Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Teacher and The Community 123
The Teacher and The Community 123
The Teacher and The Community 123
refers to a bunch of people who are alike in some way, who feel some sense of belonging or
interpersonal connection (Simon, 2018).
5. According to the bibliography made by Neal (2012), community is a broad topic within sociology,
the social sciences generally, and offered the following explanations: First, a community is a
group of people who interact with one another, for example, as friends or neighbors. Second,
this interaction is typically viewed as occurring within a bounded geographic territory, such as a
neighborhood or city. Third, the community’s members often share common values, beliefs, or
behaviors.
According to Sociology Group (https://www.sociologygroup.com/community-meaning/), society
and community are two important concepts in sociology. However, they are often used interchangeably
in everyday life. Thus, it becomes important to differentiate the two from a sociological perspective.
School and education are also terms that are used interchangeably.
2. a discipline that is concerned with methods of teaching and learning in schools or school-like
environments. It can be thought of as the transmission of the values and accumulated
knowledge of a society. In this sense, it is equivalent to what social scientists term socialization
or enculturation. Children are born without culture. Education is designed to guide them in
learning a culture, molding their behavior in the ways of adulthood, and directing them toward
their eventual role in society (https://www.britannica.com/ topic/education).
3. the process that encompasses teaching and learning specific skills, and also something less
tangible but more profound: the imparting of knowledge, positive judgment and well-developed
wisdom. It has as one of its fundamental aspects the imparting of culture from generation to
generation, yet it more refers to the formal process of teaching and learning found in the school
environment (https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/ Education).
4. the fundamental method of social progress and reform. Tulio (2010) added this statement from
John Dewey that education has been traditionally thought of as a preparation: as learning,
acquiring certain things, because they will later be useful, that acquisition of skills, possession
of knowledge, attainment of culture are not ends: they are marks of growth and means to its
continuing.
5. a social institution that includes not only the effects of schooling but also the more pervasive
effects of child rearing practices, of parental life styles, of television, magazines and other
media of mass communication. It also encompasses the behavior, attitudes and values learned
from friends, the church, political parties, social groups, and work groups. It includes all the
experiences from which one learns and which bring about changes in him (Bustos and Espiritu,
1996).
6. A lifelong learning process, which needs thorough attention on how its policies work and affect
those who are being educated. It is considered as the foundation of society that helps in the
achievement of social prosperity, political constancy, and economic wealth (Serrano & Cajigal,
2020)
Based on the information presented, we can see that there exists a relationship among the four
terms. Let us look at this figure and find out how they relate to one another.
hopes, and aspirations of the existing social organization and the religious, economic, and political
forces – everything that makes up the total culture of a group, both spiritual and material.
According to Ornstein, et al. (2017), since the early 1980s, the school has come to be seen as
only one of several educational agencies within the community. Under this concept – called community
schools – the school serves as a partner, or coordinating agency in providing educational, health, social,
family support, recreational, and cultural activities to the community. Such concentrated efforts are
designed to not only increase student achievements but to also provide a safe and supportive
environment where the whole child can develop. As part of the community schools plan, schools share
their personnel and facilities with other community agencies or even businesses. In return, schools may
expect to share facilities, equipment, and personnel with other community agencies, local businesses,
and area universities.
According to Pawilen, et al. (2019), schools play an important role in the development of
individuals and societies. They are vital sources of knowledge and innovations, contributors to
economic development, agents of social and cultural development, and are warehouses of information.
They also develop the manpower needs of the society, developing the necessary skills, values, and
knowledge needed in everyday life particularly in the industry. Furthermore, schools are national and
regional symbols serving as repository of the people’s history and culture. In a nutshell, a school is a
dynamic social organization that develops every learner for various social roles.
Additionally, Serrano and Cajigal (2020) listed the following as some of the basic roles of
schools: (a) socialization and (b) preservation and promotion of culture. They also mentioned the roles
of schools listed by Khan Baba (2015) as follows: (a) transmission of cultural values, (b) social
agreeableness, (c) civic training, (d) promotion of democratic values, (e) development of abilities, (f)
fulfillment of national aims, (g) character building, and (h) propagation of civilization and culture. They
also stated the social roles of education identified by Mondal as follows: (a) development of
personality, (b) social control, (c) social integration, (d) determination of status, (e) provision of routes
for social mobility, and (f) social development.
Serrano & Cajigal (2020) likewise enumerated the multiple school functions as provided by
Cheng (1996):
1. Technical/economic functions which refer to the contribution of schools to the technical and
economic developments and needs of individuals, the institution, the local community, the society, and
the international community.
2. Human/social functions which refer to the contribution of schools to human developments
and social relationships at different levels of the society.
3. Political functions which refer to the contribution of schools to the political developments at
different levels of society.
4. Cultural functions which refer to the contributions of schools to the cultural transmission and
developments at different levels of society.
5. Education functions which refer to the contribution of schools to the development and
maintenance of education at different levels of society.
From these statements, we can conclude that the society and the community are connected
with the school and thereby, education. The political, social, cultural, economic, technological, and
environmental conditions of the society and the community serve as the foundations in the planning of
the curriculum and affect the curriculum design that is taught in school. Whatever lessons in the
cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains are taught to children in schools, they will bring back to
their own communities and society. Likewise, whatever experiences and learnings they got from their
own families, neighborhood and community will affect how they behave and learn in their schools.
It is also important for the teachers to know the basic social institutions that are present in any
society. According to essaycorp.com, these social institutions are the establishments in a society that
make the society function. They work as the backbone of that society. They include politics
(government), economy (economics), education (schools), family, and religion. Serrano and Cajigal
(2020) added health while Tulio (2010) added recreation in the list. These institutions provide the
needed rules and norms that people have to follow in order to maintain peace, order, harmony and
prosperity in the society.
Since the school (education) and the community (society) are connected, it is important for the
school and the community to build a partnership in the business of educating the young (Lozada, n.d.).
The same author mentioned that in school-community partnership, it is the schools that should initiate
the relationship, nurture it, and see to its sustainability.
Bilbao et al. (2015) emphasized that the school and the community are the mainsprings of
effective and powerful forces that can create a wholesome climate for mutual gains and betterment.
