Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vlaar EPSL94
Vlaar EPSL94
Abstract
A model is presented to describe the cooling of the Earth in the Archaean. At the higher Archaean mantle
temperatures pressure-release melting starts deeper and generates a thicker basaltic or komatiitic crust and depleted
harzburgite layer compared with the present-day situation. Intrinsic compositional stability and lack of mechanical
coherency renders the mechanism of plate tectonics ineffective. It is proposed that the Archaean continents
stabilised early on top of a compositionally stratified root. In the Archaean oceanic lithosphere, hydrated upper crust
can founder and recycle through its high-pressure phase eclogite. Eclogite remelting and new pressure-release
melting generates new crustal material. Migration of magma and latent heat release by solidification at the surface
provides an efficient mechanism to cool the mantle by several hundreds of degrees during the Archaean. This can
satisfactorily explain the occurrence of high extrusion temperature komatiites and lower extrusion temperature
basalts in greenstone belts as being derived from the same source by different mechanisms.
processes, and that plate tectonics has been oper- Parameter Definition Value
ative in the Archaean [4,8-10]. However, the
present-day tectonic plate forces of slab pull and g gravitational acceleration 9.8 ms -z
ridge push [64] are strongly dependent on litho- ct thermal expansivity 3 x 10-5 K
spheric age and hence on lithospheric recycling thermal diffusivity 10--6 m2s-1
rate and mantle temperature. A uniformitarian D Depth of convection layer 2.8 × 106 m
extrapolation of present conditions to the Ar- v kinematic viscosity
chaean may not be valid [3,11] and therefore a rl dynamic viscosity
different approach must be adopted. v0 Minimum kinematic viscosity 2. 21 x 107 m2s -1
We will first consider some previously pub- A Activation temperature (YTm) 5.6 x 104 K
lished thermal cooling models of the Earth which
k thermal conductivity 4. 2 Wm-IK -1
have been used to constrain Archaean mantle
pcp volumetric specific heat 4. 2 x 106 Jm-aK -~
temperatures. Next, the influence of higher tem-
Rc core radius 3.471 x 106 m
peratures on the pressure-release melting of
mantle diapirs, and the related changes in upper Rm mantle outer radius 6. 271 x 106 m
mantle dynamics, are considered. Finally, we will Rac critical Rayleigh number 1100
present a model for the dynamics of the oceanic Ts surface temperature 273 K
lithosphere and discuss its applicability to the 15 power law exponent 0.3
cooling of the Earth in the Archaean.
where q is the average heat flux out of the This definition has been used by [13] to study
Earth's surface and Q is the average heat pro- the loss of primordial heat, initially stored in the
duction in the mantle. The definition of the other core, through mantle convection. For a mantle
parameters is given in Table 1. The heat flux heated entirely from within, R a is defined by
from the core into the base of the lower mantle agQ( R m -Rc) 5
has been assumed to be small [12] and is disre- Ra = Ra I = (5)
K2ppC
garded by most authors. For the mantle the Nus-
N.J. Vlaar et al. / Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18 3
In (1) the lower boundary of the mantle is power law index n in comparison to the Newto-
explicitly assumed to be insulated, and the second nian fluid, an effect that has been disregarded by
definition of the Rayleigh number, Ra~, should several authors [9,18]. To include the effect of
be used. However, several authors have used the volatiles an effective A as a function of volatile
first definition [10,14-16], based on the claim content has been defined through the melting
made in [10] that this was justified if T in (4) temperature Tm [15,18].
represents the characteristic temperature of the The general form of the heat production is
convecting region.
A temperature-dependent rheology of the form Q = Q0 e x p ( - A t ) (7)
3000 I I I I I I I
2750
-7-'
.o. E
2500 300 l
22~O0
0
E 2250
200
,.r-
200
2000 t"-
100
1750
I I I I 0 I I J I
4 3 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 0
Time [Gyr BP] Time [ G y r B P ]
Fig. 1. Example of evolution of internal mantle temperature and surface heat flow, based on parameterised mantle convection
modelling (see text). Heat production is given by Q(t) = Qo e x p ( - A t ) , where the decay constant A = 4.48- 10 -1° yr -1 is for a
chondritic composition [1980]. The initial heat production Q0 is used as a free parameter. Q0 = 220 m W • m -3 yields a present-day
heat flow of 70 m W . m -~.
4 N.J. Vlaaret al./Earth and Hanetary ScienceLetters 121 (1994) 1-18
Substitution of (2)-(4), (6) and (7) into (1) [27,28], who essentially indicates the importance
gives of the rheology of the upper boundary layer in
controlling the cooling of the Earth. As the sur-
a g ( T - Ts)D 3 ]~ face temperature is assumed to have varied very
dT - 3 Ra¢Kv o e x p ( A / T ) ] k ( T - T s ) R 2 m little over geological time, the upper boundary
- - =
present-day generation of basaltic oceanic crust pressure that is exerted by the already formed
at mid-ocean ridges. It is generally agreed that in basaltic crust. This will lead to considerably re-
a hotter mantle the melting of a rising diapir duced production of basaltic crust upon pressure-
starts at a deeper level and a larger volume of release melting [29].
basaltic m a g m a is formed [11,20,30,31,61]. Mc- Fig. 2a illustrates the effect of higher mantle
Kenzie and Bickle [32] derive the thickness of the temperature on the melting of an adiabatically
formed basaltic crust as a function of the poten- rising diapir, using the formalism developed by
tial temperature of the mantle, which is defined McKenzie [30], corrected for the crustal pressure
as the temperature obtained when a material effect [29]. Shown are the solidus and liquidus of
volume in the mantle is decompressed under mantle peridotite, each given as a third-order
isentropic and metastable conditions to the pres- polynomial fit to the data of Takahashi [31], T ( p )
sure at the Earth's surface. Estimates for the = a o + a ~ p ~ + a 2 P 2 + a 3 P 3. The coefficients can
present-day potential temperature range from be written as a vector a. These are given, with
1280 to 1400°C [20,28,30,33]. This range indicates pressure in G P a and temperature in °C, by a =
the uncertainties in the eruption temperatures of (1136, 134.2, -6.581, 0.1054) r for the solidus,
basaltic magmas, the temperature drop as a con- and a = (1762, 57.46, -3.487, 0.0769) r for the
sequence of the latent heat consumption, and liquidus. In the calculations a small correction is
possible lateral variations in potential tempera- made to account for the fact that Takahashi [31]
ture [61]. An important effect that has not been used a slightly depleted mantle peridotite in his
implemented by McKenzie and Bickle [32] is that experiments. The dotted lines indicate lines of
the amount of melting will be influenced by the equal melting for 15 and 50% melting, based on
I J I I I I 0 r I
100
Tpot = 1750" C " ~
4
t~
t'l
C9 E
•~ 6 T~t= 1330" C 200
tO
tO
D
a_ 8
1600"
10 300
1750"
12
a) b)
I i I I ~ ~ 400 I j
000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 3300 3350 3400 3450
Temperature [° C ] Density [kg/m 3]
Fig. 2. (a) The effect of higher mantle temperatures on the pressure-release melting of an adiabatically rising diapir. The solidus
and liquidus of mantle peridotite are shown as a third-order polynomial fit (see text). Lines of equal melting for 15 and 50% melt
fractions are shown, based on the data of Jaques and Green [34]. The heavy solid lines schematically indicate the (T,p) paths of a
rising diapir at potential temperatures Tpot = 1330, 1600 and 1750°C, based on [30]. In the calculations we have corrected for the
crustal pressure effect [29] (see text). (b) Compositional density in harzburgite and lherzolite. Density increases with depth, as a
consequence of the lower degree of depletion.
6 N.J. Vlaar et al./Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18
data from Jaques and Green [34]. For the entropy surface [5,31,37]. In time, this is followed by the
of melting, we used AS = 300 J- kg -~ K -1, which more basaltic outflows from the diapir, caused by
is approximately equivalent to 1 R J • mol(atom)-1 pressure-release melting and, consequently, much
K -1 [35,36]. The bold lines indicate the ( T , p ) lower extrusion temperatures. This can explain
paths for rising diapirs at three different poten- the occurrence of high-temperature komatiites as
tial temperatures, Tpot = 1330, 1600 and 1750°C. the first extrusion product in greenstone belt
The present-day situation, with a crustal thick- formation, followed by outflows of less MgO-rich
ness of 7 km, is simulated with Tpot = 1330°C. The basaltic lavas [38].
extrusion temperature here is Textr = 1240°C. At In the following section we will discuss the
Tpot = 1600°C, 29 km of basaltic crust is generated consequences of the aforementioned effects for
with Textr= 1420°C. At the highest potential tem- the dynamics of the lithosphere in a hotter man-
perature shown, Tpot = 1750°C, melting of a rising tle.
diapir generates 50 km of basaltic crust with
Textr = 1520°C. In general, it is stated that the
decrease in temperature indicates heat loss by 4. Consequences for upper mantle dynamics
the consumption of latent heat. Strictly speaking,
however, this is not correct. Pressure-release
melting occurs in adiabatically rising mantle ma- Vlaar [3,11] presented qualitative constraints
terial and no heat is lost from the system. The on Archaean global dynamics; these are sum-
temperature decreases to account for the entropy marised as follows:
increase of the melt fraction. Only when the melt (i) The mantle was originally molten shortly af-
reaches the surface and solidifies is heat lost by ter accretion [39].
the entropy decrease. However, we will assume (ii) Rapid solidification started at the bottom of
that the amount of heat lost by the melt fraction the mantle and progressed upward [36] until
at the surface equals the heat necessary to melt the whole mantle was at or below the solidus
the peridotite at depth. temperature.
Note the strong effect of the consumption of (iii) At high mantle temperatures, pressure-re-
latent heat on the extrusion temperatures. Al- lease melting of rising diapirs generates a
though the potential temperatures differ by 420°C, thick basaltic layer on top of a very thick
the temperatures at the 50 km depth differ by harzburgitic layer [11,20,32].
only 280°C. This important effect should be taken (iv) Compositional stability [40-42] and lack of
into account when using estimates of extrusion mechanical coherency of this upper bound-
temperature to constrain the potential mantle ary layer [43] renders modern-style plate tec-
temperature. tonics ineffective [3,11].
Fig. 2b shows the density in the underlying (v) Continents stabilised on top of strong chemi-
depleted harzburgitic residue for the three cases cal zonation in the harzburgitic root and the
with different potential temperature. The density generation of radiogenic heat in the conti-
of the harzburgite increases with depth as a con- nental crust blankets the surface cooling [11].
sequence of the decreasing amount of depletion. (vi) After formation of stable basalt-harzburgite
As has been shown by Vlaar [11] and Vlaar and layering, recycling of basaltic material can
Van den Berg [29], this compositional basalt- occur through its denser phases (garnet-
harzburgite stratification has a large effect on the granulite and eclogite). The recycling of
stability of the oceanic lithosphere. eclogite allows for new generation of basaltic
In this scenario, komatiite might be the melt magma.
generated at considerable depth ( > 150 km) and In the following section we will consider the
at low degrees of partial melting in a rising di- consequences of these assumptions and con-
apir. At depth, the komatiitic magma separates straints on the evolution of the lithosphere and
from the matrix and rises adiabatically to the upper mantle in a hotter Earth.
N.J. Vlaaret al./ Earth and PlanetaryScienceLetters121 (1994)1-18 7
harzburgite harzburgite
Fig. 3. Schematic overviewof the compositional layering for the (a) continental and (b) oceanic lithosphere-upper mantle in a "hot
Earth", with potential temperatures Tpot > 1600°C.
8 N.J. Vlaaret aL/Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18
Table 2
= 1 0 -~5 s-~
Parameters used in the theological description (I1)
o I
r ~-
Rock log B (MPa--as-l ) n E (kJmo1-1) C (Pa. s)
~g . ++.++ +
Diabase -2.5 3.3 268 81 x l0 ~s
+..+-f"
Peridotite 4.5 3.6 535 19 x 10t+
ao
E
~_, 2 0 0 200 200
N
I I I I I I I I
Eclogite
i,,....n
o~
0- Bottom of crust at
~2
mpot = 1 7 5 0 ° C
"-1
tfJ
o~
O_
Tpot = 1 6 0 0 ° C
1
Gabbro
0 t.
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
T e m p e r a t u r e [o C]
Fig. 6. Phase diagram for basalt [48].
on one side of the model, to avoid the model on the (T, p) path of a rising diapir. The crustal
remaining artificially stably stratified. The first heat production balances ('blankets') only par-
frame shows the initial temperature profile, based tially the heat loss through the top and the cool-
50
E
c-
o..
(D
CI \\
100
150 I I I
0 500 1000 1500
Temperature ° C]
Fig. 7. Evolution of the horizontally averaged temperature in the oceanic lithosphere generated at T = 1750°C. Convection in the
basalt generates an asthenosphere and relatively cool temperatures in the lower crust.
10 N.J. Vlaar et al. / E a r t h and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18
ing progresses slowly to larger depths. As is shown as the underlying harzburgite. The cooler garnet-
in Fig. 5, the continental lithosphere is stable to granulite may have a density that is high enough
at least 250 Myr. After this, the cooling pro- to recycle into the mantle, although the density
gresses into the undepleted peridotitic layer. In difference with the underlying harzburgite is not
some simulations this creates an instability in the very large. A more efficient way of recycling the
lower parts of the model, which can recycle the basaltic crust is through its high-density phase
lower most parts of the (now thermally defined) eclogite. This is considered in the following para-
continental root. However, the most important graphs.
result of these simulations is that the proposed Just after it forms the brittle layer is thin and
layering is intrinsically stable to cooling. This weak [43], and can probably not resist sinking into
leads to a firm basis for the suggestion that the the hot ductile lower crust. Through this mecha-
early protocontinents were able to resist recycling nism of crustal, or 'mini'-subduction, a relatively
on top of a chemically zoned root, and that the cool (T < 1000°C) and hydrated basaltic layer can
present thickness of the continental cratons (ca. be formed on top of the harzburgite. Under these
200 km) has been maintained throughout geologi- conditions, the transformation from gabbro to
cal history. eclogite is fast, with time scales of the order of 1
Myr [49]. Once eclogite is f o r m e d , recycling of
Oceanic lithosphere, potential temperature 1750°C crustal material into the harzburgitic layer is fast.
