Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fertilizer - 9M15 Offtake Update - Topline
Fertilizer - 9M15 Offtake Update - Topline
Fertilizer - 9M15 Offtake Update - Topline
Sector Research
Pakistan Fertilizer
Topline Securities (Private) Limited
508 Continental Trade Centre, 5th Floor
508,
Block-8, Clifton, Karachi, Pakistan
October 13, 2015 Tel: +9221-35303330-32
Fax: +9221-35303349
9M2015 urea sales down 3%, inventory at record high KSE 100 Index
34,183.85 +340.67
Pakistan’s total urea sales (local + imported) in Sep 2015 is likely to reach 200k
tons, down 52% YoY,, according to our channel checks. Sales of local urea Chemical Sector Capitalization
producers, in Sep 2015, may clock in at 151k tons – falling by 61% YoY. We Rs804.4bn
bn (US$7.7bn)
(US$
attribute this decline to farmers delayed buying decision on the back of likely cut in
urea prices.
To recall, as per media news on Oct 8, 2015, urea producers in a meeting with
Govt. officials agreed to reduce prices if Govt. gives concessions in gas prices.
Moreover, buyers were waiting for the farmer’s package announced by the Govt.
This delay in buying by farmers has resulted in significant inventory at Sep 2015
end. We estimate urea inventory at 686k tons – the highest level since Nov 2012.
Fertilizer Stocks: Earnings Estimates
In 9M2015, total urea sales (local + imported), which represents ~70% of the total
EPS 2014A 2015E 2016F
fertilizer sales in Pakistan, are likely to reach 3,965K tons – down 3% YoY. ENGRO 13.4 30.4 38.8
Urea sales of local players, in 9M2015, declined by 2% to 3,482k tons while EFERT 6.2 9.9 12.6
imported urea off-take is likely to clock-in
in at around 483k tons, down 11% YoY. FFC 14.3 14.5 15.1
FFBL 4.3 4.1 4.9
In Sep 2015, imported sales are expected at 49k tons which rose by 190% MoM as
FATIMA 4.3 4.7 5.4
domestic to international urea price discount (historically ~25
~25-30%) has almost Source: Company Account, Topline Research
disappeared.
Company wise break up reveals that all fertilizer companies in Sep 2015 posted a
decline in their urea off-takes in range of 58--92% YoY.
Engro Fertilizer (EFERT) urea sales is estimated at 65k tons in Sep 2015 versus
155k tons in Sep 2014 and 147k tons in Aug 2015 – down 58% YoY and 56%
MoM. In 9M2015, the company posted decline of 1 1.4% YoY to 1,303k tons.
In Sep 2015, urea off-taketake of Fauji Fertilizer (FFC) is estimated at 78k tons as
compared to 185k tons in Sep 2014 and 235 235k tons in Aug 2015. During 9M2015,
off-take
take of FFC is likely to decline by 3% YoY to 1,864
1,864k tons.
2014A
2016F
2017F
Source: NFDC, Topline Research
Page | 2
Pakistan Fertilizer Sector Research
Additionally, as per regulation 8(2)(i) of the Research Analyst Regulations, 2015, we currently do not have a financial interest in the
securities of the subject company aggregating more than 1% of the value of th
the company.
Rating System
Topline Securities employs three tier ratings system to rate a stock, as mentioned below, which is based upon the level of expected return
for a specific stock. The rating is based on the following with time horizon of 12
12-months.
For sector rating, Topline Securities employs three tier ratings system, depending upon the sector’s proposed weight in the portfolio as
compared to sector’s weight in KSE-100 Index:
Ratings are updated daily to account for the latest developments in the economy/sector/company, changes in stock prices and changes in
analyst’s assumptions or a combination of any of these factors
factors.
Valuation Methodology
To arrive at our 12-months
months Target Price, Topline Securities uses different valuation methods which include: 1). Present value
methodology, 2). Multiplier methodology, and 3). Asset
Asset-based methodology.
Page | 3
Pakistan Fertilizer Sector Research
Disclaimer
This report has been preparedared by Topline Securities and is provided for information purposes only. Under no circumstances this is to be
used or considered as an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure that th the
information contained therein is not untruerue or misleading at the time of publication, we make no representation as to its accuracy or
completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. From time to time, Topline Securities and/or any of its officers or directors may, as
permitted by applicablele laws, have a position, or otherwise be interested in any transaction, in any securities directly or indirectly subject of
this report. This report is provided only for the information of professional advisers who are expected to make their own investment inv
decisions without undue reliance on this report. Investments in capital markets are subject to market risk and Topline Securities accepts no
responsibility whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from any use of this report or itsit contents. In particular, the
report takes no account of the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of investors, who should seek further
professional advice or rely upon their own judgment and acumen before making any investment. The views expressed in this report are
those of Topline Research Department and do not necessarily reflect those of Topline or its directors. Topline as a firm may have business
relationships, including investment‐banking
banking relationships, with the companies referred to in this report.
All rights reserved by Topline Securities. This report or any portion hereof may not be reproduced, distributed or published by
any person for any purpose whatsoever. Nor can it be sent to a third party without prior consent of Topline Securities. Action
could be taken for unauthorized reproduction, distribution or publication.
Page | 4