They can forge a kind of partnership where both are willing to share information as well as
responsibilities to the best interest of the children while in school, likewise when dealing with members
of the community. Ensuring a strong alliance between the school and the community is guaranteed to
foster sound academic practices in the school, as well as civic-mindedness and public accountability in
the community. They concluded by saying that a favorable partnership between the school and the
community will yield a bountiful harvest by way of establishing a conducive environment in the school
and an orderly and civic-minded citizenry in the community.
In relation, Prieto et al. (2019) stated that school and community partnership means the
working together of school heads, teachers, learners, non-teaching personnel and parents of learners
with civic and religious leaders, alumni, other parents, non-government organizations, and government
organizations for the good of children.
Knowing this relationship, what now is the role of the teachers in the community? Can they be
considered as change agents? Can they establish relevant and responsive learning environments inside
and outside the school?
Tozer et al. (2009) mentioned that teachers need to know the background information about
school-community relationships to help them contextualize classroom events and thereby, enable them
better to understand and adjust their teaching practices.
As Pawilen et al. (2019) emphasized, the school curriculum and all educational programs need
to evolve with the different changes and challenges happening in the society.
Since the teachers are the frontliners in the implementation of the curriculum, they are tasked to
prepare their students for the transitions brought about by the changing conditions in the community
and society. This covers adjustments in content, teaching strategies and evaluation procedures. The
teachers are then challenged to establish relevant and responsive learning environments inside and
outside the school.
As a salient feature of the K to 12 Program, the curriculum should be made relevant to the
learners. This can be done through contextualization and localization (www. deped.gov. ph). According
to Tinong (2018), contextualization is the process of presenting lesson in meaningful and relevant
context based on previous experiences and real-life situations. On the other hand, localization is the
process of adapting and relating the content of the curriculum and the process of teaching and learning
to local condition, environment, and resources. Both adhere in making the lesson flexible, fit, creative,
relevant, meaningful, and adaptive to students’ level of understanding and instructional needs. The
concept of localization and contextualization falls on the idea that students learned best when
experiences in the classroom have meanings and relevance in their lives. If students were put in an
actual learning environment, letting them to manipulate, relate, and adapt to various learning
opportunities and resources available within the locality or community, profound learning will be
assured and realized. It helps teachers and students comprehend concepts by relating and presenting
lesson on the context of prevailing local environment, culture, and resources. Hence, lessons are
becoming more real-life, customized, and appropriate. Through the use of contextualization and
localization, the teachers can establish relevant and responsive learning environments where their
students can maximize their learning in the classrooms and can apply these learnings in situations
outside of the school.
These changes turn today’s society into a V.U.C.A. world, a world of volatility, uncertainty,
complexity, and ambiguity. Kraaijenbrink (2018) gave the following discussion:
1. Volatility refers to the speed of change in an industry, market or the world in general. It is
associated with fluctuations in demand, turbulence and short time to markets and it is
well-documented in the literature on industry dynamism. The more volatile the world is, the more and
faster things change.
2. Uncertainty refers to the extent to which we can confidently predict the future. Part of
uncertainty is perceived and associated with people’s inability to understand what is going on.
Uncertainty, though, is also a more objective characteristic of an environment. Truly uncertain
environments are those that don’t allow any prediction, also not on a statistical basis. The more
uncertain the world is, the harder it is to predict.
3. Complexity refers to the number of factors that we need to take into account, their variety and
the relationships between them. The more factors, the greater their variety and the more they are
interconnected, the more complex an environment is. Under high complexity, it is impossible to fully
analyze the environment and come to rational conclusions. The more complex the world is, the harder it
is to analyze.
4. Ambiguity refers to a lack of clarity about how to interpret something. A situation is
ambiguous, for example, when information is incomplete, contradicting or too inaccurate to draw clear
6
conclusions. More generally, it refers to fuzziness and vagueness in ideas and terminology. The more
ambiguous the world is, the harder it is to interpret.
COMPLEXITY
Characteristics: The situation has many interconnected parts and variables. Some information is
available or can be predicted, but the volume or nature of it can be overwhelming to process.
Example: You are doing business in many countries, all with unique regulatory environments, tariffs,
and cultural values.
Approach: Restructure, bring on or develop specialists, and build up resources adequate to address the
complexity.
VOLATILITY
Characteristics: The challenge is unexpected or unstable and may be of unknown duration, but it's not
necessarily hard to understand; knowledge about it is often available.
Example: Prices fluctuate after a natural disaster takes a supplier off-line.
Approach: Build in slack and devote resources to preparedness-for instance, stockpile inventory or
overbuy talent. These steps are typically expensive; your investment should match the risk.
AMBIGUITY
Characteristics: Causal relationships are completely unclear. No precedents exist; you face "unknown
unknowns."
Example: You decide to move into immature or emerging markets or to launch products outside your
core competencies.
Approach: Experiment. Understanding cause and effect requires generating hypotheses and testing
them. Design your experiments so that lessons learned can be broadly applied.
UNCERTAINTY
Characteristics: Despite a lack of other information, the event's basic cause and effect are known.
Change is possible but not a given.
Example: A competitor's pending product launch muddies the future of the business and the market.
Approach: Invest in information-collect, interpret, and share it. This works best in conjunction with
structural changes, such as adding information analysis networks, that can reduce ongoing uncertainty.
These challenges that are present in today’s society can be related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution or
Industry 4.0 which has begun adding more fire to the already volatile, uncertain, complex and
ambiguous world and impacting our lives, our relationships, as well as the future of our job (Vyas,
2021).
This necessitates a change in the way education is delivered. Vyas (2021) added that lectures and
memorization (Education 1.0), internet-enabled learning (Education 2.0), and knowledge-based
education (Education 3.0) are not enough. It’s time to focus on innovation- based education or
Education 4.0 which is relevant to Industry 4.0 and can transform the future of education by using
advanced technology and automation. James (2019) added that Education 4.0 is a desired approach to
learning that aligns itself with the emerging fourth industrial revolution which focuses on smart
technology, artificial intelligence, and robotics, all of which now impact our everyday lives.
In order for the schools to respond to the demands of society brought about by Industry 4.0, Vyas
(2021) stated that the curriculum and learning outcomes should focus on complex 21st century skills
as follows: (a) problem-solving, (b) critical thinking, (c) creativity, (d) people management, (e) teamwork
and collaboration, (f) emotional intelligence, (g) judgment and decision-making, (h) service orientation,
(i) negotiation, and (j) cognitive flexibility. This means building a technology-rich curriculum and
transforming the learning approach to better the student experience.
