Remote surgeries have evolved from early invasive surgeries with significant damage to now using minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopy. Laparoscopy reduces adverse effects but training for it is limited and machines are costly. Remote surgeries allow small hospitals access to emergency or urgent surgery by specialists otherwise unavailable, reducing complication risks. However, remote surgery also has disadvantages as it requires expensive technology, stable infrastructure like networks and power, and backup human resources for emergencies or anatomical variations requiring traditional techniques. Overall remote surgery is promising especially for rare specialties, but it depends on sufficient resources to succeed.
Emerging Frontiers in Surgical Advancements: Exploring Cutting-Edge Technologies and Pioneering Techniques (Advances in Surgical Innovation: New Technologies and Techniques 2)
Remote surgeries have evolved from early invasive surgeries with significant damage to now using minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopy. Laparoscopy reduces adverse effects but training for it is limited and machines are costly. Remote surgeries allow small hospitals access to emergency or urgent surgery by specialists otherwise unavailable, reducing complication risks. However, remote surgery also has disadvantages as it requires expensive technology, stable infrastructure like networks and power, and backup human resources for emergencies or anatomical variations requiring traditional techniques. Overall remote surgery is promising especially for rare specialties, but it depends on sufficient resources to succeed.
Remote surgeries have evolved from early invasive surgeries with significant damage to now using minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopy. Laparoscopy reduces adverse effects but training for it is limited and machines are costly. Remote surgeries allow small hospitals access to emergency or urgent surgery by specialists otherwise unavailable, reducing complication risks. However, remote surgery also has disadvantages as it requires expensive technology, stable infrastructure like networks and power, and backup human resources for emergencies or anatomical variations requiring traditional techniques. Overall remote surgery is promising especially for rare specialties, but it depends on sufficient resources to succeed.
Remote surgeries have evolved from early invasive surgeries with significant damage to now using minimally invasive techniques like laparoscopy. Laparoscopy reduces adverse effects but training for it is limited and machines are costly. Remote surgeries allow small hospitals access to emergency or urgent surgery by specialists otherwise unavailable, reducing complication risks. However, remote surgery also has disadvantages as it requires expensive technology, stable infrastructure like networks and power, and backup human resources for emergencies or anatomical variations requiring traditional techniques. Overall remote surgery is promising especially for rare specialties, but it depends on sufficient resources to succeed.
As the human being evolves in the same way, technological development advances by leaps and bounds, every day the human being tries to improve his life and minimize risks, this is the case of remote surgeries ; remote surgeries come from small steps taken in the world of medical technology, at first the surgeon did not have all the necessary tools to reach the point of repair, which made it necessary to expand the field of action, that is, quite invasive surgeries with a lot of collateral damage. The path of improvement of the surgical technique has brought with it the use of technological tools that guarantee fewer adverse effects and rapid recovery of the patient, such as laparoscopic surgery, which only involves making three or four incisions through which the surgeon operates through of a camera and super small tools , The problem with this technique is the limited number of doctors trained in it and the cost of maintaining the machines. However, the advantage is how cost effective it is for the medical system, seeing it from the point of view of recovery.Given the lack of doctors trained in laparoscopic techniques , the use of remote surgeries opens the opportunity for small hospitals to treat patients who require emergency surgery or as soon as possible , reducing the risk of complications. All before sound perfect but all have advantages and disadvantages in this case the main disadvantage is that its a expensive technology and need resources that they don't have at all places for example a good network , stable power grid and the human resources to respond in case of an emergency , because not all bodies are same and sometimes the anatomy can change and it’s necessary use traditional techniques. In conclusion I think that the remote surgery is a good idea maybe if I had to choose I would prefer remote surgery especially specialities hard to find for example cardiothoracic surgeon or neurosurgeon however I am conscious that Its necessary a lot human and physical resources to have a good result.
Emerging Frontiers in Surgical Advancements: Exploring Cutting-Edge Technologies and Pioneering Techniques (Advances in Surgical Innovation: New Technologies and Techniques 2)