Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Benefits of Pet S Ownership A Review Based On Health Perspectives - 1626185594
Benefits of Pet S Ownership A Review Based On Health Perspectives - 1626185594
net/publication/353211563
CITATIONS READS
5 8,776
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmed A. Khalifa on 13 July 2021.
Introduction
Although most pet owners feel joy and somebody for the sake of forming and
happiness as soon as they own a pet, maintain a relationship to achieve a sense of
regardless of their age, most of them are well-being [8]. Based on this attachment
unaware of the physical, mental, and health theory, many studies evaluated the ownership
benefits of owning a pet [1-3]. Many studies of pets as a way of achieving this theory's
started to evaluate scientifically the possible goals [9].
benefits of raising or owning a pet [2,4-7].
It had been shown that Pets, especially
Bowlby's attachment theory postulated that a interactive ones such as dogs and cats, can
human need to be attached and near to reduce stress, anxiety and alleviate depression
Khalifa AA | Volume 2; Issue 1 (2021) | Mapsci-JIMER-2(1)-020 | Review Article
Citation: Hussein SM, Soliman WS, Khalifa AA. Benefits of pets’ ownership, a review based on health perspectives. J Intern Med Emerg
Res. 2021;2(1):1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37191/Mapsci-2582-7367-2(1)-020
and loneliness [10,11]. It also encourages their the effects of pet ownership on various
owners to be more physically active and physical health aspects:
socially involved [12].
Reducing Systemic Hypertension
What is called the 'magic effect' of owning a
In an Australian study, Anderson et al.
pet is being explained by the ability to reduce
including 5741 individuals visiting a free
stresses and relieving anxiety through the
screening clinic; although there was no
security sense by the pet presence in a
difference regarding the BMI or
household, even the daily caring routines
socioeconomic status, however, the authors
such as walking them, feeding them, and
found that individuals who reported having a
cleaning them could significantly boost your
pet had a significant (P=0.03) lower systolic
mood when we mention "pet," it should not
blood pressures (SBP) than individuals who
be necessarily a cat or dog, even watching a
do not have a pet [3].
fish swimming in an aquarium can reduce
muscle tension and decrease the heart rate Another study by Wright et al. including 1179
[13]. subjects to evaluate the relationship between
pet ownership and the presence of elevated
On the contrary, some reported owning a pet
systolic blood pressure, the authors found
could carry some disadvantages and risks,
lower values in pet owners (132.8 versus 139.5
starting from being a source of disease
mm Hg), lower pulse pressure (55.5 versus
transmission, especially parasitic organisms
63.9 mm Hg), and lower mean arterial
[14,15].
pressure (105.0 versus 107.6 mm Hg) than
If certain animal species are kept under less nonowners [18].
optimum conditions, they can pose a physical
Lowering Hyperlipidemia
danger to the people around them [14]. The
economic burden on the pet’s owners, owing In the previous study by Anderson et al., the
to special foods and veterinary care [16]. authors found that male dog owners had
Furthermore, the possible negative significantly lower total cholesterol (201
psychological impact of losing a pet [17]. versus 206 mg/dL; P=0.02) and triglyceride
(108 versus 125 mg/dL; P=0.01) levels than
In this review, we aimed at shedding some
nonowners [3]. In a cross-sectional study by
light on the possible physical and mental
Dembicki and Anderson, including 32 adults
health benefits of owning and raising a pet.
≥60 years, the authors reported significantly
How can pets impact your health? lower triglyceride levels in pet owners than
nonowners (109 versus 192 mg/dL;P<0.01)
Impact on Physical Health
[19].
Some studies showed that pet ownership
Promoting Physical Activity:
might have some cardiovascular health
benefits, as people with borderline An online survey by Oka et al. performed on
hypertension who adopted dogs showed a 5253 Japanese adults who were controlled for
decline in their blood pressure significantly age, sex, and socioeconomic status; the
within five months [18,5]. Here are some of authors found that dog owners were involved
Khalifa AA | Volume 2; Issue 1 (2021) | Mapsci-JIMER-2(1)-020 | Review Article
Citation: Hussein SM, Soliman WS, Khalifa AA. Benefits of pets’ ownership, a review based on health perspectives. J Intern Med Emerg
Res. 2021;2(1):1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37191/Mapsci-2582-7367-2(1)-020
in more walking and physical activity than Effect on cancer patients
nonowners, the pet owners were able to
Pet ownership had been shown to provide
achieve about 54% more of the recommended
benefits for cancer patient's well-being, and it
physical activity level [20]. After controlling
was proved to be valuable to be added to the
variables such as sociodemographic, social
model of cancer patients' care protocol [23].
environment, and neighborhood, Cutt et al.