● Ability to translate vast amounts of data into abstract concepts and to understand data based
reasoning
■ The Drivers: New media ecology, Computational world
New Media Literacy
● Ability to critically assess and develop content that uses new media forms, and to leverage
these media for persuasive communication
■ The Drivers: Extreme longevity, New media ecology, Superstructed organizations
Transdisciplinary
● Literacy in and ability to understand concepts across multiple disciplines
■ The Drivers: Extreme longevity, Computational world
Design Mindset
● Ability to represent and develop tasks and work processes for desired outcomes
■ The Drivers: Superstructed organizations, Computational world
Cognitive load management
● Ability to discriminate and filter information for importance, and to understand how to
maximize cognitive functions
■ The Drivers: Superstructed organizations, Computational world, New media ecology
Virtual collaboration
● Ability to work productively, drive engagement, and demonstrate presence as a member of a
virtual team
■ The Drivers: Superstructed organizations, Globally connected world
In our country, the government has made several attempts to continuously respond to the
demands of the society through the educational system. It has assigned committees to do evaluation
studies, introduce reform packages, and implement development projects. This was done by the
government to improve the educational system and make education relevant and responsive to the
people’s needs and situations. In this way, it can accelerate social progress, and promote total human
liberation and development (Art. II, Sec 17, 1987 Philippine Constitution).
Through the following reforms, changes were made in the structure of the education agencies,
increase was made in the budget for education, teachers were professionalized, teacher salaries were
improved, school buildings were constructed, learning materials were printed, several education laws
and policies were enacted, and many others.
However, despite the efforts of the government to bring about positive changes in our school system,
the question of educational quality still remains.
• How do our students perform in national and international examinations?
• Why is there a mismatch between the graduates produced in schools and the manpower
needs of the country?
• Are we producing graduates who are at par with their counterparts around the globe?
• What is the employment, underemployment and unemployment rate in the country?
• Why does the poverty rate in the country remain very high?
• Why do we still remain as a third world country in spite of our high literacy rate?
• Why is there an inverse relationship between our literacy rate and our economic growth?
These are the questions that have to be answered whenever the education sector initiates a reform.
10
Good reading material for this is the discussion paper presented by Bautista et al. (2009) to the
Human Development Network entitled ‘When Reforms Don’t Transform: Reflections on institutional
reforms in the Department of Education.’
As future teachers, the reforms that you need to understand well are the curricular innovations
in basic education embodied in two Republic Acts.
The two-track method (storytelling and reading, listening story, oral communication activities);
➔ - Interactive strategies;
➔ - Use of manipulative games; and
➔ - Experiential, small group discussions and Total Physical Response (TPR) among others.
The learning development materials shall consist of the following at the minimum:
➔ Listening story. A story written by the teacher, in relation to the theme, that is read aloud
for story appreciation and understanding; -
➔ Small books. Story books which provide opportunities for an individual child to look at
pictures, browse, and read independently, which are the crucial steps in a child’s journey
to early and lifelong literacy;
➔ Big books. Story books intended for group or shared reading with the teacher for
teaching children to focus or pay attention and enhance their listening and
comprehension skills while in a group;
➔ Experience story. A story written by the teacher based on the experiences of the children;
➔ Primer lessons. Structured and frequency-based lessons using the mother tongue’s
orthography; and
➔ Lesson exemplars. Sample lessons in the mother tongue using the two-track method.
d. Conceive, develop and extend a continuing professional development program for kindergarten
teachers to ensure constant updating of their knowledge in current trends, pedagogy,
methodologies and concepts on kindergarten education;
e. Prescribe the necessary qualifications for the hiring and accreditation of teachers who will
handle the kindergarten classes;
f. Exercise authority over the operation of private kindergarten institutions;
g. Supervise the establishment of various venues for early childhood education specifically
kindergarten which may be institution-based, home-based, hospital-based or community-based,
and which shall be duly accredited by the DepEd; and
h. Introduce innovative programs in kindergarten that shall include educational technologies,
whenever applicable.
DepEd Order 32, s. 2012 contains the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of RA10157
and DepEd Order 47, s. 2016 is the Omnibus Policy on Kindergarten Education.
12
(a) Give every student an opportunity to receive quality education that is globally competitive
based on a pedagogically sound curriculum that is at par with international standards;
(b) Broaden the goals of high school education for college preparation, vocational and technical
career opportunities as well as creative arts, sports and entrepreneurial employment in a rapidly
changing and increasingly globalized environment; and
(c) Make education learner- oriented and responsive to the needs, cognitive and cultural capacity,
the circumstances and diversity of learners, schools and communities through the appropriate
languages of teaching and learning, including mother tongue as a learning resource.
Section 3. Basic Education
Basic education is intended to meet basic learning needs which provides the foundation on
which subsequent learning can be based. It encompasses kindergarten, elementary and secondary
education as well as alternative learning systems for out-of-school learners and those with special
needs.
Section 4. Enhanced Basic Education Program
The enhanced basic education program encompasses at least one (1) year of kindergarten education,
six (6) years of elementary education, and six (6) years of secondary education, in that sequence.
Secondary education includes four (4) years of junior high school and two (2) years of senior high
school education.
Kindergarten education shall mean one (1) year of preparatory education for children at least five (5)
years old as a prerequisite for Grade I.
Elementary education refers to the second stage of compulsory basic education which is composed of
six (6) years. The entrant age to this level is typically six (6) years old.
Secondary education refers to the third stage of compulsory basic education. It consists of four (4)
years of junior high school education and two (2) years of senior high school education. The entrant
age to the junior and senior high school levels are typically 12 and 16 years old, respectively.
Basic education shall be delivered in languages understood by the learners as the language
plays a strategic role in shaping the formative years of learners.
For kindergarten and the first three years of elementary education, instruction, teaching
materials, and assessment shall be in the regional or native language of the learners. The DepEd shall
formulate a mother tongue language transition program from Grade 4 to Grade 6 so that Filipino and
English shall be gradually introduced as languages of instruction until such time when these two
languages can become the primary languages of instruction at the secondary level.
13
(PRC), the private and public schools associations, the national student organizations, the national
teacher organizations, the parents-teachers associations and the chambers of commerce on matters
affecting the concerned stakeholders.
To achieve an effective enhanced basic education curriculum, the DepEd shall undertake
consultations with other national government agencies and other stakeholders including, but not
limited to, the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), the Professional Regulation Commission
(PRC), the private and public schools associations, the national student organizations, the national
teacher organizations, the parents-teachers associations and the chambers of commerce on matters
affecting the concerned stakeholders.