The oceanic lithosphere, formed a t Tpo t = Fig. 8 illustrates this for a layering formed at
1750°C, is stably stratified in a fashion similar to potential temperature Tpot = 1750°C. The eclogite
that of the continental lithosphere discussed layer is 10 km thick and within 5 Myr most of the
above. Recycling of the basaltic crust and under- eclogite is recycled into the underlying harzbur-
lying harzburgite can only be achieved in this gite.
environment through the formation of the denser
phases of gabbroic basalt: garnet-granulite (GG, Oceanic lithosphere, potential temperature 1600°C
p =3.3 g - c m -3) and eclogite (E, p = 3.6 g. At lower potential temperature, the recycling
cm-3). Fig. 6 shows a phase diagram for basalt of eclogite will become less efficient, and eventu-
taken from [48]. The horizontal lines indicate the ally cease. The viscosity of the lower basaltic crust
pressures at the base of the crust, formed at and harzburgite increases, the recycling of hy-
Tpo t = 1750, 1600 and 1330°C respectively. At Tpo t drated crust will become less efficient and eclogi-
= 1750°C, the crust is approximately 50 km thick tisation is less rapid. The less efficient eclogitisa-
and solid-state convection can occur in the tion of the lower crust is the main factor deter-
basaltic layer (assuming that the upper brittle mining the lower speed of the mechanism. The
crust has negligible influence on the dynamics). increase in viscosity and thinning of the eclogite
Fig. 7 shows the evolution of the horizontally layer have only a minor effect, as is illustrated in
averaged temperature in the oceanic lithosphere. Fig. 9, where the recycling of a now 5 km thick
The initial temperature profile beneath the basalt eclogitic layer is shown in a model based on a
layer is taken from Fig. 2a. It is assumed that basalt-harzburgite layering formed at Tpot =
after formation the basaltic crust solidified very 1600°C. The basaltic crust has a total thickness of
rapidly and that the basalt is at its solidus tem- 29 km. Initial temperature and compositional
perature, except for the thin boundary layer on density are given for the harzburgite/lherzolite
top. The grey area indicates the garnet-granulite in Fig. 2a and b. Recycling of the eclogite layer is
stability field, taken from Fig. 6. Cooling pro- now approximately 2 × slower.
gresses rapidly through the efficient heat loss by At even lower temperatures the crust will be-
the combined effects of conduction and low come too thin and the brittle upper crust too
Rayleigh number convection. After 10 Myr, the strong for crustal subduction to take place and
lower part of the crust is in the garnet-granulite pressures at the bottom of the crust may be too
stability field. Garnet-granulite is nearly as dense low for eclogite to be formed, although it is not
N.J. Vlaar et a l . / Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18 11
B
E
100
Hz
Ioo 100
clear at which crustal thickness this will occur. some evidence exists for the formation of eclogite
The phase diagram for basalt shown in Fig. 6 from hydrated basalt at the shallower levels [49].
indicates that eclogite cannot be formed at crustal The driving forces of the present-day form of
thicknesses of less than ca. 25 km. However, plate tectonics will become increasingly impor-
E
200 200 200
N
tant and in a certain temperature range a gradual by new basalt which is either generated by eclog-
transition from the proposed mechanism and ite remelting or pressue-release melting of harz-
plate tectonics may occur. We tentatively place burgite. Using this simplifying description, we
this transition at a potential 'blocking' tempera- propose that this mechanism of recycling of
ture of Tpot = T 0 = 1475°C, at which 15 km of basaltic crust through mini-subduction, rapid
crust is produced. eclogitisation at the bottom of the crust, recycling
of the eclogite into the upper mantle and forma-
Consequences o f eclogite recycling tion of new crust is responsible for the initial
The models presented above indicate the time cooling of the hot Earth, after solidification of
the eclogite can reside in the lower crust and an the mantle, but will grow less efficient in the
eclogite recycling rate can be estimated. Once the cooling Earth. We take the rate of eclogite recy-
eclogite starts sinking into the underlying cling, that can be estimated from the model re-
harzburgite, several processes can be envisaged. sults presented above, to be the factor governing
Firstly, the eclogite will heat up (see Fig. 7) and the rate of cooling induced by the present sce-
will melt once its temperature is above the solidus, nario. Both the formation of eclogite from hy-
leading to new creation of basalt and tonalite. drated basaltic crust and remelting of the eclogite
Secondly, the uppermost parts of the harzburgitic are assumed to occur at shorter time scales.
