Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PSY309 Cognitive
PSY309 Cognitive
School of Psychology
Is this a resubmission? No
Plagiarism
I declare that this is all my own work and does not contain unreferenced material copied
from any other source. I understand the policy and definition of plagiarism used by the
University and the programme (as explained in the programme handbook). If it is shown that
material has been plagiarised or I have otherwise attempted to obtain an unfair advantage
for myself or others, I understand that I may face sanctions in accordance with penalties as
determined by the University. A mark of zero may be awarded and the reason for that mark
will be recorded on my file.
Mark an X in the box to confirm the above statement.
Date:
NOTE: Your work will not be marked unless you have completed this section.
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 2
Stroop Task.
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 3
Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was to look at the variance in reaction times between
gender and the congruent and incongruent conditions by using the Stroop task. There were
114 participants of Year 2 psychology degree students involved in this task with a repeated
measures design which collected data using descriptive statistical methods and mixed
repeated methods ANOVA which was used to analyse participant response times, gender, and
the three degrees of congruency, low incongruency, and high incongruency between the
interaction between coloured words and ink colour. The task required for participants to
disregard the actual word, and to identify the colour of the ink by looking at coloured words.
The findings suggest, there were less errors made and response times were greater in the low
that the outcomes were the result of a level of significance was p<.05 suggesting that the
Introduction
The objective of this study was to establish how the Stroop task tests a person’s
managing of information and the reaction time that the brain has over the automatic and
controlled processing when completing this task. The task specifies the difference between
the times that congruent and incongruent stimuli require a response. The Stroop task, along
with dichotic listening, is regarded as one of the gold standards for measuring attention both
inside and outside of cognitive psychology (MacLeod, C. M., 1992). It offers a perspective
on awareness because there is a strong variance between the repeated but incorrect response
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 4
of reading the word name (i.e., green) and the appropriate response to the colour of the text
(i.e. blue).
Bondi et al., (2002) states that the original version of the task, participants were timed
on how quickly they could recite words that were the names of colours, name the colour of
ink patches, and name the colour of the ink in which words of different colours were printed
implying that participants' slower response times when naming the colour of the ink of non-
congruent colour words than when reading words that are the names of colours or naming the
colour of ink patches indicate the effects of response inhibition. According to the theory of
selective attention, identifying colours demands more attention than reading words. As a
result, naming a colour requires more concentration from the brain, which adds a little extra
time to the process (Ruhl et al., 2023). Frings et al., 2010 states the Stroop effect is a
phenomena in which individuals react more quickly to neutral than to negative word stimuli
due to the ink colour, which may be an indication of a rapid and instinctive allocation of
Each of these studies are relevant to our research, which is to establish whether the
low-level processing colour word Stroop task has an overall impact of congruency on
response time, if gender has an overall impact on response time and if there is significant
Methodology
Design
A controlled task was used for this research to study cognitive control to investigate
cognitive processes. The mean of the effect of the response times of the Stroop task
using MANOVA, which was able to analyse participant response times, gender, and the three
Participants
For this Stroop task, 114 Year 2 psychology student participants participated to test
the overall impact of congruency and incongruency while completing the task. The inclusive
criteria for this study were there was 90 females and 24 male participants with their ages
ranging from 18 to 50. Students were asked to complete a Stroop Task within their lab class
which determined congruency and incongruency between the interaction between coloured
Ethical regulations and informed consent were obtained from each participant who
took part in the study, specified that participants will remain anonymous and any disclosed
information would stay confidential. It has also been made aware to participants that taking
part in this study is voluntary and are under no obligation to complete it (See Appendix 1).
The Stroop task allows for participant withdrawal at any time, but once data has been
Materials
The Stroop task was a controlled task which was performed using the gorilla platform
on a computer with 114 participants who were second year psychology student’s ability to
participate in the interaction between coloured words and ink colour was tested by measuring
them in three different conditions. This includes congruent and low and high incongruency
which assesses the participants overall performance with the Stroop task. Using this platform
allowed to assess the overall impact of accuracy and response times which lead to either
Procedure
Using the online platform Gorilla, The Stroop task was completed by 114 student
participants in which it was accessed via a link to complete a series of short questions about
the applicant before completing the online experiment (See Appendix 2). Within this task it
condition. The first task was to match the colour of the word which indicates to click on the
colour of the word but to ignore the colour of the text (See Appendix 3). This is to test low
incongruency of a participant who is able name the word colour but mismatch it with the
colour of ink. The second task consisted of instructions for that condition so when the task
asked for the colour of the word, which requires ignoring the colour of the text, it is based on
what the actual word is (See Appendix 4). This is to test the high incongruency of a
participant who is able to name the text colour but mismatch it to the colour of ink. These two
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 7
tasks assess the incongruence of a participant and the reaction times and increased errors
within the tasks. The final task involved corresponding the colour of the text, (i.e., ‘Blue’
button for the blue text. This tests the congruence of a person where they agree that the
meaning of a word and its font colour is the same. Once the data was submitted, the
participant got a final score, and the data has been recorded by the gorilla system.
