Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gun Control SP
Gun Control SP
Gun Control SP
Emmanuel Karnley
Carlyle
English 4
24 March 2023
gun control. Many nations, notably the United States, where the Second Amendment of
the Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms, have engaged in spirited discussion
about this problem. Gun control advocates contend that limiting access to firearms can
lower gun violence and make neighborhoods safer. The right to bear weapons and the
Following a string of mass shootings in the country, including the sad incident at Sandy
Hook Elementary School in 2012, the argument over gun regulation has recently flared
legislation to impose limits on gun ownership, including background checks for all
prospective buyers, waiting periods, and bans on the sale of specific firearms, such as
assault weapons. Over the effectiveness of these measures, there is still a lot of
contention. Mass shootings and other sorts of gun violence, according to proponents of
gun control, will be decreased by greater restrictions on access to firearms. They cite
nations like Australia and the United Kingdom as examples, where rigorous gun control
laws have been put in place and gun violence has decreased (Goldstein 23).
Karnley 2
Stricter gun control laws are opposed on the grounds that they violate the right to
self-defense and ineffectively reduce gun violence. They contend that even if
law-abiding persons' access to firearms is restricted, criminals will still be able to obtain
them. They contend that the right to keep and bear arms is a basic freedom that
complicated and diverse. Both sides have significant points of contention, therefore
finding just one answer to the problem is unlikely. To discover a strategy to lessen gun
violence and make communities safer, it is crucial to keep the dialogue going and
consider all viable options.It is also important to consider the role of mental health and
access to mental health resources in preventing gun violence. Many mass shootings are
committed by individuals with mental health issues who were not able to access the
resources they needed (Schaeffer). Improving access to mental health resources and
addressing the stigma surrounding mental health may be a critical step in reducing gun
violence. To summarize this issue, gun control is a highly debated and complex issue
that requires a nuanced approach. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it is
important to continue the conversation and explore all potential solutions in order to
find a way to reduce gun violence and make communities safer. The modern day issues
brought about by recent gun violence and controversy has raised the question: Why
The implementation of strict gun control measures can bring about a range of
benefits, including reduced gun violence by limiting access to firearms, the number of
firearms in circulation decreases, reducing the potential for gun violence. This is
Karnley 3
particularly true in the case of restricting access to firearms for individuals who pose a
measures can also make communities safer by reducing the number of firearms on the
streets. This decreases the chances of accidental shootings and reduces the potential
for firearms to fall into the wrong hands, such as those of criminals. Another benefit of
gun control is prevention of mass shootings. Mass shootings, which have become all
too frequent in recent years, can be avoided with the aid of gun control laws. The
likelihood of mass shootings is reduced by limiting access to firearms for those who
might be a danger. Suicide rates have decreased as a result of gun regulation. Since
using a gun to commit suicide is a common practice, gun regulation helps lower the
number of suicides (Murphy). The amount of suicides committed with firearms can be
decreased by restricting access to firearms. Last but not least, gun regulation enhances
public health.Public health can benefit from the decrease in gun violence and suicides
brought on by gun control policies (Vanderhoff). This can lower healthcare expenses
while also enhancing the standard of living for both people and communities. While
there are reasons against gun control, it's critical to take into account the advantages
listed above in order to decide on firearms regulations. Public safety and community
health can significantly improve with the adoption of strict gun control measures. Even
though these are unmistakable advantages of gun regulation, there are always opposing
viewpoints.
A wish to lessen the number of gun-related fatalities and injuries is frequently the
driving force behind the concept of restricting access to firearms. Gun regulation,
problems with the second amendment The Second Amendment to the US Constitution
guarantees the freedom to bear arms (Yarl). Any efforts to limit access to guns must,
therefore, be made in a way that is compliant with this amendment. Many proponents of
gun rights contend that any effort to limit access to weapons violates their fundamental
There are many controversial opinions with gun control, on its effectiveness.
Despite the intentions of those who support gun control, there is no evidence that it is
effective in reducing gun violence. In many countries where gun control is strict, such as
Australia and the United Kingdom, gun-related deaths have not significantly decreased
(Vanderhoff). Furthermore, countries with lenient gun laws, such as Switzerland, have
low levels of gun violence. Another relevant controversy is the laws’ enforcement. Even
if laws are put in place to restrict access to firearms, it can be difficult to enforce them.
Guns can be easily obtained on the black market, and criminals who are already
addition to more ethical concerns, there is also the lack of consensus. On what exactly
qualifies as an effective gun control policy, there is no agreement. Some support strict
gun control laws, while others support fierce defense of the Second Amendment's right
majority of the population because of this lack of agreement. Cost is a major factor in
firearms control legislation. It can be expensive to put firearms control laws into effect
and enforce them (Richenbaucher). This covers the price of licensure, training, and
Even with firearms control laws in place, misuse is still a possibility. There are concerns
that gun control measures could be misused to restrict access to firearms for
law-abiding citizens, while doing little to prevent criminals from obtaining firearms
illegally. This could lead to a situation where only those who are intent on breaking the
law have access to firearms, which would make law-abiding citizens vulnerable
(Johnstone).
I had the chance to speak with someone who served as a police officer, but is
now retired. Per his request, he wanted to stay anonymous. Many different reasons are
yielded from police officers as to why they took up their job.My interviewee joined the
force as a means to help his community. Coming from a lower income neighborhood, he
stated, he often had to witness local shop owners yell at young kids who would often
steal bags of merchandise, food, and other miscellaneous items. This example he used
was from decades ago, but instances like these are still very common today. “I hoped
that I could be the authority for similar neighborhoods facing similar circumstances”, he
stated when reflecting on his memories.I then shifted the subject of the interview to gun
control. Being an officer, he was required to carry a firearm while on duty. An advocate
for firearms, my interviewee expressed his concerns over recent events like the Uvalde
shooting. “Seeing the individuals responsible for it and how they obtained weapons of
that capability scared me”, stated the ex-officer, pondering the horrific nature of the
event. He expressed that he believed that the Uvalde shooting had set the example for
modern day weapons access. In the case of Uvalde, Robb Elementary was the victim of
Karnley 6
an attack staged by an 18-year old former student. In the United States, the legal age to
own a rifle or shotgun is 18. The shooter in Uvalde used an AR-15 style rifle, which was
illegal for him to have possession of. This raises the case of how he obtained it. This
With a firm tone, he stated: “We need to crack down on the illegal possession of these
weapons….without tighter gun control, I fear that we will see similar events in the
future.”. The scary part of the event is it took place last year in 2022, and shows how
this is an issue we will have to tackle now so it does not persist through future
generations.
In the United States, fatal school shootings are a horrifying and all-too-common
occurrence that result in a terrible loss of life and long-lasting trauma for those who
escape. These shootings have sadly become a reality in schools across the nation,
forcing parents, teachers, and students to face the terrifying prospect of gun violence in
a setting that ought to be secure for learning. National discussions about gun regulation
and the reasons it should be strengthened have been sparked by the regularity of these
shootings and their tragic consequences. There is general agreement that something
must be done, but there hasn't been much success in averting these tragedies. School
shootings have a lasting impact not only on the families and friends of the victims, but
also on the entire community. It is crucial that society takes the issue of school
shootings seriously and works to prevent future incidents through stricter gun control
laws. By taking action, we can help to ensure that our schools and communities remain
safe.
Karnley 7
The need for stricter gun control laws is a highly debated and polarizing topic, but
the fact remains that the United States has a serious problem with gun violence as seen
in recent events of violence. Despite having less than 5% of the world's population, the
United States is responsible for nearly half of all civilian-owned guns globally and has
countries (Ryan). The high rates of gun violence in the nation are largely attributable to
the ease with which guns can be obtained, particularly by dangerous individuals or
those with a violent past. In recent years, it has been demonstrated that stricter gun
control regulations reduce gun-related fatalities in other nations and can help keep
firearms out of the hands of people who shouldn't have access to them. Adopting
policies like thorough background checks, waiting times, and limitations on the sale of
specific kinds of firearms can also aid in preventing dangerous people from obtaining
firearms. Background checks allow licensed firearm dealers to make sure that guns
don’t end up in the wrong hands. They provide a “deep dive” into a customer's record,
looking for things like past police interactions, court appearances, and jail time served.
These instances will flag the customer and determine whether or not they should be
allowed to purchase firearms. Wait times vary by state. Here in California,a buyer must
wait 10 days between starting the background check process and going home with a
new firearm. Lengthening this wait time could detour ill-natured buyers from acquiring a
gun rapidly, as well as stay fair to buyers looking to use guns for game and recreation. In
Automatic rifles are banned,and handhelds are limited to only those above the age of 21
Karnley 8
years old. These limitations are there to keep people safe, but can also be altered based
on the people’s needs. Although the second amendment establishes the right to bear
weapons, it is not an unqualified right and may be restricted for the sake of public
safety. By making it more difficult for dangerous individuals to access firearms, stricter
gun control laws can help to reduce the number of gun related deaths and make
communities safer.
Every American has the unalienable right to possess firearms under the Second
Amendment. The vast majority of people believe that they should be allowed to own
guns for their personal protection as well as for leisure purposes like hunting. "A
well-regulated militia, being essential to the security of a free state, the right of the
people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed," the Second Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution reads. Citizens think that in order to defend themselves against
violence and tyranny, they should have the fundamental right to possess and bear arms.
Although many people have different interpretations of the Second Amendment and gun
ownership, we should still maintain a judicious use of guns. Even with numerous gun
100,000 people are victims of gun violence each year, and many lives are radically
affected as a result (Ryan).I believe that if there were stricter rules enforcing gun laws,
violence. Tougher gun laws are desperately required to protect public safety and
welfare. Gun violence, which has increased and is now a major issue in many countries,
weapons for those who pose a threat to others or themselves. These laws would
provide a more effective means of combating the unlawful trafficking of firearms while
also assisting in the creation of a safer environment for families, communities, and
educational institutions. Overall, tighter gun restrictions are necessary in the ongoing
fight to minimize gun violence and would help to create a society that is safer and more
secure.
Jancer, Matt. "Gun Control Is as Old as the Old West." Sections, Smithsonian
Johnstone, Kevin. "Gun Safety in New York State." New York State, NY Gov, 25
Murphy, Sarah. "Gun Control: All Latest News." The Hill, Hill Social Publishing,
Karnley 10
Feb. 2023.
Ryan, Jeff. "US Gun Control." The Guardian, World Environment Service, 8 July
Schaeffer, Katherine. "Key Facts about Americans and Guns." Pew Research Center,
Vanderhoff, Mark. "What Are the Chances Gun Control Measures Pass in Frankfort
www.wlky.com/article/gun-control-measures-frankfort-violence-louisville/
Yarl, Ralph. "News about Shootings, Weapons and the Debate about America's Gun