The document outlines procedures for two experiments:
1) A food reserves test of peanut, mung bean, and corn samples using iodine and Benedict's solutions to test for starch and reducing sugars. The results found starch in corn and no food reserves in peanut or mung bean.
2) An experiment testing the effect of amylase on starch using untreated saliva, preheated saliva, and acidified saliva with iodine and Benedict's tests. The results showed starch breakdown by untreated and preheated saliva but not acidified saliva.
The document outlines procedures for two experiments:
1) A food reserves test of peanut, mung bean, and corn samples using iodine and Benedict's solutions to test for starch and reducing sugars. The results found starch in corn and no food reserves in peanut or mung bean.
2) An experiment testing the effect of amylase on starch using untreated saliva, preheated saliva, and acidified saliva with iodine and Benedict's tests. The results showed starch breakdown by untreated and preheated saliva but not acidified saliva.
The document outlines procedures for two experiments:
1) A food reserves test of peanut, mung bean, and corn samples using iodine and Benedict's solutions to test for starch and reducing sugars. The results found starch in corn and no food reserves in peanut or mung bean.
2) An experiment testing the effect of amylase on starch using untreated saliva, preheated saliva, and acidified saliva with iodine and Benedict's tests. The results showed starch breakdown by untreated and preheated saliva but not acidified saliva.
The document outlines procedures for two experiments:
1) A food reserves test of peanut, mung bean, and corn samples using iodine and Benedict's solutions to test for starch and reducing sugars. The results found starch in corn and no food reserves in peanut or mung bean.
2) An experiment testing the effect of amylase on starch using untreated saliva, preheated saliva, and acidified saliva with iodine and Benedict's tests. The results showed starch breakdown by untreated and preheated saliva but not acidified saliva.
1. The whole of the cotyledon was stained in iodine solution. 2. Results are recorded in Table 2. 3. Blender used to prepare the sample for reducing sugar test. 4. The test tubes are filled with 1 g sample. 5. 4 ml Benedict’s reagent added into the test tube and the initial color recorded. 6. The test tube was placed in a boiling water bath for 3 minutes. 7. The test tube then removed form the hot water bath using the test tube holder and placed in test tube rack. The color changes recorded in Table 2. 8. The contents of the test tube were discards and the test tube was rinsed properly. The excess water was shaken out from the test tube. 9. The same procedure was carried for other samples.
B. Effect of Amylase on a Starchy Substance
1. 10 ml of uncontaminated saliva was collected in a measuring cylinder: the flow of saliva was increased by chewing paraffin wax. 2. 2 ml of the saliva was transferred to a test tube and placed in a boiling water bath for 15 minutes. 3. Another 2 ml was transferred to another test tube and 2 drops of hydrochloric acid (1 mol dm-3) was added, the solution was mixed well and left for 15 minutes. The rest of untreated saliva were kept at the room temperature. 4. Six pairs of test tubes were set up as follows, each test tube was labeled with code number as in Table 1. Table 1: Test Tube Setup LABEL CONTENT 1 2 ml sugar only PAIR A 2 2 ml sugar only 3 2 ml sugar only PAIR B 4 2 ml sugar only 5 2 ml untreated saliva only PAIR C 6 2 ml untreated saliva only 7 2 ml starch + 1 ml untreated saliva PAIR D 8 2 ml starch + 1 ml untreated saliva 9 2 ml starch + 1 ml preheated saliva PAIR E 10 2 ml starch + 1 ml preheated saliva 11 2 ml starch + 1 ml acidified saliva PAIR F 12 2 ml starch + 1 ml acidified saliva 5. The test tube was left for 10 minutes before the next procedure. 6. The contents of each pair of test tube was tested with: a) For starch, 2 drops of Iodine solutions were added. b) For sugar, heated with 3 ml of Benedict’s reagent. 7. Starch test were done on the first of each pair of test tube, and sugar test are done on the second test tube of each pair. 8. The test tube was arranged in the rack in numerical order to facilitate comparison. 9. Color changes are recorded in Table 3. For each starch and sugar contents, the test tube which shows either positive or negative results was indicated. RESULTS A. Food Reserves Test
Table 2: Analysis of Seed Characteristic
Food Reserve Test (present or not present) Sample Starch Reducing Sugar
Peanut Not present Not present
Mung Bean Not present Not present
Corn Present Present
Figure 1: Iodine Test on Food Reserves
Figure 2: Benedict’s Test on Food Reserves
B. Effect of Amylase on a Starchy Substance
Table 3: Enzyme Reactions for Sugar and Starch TEST TUBE LABEL CONTENT OBSERVATION CONCLUSION PAIR 1 2 ml sugar only No change No presence of A starch 2 2 ml sugar only Color change from Presence of blue to red-brick sugar precipitate PAIR 3 2 ml sugar only Yellow to blue-black Presence of B starch 4 2 ml sugar only No change No presence of sugar PAIR 5 2 ml untreated saliva only No change No presence of C starch 6 2 ml untreated saliva only No change No presence of sugar PAIR 7 2 ml starch + 1 ml untreated Yellow to light blue Presence of D saliva starch 8 2 ml starch + 1 ml untreated Blue to greenish Presence of saliva yellow sugar PAIR 9 2 ml starch + 1 ml preheated Yellow to blue Presence of E saliva starch 10 2 ml starch + 1 ml preheated No change No presence of saliva sugar PAIR 11 2 ml starch + 1 ml acidified Yellow to blue-black Presence of F saliva starch 12 ml starch + 1 ml acidified No change No presence of saliva sugar Figure 3: Effect of Amylase on a Starchy Substance