Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Construction and Building Materials: Mian Luo, Chunxiang Qian
Construction and Building Materials: Mian Luo, Chunxiang Qian
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Bacterially induced calcium carbonate precipitation has been proposed as an alternative and environ-
Received 29 October 2015 mental technique to develop self-healing cementitious materials system in recent years. This study inves-
Received in revised form 2 June 2016 tigated the influences of bacteria-based self-healing agents on the rheology, hydration kinetics and
Accepted 14 June 2016
compressive strength of cementitious materials to further verify the feasibility of bacteria-based self-
healing agents for crack repairing. The results showed that the rheology of cement mortar was signifi-
cantly improved by the addition of bacteria-based self-healing agents. Incorporation of bacteria-based
Keywords:
self-healing agents in cement greatly influenced the hydration kinetics. The self-healing agent RB could
Bacteria
Self-healing agent
delay the hydration of cement resulting in final setting time increase, however the self-healing agents JB
Rheology and NB accelerated the hydration resulting in initial and final setting time decrease. In addition, compres-
Hydration heat sive strength test results showed that incorporation of RB in cement mortar resulted in early age com-
Setting time pressive strength decrease, but the 28 d compressive strength increased compared to control.
Compressive strength Incorporation of JB in cement mortar enhanced compressive strength, however incorporation of NB in
cement mortar could result in unwanted compressive strength loss. Furthermore, MIP test results indi-
cated that the pore size distributions were different between cement paste samples with and without
bacteria-based self-healing agents. The addition of bacteria-based self-healing agents increased the
porosity between 100 and 1000 nm. The porosity between 100 and 1000 nm of the sample with NB
increased the most compared to the samples with RB and JB. The incorporation of JB increased the poros-
ity between 100 and 1000 nm, but at the same time the small pores with a diameter under 10 nm
increased. These results could be used to explain the compressive strength development.
Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.075
0950-0618/Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
660 M. Luo, C. Qian / Construction and Building Materials 121 (2016) 659–663
bacteria-based self-healing agents could improve the ability of Code Cement Sand Water Self-healing Self-healing agent
cementitious materials crack self-repairing and reduce the possi- (g) (g) (g) agent types contents (wt%)
bility of erosion media through the cracks into the matrix resulting C 450 1350 225 / 0
in improvement of the material durability. However, the prerequi- RB1 450 1350 225 RB 1
site for achieving this goal is the need to introduce bacteria-based RB2 450 1350 225 RB 2
RB3 450 1350 225 RB 3
self-healing agents as a new component into cementitious materi- JB1 450 1350 225 JB 1
als. Cementitious materials is a kind of complex multi-component JB2 450 1350 225 JB 2
composite material and anyone new component introducing could JB3 450 1350 225 JB 3
have adversely affected its performance. So, it is very important to NB1 450 1350 225 NB 1
NB2 450 1350 225 NB 2
investigate the compatibility between bacteria-based self-healing
NB3 450 1350 225 NB 3
agents and cementitious materials. Jonkers et al. [17] investigated
the effect of bacteria and organics additions on paste strength.
Incorporation of a high number of bacterial spores in the paste
The initial and final setting times of the cement paste with and without self-
resulted in about 10% decrease in compressive strength compared healing agents RB, JB and NB in various contents from 1% to 3% were tested, respec-
to controls. Additions of different organic compounds (0.5% of tively. In order to reveal the influence mechanism of setting time, the effects of each
cement weight) also affected splitting-tensile strength of the paste. component of self-healing agents on setting time were researched.
The study results of Zeynep Basaran Bundur et al. [18] indicated
that hydration kinetics and compressive strength behavior of mor- 2.4. Hydration heat
tar were highly influenced when Sporosarcina pasteurii cells were
A constant temperature gauge TAM Air (Swedish Leite La Ltd) was used to mea-
vegetatively inoculated.
sure the rate of heat evolution and the total heat evolution during 72 h of cement
In our previous studies, three types of bacteria-based self- hydration, the experimental temperature is kept at 20 °C. The cement paste mixing
healing agents were developed. The crack self-healing capacity of was performed by water to cement ratio of 0.5. The hydration heat evolutions of the
bacteria-based concrete in different conditions has been widely cement paste with and without self-healing agents RB, JB, NB, R, J, N and B in con-
researched and the results showed that the bacteria-based self- tents of 2% were investigated, respectively.