layer will be entrained by the sinking eclogite,
which will lead to passive upwelling of the
harzburgite, and, if the top of the harzburgite is 6. A thermal model for the early Earth
still hot enough, some new basalt can be formed
by pressure-release melting. If this process con- We will now turn to the consequences of the
tinues for some time, further depletion of the presented dynamic model for the thermal history
harzburgitic layer might result: depleted harzbur- of the Earth. Our approach to this problem is
gite is recycled into the underlying less depleted necessarily conjectural, due to the lack of de-
layers, which eventually may lead to homogenisa- tailed knowledge of the interaction between the
tion of part of the harzburgitic layer in which different processes and the variability of the pa-
thermal convection can lead to rapid cooling. rameters governing the dynamic behaviour.
This in turn may trigger an overturn of the We assume that the cooling of the Earth's
basalt-harzburgite system, generating renewed mantle is entirely caused by heat loss through the
pressure-release melting. Lastly, thinning of the oceanic lithosphere. This is presently estimated at
eclogite and mixing into the harzburgite may lead 3 × 1013 W, predominantly ( > 90%) by the con-
to enrichment of the harzburgite, but the reaction ductive cooling of the continuously recycling
time is expected to be long, and the volumes lithosphere [19]. The consumption of latent heat
involved relatively small. Implicitly, this scenario at mid-oceanic ridges is only a fraction of this
assumes that when the mantle temperature is [31]. However, in a hotter mantle, the amount of
constant the thickness of the basaltic crust re- melt generated is much larger and the dissipation
mains constant. Thinning of the basaltic crust is of heat by solidification of extruding magma may
assumed to occur only when the potential mantle be the dominant form of cooling of the Earth
temperature decreases. [31,50]. We will use this and estimate the amount
Because of the different time scales and the of cooling in our models by (i) advection of magma
complex interaction between the mechanisms the to the surface, (ii) consumption of latent heat by
interaction between them is extremely difficult to solidification of magma and remelting of eclogite,
model. We choose to simplify the model descrip- and (iii) conductive cooling of the basaltic crust.
tion by assuming that we can describe the pro- The key parameter is the rate of recycling of
cesses above by a continuous model in which it is basaltic crust through the eclogite phase. We will
assumed that the eclogite layer is recycled in the make some simplifying assumptions regarding the
mantle and completely replaced at crustal levels recycling process. Recycling of the eclogitic layer
N.Z Vlaar et al. /Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18 13
contribution to the total heat loss in the hotter Sleep's estimates of the absolute mantle abun-
Earth. For all practical purposes we assume that dance of K, U and Th from the amount of 4°Ar
the conductive heat loss has not varied through [20]. Fig. 11 shows the evolution of the model,
geological time, and fix it at the present-day value initially with Tpot _ 1750°C for initial crustal recy-
of cling rates of 0.5Vm, x, 0.2I)m,x and 0.11)max. Note
that the dimensional time shown on the horizon-
4rrqR2m= 3 × 1013W (14a)
tal axis indicates the time that has elapsed since
In comparison, at the highest estimated recy- the calculation started. It does not necessarily
cling rate Vmax, the cooling through melt solidifi- coincide with the age of the Earth. Shown are,
cation, assumed equal to the latent heat con- from left to right, the potential temperature Tpot
sumption, contributes (°C) and latent heat consumption and heat ad-
vected by migrating melt (both in 1012 W). At
pLl)'ma x = 2 X 1014W (14b)
potential temperature T o = 1475°C, it is assumed
and the melt migration contributes (Toot = that the mechanism becomes inefficient and heat
1750oO loss is governed by conductive heat loss (14a)
only. At the highest recycling rate shown the
pcp(T~xtr - TSB) I)m a x = 1.5 X 1014W (14c)
Earth cools by more than 200 K within 200 Myr.