The DepED shall adhere to the following standards and principles in developing the enhanced basic
education curriculum:
(a) The curriculum shall be learner- centered, inclusive and developmentally appropriate;
(b) The curriculum shall be relevant, responsive and research-based;
(c) The curriculum shall be culture-sensitive;
(d) The curriculum shall be contextualized and global;
(e) The curriculum shall use pedagogical approaches that are constructivist, inquiry-based,
reflective, collaborative and integrative;
(f) The curriculum shall adhere to the principles and framework of Mother Tongue-Based
Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) which starts from where the learners are and from what they
already knew proceeding from the known to the unknown; instructional materials and capable
teachers to implement the MTB-MLE curriculum shall be available;
(g) The curriculum shall use the spiral progression approach to ensure mastery of knowledge and
skills after each level; and
(h) The curriculum shall be flexible enough to enable and allow schools to localize, indigenize and
enhance the same based on their respective educational and social contexts. The production
and development of locally produced teaching materials shall be encouraged and approval of
these materials shall devolve to the regional and division education units.
Section 6. Curriculum Consultative Committee
There shall be created a curriculum consultative committee chaired by the DepED Secretary or
his/her duly authorized representative and with members composed of, but not limited to, a
representative each from the CHED, the TESDA, the DOLE, the PRC, the Department of Science and
Technology (DOST), and a representative from the business chambers such as the Information
Technology – Business Process Outsourcing (IT-BPO) industry association. The consultative committee
shall oversee the review and evaluation on the implementation of the basic education curriculum and
may recommend to the DepEd the formulation of necessary refinements in the curriculum.
14
Section 8. Hiring of Graduates of Science, Mathematics, Statistics, Engineering and Other Specialists
in Subjects with a Shortage of Qualified Applicants, Technical-Vocational Courses and Higher Education
Institution Faculty
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 26, 27 and 28 of Republic Act No. 7836, otherwise known
as the “Philippine Teachers Professionalization Act of 1994”, the DepEd and private education
institutions shall hire, as may be relevant to the particular subject:
(a) Graduates of science, mathematics, statistics, engineering, music and other degree courses
with shortages in qualified Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) applicants to teach in their
specialized subjects in the elementary and secondary education. Qualified LET applicants shall
also include graduates admitted by foundations duly recognized for their expertise in the
education sector and who satisfactorily complete the requirements set by these organizations:
Provided, that they pass the LET within five (5) years after their date of hiring: Provided, further,
that if such graduates are willing to teach on part-time basis, the provisions of LET shall no
longer be required;
(b) Graduates of technical- vocational courses to teach in their specialized subjects in the
secondary education: Provided, that these graduates possess the necessary certification issued
by the TESDA: Provided, further, that they undergo appropriate in-service training to be
administered by the DepEd or higher education institutions (HEIs) at the expense of DepEd;
(c) Faculty of HEIs be allowed to teach in their general education or subject specialties in the
secondary education: Provided, that the faculty must be a holder of a relevant Bachelor’s degree,
and must have satisfactorily served as a full-time HEI faculty;
(d) The DepEd and private education institutions may hire practitioners, with expertise in the
specialized learning areas offered by the Basic Education Curriculum, to teach in the secondary
level; Provided, that they teach on part- time basis only. For this purpose, the DepEd, in
coordination with the appropriate government agencies, shall determine the necessary
qualification standards in hiring these experts.
Section 9. Career Guidance and Counselling Advocacy
To properly guide the students in choosing the career tracks that they intend to pursue, the
DepED, in coordination with the DOLE, the TESDA and the CHED, shall regularly conduct career
advocacy activities for secondary level students. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 27 of
Republic Act No. 9258, otherwise known as the “Guidance and Counselling Act of 2004”, career and
employment guidance counsellors, who are not registered and licensed guidance counsellors, shall be
allowed to conduct career advocacy activities to secondary level students of the school where they are
currently employed; Provided, that they undergo a training program to be developed or accredited by the
DepEd.
15
The Secretary of Education shall include in the Department’s program the operationalization of the
enhanced basic education program, the initial funding of which shall be charged against the current
appropriations of the DepEd. Thereafter, the amount necessary for the continued implementation of the
enhanced basic education program shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act.
To manage the initial implementation of the enhanced basic education program and mitigate
the expected multi-year low enrolment turnout for HEIs and Technical Vocational Institutions (TVIs)
starting School Year 2016-2017, the DepED shall engage in partnerships with HEIs and TVIs for the
utilization of the latter’s human and physical resources. Moreover, the DepED, the CHED, the TESDA,
the TVIs and the HEIs shall coordinate closely with one another to implement strategies that ensure the
academic, physical, financial, and human resource capabilities of HEIs and TVIs to provide
educational and training services for graduates of the enhanced basic education program to ensure
that they are not adversely affected. The faculty of HEIs and TVIs allowed to teach students of
secondary education under Section 8 hereof, shall be given priority in hiring for the duration of the
transition period. For this purpose, the transition period shall be provided for in the implementing rules
and regulations (IRR).
Section 13. Joint Congressional Oversight Committee on the Enhanced Basic Educational Program (K
to 12 Program)
Section 14. Mandatory Evaluation and Review
By the end of School Year 2014-2015, the DepEd shall conduct a mandatory review and submit a
midterm report to Congress as to the status of implementation of the K to 12 program in terms of
closing the following current shortages: (a) teachers; (b) classrooms; (c) textbooks; (d) seats; (e)
toilets; and (f) other shortages that should be addressed.
The DepEd shall include among others, in this midterm report, the following key metrics of
access to and quality of basic education:
(a) participation rate;
(b) retention rate;
(c) National Achievement Test results;
(d) completion rate;
(e) teachers’ welfare and training profiles;
(f) adequacy of funding requirements; and
(g) other learning facilities including, but not limited to, computer and science laboratories,
libraries and library hubs, and sports, music and arts.
DepEd Order 43, s. 2013 provides the IRR of RA10533 and DepEd Order 21, s. 2019 contains the Policy
Guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
16
The additional information collated from the K to 12 Toolkit 2012 produced by SEAMEO and
INNOTECH, the DepEd website, and other write-ups on K to 12 is presented here:
● Bases of the K to 12 Implementation
- Insufficient mastery of basic competencies due to congested curriculum
- The Philippines remains to be the only country in Asia with a 10-year basic education
curriculum.
