Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1991 BaggishMD
1991 BaggishMD
Fig. 4. Polymerse chain reaction of tubing segments containing vaporous debris from laser
vaporization in Figure 3. The HUT 78 infected cells show strongly positive reaction in slices
1, 3, 5 , and 9, indicating presence of proviral human immune deficiency virus DNA. The
controls are negative.
Fig. 5 . Vaporization of uninfected HUT 78 cells reveal no presence of human immune de-
ficiency virus proviral DNA (polymerase chain reaction).
tic tubing through which laser vapor passed be- tered sterile distilled water. Fifty microliters of
fore reaching the flask containing the culture the reaction mixture was added to each cell or
medium. Additionally similar studies were per- tubing sample, a negative DNA, and a reaction
formed on control tubing as well as medium ob- mixture control tube.
tained from flask B (Fig. 1).The 1.5-cm numbered Amplification. The reaction tubes were
sections of tubing were placed in 15-ml conical placed in a Perkin Elmer Cetus DNA thermal cy-
tubes and covered with lysis buffer (100 mM KC1, cler. The tubes were heated to 95°C for 30 seconds
10 mM TRIS [pH 8.31, 2.5 mM Mg C12.) A second to denature the DNA and ‘at a 1 second cycled
series of polymerase chain reaction were done on interval cooled to 53°C for 30 seconds to allow the
cultured cells obtained and frozen on days 14 and primer to anneal. The temperature was then
28 as described under Culture of Tubing Seg- raised to 68°C for 30 seconds to allow extension of
ments. To 1 x lo6 cells, 25 pl of solution A, con- the new strand of DNA. The heating and cooling
taining 100 mM KC1, 10 mM TRIS (pH 8.3), 2.5 cycles were repeated 30 times; the entire process
mM Mg Cl,, was added. Next, 25 p,I of solution B, encompassing approximately 2% hours.
containing 100 mM TRIS (pH 8.3), 2.5 mM Mg Liquid hybridization. After amplification
Cl,, 1%Tween 20, 1%NP40 (containing 2.4 pl 150 pl chloroform: amylisoalcohol (24:1) were
self-digested proteinase K, 5 mg/ml) was added. added to the tubes, which were vigorously sha-
The sample was incubated for 1hour at 60°C and ken. Two layers were then visible (The amplified
the proteinase K was then inactivated by boiling DNA was in the top layer) 30 pl of the PCR-DNA
the sample for 30 minutes. was removed and placed in another 0.5 ml Eppen-
Polymerase chain reaction. Fifty liters of dorf tube to which 20 p1 of a liquid hybridization
cell lysates from 1 and 2 were transferred to a cocktail was added (probe 250,000 cpm/sample,
500-pl microcentinfuge tube for amplification of 1.5 M NaC1, TE was added to allow 20 pl aliquots
the gag region of HIV-1 (Fig. 4). Immediately per sample). The probe/amplified DNA samples
prior to amplification for gag, a common reaction were boiled for 5 minutes, and placed in a 55°C
mixture was prepared containing 10 1of 10 x Taq water bath for 30 minutes 1/10 volume (5 plt,
buffer/sample; 6 pl of 3.75 mM d NTP’slsample, 1 then a gel loading dyelsample was added. Sam-
p1 50 pm of each primer/sample, 0.2 p1 1U of ples were run on 8% polyacrylamide gel at 200 V
Taq enzyme/sample, and the final volume was for approximately 60 minutes. The gel was then
brought up to 50 pl/sample with Gene screen fil- covered with Saran Wrap, individually wrapped.
HIV in Laser Smoke 201
?
-
5'
LTR
P 55
A
95,000
A
/I\
p19 p 2 4 pi5
n
gp46 gp21
/\ \
p21X p27X p 4 0 X
5' 3'
U
LTR 1I I
pss/si/as
I
pi3
tnv
I
I P 27
P 55 gp160 (~21)
/I\ / \
6 p17 p 2 4 PI2 gp120 OP41
Fig. 6. Proviral DNA genomes and their known protein prod- from Poiesz BJ, Byrne BC: Retroviruses and anti-retroviral
ucts of HTLV-1 (A) and HTLV-11 (B)p 24 protein is a product therapy in AIDS in Gynecology. Osborne NG (ed). Clinical
of the gag portion of the genome. Reprinted with permission Practice of Gynecology, Elsevier, New York, 1989 1:81-107.
Kodak X-A-R-5 film was placed over the gel and Control tubing and culture flask contents
exposed at room temperature for 2 hours-over- were negative for p24 protein from day 1 to 28.
night. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were run
on cells obtained from culture on days 14 and 28.
Figure 8 shows PCR proviral DNA obtained from
RESULTS tube segments 6 and 8 on day 14 specimens.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies of No proviral DNA was identified by PCR in
sterile, proximal tube segments 1, 3, and 5, were any day 28 cultured cell samples (Fig. 9).
strongly positive for HIV proviral DNA (Fig. 4).
DISCUSSION
Uninfected HUT 78 cells showed no evidence of
proviral DNA by PCR (Fig. 5). Likewise material This study has clearly shown that HIV pro-
from the flask containing RPMI (HIV) culture viral1 DNA is present in laser smoke. The results
medium through which the laser smoke bubbled of the culture experiment showed that HIV p24
was PCR negative for HIV proviral DNA. protein was detected for at least 14 days in one
Tube segments containing laser vaporous de- case. Additionally the cultured cells were also
bris were placed in culture for 28 days and ana- PCR positive for proviral DNA. Less clear is the
lyzed for gag gene group specific antigen, i.e., p24 fact that productive infection with HIV cultured
protein (Fig. 6). A summation of the culture re- cells was not sustained to the 28th day. The PCRs
sults is seen in Table 2. The cultures were consid- were all negative for proviral DNA in the 28 day
ered positive if >30 pg ml of p24 protein was re- culture samples. The most plausible explanation
covered. Tube segments 7 and 8 were positive for for the aforesaid events could be that the laser
p24 protein for 7 days, then became negative. Seg- action somehow may have impaired the HIV in-
ment 6 was positive for p24 protein until day 14 tegrity to such a n extent that long-term replica-
but was negative from day 18 to day 28 (Fig. 7). tion was precluded.
Baggish et al.
200 J
50 -
0 4
3 7 10 14 10 21
Day
Fig. 7. *1copy virusicell; ** a positive result is greater 2 30 pqiml of p-24 protein.
H U T 78 H U T ?8/AAV
SL1CE2 4 6 8 10 II 2 4 6 8 10 II
* I 1 I l l I I I I I I I
DAY 14