Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL TECHNICAL PAPER

Title No. 120-S38

Influence of Textile Reinforcement on Masonry Walls


Subjected to In-Plane Loads
by Nadia Tarifa, Zakaria Ilyes Djamaï, Frédéric Duprat, and Carole Soula

Masonry walls are particularly vulnerable to large shear forces popular3-5 due to their light weight and high mechanical
during earthquakes because of their low tensile strength and the performance (although also implying a high cost). However,
heterogeneity of their material. In this paper, experimental results FRPs are often not fully exploited despite their potential
are presented for four masonry walls reinforced with textile-reinforced when applied to low tensile and shear strength materials,
mortars (TRMs) and one unreinforced wall (URW) tested under
such as masonry. In addition to providing benefits, FRP mate-
quasi-static in-plane loading. These full-scale masonry walls were
rials suffer from the drawbacks of organic binders (epoxy
tested in the LMDC laboratory at the National Institute of Applied
Sciences (INSA) Toulouse. Clay bricks and lime mortar were used resins): sensitivity to high temperatures (the maximum
in a traditional construction technique to build the walls. The four service temperature must be lower than the glass transition
specimens were tested and damaged until failure. One of them was temperature of the resin), inconvenient application under wet
strengthened along its diagonals and the other three over their conditions (the resin must be applied to dry surfaces), envi-
entire surfaces. Displacements and crack patterns were monitored ronmental impact of the solid form (non-removability, for
using a network of sensors and a digital image correlation system. instance) and potential health risks to workers. Additionally,
A comparison of the experimental results determined whether TRM the lack of vapor permeability, which may cause condensa-
could efficiently reinforce masonry walls and increase their load- tion concerns in masonry, is likely another limitation.6
bearing capacity. The fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) or
An increase in peak load and cumulative energy, respectively,
textile-reinforced cementitious matrix (TRM or TRC)
was hence observed during the tests (140 kN and 3176 J for an
have overcome most of the limitations of FRPs (they are
unreinforced wall, and 343 kN and 13,303 J for one of the rein-
forced walls). These results provide valuable information about compatible with masonry substrates, easy to apply, resistant
masonry wall strengthening for architects, structural engineers, to fire, and fairly sustainable). These composite materials,
and the scientific community. which combine a fine-grained matrix with fabric reinforce-
ment, have been developed recently,7-9 and previous studies
Keywords: masonry; reinforcement; shear loads; textile-reinforced mortar have proven their effectiveness in strengthening masonry
(TRM). walls made of hollow masonry blocks that are subjected
to in-plane movements. The TRM strengthening method
INTRODUCTION helps increase the mechanical strength and ductility of the
In addition to its rich artistic, historical, and scientific heri- masonry structure.7-10
tage, monumental masonry is of interest because it is among TRM can be realized through different techniques which
the oldest building materials available. Masonry is used allow the alignment of the fibers to be controlled and achieve
throughout the world for its low cost, rapidity of construc- TRM with high fiber contents (up to 25% in volume11). The
tion, and insulation value. result is stable crack development and strain hardening with
A large percentage of the current built stock worldwide significant post-cracking stiffness and high tensile strength
consists of structures made of unreinforced masonry (URM). of the composite. Furthermore, the small diameter of the
This type of construction remains used despite competition fibers results in a very fine crack pattern.12
from other materials such as concrete and steel. As a result, this technique has gained considerable
However, traditional masonry buildings are prone to popularity as a retrofitting solution for masonry struc-
degradation and weakness due to the loads originating in the tures. Consequently, many structures have been effectively
bracing system whenever it is composed of masonry walls. strengthened with TRMs. However, most of this research
Such structures have a significant capacity to resist gravity has been conducted on modern or traditional masonry, and
loads, but are not designed to withstand horizontal loads.1,2 very few articles deal with the reinforcement of historical
A critical element in the failure of walls during catastrophic masonry. The few papers published on such constructions
earthquakes is the lack of shear capacity, which leads to focus on diagonal compression tests to prove the efficiency
out-of-plane failure as well as in-plane failure. Preserving of this technique. Castori et al.13 tested 12 full-size wall
heritage buildings as well as dwellings from such a type of
ruin remains a salient concern. ACI Structural Journal, V. 120, No. 2, March 2023.
MS No. S-2022-059.R6, doi: 10.14359/51737143, received July 11, 2022, and
An increasingly common method for upgrading masonry reviewed under Institute publication policies. Copyright © 2023, American Concrete
structures consists in using externally bonded composite Institute. All rights reserved, including the making of copies unless permission is
obtained from the copyright proprietors. Pertinent discussion including author’s
materials. Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) became closure, if any, will be published ten months from this journal’s date if the discussion
is received within four months of the paper’s print publication.

ACI Structural Journal/March 2023 191

You might also like