MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 1. Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of
Services and content within and
Pedagogy across curriculum
teaching areas.

Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Quality
Education of teaching
Services strategies that
enhance learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy skills.

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Quality
Education of teaching
Services strategies to
develop critical
and creative
thinking, as well
as other higher-
order thinking
skills.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Quality
Education Environment classroom
Services and Diversity structure to
of Learners engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in
meaningful
exploration, Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on
activities within a
range of physical
learning
environments.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed 1. Quality
Education learner behavior
Services constructively by
applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to
ensure learning-
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
focused Efficiency
environments.

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 1. Quality
Education differentiated,
Services developmentally
appropriate
learning
experiences to
address learners’
gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences. Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Quality
Education and Planning managed and
Services implemented
developmentally
sequenced
teaching and
learning
processes to
meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts. Efficiency

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Quality
collegial
discussions that
use teacher and
learner feedback
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
to enrich teaching Efficiency
practice.

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Quality
Education developed,
Services organized and
used appropriate
teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
address learning Efficiency
goals.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Quality
Education Assessment selected,
Services and organized and
Reporting used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Quality
Education evaluated learner
Services progress and
achievement
using learner
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
attainment data. Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 12. 1. Quality
Education Communicated
Services promptly and
clearly the
learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to
key stakeholders,
including Efficiency
parents/guardians
.

Timeliness
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 1. Quality
Education Growth and Personal
Services Professional philosophy of
Development teaching that is
learner centered
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Means of
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review Results
per KRA Verification Performance Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Efficiency

Timeliness

14. Set Quality

Professional
development
goals based on
the Proffessional
Standards for
Teachers.
Efficiency
Timeliness
15. Performed Quality
various related
works/activities
that contribute to
the teaching-
learning process.
Efficiency
Timeliness
Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority