gas project under construction off the 0.05 4 0.20
west coast of British Columbia, Canada, but 10 years away from
completion. Shell owns 40% of this project.
Table 4.12 (continued)
An Actual IFE Matrix for Shell Corporation
Strengths Weight Rating Weighted
Score
Zero decimal zero five Zero decimal one five
6. Shell is attempting to shift its resources to becoming a net zero 0.05 3 0.15
emissions firm with a target by 2050 of reaching that goal. In fact,
in 2021, Shell introduced its Powering Progress initiative to
accelerate the transition to a net zero emission business.
Zero decimal zero four Zero decimal one six
7. Shell operates chemical plants worldwide and supplied 1,000 0.04 4 0.16
industrial customers with over 15 million tons of petrochemicals
in 2020.
Zero decimal zero three Zero decimal zero nine
8. Shell focuses on safety with Goal Zero, meaning zero harm to its 0.03 3 0.09
people or the environment.
Zero decimal zero three Zero decimal zero six
10. There are more women than men on Shell’s Board of Directors. 0.01 4 0.04
Figure 4.3
How to Gain and Sustain Competitive Advantages