Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mona Naim - Art - Lesson Plan
Mona Naim - Art - Lesson Plan
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Lesson Plan: Student-centered / high-tech
Topic of lesson: Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Instructional approach
LO 1: Students will read and explore the supplementary articles related to Intra
Uterine insemination (IUI) that are uploaded on Moodle.
In class, students are divided into three groups.
-One group will use Canva to explain the process of IUI.
-A second group will prepare a PowerPoint to explain the process of IUI.
-A third group will get a youtube video to explain the process of IUI.
Each group will get a chance to present what they have prepared.
Afterward, students will access the Poll Everywhere link to respond to the posted
IUI-related questions, and a discussion of the responses will take place during
class time.
Therefore, the instructional strategy is more of articulation, collaboration, and
social negotiation.
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Platforms Toolbox
- links to resources
Moodle - PowerPoint
- Canva
- YouTube
- poll everywhere
- H5P
- articulate interactive eLearning
course link
- screencast-O-Matic recorded
PowerPoint with voice
explanation
- discussions
Course-level objectives
-discussion of the
responses to questions
posted on Poll
Everywhere
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
list the steps of Assisted recorded PowerPoint
Reproductive Techniques presentation with
(IVF/ICSI). instructor explanation
-Moodle assessment
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Lesson Plan: Teacher-centered / low tech
Topic of lesson: Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Instructional approach
Platforms Toolbox
Course-level objectives
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Objective Assessment Learning material
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Report:
The topic of the lesson is Assisted Reproductive Techniques. I prepared two
lesson plans one student-centered high tech and the other teacher-centered low
tech.
The student-centered high-tech lesson is taught to undergraduate university
students who have their personal laptops to aid them in their classroom learning.
There is an interactive whiteboard in the classroom as well as the instructor's laptop.
Additionally, there is internet connectivity, which gives the instructor and the student
access to an endless amount of information. In this classroom, the student is in
charge of his education and takes a more active role in learning by finding the crucial
materials for the course. The students take an active part in the educational setting
and are given the freedom to choose what, when, where, and how to learn. Through
the use of technology, they participate in critical thinking, problem-solving, teamwork,
and self-directed learning. The instructor, on the other hand, serves as a learning
facilitator and pays particular attention to each student's interests, skills, and
preferred methods of learning.
This teacher-centered low-tech lesson is taught to university undergraduate
students who use a more traditional low-tech approach to learning. In this classroom,
the instructor serves as the main authority figure, and students are treated as “empty
vessels” who passively receive knowledge from their teachers through lectures and
direct instruction, with an end goal of positive results from testing and assessment. In
this learning style, teaching and assessment are viewed as two independent entities,
student learning is measured through objectively scored tests and assessments. As
regards technology use, the teacher uses a laptop connected to an LCD projector to
show content to the class but the students don't have any technological devices and
take handwritten notes. Students can reserve a desktop in the university's computer
lab to use to email an assignment, type any document they like, or simply browse the
internet.
I considered the cognitive load theory while creating both lesson plans by
reducing the intrinsic burden on the students' brains. Since every piece of knowledge
being taught to students is new, I made sure to chunk the subject material and
present it in a sequential manner so that working memory could quickly digest and
store it in long-term memory. In addition, the PPT slides that I prepared were free of
any unnecessary details, organized in proper font, and presented using simple words
and a vivid tone to avoid generating an extraneous load. The brain could then link
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
new information to information previously stored there because it was not
overburdened and the germane mode functioning properly.
I included Gagne's 9 events of instruction into my lesson plans at various
stages that I will mention hereafter. The purpose of the YouTube video is to draw
students' attention to the presented subject. In addition, the lesson plan's objectives
are clearly stated but normally told to students in casual conversation. Furthermore,
during instruction, I always try to relate the material being taught currently to
information students already have in their brains by asking questions during the
lesson that draw on pre-existing knowledge. Moreover, the content that I present is a
blend of text and media, well aligned with the objectives, and is chunked into pieces.
Also, the assessment embedded in both lesson plans whether done with the aid of
technology or without serves as a practice opportunity to provide feedback to
learners and instructors and thereby assess performance. Any misconceptions in the
learning process will be cleared easily through the discussions done in class and
learners usually learn from their mistakes. Over and above, this ART content is
actually science, and students after being taught this topic immediately start to relate
it to real-world situations by sharing stories about friends or family members who
have been through the issue of misconceiving and are going through reproductive
treatment cycles.
On a personal level, I instruct nursing and medical lab students at the
University of Balamand on this subject. I experimented with both teaching strategies
because I initially followed the teacher-centered approach before switching to the
student-centered approach. The input I receive from in-class assessments helps me
to stay on track with the student-centered approach. Additionally, I conduct an
anonymous survey for my students, and it reveals that students learn more when I
keep them at the center because they are more engaged and active. Thus, the
feedback provided showed that students were able to readily digest the content and
link it to situations that actually occur in their daily lives. As for technology use, it is
high tech given how interested my students are in technology and internet use these
days and the infrastructure available at the university.
This document has been adapted from “The design document” © 2021 by William Cronje & Eduflow Academy is licensed
under Attribution 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/