We can now model the thermal evolution of At t = 0.5 Gyr, the blocking t e m p e r a t u r e T 0 is
the Earth using an extension to (1), given reached. At the lower recycling rates the cooling
4~- dT progresses slower, but still a large drop in tem-
3 OC°(R m--R c) dt perature is observed in 1 Gyr. These results
should be considered with proper caution as they
4rr are based on a rather speculative quantification
= -4~qR2m + ~-Q(R 3-R3c)
and error margins are large. Most likely the con-
ductive heat loss has been larger than modelled
-pcoI)(T~xtr- TSB) -- (1 + b)pLl) (15)
here, leading to more efficient cooling. The esti-
The t e m p e r a t u r e T is the mean mantle tem- mates for the radiogenic heat production [20] are
perature, which is assumed to be the t e m p e r a t u r e rather low compared to others. Increasing the
at a depth of 1500 km. The relationship with the heat production by a factor of 2 leads to much
potential t e m p e r a t u r e is given as T = Toot + 750, longer cooling times. However, it is not entirely
assuming a constant adiabatic gradient of 0.5 unreasonable to assume that, after the proposed
K . k m - 1 . H e a t production Q is modelled using mechanism has been active at some time in the
1800 I I I 75 I 1 I I 75 I I I I
~
O
m 1700
0.1 50 ~- 50
1600
E 04
o
.Iz
--~ 1500 ~ 25 0.2
0.2 O.
o 1400
I I I I i J I I I I I
0.0 0.5 t.o 1.5 o.o 0.5 1 .o 1.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Time [Gyr] T i m e [Gyr] T i m e [Gyr]
Fig. 11. Influence of the latent heat loss and melt migration on the internal temperature of the Earth (15). Numbers indicate the
crustal recycling rate at the arbitrary starting point, put at t = 0, relative to the proposed maximum Vmax (12a).
N.J. Vlaaret al. / Earth and Planetary ScienceLetters 121 (1994) 1-18 15
Earth's history, it has efficiently cooled the man- temperatures, the basaltic crust is still thick
tle by several hundreds of degrees in, say, a 500 enough to resist lithospheric subduction, but is
Myr period, leading to a moderate mantle tem- probably too thin to allow efficient eclogite for-
perature that is perhaps 100-200 K higher than mation and recycling.
the present-day temperature.
Geological constraints on the thermal develop-
ment of the upper mantle are given by the extru- 7. Discussion
sion temperatures of volcanic rocks. Komatiites
indicate the highest mantle temperatures (ca. Tpot In the above, we have illustrated, quantita-
= 1650-1750°C at 3.5 Gyr B.P., and Tpot = 1500- tively, some dynamic effects that can occur in a
1600°C at 2.7 Gyr B.P.). These values are based hotter mantle. Using the results of the dynamic
on the estimates of the extrusion temperatures of modelling we can envisage strong episodic be-
komatiites [e.g., 52] and ad hoc estimates of the haviour of the upper boundary layer, with periods
temperature decrease by the consumption of la- of relative stabilisation and conductive cooling
tent heat necessary to generate komatiitic melt at followed by strong magmatic activity as a conse-
depth, which range from 0°C [5,31] to 100°C [20]. quence of the thermal and compositional instabil-
Other Archaean volcanic rocks, such as green- ity of the lower basaltic crust and underlying
stones, have extrusion temperatures that are dis- harzburgite.
tinctly lower. Abbott et al. [33] concluded that the The interaction between the different mecha-
mean extrusion temperature determined for such nisms has yet to be explored, and at present
rocks has decreased by approximately 150 K since further progress is hampered by technical diffi-
the middle Archaean (3.0 Gyr B.P.). Note that culties: high resolution both in time and space is
this is not at odds with the estimated extrusion necessary to resolve the complex interaction. A
temperatures estimated for komatiites, which are large problem is presented by the different time
generated at depth and ascend adiabatically, in scales at which relevant processes take place, as
contrast to the basaltic outflows found in green- for example the migration of magma compared to
stone belts, which are generated by pressure-re- the deformation of the solid phase. Studying one
lease melting. Taking into account the concomi- of these processes necessitates simplifying as-
tant temperature drop, a decrease in potential sumptions for the other, whereas the two pro-
mantle temperature of some 250 K can be in- cesses are dependent on each other.