- Bologna Accord and Washington Accord affect the practice of the profession of Filipino
professionals abroad since they require 12 years of basic education before university education.
17
d. Focus on integrated instruction to equip learners with skills for future employment, critical and
creative thinking and life skills
e. Universalize kindergarten by 2012
f. Institutionalize school-based management for school empowerment
g. Institute reform in assessment framework and practice for a learner-centered basic education
h. Address basic input shortages in classrooms, teachers and textbooks
i. Promote good education governance in the entire DepEd
j. Pursue legislation to institutionalize K to 12 Basic Education Program
k. Formulate transition management plan for the K to 12 implementation by including modelling
per region per specialization
l. Identify K to 12 model schools per region and per specialization tracks that will model senior
high school by SY 2012-2013
● Curricular Years
a. Kindergarten education – one year (for 5-year old children, pre-requisite for Grade 1)
18
● Curricular Content
○ Kindergarten: Central to the kindergarten curriculum is the child who is envisioned to be
prepared for life. It is anchored on the developmental practices and leading early
childhood education principles and approaches. The subjects are anchored on the six
developmental domains, namely:
■ character/values development – Values Education
■ physical health and motor development – Physical Education and Health
■ social and emotional development – Social Studies
■ cognitive/intellectual development – Science and Mathematics
■ creative/aesthetic development – Music and Arts
■ language literacy and communication – Language
○ Grades 1 to 10: Mother Tongue (Grades 1, 2, 3), Filipino, English, Mathematics, Science,
Araling Panlipunan, Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (EsP), Music, Arts, PE and Health
(MAPEH), Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP)/ Technology and Livelihood
Education (TLE) (Agro-fishery arts, home economics, information and communication
technology, industrial arts)
○ Senior High School:
■ Core Curriculum subjects – 15 subjects (Oral Communication, Reading and
Writing, Komunikasyon at Pananaliksik sa Wika at Kulturang Filipino, Pagbasa at
Pagsusuri ng Iba’t Ibang Teksto Tungo sa Pananaliksik, 21st Century Literature
from the Philippines and the World, Contemporary Philippine Arts from the
Regions, Media and Information Literacy, General Mathematics, Statistics and
Probability, Earth and Life Sciences/Earth Science for STEM, Physical
Science/Disaster Readiness and Risk Reduction for STEM, Personal
Development, Understanding Society and Culture, Introduction to Philosophy of
the Human Person, PE and Health);
■ Applied Track subjects – 7 subjects (English for Academic and Professional
■ Purposes, Practical Research 1 (Quantitative Research), Practical Research 2
(Qualitative Research), Filipino sa Tanging/Piling Larangan, Empowerment
Technologies, Entrepreneurship, Inquiries/ Investigations/Immersion);
■ Specialized subjects – 9 subjects for the academic track (STRANDS: STEM,
HUMSS, ABM, GAS, Pre-baccalaureate Maritime), sports track, and arts and
design track; and 640 hours for tech-voc track.
19
20
➔ Curriculum must be arranged according to their contribution to human survival and progress.
➔ Science and other subjects that sustained human life and prosperity should have curricular
priority since they aid in the performance of life activities.
➔ Individual competition leads to social progress. He who is fittest survives.
Implications
➔ To survive in a complex world, we should have specialized education over that of general
education. We are in need of social engineers who can combine harmoniously the findings of
specialized knowledge.
➔ The expert who concentrates on a limited field is useful but he should not lose sight of the
interdependence of things.
➔ Competition should be promoted in schools.
[Utilitarianism is an effort to provide an answer to the practical question “What ought a person to do?”
The answer is that a person ought to act so as to produce the best consequences possible.
(https://www.britannica.com/topic/ utilitarianism-philosophy)]
22
➔ Education and literacy are the vehicles for social change. Humans must learn to resist
oppression and not become its victims, nor oppress others. To do so requires dialogue and
critical consciousness, the development of awareness to overcome domination and oppression.
➔ Teaching and learning must be a process of inquiry in which the child must invent and re-invent
the world.
➔ Teachers must not see themselves as the sole possessors of knowledge and their students as
empty receptacles. This banking method of education must not be done.
➔ A democratic relationship between the teacher and the students is necessary in order for the
conscientization process to take place.
➔ His critical pedagogy is problem-posing education.
➔ A central element of this pedagogy is dialogue, which means the presence of equality, mutual
recognition, affirmation of people, a sense of solidarity with people, and remaining open to
questions.
➔ Dialogue is the basis for critical and problem-posing pedagogy, as opposed to banking
education, where there is no discussion, only the imposition of the teacher’s ideas on the
students.
Implications
➔ Critical pedagogy and dialogue should be employed in schools.
➔ There is a need to interact with others and create a ‘community of inquiry’ where a group of
persons is involved in inquiry, investigating more or less the same question or problem, and
developing through their exchanges a better understanding both of the questions as well as the
probable solutions.
➔ A community of inquiry will engage learners in active problem solving.
➔ Learners are not empty receptacles to be filled.
[Critical pedagogy, a system proposed by Freire, has been considered today to be the new path of
pedagogy, one in which the two parties involved are invited to build society from the awareness of
social problems, which they live daily and they directly and indirectly affect the classrooms.
(http://www.radioenciclopedia.cu/cultural-news/exclusive/paulo-freire-and-critical-pedagogy-201705
15/)]
Structural-Functional Theory
Herbert Spencer, a proponent of this theory, viewed society as a system of interconnected parts, each
with a unique function. The parts have to work together for stability and balance of society.
● The different but interrelated components of society – family, government, church, school, mass
media, economy – must coordinate and collaborate for society to function well.
● This theory focuses on how education can serve the need of society through the development
of skills encouraging social cohesion.
● The role of the schools is to prepare students for participation in the institutions of society.
23
● Education can yield social control through the transmission of core values. It can bring together
people from different backgrounds through its socializing functions. These can bring about
social stability and solidarity which are the focus of the functionalist theory.
● The purposes of schooling are:
○ Intellectual purpose – students’ acquisition of cognitive and inquiry skills
○ Political purpose – educate future citizens; promote patriotism; promote assimilation of
immigrants; ensure order, public civility and conformity to laws
○ Economic purpose – prepare students for later work roles; select and train the labor
force needed by society
○ Social purpose – promote a sense of social and moral responsibility; serve as a site for
the solution or resolution of social problems; supplement the efforts of other institutions
of socialization such as the family and the church
Conflict Theory
According to this theory, there are always two opposing sides in a conflict situation. People take sides
between maintaining the status quo and introducing change then arrive at an agreement.