Figs. 2–4 show the initial and final setting time of the cement
paste with self-healing agents RB, JB and NB in different contents,
respectively. The results indicated that addition of self-healing
agent RB had an obvious setting retarding. With the increase of
RB content, the initial setting time gradually decreased, but the
final setting time significantly increased. The initial and final times
of control samples were 136 min and 216 min, respectively,
whereas for the cement paste with RB in contents of 3%, the initial
setting time was 68 min with final setting at 338 min. However, Fig. 3. Initial and final setting time of cement mortar with different JB contents.
the addition of JB and NB accelerated the setting and the initial
and final setting time gradually decreased with the increase of JB
and NB contents, respectively. In order to reveal the influence
mechanism of setting time, the effects of each component of self-
healing agents on setting time were researched, as shown in
Fig. 5. Through a detailed study of the individual component of
self-healing agents, the results showed setting retarding mainly
caused by the calcium lactate and the setting acceleration could
be attributed to calcium formate and calcium nitrate. In addition,
bacteria spore powder had only a slight setting retarding effect.
400 ,QLWLDOWLPH5%
)LQDOWLPH5%
350
300
Setting time (min)
250
200
150
100
Fig. 5. Initial and final setting time of cement mortar with each component of self-
50 healing agents.
0
0 1 2 3 From Fig. 7, it can be found that the total heat generated before
20 h of hydration for cement pastes with JB, NB, J and N was higher
Self-healing agent contents (wt.%)
than the control and the cement paste with RB and B was lower
Fig. 2. Initial and final setting time of cement mortar with different RB contents. than the control. However, the total heat generated during 72 h
662 M. Luo, C. Qian / Construction and Building Materials 121 (2016) 659–663
Fig. 6. Heat flow during the hydration of cement pastes with and without self-
healing agents. Fig. 8. Compressive strength development of cement mortar samples with RB.
Fig. 7. Total heat during the hydration of cement pastes with and without self- Fig. 9. Compressive strength development of cement mortar samples with JB.
healing agents.
loss. Furthermore, MIP test results indicated that the pore size dis-
tributions were different between cement paste samples with and
without bacteria-based self-healing agents. In control sample the
majority of the pores concentrate on diameters between 10 and
100 nm whereas the addition of bacteria-based self-healing agents
increased the porosity between 100 and 1000 nm. The porosity
between 100 and 1000 nm of sample with NB increased the most
compared to the samples with RB and JB. The incorporation of JB
increased the porosity between 100 and 1000 nm, but at the same
time the small pores with a diameter under 10 nm increased. These
results could be used to explain the compressive strength test
results.
Acknowledgments
Fig. 11. Pore size distribution curve of the cement pastes with and without References
bacteria-based self-healing agents (curing for 28 days).
[1] U.K. Gollapudi, C.L. Knutson, S.S. Bang, et al., A new method for controlling
leaching through permeable channels, Chemosphere 30 (4) (1995) 695–705.
3.5. The pore size distribution of cement pastes [2] S S Bang, J K Galinat, V. Ramakrishnan, Calcite precipitation induced by
polyurethane-immobilized Sporosarcina pasteurii, Enzyme Microb. Technol. J28
(4–5) (2001) 404–409.
The pore size distribution curves of cement paste samples with [3] W. De Muynck, K. Cox, N. De Belie, W. Verstraete, Bacterial carbonate
different bacteria-based self-healing agents (RB, JB and NB) were precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete, Constr. Build.
Mater 22 (2008) 875–885.
shown in Fig. 11. It can be seen that the pore size distributions [4] S.S. Bang, J.J. Lippert, U. Yerra, et al., Microbial calcite, a bio-based smart
were different between the samples with and without bacteria- nanomaterial in concrete remediation, Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 1 (1) (2010)
based self-healing agents. In control sample the majority of the 28–39.