ferred from the greenstone extrusion tempera-
tures. Therefore, it is not unreasonable to assume 7.1. Comments on rheological parameters and
that the mean Archaean mantle temperature has composition of the crustal layer
been some 200-300 K higher than the present-day
temperature. Even higher mantle temperatures The rate of recycling is strongly dependent on
imply conditions that are more favourable for the rheology of the basalt/eclogite and harzbur-
eclogite formation and recycling as a conse- gite. Some field evidence exists that eclogite has a
quence of the thicker basaltic layer, lack of me- lower viscosity than basalt [54]. We have taken
chanical coherency and greater mobility of the this into account in some model calculations but
•crust and upper mantle. The remelting of eclogite no large difference was observed: as harzburgite
upon recycling at moderate depths (50-100 km, is more viscous than both basalt and eclogite at
see Fig. 7) may well have been important in the the ambient temperatures (Fig. 4), it controls the
formation of tonalitic protocontinents in the very speed of the sinking eclogite. In some models we
early Archaean [53]. The middle to late Archaean have included pressure dependence by extending
could have been characterised by some form of the Arrhenius term in (9): o-~ exp [(E +
'flake tectonics' [43] at the transition between hot p V ) / n R T ) ] , where p is the pressure and V the
Earth dynamics and the present-day plate tecton- activation volume, which was assumed constant
ics. At these moderately higher upper mantle (V = 10 cm 3 mol-1). Pressure dependence is rela-
16 N.J. Vlaar et al. /Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18
[12] F.D. Stacey, Physics of the Earth, Wiley, New York, [31] E. Takahashi, Speculations on the Archean mantle: miss-
1977. ing link between komatiite and depleted garnet peri-
[13] H.N. Sharpe and W.R. Peltier, Parameterized mantle dotite, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 15941-15954, 1980.
convection and the Earth's thermal history, Geophys. [32] D. McKenzie and M.J. Bickle, The volume and composi-
Res. Lett. 5, 737-740, 1978. tion of melt generated by the extension of the litho-
[14] M.J. Jackson and H.N. Pollack, On the sensitivity of sphere, J. Petrol. 29, 625-679, 1988.
parameterized convection to the rate of decay of internal [33] D. Abbott, L. Burgess, J. Longhi and W.H.F. Smith, An
heat sources, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 10103-10108, 1984. empirical thermal history of the Earth's upper mantle, J.
[15] M.J. Jackson and H.N. Pollack, Mantle devolatilization Geophys. Res., submitted, 1993.
and convection: implications for the thermal history of [34] A.L. Jaques and D.H. Green, Anhydrous melting of
the earth, Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 737-740, 1987. peridotite at 0-15 kb pressure, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol.
[16] P.J. McGovern and G. Schubert, Thermal evolution of B73, 287-310, 1980.
the Earth: effects of volatile exchange between atmo- [35] R. Jeanloz, Thermodynamics of phase transitions, Rev.
sphere and interior, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 96, 27-37, Mineral. 14, 389-429, 1985.
1989. [36] G.H. Miller, E.M. Stolper and T.J. Ahrens, The equation
[17] J. Weertman and J.R. Weertman, High temperature of state of a molten komatiite 2. Application to komatiite
creep of rock and mantle viscosity, Annu. Rev. Earth petrogenesis and the Hadean mantle, J. Geophys. Res.
Planet. Sci. 3, 293-315, 1975. 96, 11849-11864, 1991.
[18] D.R. Williams and V. Pan, Internally heated mantle [37] M.J. O'Hara, M.J. Saunders and E.L.P. Mercy, Garnet-
convection and the thermal and degassing history of the peridotite, primary ultrabasic magma and eclogite: inter-
Earth, J. Geophys. Res. 97, 8937-8950, 1992. pretation of upper mantle processes in kimberlite, Phys.
[19] J.G. Sclater, J. Jaupart and D. Galson, The heat flow Chem. Earth 9, 571-604, 1975.
through oceanic and continental crust and the heat loss [38] E.G. Nisbet, The Young Earth: An Introduction to Ar-
of the Earth, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 18, 269-311, chaean Geology, Allen and Unwin, London, 1987.
1980. [39] D.J. Stevenson, Formation and early evolution of the
[20] N.H. Sleep, Thermal history and degassing of the earth: Earth, in: Mantle Convection, W.R. Peltier, ed., pp.
some simple calculations, J. Geol. 87, 671-686, 1979. 818-873, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1989.
[21] F.D. Stacey, The cooling Earth: a reappraisal, Phys. [40] N.J. Vlaar, The driving mechanism of plate tectonics: a
Earth Planet. Inter. 22, 89-96, 1980. qualitative approach, in: Progress in Geodynamics, G.J.
[22] U. Hansen and A. Ebel, Experiments with a numerical Borradaile et al., eds., North Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.
model related to mantle convection: boundary layer be- [41] N.J. Vlaar and M J . R . Wortel, Lithospheric aging, insta-
haviour of small- and large-scale flows, Phys. Earth bility and subduction, Tectonophysics 32, 331-351, 1976.
Planet. Inter. 36, 374-390, 1984. [42] E.R. Oxburgh and E.M. Parmentier, Compositional and
[23] V. Steinbach, Numerische Experimente zur Konvektion density stratification in oceanic lithosphere--causes and
in kompressiblen Medien, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Cologne, consequences, J. Geol. Soc. London 133, 343-355, 1977.