● Conflict is the way to the establishment of a new society.
● Conflict theorists find potential conflict between groups where inequality exists – racial, gender,
religious, political, economic, etc. This constant competition between groups forms the basis for
the ever-changing nature of society.
● This theory emphasizes that education is not truly a social benefit or opportunity as seen by the
functionalists. It is a powerful means of maintaining power structures and creating a docile
work force for capitalism.
● The purpose of education is to maintain social inequality and to preserve the power of those
who dominate society and teach those in the working class to accept their position as a lower
class worker of society. This becomes the ‘hidden curriculum’ in schools. This ‘hidden
curriculum’ socializes young people into obedience and conformity for them to be developed as
docile workers.
24
➔ Teachers should teach their students how to send and receive messages correctly (using the
principles of linguistic philosophy), to be able to give the same meaning to the symbol, or run
the risk of misunderstanding.
The major sociological perspectives on education fall nicely into the functional, conflict, and symbolic
interactionist approaches (Ballantine & Hammack, 2012).Ballantine, J. H., & Hammack, F. M. (2012).
The sociology of education: A systematic analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Table
11.1 "Theory Snapshot" summarizes what these approaches say.
Functionalism Education serves several functions for society. These include (a)
socialization, (b) social integration, (c) social placement, and (d) social
and cultural innovation. Latent functions include child care, the
establishment of peer relationships, and lowering unemployment by
keeping high school students out of the full-time labor force. Problems
in the educational institution harm society because all these functions
cannot be completely fulfilled.
Conflict theory Education promotes social inequality through the use of tracking and
standardized testing and the impact of its “hidden curriculum.” Schools
differ widely in their funding and learning conditions, and this type of
inequality leads to learning disparities that reinforce social inequality.
25
A second function of education is social integration. For a society to work, functionalists say,
people must subscribe to a common set of beliefs and values. As we saw, the development of such
common views was a goal of the system of free, compulsory education that developed in the
nineteenth century. Thousands of immigrant children in the United States today are learning English, US
history, and other subjects that help prepare them for the workforce and integrate them into American
life.
A third function of education is social placement. Beginning in grade school, students are
identified by teachers and other school officials either as bright and motivated or as less bright and
even educationally challenged. Depending on how they are identified, children are taught at the level
that is thought to suit them best. In this way, they are presumably prepared for their later station in life.
Whether this process works as well as it should is an important issue, and we explore it further when
we discuss school tracking later in this chapter.
Social and cultural innovation is a fourth function of education. Our scientists cannot make
important scientific discoveries and our artists and thinkers cannot come up with great works of art,
poetry, and prose unless they have first been educated in the many subjects they need to know for their
chosen path.
Education also involves several latent functions, functions that are by-products of going to school and
receiving an education rather than a direct effect of the education itself. One of these is child care:
Once a child starts kindergarten and then first grade, for several hours a day the child is taken care of
for free. The establishment of peer relationships is another latent function of schooling. Most of us met
many of our friends while we were in school at whatever grade level, and some of those friendships
endure the rest of our lives. A final latent function of education is that it keeps millions of high school
26
students out of the full-time labor force. This fact keeps the unemployment rate lower than it would be
if they were in the labor force.
Because education serves so many manifest and latent functions for society, problems in schooling
ultimately harm society. For education to serve its many functions, various kinds of reforms are needed
to make our schools and the process of education as effective as possible.
Such tracking does have its advantages; it helps ensure that bright students learn as much as their
abilities allow them, and it helps ensure that slower students are not taught over their heads. But
conflict theorists say that tracking also helps perpetuate social inequality by locking students into
faster and lower tracks. Worse yet, several studies show that students’ social class and race and
ethnicity affect the track into which they are placed, even though their intellectual abilities and potential
should be the only things that matter: White, middle-class students are more likely to be tracked “up,”
while poorer students and students of color are more likely to be tracked “down.” Once they are tracked,
students learn more if they are tracked up and less if they are tracked down. The latter tend to lose
self-esteem and begin to think they have little academic ability and thus do worse in school because
they were tracked down. In this way, tracking is thought to be good for those tracked up and bad for
those tracked down. Conflict theorists thus say that tracking perpetuates social inequality based on
social class and race and ethnicity (Ansalone, 2010).Ansalone, G. (2010). Tracking: Educational
differentiation or defective strategy. Educational Research Quarterly, 34(2), 3–17.
Conflict theorists add that standardized tests are culturally biased and thus also help perpetuate social
inequality (Grodsky, Warren, & Felts, 2008).Grodsky, E., Warren, J. R., & Felts, E. (2008). Testing and
social stratification in American education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 385–404. According to
this criticism, these tests favor white, middle-class students whose socioeconomic status and other
aspects of their backgrounds have afforded them various experiences that help them answer questions
on the tests.
A third critique of conflict theory involves the quality of schools. As we will see later in this chapter, US
schools differ mightily in their resources, learning conditions, and other aspects, all of which affect how
much students can learn in them. Simply put, schools are unequal, and their very inequality helps
perpetuate inequality in the larger society. Children going to the worst schools in urban areas face many
more obstacles to their learning than those going to well-funded schools in suburban areas. Their lack
of learning helps ensure they remain trapped in poverty and its related problems.
27
In a fourth critique, conflict theorists say that schooling teaches a hidden curriculum, by which they
mean a set of values and beliefs that support the status quo, including the existing social hierarchy
(Booher-Jennings, 2008).Booher-Jennings, J. (2008). Learning to label: Socialisation, gender, and the
hidden curriculum of high-stakes testing. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29, 149–160.
Although no one plots this behind closed doors, our schoolchildren learn patriotic values and respect
for authority from the books they read and from various classroom activities.
A final critique is historical and concerns the rise of free, compulsory education during the nineteenth
century (Cole, 2008).Cole, M. (2008). Marxism and educational theory: Origins and issues. New York,
NY: Routledge. Because compulsory schooling began in part to prevent immigrants’ values from
corrupting “American” values, conflict theorists see its origins as smacking of ethnocentrism (the belief
that one’s own group is superior to another group). They also criticize its intention to teach workers the
skills they needed for the new industrial economy. Because most workers were very poor in this
economy, these critics say, compulsory education served the interests of the upper/capitalist class
much more than it served the interests of workers.
