Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Book Review Dawn Lyon What Is Rhythmanal 230407 055631
Book Review Dawn Lyon What Is Rhythmanal 230407 055631
Book Review Dawn Lyon What Is Rhythmanal 230407 055631
What is Rhythmanalysis?
by Dawn Lyon, London, Bloomsbury Press, 2018, 144 pp., £45 (hardcover),
ISBN: 9781350018280, £16.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781350018273, £18.34 (e-
book), ISBN: 9781350018297
Emily Reid-Musson
To cite this article: Emily Reid-Musson (2020) What is Rhythmanalysis?, Social & Cultural
Geography, 21:1, 137-138, DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2019.1632059
Article views: 78
Zimman, L. (2017). Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming,
gender inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 1(1), 84–105.
James D. Todd
Department of Geography, Durham University
j.d.todd@durham.ac.uk Durham United Kingdom
© 2019 James D. Todd
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1632058
What is Rhythmanalysis? by Dawn Lyon, London, Bloomsbury Press, 2018, 144 pp.,
£45 (hardcover), ISBN: 9781350018280, £16.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781350018273,
£18.34 (e-book), ISBN: 9781350018297
One of the most central foci of the volume across each of the chapters is the focus on the body,
an element that is central to Lefebvre’s approach. Yet, as Lyon rightly states, Lefebvre was ‘firm in his
refusal to deepen his understanding of his own body through rhythmanalysis’ (p. 35). This tension is
noted throughout the volume; in the current rhythmanalysis research, Lyon points out, researchers’
own bodies are keenly absent from the analysis. Lyon devotes a chapter to operationalizing
rhythmanalysis, framed around the body as a sensory, phenomenological tool of research. Lyon
identifies three distinct ways of conducting rhythmanalysis through the body: instances where the
body is a >central tool of study, where the body is displaced (where the body ‘cannot directly
register rhythms’), and lastly, where the body is insufficient to record rhythms (that is, where other
methodological tools are required to capture and explain the pattern under investigation). Again,
Lyon draws from existing research to explore each of these approaches, while gleaning methodo-
logical insights for the reader and highlighting the limitations and gaps of the various approaches.
While Lyon recognizes the limitations of Lefebvre’s politics and approach in relation to post-
colonial and feminist perspectives, the volume does not explore the literature on the production of
gender, race, and class inequalities in relation to rhythmanalysis – perhaps because there is very
little research in this area. These lacunae are especially salient given the heavy focus on the body in
rhythmanalysis. Greater emphasis in this area would have been worthwhile. Lyon does argue,
however, that there are multiple possibilities for conducting rhythmanalysis research that bridges
these gaps, and believes such lines of investigation are possible and worthy. Moreover, the literature
on rhythmanalysis, especially the literature the Lyon draws upon, focuses primarily on the UK and,
to a lesser extent, western European context. Acknowledgement of and perhaps a commentary on
the UK- and Eurocentric nature of the literature (on what such a pattern reveals and excludes) would
have been valuable for readers as well.
Overall, What is Rhythmanalysis? will be a welcome resource for social and cultural geographers
as well as qualitative and mixed methods geography researchers, in a context where there are so
few methodology-focused rhythmanalysis resources available.
Emily Reid-Musson
Department of Geography and SafetyNet, Memorial University of Newfoundland,
St. John’s, Canada
ereidmusson@mun.ca
© 2019 Emily Reid-Musson
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1632059
Environmentalism as a political movement has long been characterized by its seriousness. In the
contemporary moment, we are told that impending apocalypse demands action from institutions
and individuals. The foreboding images of disappearing ice caps or flooded cities mandate affective
response. We are supposed to develop a love and reverence for capital-n Nature and
a mournfulness for its disappearance. Yet this purity politics also results in a sanctimonious petty
moralism, demanding that we change lightbulbs and use reusable bags. And these feel-good
actions can entail a self-righteous smugness and judgment of supposedly failed others (especially