Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEI-Training and Placement
DEI-Training and Placement
Contents
Vision
Objectives
Organization Structure
Placement Policy and
Guidelines Student’s Support
Activities at a glance
Career Opportunities &
Assistance
The Co-operative Education Model of DEI
Talk of the Industry
Internship Ratings & Feedback
MILAN
Industry Presence
Placements at Glance
Higher Studies
DEI Alumni Feedback
Future Plan of Action
A
n
n
e
x
u
r
e
(
N
I
R
F
D
a
t
a
)
To develop the
faculties of thinking,
analysis and
reasoning and a habit
of learning in
students in order to
enable them to
realize their
maximum potential.
To increase students’
general awareness
and knowledge.
Objectives
To prepare graduates/post
graduates/doctoral students for
future roles by continuous training,
mentoring and counseling and
developing relevant skills for
superior career.
Faculty
Conveners
All students
Phase 1 In case of
Once After hiring, during
Eligible Pre
selected for Letter of internship
Students for Phase 2 Placement
internship Intent and must
placement eligible Offer during
by any other adhere to
procedure students All students internship,
organization details must the It is
are equally can appear not placed a student
and interest be shared guidelines generally
exposed to in hiring till phase III can avail
for hiring a with the shared in advised not
orientation process for are eligible the PPO by
student is concerned Co-op to leave a
continuous an to apply for obtaining
expressed FTPC (if manual. job prior to
training internship campus prior
that student organization They must completing
through in placement approval
will not is in directly participate one year
curriculum organization drives from
appear for touch with in joint
on different campus or Faculty
campus the evaluation
skills off campus Training and
placement candidate by industry
(procedure Placement
drive post hiring) and faculty
next slide) Cell (FTPC)
mentors
Standard Placement Procedure Phase - I
PHASE-I: Orientation and Capacity
Building
Orientation with
Training and Continuous Training:
Placement Cell: Resume Writing
Possible Career Workshops
Admission Avenues Soft Skill Trainings
into the Technical Trainings
Course Analytical Tools
Quantitative Aptitude
Continuous Training
Training
through Academic
Work Based Training
Curriculum
(Practical Training
courses/
internships/major
Projects/Industry
Analysis Projects)
Standard Placement Procedure Phase - II
Formal
PHASE II: Internships
Placement for Internship
Inviting Organizations:
Through Formal
Invites/ Alumni Floating Available
Network/ Internshala Opportunities to
and other Students and Inviting
Government Portals/ Applications
Personal Referrals
Continuous Joint
Allocation of Evaluation of
Faculty Mentors Internship by
Industry and Faculty
Mentors
Feedback Visit by
Faculty Mentors
Assessment of
Facilitating Pre-
Pre- placement
Placement Offers
Opportunities
Standard Placement Procedure Phase -
IV
Organizing
Campus week
(Inviting Facilitating
Organization for Selection Facilitating On-
Participation) Procedure of Boarding of Placements /
Job Fairs Organizations Selected Feedback of
Off-Campus for Hiring Talent Candidates organisation
Drives
Student’s Support
Student’s • Internships
• Professional Courses
(B.Tech, BBA, Bsc.
Computer Science,
Mentoring
MILAN Training
Industrial Mock
Visits Sessions
Industry Campus
Interactions Drives
Visuals
Career Opportunities-
Entrepreneurship
Placement in Industry
Career Opportunities - Assistance
Strong
Alumni
Support
(MILAN and
meets) AADEIs ,
APAC and
IIPC
Assistance
Abroad
Job Fairs Internships
University
Co-Op MoUs
Internships-
-- Pre-
placement
Offers
The Co-operative Education Model of DEI
Pre-Internship
Faculty mentor selected and assigned to student
Student provided with necessary theoretical inputs required like technical skills,
project management, goal setting, communication skills, research methodology
Internship
Internship/Traning Coordinator Appointment
Alumni Mentor Appointment
Online weekly activity report.
Written monthly activity report
Visit of Co-op Faculty Coordinator to the internship location
Final evaluation of student by the Faculty/Industry mentor
Post-Internship
Project report submission, with comments from Internship/Training Coordinator
Presentation by students to reflect their accomplishments, experiences, learning and value
add to their growth
Co-op Feedback From Students(in %) 2017-2019
100.
75.
50.
25.
0.
Take initiatives Awrae of there Satisfied with People think Organization Employee have Clear defined
abilities Internship encourages proper goals and roles
better than employees who knowledge
location classroom display
leadership
qualities
Talk of the Industry…
Humility 94.28571429
66
Dignity Of Labour 97.14285714
68
Sinceriity 94.28571429
66
Honesty 100
70
Cooperation 97.14285714
68
Self less Service 91.42857143
64
Self-Reliance 85.71428571
60
Integrity 91.42857143
64
Hard working 94.28571429
66
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
In percent In numbers
Non Technical Attributes of Students 2017-2019
PROBLEM SOLVING 88
66
ORIGINALITY AND CREATIVITY 85.33333333
64
ABILITY TO WORK IN UNSTRUCTURED… 82.66666667
62
COMMUNICATION SKILLS- WRITING 85.33333333
64
COMMUNICATION SKILLS-ORAL 84
63
WILLINGNESS TO LEARN 90.66666667
68
RELATIONSHIP BUILDING WITH OTHERS 88
66
QUALITY OF WORK/RESEARCH 85.33333333
64
INITIATIVE FOR DATA COLLECTION 90.66666667
68
ATTITUDE/PASSION OBSERVED 96
72
0 20 40 60 80 100
In Percent In Number
Achievement Internshala
Number of Questions
Dimensions)
2 Evaluation 13 10
3 Curriculum 8 7
4 Resources 4 4
5.0 5 Library 5 5
2018 6 Infrastructure 6 6
7 Other Areas 13 6
2003 8 Values & Innovation 9 10
Total Questions 75 64
4.2798
4.3 4.1089 4.1665 4.1423
4.0154 4.062
3.9962 3.9 569 3.9079
3.7952 3.8614
3.7765 3.7319 3.6603 3.7023 3.6852
3.5842
3.4581
3.5
3.2578
2.8
2.0
ARTS COM ED ENG. SC. SSC. TC DIST.ED. OTHERs* WT. AVG
22
M.I.L.A.N (An Alumni Meet)
2013-14 Placed 42 52 25 50 15 12
Avg. Participation 84 80 40 70 40 35
% 50.00 65.00 62.50 71.42 37.50 34.28
Placed 48 52 29 40 24 23
2014-15 Avg. Participation 98 85 45 65 42 35
% 48.97 61.17 64.44 61.53 57.14 65.71
Placed 43 66 48 22 15 24
2015-16 Avg. Participation 102 95 60 65 38 52
% 42.15 69.47 80.00 33.84 39.47 46.15
Placed 46 104 43 14 18 17
2016-17 Avg. Participation 115 150 80 50 36 50
% 40.00 69.33 53.75 28.00 50.00 34.00
Placed 30 112 48 18 14 28
2017-18 Avg. Participation 128 148 88 70 60 52
% 23.43 75.67 54.54 25.71 23.33 53.84
Placements in 2013-14
placed participants %
90.
67.5
45.
22.5
0.
Education Engineering M.B.A. Arts Commerce Science
Placements in 2014-15
placed participants %
112.5
90.
67.5
45.
22.5
0.
Education Engineering M.B.A. Arts Commerce Science
Placements in 2015-16
placed participants %
110.
82.5
55.
27.5
0.
Education Engineering
M.B.A. Arts Commerce Science
Placements in 2016-17
placed participants %
160.
120.
80.
40.
0.
Education Engineering M.B.A. Arts Commerce Science
Placements in 2017-18
placed participants %
160.
120.
80.
40.
0.
Education Engineering M.B.A. Arts Commerce Science
Placements in 2013-18
57.14
37.5
39.47
61.53
71.42 50
33.84
23.3
48.87 42.15 25.71
28
50 23.43
65.7 46 40
53.8
34 34
80
62.5 64.4 53.7 54.5
900.
800. 762
700. 633
600. 577
500.
400.
300.
200.
100.
0.
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Feedback
Future Plan of Action
Strengthening Industry-Institute
Partnerships
DPS Nasik 1 3 3 3 3
DSCL, Kota 3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
Education Teacher,CEO
Office,Kishkwar,J&K,2015 1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2