Other research in the symbolic interactionist tradition focuses on how teachers treat girls and boys.
Many studies find that teachers call on and praise boys more often (Jones & Dindia, 2004).Jones, S. M.,
& Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analystic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational
Research, 74, 443–471. Teachers do not do this consciously, but their behavior nonetheless sends an
implicit message to girls that math and science are not for them and that they are not suited to do well
in these subjects. This body of research has stimulated efforts to educate teachers about the ways in
28
which they may unwittingly send these messages and about strategies they could use to promote
greater interest and achievement by girls in math and science (Battey, Kafai, Nixon, & Kao, 2007).Battey,
D., Kafai, Y., Nixon, A. S., & Kao, L. L. (2007). Professional development for teachers on gender equity in
the sciences: Initiating the conversation. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 221–243.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
● According to the functional perspective, education helps socialize children and prepare them for
their eventual entrance into the larger society as adults.
● The conflict perspective emphasizes that education reinforces inequality in the larger society.
● The symbolic interactionist perspective focuses on social interaction in the classroom, on
school playgrounds, and at other school-related venues. Social interaction contributes to
gender-role socialization, and teachers’ expectations may affect their students’ performance.
29
Let us check if we can consider the school as a social system by examining this information from the
book of Hoy et al. (2013).
The idea of a social system can be applied to social organizations that are carefully and
deliberately planned or to those that emerge spontaneously. The school is a system of social
interaction; it is an organized whole comprising interacting personalities bound together in an organic
relationship. As a social system, the school is characterized by an interdependence of parts, a clearly
defined population, differentiation from its environment, a complex network of social relationships, and
its own unique culture.
Since the school has all of these characteristics, then it can be considered as a social system.
30
This figure presents the major elements, or subsystems, of a social system. Behavior in formal
organizations is influenced not only by structural and individual elements but also by cultural and
political elements as well as the technical core, which is the teaching and learning system.
● Structure is defined in terms of formal bureaucratic expectations, which are designed and
organized to fulfill the goals of the organization.
● The individual is viewed in terms of the needs, goals, beliefs, and cognitive understandings of
work roles; the individual provides the energy and capacity to achieve the organization’s goals.
● Culture is the shared work orientations of participants; it gives the organization special identity.
● Politics is the system of informal power relations that emerge to resist other systems of control.
● The technical core of the school is the teaching-learning system.
● Further, all the elements and interactions within the system are constrained by important forces
from both the technical core and the environment; the system is open. Finally, formal
organizations as social systems must solve the basic problems of adaptation, goal
achievement, integration, and latency if they are to survive and prosper.
31
Let us look at DLSU-D. What are its key elements as a social system? How do these elements affect the
overall impact of the university to its stakeholders?
We can say that indeed, a school like DLSU-D is a social system. As such, the systems model
can be used to evaluate the school. It is composed of input, process, and output. Under input, we
normally consider the vision-mission, goals, objectives and philosophy (VMGOP) of the school and the
kind of resources that it has – human (administrators, teachers, non-teaching staff, students), material
(school physical plant and facilities, equipment, furniture and all learning resources), and financial
(budget). Under process, we can consider the kind of teaching-learning process that happens in the
school, the strategies and methods used by the teachers in delivering the lesson and the kind of
learning experiences provided to the students. Under output, we generally look at the kind of graduates
the school produces and also consider the following data: students’ dropout and graduation rates and
achievements, teachers’ performance ratings, achievements, and turn-over rates, accreditation and
certifications received by the school from external agencies, feedbacks of the external stakeholders
(industry partners) on the on-the-job performance of the students, and the overall impact of the school
to the community. After considering all these things, the discrepancy between what is desired
(expected performance) and what is achieved (actual performance) is determined to serve as guide in
the improvement and /or revision of school practices and policies.
● Culture (pertains to shared values and behaviors of students, teachers, administration, and
non-teaching staff)
The school is an organization. It has its own system of governance influenced by a fixed
organizational structure or bureaucracy. In basic education, the Department of Education (DepEd)
determines the bureaucratic structure of schools from national, regional, division, district, and local
school levels, with the DepEd Secretary acting as the head of the whole bureaucracy supported by
Undersecretaries and Assistant Secretaries. The regional office is headed by the Regional Director
supported by different education supervisors. The division office is headed by the Schools Division
Superintendent and also supported by different education supervisors. The district level is headed by
the District Supervisor and supported by different education supervisors. The school level is headed by
a principal who serves as the chief administrative and academic officer of the school. Master teachers
and classroom teachers support the principal in accomplishing various tasks.
The school is a learning organization. Its main function is to help the students to learn and
develop knowledge, skills and values essential for every individual. Its main function is to implement
the curriculum prescribed by DepEd. Guided by the different principles and theories of teaching and
learning, the school carries this function to help mold the minds and character of students.
The school is a social organization. It aims to respond to the different changes and challenges
in the society brought by different social and natural forces. It plays an important role in shaping the
future of the society where it belongs. The school’s working mechanism has a strong effect not only on
the delivery of quality education but also on the development of human resources needed by the
society.
To model being a dynamic social organization, the school should aim to develop the following
characteristics:
- The school climate must be professional and friendly to all.
- There must be positive relationships among students, teachers, non-teaching staff,
administrators, and stakeholders.
- The classroom atmosphere must be mentally and emotionally engaging for learning.
- The teachers and the non-teaching staff receive support for professional and personal growth.
- The school must be efficient in managing its resources.
- There must be an efficient communication system among teachers, students, administrators,
non-teaching staff, parents, and other stakeholders.
- The school has a system to recognize good works and other achievements.
- There must be a strong school and home relationship.
- All members of the school community must be treated with respect.
-
The discussion of Pawilen et al. (2019) pointed to the fact that the school can be considered a
learning community, being a community itself and a learning organization. Being a learning community,
33
the school has the role of providing learning opportunities primarily to the students and then to the
other stakeholders of the school. Through the different trainings provided to the teachers,
administrators, and non-teaching staff, learning and professional growth become possible. Learning
sessions with the parents and the community people, like those related to literacy and livelihood, may
also be provided by the school.