[5] H.M. Jonkers, Arjan. Thijssen, Gerard. Muyzer, et al., Application of bacteria as
pores concentrate on diameters between 10 and 100 nm whereas
self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete, Ecol. Eng. 36
the addition of bacteria-based self-healing agents increased the (2010) 230–235.
porosity between 100 and 1000 nm. The porosity between 100 [6] V.C. Li, E.N. Herbert, Robust self-healing concrete for sustainable
infrastructure, J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 10 (2012) 207–218.
and 1000 nm of sample with NB increased the most compared to
[7] Qian. Chunxiang, Pan. Qingfeng, Wang. Ruixing, Cementation of sand granular
the samples with RB and JB. The incorporation of JB increased based on carbonate precipitation induced by microorganism, Sci. China
the porosity between 100 and 1000 nm, but at the same time the Technol. Sci. 53 (1) (2010) 101–109.
small pores with a diameter under 10 nm increased. The results [8] Willem. De Muynck, Nele. De Belie, Willy. Verstraete, Microbial carbonate
precipitation in construction materialsa review, Ecol. Eng. 36 (2010) 118–136.
were consistent with the strength test results, which could well [9] Virginie. Wiktor, Henk.M. Jonkers, Quantification of crack-healing in novel
explain why the addition of self-healing agent JB had improved bacteria-based self-healing concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos. 33 (7) (2011) 763–
the 28 days compressive strength of cement mortar, however the 770.
[10] Kim. Van Tittelboom, Nele. De Belie, Willem. De Muynck, et al., Use of bacterial
addition of self-healing agent NB resulted in unwanted compres- to repair cracks in concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 40 (2010) 157–166.
sive strength loss. [11] W. De Muynck, D. Debrouwer, N. De Belie, et al., Bacterial carbonate
precipitation improves the durability of cementitious materials, Cem. Concr.
Res. 38 (7) (2008) 1005–1014.
4. Conclusion [12] C.X. Qian, J.Y. Wang, R.X. Wang, L. Cheng, Corrosion protection of cement-
based building materials by surface deposition of CaCO3 by Bacillus pasteurii,
The study investigated the influences of bacteria-based self- Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29 (2009) 1273–1280.
[13] H.M. Jonkers, E. Schlangen, Crack repair by concrete-immobilized bacteria, in:
healing agents on the rheology, hydration kinetics and compres- Proceedings of the First International Conference on Self Healing Materials,
sive strength of cementitious materials to further verify the feasi- Amsterdam, 2007.
bility of bacteria-based self-healing agents for crack repairing. [14] J.Y. Wang, N. De Belie, W. Verstraete, Diatomaceous earth as a protective
vehicle for bacteria applied for self-healing concrete, J. Ind. Microbiol.
Based on the present experimental investigation, the following Biotechnol. 39 (4) (2012) 567–577.
conclusions are drawn. The rheology of cement mortar was signif- [15] J.Y. Wang, K.V. Tittelboom, N. De Belie, et al., Use of silica gel or polyurethane
icantly improved by addition of the bacteria-based self-healing immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 26 (2012)
532–540.
agents. Incorporation of bacteria-based self-healing agents in [16] J.Y. Wang, H. Soens, W. Verstraete, N. De Belie, Self-healing concrete by use of
cement greatly influenced the hydration kinetics. The self-healing microencapsulated bacterial spores, Cem. Concr. Res. 56 (2014) 139–152.
agent RB could delay the hydration of cement resulting in final set- [17] H.M. Jonkers, E. Schlangen, Development of a bacteria-based self-healing
concrete, in: Joost.C. Walraven, Dick. Stoelhorst (Eds.), Tailor Made Concrete
ting time increase, however the self-healing agents JB and NB StructuresNew Solutions for Our Society, CRC Press, London, 2008, pp. 425–
accelerated the hydration resulting in initial and final setting time 430.
decrease. In addition, compressive strength test results showed [18] Zeynep Basaran Bundur, Mary Jo Kirisits, Raissa Douglas Ferron, Biomineralized
cement-based materialsimpact of inoculating vegetative bacterial cells on
that incorporation of RB in cement mortar resulted in early age
hydration and strength, Cem. Concr. Res. 67 (2015) 237–245.
compressive strength decrease, but the 28 d compressive strength [19] Mian Luo, Chun.-xiang Qian, Rui.-yang Li, Factors affecting crack repairing
increased compared to control. Incorporation of JB in cement mor- capacity of bacteria-based self-healing concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 87
tar enhanced compressive strength, however incorporation of NB (2015) 1–7.