PHILOSOPHY

December 15, 2022

 General meaning about Human Intersubjectivity

 Research about the three personalities of the Perspective about Human Intersubjectivity
a. Paul Ricoeur
b. Martin Buber
c. Emmanuel Levinas

1.) Human Intersubjectivity - The term "intersubjectivity" has also been used to describe the
commonsense, shared meanings that individuals create through their contacts with one another
and use as a daily tool to analyze various aspects of social and cultural life. If people possess
common sense, they will have a common understanding of what is going on. Additionally, shared
(or partially shared) divergences of meaning have been described using this phrase. Self-
presentation, lying, practical jokes, and social emotions, for instance, all involve partially shared
divergences of meaning rather than a shared description of the event. Because they are using two
separate definitions of the situation, someone who is lying is doing an intersubjective act.

2.) Paul Ricoeur

- Ricoeur rejects the idea that a self is a metaphysical entity; there is no entity, “the self,” there
is only selfhood. Selfhood is an intersubjectively constituted capacity for agency and self-
ascription that can be had by individual human beings. Paul Ricoeur was a notable French
philosopher of the 20th century who lived from 1913 to 2005. His work has been widely
translated and studied around the world. also According to Ricoeur, there is no such thing as
"the self" as a metaphysical entity; rather, there is simply selfhood. Individual humans can
possess selfhood, which is an intersubjectively constructed capacity for agency and self-
ascription.
Martin Buber
- From Jewish mysticism to social philosophy, biblical studies, religious phenomenology,
philosophical anthropology, education, politics, and art, Martin Buber (1878–1965) was a
prolific scholar, literary translator, and political activist. His writings were mostly in German
and Hebrew. Martin Buber additionally composed broadly on humanistic subjects, especially
as these impacted his philosophical worries. These writings, which have been collected here,
provide crucial insights into the human condition as it is reflected in culture and society. The
relationship between social interaction, or intersubjectivity, and the process of human
creativity is Buber's primary sociological focus. Buber tries to define the nature and
conditions of creativity, specifically the authentic intersubjective social relations that foster
creativity in culture and society. He tries to find conditions that are good for creativity, which
he thinks are present in all cultures to some extent but rarely reach full potential. Buber
believes that the crystallization of the common discourse that is necessary for maintaining a
society that is free, just, and open necessitates the combination of open dialogue between
humans and God.
Emmanuel Levinas
- The intellectual endeavor of Emmanuel Levinas (1905–1995) was to create a fundamental
philosophy. Levinas suggested that ethics should be thought of as the first philosophy, since
historically the first philosophy was either metaphysics or theology, only to be reconceived
by Heidegger as foundational ontology. But rather than formulating an ethical theory. Also
Levinas contends that an ethically sound intersubjective interaction can only exist when both
parties acknowledge the other's individuality (irreplaceability, irreducibility, and
unrepeatability). It can only be accomplished when there is no secret agenda between the I
and the Other.