The school is also associated with the term community of practice. But what is a community of
practice (CoP)? According to Edmonton Regional Learning Consortium (ERLC)
(https://www.communityofpractice.ca/background/what-is-a-community-of-practice/):
★ A community of practice (CoP) is a group of people who share a common concern, a set of
problems, or an interest in a topic and who come together to fulfill both individual and group
goals.
★ Communities of practice often focus on sharing best practices and creating new knowledge to
advance a domain of professional practice. Interaction on an ongoing basis is an important part
of this.
★ Many communities of practice rely on face-to-face meetings as well as web-based collaborative
environments to communicate, connect and conduct community activities.
34
Balderas (2019) mentioned that motivations for convening a community of practice are many,
but at the most fundamental level, a group of people come together driven by a shared learning need.
By engaging each other over time in collective learning, they develop a bond that in turn fuels the
production of resources to influence their own practices. The combination of a shared field/area of
expertise, community, and practice lie at the heart of a community of practice. She shared some
helpful steps towards creating a community of practice:
1) Articulate a clear, shared-learning need
2) Identify other people working towards a similar mission
3) Gather with one another, in person or virtually
4) Collectively create a shared vision, definition and set of norms for your community of practice
5) Be open to continuous improvement and evolving to meet the needs of your community
Another term associated with schools is learning action cell. This is commonly referred to in the
public schools as LAC or SLAC (school LAC) and is provided for in DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016.
According to this Order, the LAC is a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing
professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. It is a manifestation
of DepEd’s commitment to invest in the development of human potential, hence it fully supports the
continuing professional development of its teaching personnel based on the principle of lifelong
learning and the view of the teaching profession as one that “requires teachers’ expert knowledge and
specialized skills, acquired and maintained through rigorous and continuing study” (UNESCO, 1966).
Likewise, DepEd also recognizes that the quality of learning is greatly influenced by the quality
of teaching. Therefore, it is imperative for DepEd to hire good teachers and to support their
development in the teaching profession. Organizing professional learning communities will aid
teachers in the construction of new knowledge about instruction as well as in revising traditional beliefs
and assumptions about education, community, teaching, and learning (Little 2003) to suit the present
needs of learners.
Though there are professional development activities provided to the teachers, these are mostly
top-down processes wherein expert knowledge is shared or transferred. Examples of these are lectures
or workshops during cascaded or echoed teacher training and short-term courses. Other top-down
training programs are done over time such as scholarships, and distance learning programs. There are
fewer instances of bottom-up teacher professional development programs where colleagues study
content and pedagogies together, plan lessons collaboratively, and conduct action research as a group.
Examples of these are school-based learning action cells, teaching circles, communities of practice,
and lesson study.
As defined by DepEd, a Learning Action Cell (LAC) is a group of teachers who engage in
collaborative learning sessions to solve shared challenges encountered in the school facilitated by the
school head or a designated LAC Leader. LACs will become the school-based communities of practice
that are positive, caring, and safe spaces.
Key aspects of the process are ongoing collaborative learning or problem solving within a
shared domain of professional interest, self-directed learning, reflective practice leading to action and
self- evaluation, and collective competence.
35
LACs are the most cost-effective CPD process but may entail some expenses for meetings and
handouts. Funds for the LACs may be sourced from the school’s Maintenance and Other Operating
Expenses (MOOE), subject to its utilization guidelines. Other resources may be generated by the school
or schools divisions to support LACs as these endeavor to upgrade the quality of teaching and learning
in their respective schools.
In addition to the topics that the LAC members have identified and those enumerated above,
teachers should also find time to discuss how their community linkages can support the curriculum and
how the LAC sessions promote their own professional growth. Furthermore, emerging and urgent
issues or concerns affecting teaching and learning must be discussed during LAC sessions. These may
include school data such as school participation, attendance, completion and assessment, child-finding
activities, programs to be offered so as to include more learners in schools, results-based practices,
and technologies, and school successes. LAC sessions also cover DepEd thrusts and policies relevant
to the above-mentioned priority needs.
36
Please read DepEd Order No. 35. s. 2016 for the details on the LAC implementation.
Another term that is associated with schools and the teachers is professional learning
communities. Miller (2020) stated that professional learning communities (PLCs), which harness “an
ongoing process in which educators work collaboratively in recurring cycles of collective inquiry and
action research to achieve better results for the students they serve” are a common and proven practice
to promote teacher collaboration that increases student achievement. Further, he said that as a
learning team, PLCs should constantly engage in a cycle of learning: analyzing data, setting goals, and
learning individually and collaboratively, as well as implementing and adjusting practices to meet the
needs of all learners. This process allows teachers to try new teaching practices and discover what’s
working and what isn’t. PLCs should, therefore (a) determine common learning and assessments, (b)
make space for innovation, and (c) ensure that teams work effectively. He concluded that PLCs are the
lifeblood of innovation and risk taking in school. When structured well, they can be teams that
constantly learn together and work to discover what is best for students.
To Victoria State Government (n.d.), professional learning communities (PLCs) are an approach
to school improvement where groups of teachers work collaboratively at the school level to improve
student outcomes. PLC schools start from a simple idea: students learn more when their teachers work
together. Building a PLC is a proven way for schools to increase student learning by creating a culture
that is: (a) focused on continuous improvement by linking the learning needs of students with the
professional learning and practice of teachers, (b) committed to professionalism, and (c) fueled by
collaborative expertise
(https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/management/improvement/plc/Pages/default.asp
x).
8. Evidence driven: Effective professional learning and practice is evidence based and data driven.
9. System focus: The most effective school leaders contribute to the success of other schools.
10. Integrated regional support: Schools in improving systems are supported by teams of experts who
know the communities they work in.
Serviss (2021) described a PLC as a team of educators who share ideas to enhance their
teaching practice and create a learning environment where all students can reach their fullest potential.
Most PLCs operate within a school building or across a district. They can be organized by grade level,
content area or an entire teaching staff. She enumerated the following as the benefits of an active PLC:
1. PLCs allow educators opportunities to directly improve teaching and learning.
2. PLCs build stronger relationships between team members.
3. PLCs help teachers stay on top of new research and emerging technology tools for the
classroom.
4. PLCs help teachers reflect on ideas.
5.
If we want the PLC to really function well, we should be guided by these three crucial questions
that should drive the work of those within a PLC (DuFour (2004):
1. What do we want each student to learn?
2. How will we know when each student has learned it?
3. How will we respond when a student experiences difficulty in learning?
38