found that dog owners achieved more In a pilot study by Cerulli et al. evaluating the
minutes of physical activity (322.4 versus. effect of horseback riding on patients
267.1, P<0.001) and walking (150.3 versus 110.9, surviving from breast cancer, the authors
P<0.001) compared to nonowners; moreover, found that the patients riding horses
they were 57% more likely to achieve the experienced significant improvements in
recommended physical activity levels [21]. various aspects of aerobic capacity, strength,
Raina et al. reported that people who owned and quality of life compared to non-riders
a pet were physically more active than non- [24].
pet-owners, with pet ownership playing a
To evaluate the benefits of trained dogs' visits
significant role in modifying the relationship
to oncology patients on treatment, Johnson et
between social support and mental health
al. included 30 in patients who were assigned
change [6].
to have a 15-minute session of one of three
Reducing Obesity options: a dog visit, a friendly human visit, or
quiet reading. The authors found that the dog
In an observational study including 2199
visits had more positive effects, as reported by
subjects performed by Coleman et al.,
the patients, as ‘making their therapy easier
significantly lower obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2)
and feel better’ than human interaction or
in dog walkers (17%) compared with both
reading time [25].
owners who did not walk their dogs (28%)
and nonowners (22%). The authors found In a recent study performed in adult cancer
that dog walking has an association with patients (diagnosed with aggressive head and
performing moderate to vigorous physical neck cancers) by Fleishman et al., the authors
activity (up to 53%) while people who owned included 42 patients who completed a six-
but did not walk their dog (33%) and dog week study in which they received 15 to 20-
nonowners (46%) [12]. In another study by minute daily animal-assisted visits
Lentino et al., a nearly two-fold greater odds accompanied by a volunteer handler. The
of being overweight was found in people who authors found a significant improvement in
did not own a dog while people who did not social well-being (p=0.03) and emotional
walk their dog had 60% higher odds (OR,1.58; well-being (p=0.004) compared to the
95% CI,1.07–2.33) of being overweight baseline scores, with some patients reporting
compared with dog walkers [4]. Even in more ability to withstand the concurrent
young children, Timperio et al. showed that radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the
the odds of being overweight or obese were in presence of an accompanying therapy dog
families who raised a dog than families who [26].
did not (OR,0.5;95% CI,0.3–0.8) [22].
References
1. Valeri RM. Tails of laughter: A pilot study examining the relationship between companion animal guardianship
(pet ownership) and laughter. Society & Animals. 2006;14(3):275-93. CrossRef
2. Lass-Hennemann J, Schäfer SK, Sopp MR, Michael T. The relationship between dog ownership,
psychopathological symptoms and health-benefitting factors in occupations at risk for traumatization. Int J
Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2562. PubMed | CrossRef
3. Anderson WP, Reid CM, Jennings GL. Pet ownership and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Med J Aust.
1992;157(5):298-301. PubMed
4. Lentino C, Visek AJ, McDonnell K, DiPietro L. Dog walking is associated with a favorable risk profile
independent of a moderate to high volume of physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(3):414-20. PubMed |
CrossRef
5. Levine GN, Allen K, Braun LT, Christian HE, Friedmann E, Taubert KA, et al. Pet ownership and cardiovascular
risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(23):2353-63. PubMed |
CrossRef
6. Engel SE, Kiely DK, Mitchell SL. Satisfaction with end‐of‐life care for nursing home residents with advanced
dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(10):1567-72. PubMed | CrossRef
7. Matchock RL. Pet ownership and physical health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(5):386-92. PubMed | CrossRef
8. Bowlby J. The making and breaking of affectional bonds: I. Aetiology and psychopathology in the light of
attachment theory. Br J Psychiatry. 1977;130(3):201-10. PubMed | CrossRef
9. McNicholas J, Gilbey A, Rennie A, Ahmedzai S, Dono JA, Ormerod E. Pet ownership and human health: a brief
review of evidence and issues. BMJ. 2005;331(7527):1252-4. PubMed | CrossRef
10. Young J, Bowen-Salter H, O’Dwyer L, Stevens K, Nottle C, Baker A. A qualitative analysis of pets as suicide
protection for older people. Anthrozoos. 2020;33(2):191-205.
11. Brooks HL, Rushton K, Lovell K, Bee P, Walker L, Grant L, et al. The power of support from companion animals
for people living with mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence. BMC
psychiatry. 2018;18(1):1-2. PubMed | CrossRef
12. Coleman KJ, Rosenberg DE, Conway TL, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, et al. Physical activity, weight status,
and neighborhood characteristics of dog walkers. Prev Med. 2008;47(3):309-12. PubMed | CrossRef
13. Feldman S. Alleviating Anxiety, Stress and Depression with the Pet Effect. 2019.