1991. [43] P.F. Hoffman and G. Ranalli, Archaean oceanic flake
[24] B.H. Hager, Subducted slabs and the geoid: constraints tectonics, Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 1077-1080, 1988.
on mantle theology and flow, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6003- [44] R.J. O'Connell and B.H. Hager, in: Physics of the Earth's
6016, 1984. Interior, A.M. Dziewonski and E. Boschi, eds., pp. 270-
[25] A. Chopelas and R. Boehler, Thermal expansion mea- 317, Elsevier, New York, 1980.
surements at very high pressure, systematics and a case [45] P.E. van Keken, C.J. Spiers, A.P. van den Berg and E.J.
for a chemically homogeneous mantle, Geophys. Res. Muyzert, The effective viscosity of rocksalt: implementa-
Lett. 16, 1347-1350, 1989. tion of steady-state creep laws in numerical models of
[26] M. Osaka and E. Ito, Thermal diffusivity of MgSiO 3 salt diapirism, Tectonophysics 225, 457-476, 1993.
perovskite, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 239-242, 1991. [46] P.E. van Keken, Numerical modelling of thermochemi-
[27] U.R. Christensen, Heat transport by variable viscosity cally driven fluid flow with non-Newtonian rheology ap-
convection and implications for the Earth's thermal evo- plied to the Earth's lithosphere and mantle, Ph.D. The-
lution, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 35, 264-282, 1984. sis, Univ. Utrecht, 1993.
[28] U.R. Christensen, Thermal evolution models for the [47] U. Christensen and D.A. Yuen, The interaction of a
Earth, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 2995-3008, 1985. subducting lithospheric slab with a chemical or phase
[29] N.J. Vlaar and A.P. van den Berg, Continental evolution boundary, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 4389-4402, 1984.
and archaeo-sea-levels, in: Glacial Isostasy, Sea-level and [48] A.E. Ringwood, Composition and petrology of the Earth's
Mantle Rheology, R. Sabadini, K. Lambeck and E. Mantle, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
Boschi, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991. [49] T.J. Ahrens and G. Schubert, Gabbro-eclogite reaction
[30] D.P. McKenzie, The generation and compaction of par- rate and its geophysical significance, Rev. Geophys. Space
tially molten rock, J. Petrol. 25, 713-765, 1984. Phys. 13, 383 400, 1975.
18 N.J. Vlaar et al. / Earth and Planetary Science Letters 121 (1994) 1-18
[50] M. Ogawa, Numerical experiments on coupled magma- [58] U. Hansen, V. Steinbach and D.A. Yuen, The dynamics
tism-mantle convection system: implications for mantle at internal boundaries in an Earth's mantle with depth-
evolution and Archean continental crust, J. Geophys. dependent material properties, Terra Nova 5, 101, 1993
Res. 93, 15119-15134, 1988. (EUG VII Suppl.).
[51] H. Fukuyama, The heat of fusion of basaltic magma, [59] P.E. van Keken, D.A. Yuen and A.P. van den Berg,
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 73, 407-414, 1985. Pulsating diapiric flows: Consequences of vertical varia-
[52] N.T. Arndt and E.G. Nisbet, eds., Komatiites, Allen and tions in mantle creep laws, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 112,
Unwin, London, 1982. 179-194, 1992.
[53] K.C. Condie, Archean geotherms and supracrustal as- [60] U. Hansen and D.A. Yuen, High Rayleigh number regime
semblages, Tectonophysics 105, 29-41, 1984. of temperature-dependent viscosity convection and the
[54] H. Austrheim, Eclogite formation and dynamics of crustal Earth's early thermal history, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20,
roots under continental collision zones, Terra Nova 3, 2191-2194, 1993.
492-499, 1991. [61] E.M. Klein and C.H. Langmuir, Global correlations of
[55] P. Machetel and D.A. Yuen, Penetrative convective flows ocean ridge basalt chemistry with axial depth and crustal
induced by internal heating and mantle compressibility, thickness, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 8089-8115, 1987.
J. Geophys. Res. 94, 10609-10626, 1989. [62] V. Steinbach, D.A. Yuen and W. Zhao, Instabilities from
[56] V. Steinbach and D.A. Yuen, The effects of multiple phase transitions and the timescales of mantle thermal
phase transitions on Venusian mantle convection, Geo- evolution, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 1119-1122, 1993.
phys. Res. Lett. 19, 2243-2246, 1992. [63] M.J.R. Wortel, M.J.N. Remkes, R. Govers, S.A.P.L.
[57] L.H. Kellogg, Interactions of plumes with a composi- Cloetingh and P.Th. Meijer, Dynamics of the lithosphere
tional boundary at 670 km, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, and the intraplate stress field, Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
865-868, 1991. London A 337, 111-126, 1991.