Results
The interpretation of these results has been collected using descriptive statistical
methods and mixed repeated methods ANOVA to analyse the response times, congruency
and gender of the Stroop task. With using the repeated mixed ANOVA, data must adhere to
five assumptions and that they are not violated to provide a valid result. The data gathered
during this study satisfied four of the five assumptions. Before beginning the data analysis, it
was confirmed that assumptions 1 and 2 had not been violated. This is validated as the
congruency score from this study is an interval variable, measurable at a continuous basis.
The tested data had to be categorised into two or more classification groups, with the level of
For the final 3 assumptions, SPSS was used to test these. With assumption 3, an
outlier was evident in a boxplot of data from each of the three conditions and was identified
by a dot that extended the plot's whiskers, rejecting the presumption that outliers were absent.
The resiliency of ANOVA allows it to handle and enable this type of violation even though
the assumption was not met. For assumption 4 and 5, the Levene’s test for homogeneity of
variances was used to prove that the statistics was not violated. The assumptions of this
method including the independent observations, the normality and the sphericity are
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 8
examined. As the data collected was interval, the skewness and kurtosis where over 2 so
normal distribution was not assumed. It should approximately follow a normal distribution.
The Levene’s test was carried out to test the Homogeneity of Variance which resulted in that
it met the assumption that it was non-significant with results of p >.05. The Mauchly test of
sphericity has no significant effect as sig = <.001. As this assumption has not been violated,
the results can be interpreted in their present form. If this had of been significant, results may
Table 1
N M SD Skewness Kurtosis
and within-subjects using MANOVA. The participant response times were analysed along
with congruency, gender, and the three degrees of congruency, low incongruency, and high
incongruency. The results attained emphasised that there was a significant main effect in
statistically significant difference between the congruent and the high incongruency
conditions, t(113)=-6.14, p<,001, The conditions of low incongruency and high incongruency
did not differ in a way that was statistically significant t(113)=1.44, p=.153.
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 9
These results imply that the main is not dependent on the degree of incongruity but
solely with differences between congruent and incongruent stimuli. A Bonferroni correction
was applied, decreasing the p-value to p.016 and establishing a stricter criterion, in order to
account for the increased likelihood of type 1 errors when performing repeated statistical
analyses on the same data set. After this Bonferroni adjustment, the two statistically
Figure 1: A line graph showing the mean score between the three conditions.
The calculated marginal means for the three test conditions are presented in Figure 1,
which illustrates how differently males and females performed on the various Stroop tests.
Figure 1 presents that there is a significant effect of low incongruency between male and
females. Statistically the effect of interaction between gender and congruence in response
time is F(1.23,137.63)=1.374, p=.250 which is significant as the two lines from the graph
interacted in the high incongruency condition. The significant main effect of gender on
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 10
response time is F(1,112)=.514, p=.475 and the significant main effect of congruence in
response time F(1.23,137.63)=4.48, p=.025. These finding imply that when participants were
placed under two different conditions, it demonstrated the effect of the Stroop task and
confirms the assumptions of the hypothesis. Comparing the reaction times of individuals in
the congruent condition to those in the incongruent condition, it was observed that the
incongruent participants with male participants response times a lot lower than females.
Discussion
ones, the results from this task illustrate that impact of incongruency was higher than
congruency. As Ruhl et al., (2023) hypothesised naming a colour requires more concentration
from the brain, which increases additional time to the activity. Comparing the response time
observed that the congruent condition participants had significantly lower reaction times,
with the reaction time for the incongruent condition significantly higher in females than in
males. There has also been an interaction between high incongruency in participants.
The main limitation of this study was the sample bias. Since the participants were all
psychology students, the results cannot be generalised to public society. As a result, the
females, which can be heavily analysed for its gender bias. Male participants demonstrated
faster response times than female participants, which had a confounding impact on the
results. As the sample size was not equal, it was unable to generalise the results gained.
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 11
Another limitation is how uncontrollable factors, like interference from sound and light,
could have reduced response times and increased the likelihood of errors.
To make the results more reliable, improvements are necessary, which includes a
similar sample size in gender that would increase the validity and generalisation of this study
due to important discrepancies between male and female. Also, interference can be assessed
in addition to reaction times to further this investigation. The validity would increase as a
result of the improved accuracy of the outcomes including a broader age range would
increase the reliability and contribute to enhancing this factor as age might influence attention
References
Bondi, M. W., Serody, A. B., Chan, A. S., Eberson-Shumate, S. C., Delis, D. C.,
Hansen, L. A., & Salmon, D. P. (2002). Cognitive and neuropathologic correlates of Stroop
https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.335
Frings, C., Englert, J., Wentura, D., & Bermeitinger, C. (2010). Decomposing the
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903156594
https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.12
Ruhl, C., & Analyst B.A., C. R. M. A. (2023, February 14). Stroop effect experiment
https://www.simplypsychology.org/stroop-effect.html
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 13
Appendix
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
PSY309 Cognitive Psychology 14
Appendix 3
Appendix 4