Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2 Derived Demand and Buying Center
Chapter 2 Derived Demand and Buying Center
Chapter 2 Derived Demand and Buying Center
center
Chapter objectives
Learn the factors influencing the demand of goods and services business to
business
Understand the two key notions of sector and derived demand and measure
their importance in their implementation in B to B marketing approach
Present the diversity of actors involved in the buying process within
customer organizations: buying center
Measure the importance and nature of the risk on business to business
market within customer-supplier relationship framework
Understand the supplier need to lead targeted marketing approaches with
the different members of the buying center
Understand the relational dimension of the B to B business relationship.
The success of a supplier's product is closely linked to the success of his customer.
An electronic component for example or a textile fiber is meaningful only in the
context of the anti-locking system of a car’s wheels or the undergarment into
which they are incorporated.
Thus demand for an industrial product or service depends on demand for the
product in which it is:
The term sector comes from the vertical presentation often used to represent the
complete production chain and its interdependence, from basic materials to the
finished product (cf. figure 2.1).
This dependence can be an even greater problem for medium sized specialized
suppliers, who generally only work for a few prime contractors. A limited customer
portfolio can be a sign of a strong partnership, a real commitment (risk-sharing),
and collaboration of new products design to services related to equipment supplies.
However, at the same time, sub-contractor status involves a high level of
dependence on the contractor. In fact, in an economic turndown, the trend is for
major contractors to reintegrate operations so as to avoid or minimize job cuts in
their own companies.
Unlike the consumer market, the supplier company is not in direct contact with the
final customer. As such it cannot react quickly by modifying its products or
services. The reactivity of the supplier depends on that of the actors downstream
in the sector.
To win over a customer and keep his loyalty, the most effective method is often a
discussion about his own customer, to provide him with information and studies on
the demand for his own products (marketing studies). This proximity with
customers, this relational dimension proves to be at the heart of the B to B
marketing approach.
Both market studies and promotion should be used to target customers at two
levels.
Medical studies analyze back problems and fatigue suffered by people who
have to drive all the time for their jobs (taxi drivers, sales reps, etc.)
Figure 2.2 - Studies carried out on end customers are an asset for the supplier in terms of his
industrial customer
Thanks to driver specific studies, the supplier assists his customer with design,
choice of options, and equipment for future models. By making his customer aware
of end customer reactions to competing products, Faurecia also participates in
monitoring technological development. Suppliers that position themselves
upstream from the design process can get ahead of the competition.
Figure 2.3 - The different levels of marketing intervention of Invista for its brand,
Lycra
The first level of intervention for Invista is his direct customer, reel producers and
hosiery manufacturers (Dim, Well, Le Bourget, Rosy) in the hosiery sector for
example. Obviously, if the latter don't choose Lycra, any other measures are
pointless.
What are the targets that Invista must identify within the manufacturer company?
Production manager: if the hosiery production process does not allow use of
Lycra, owing to technical constraints, such as resistance of the fiber to
stretching or the required hygrometry conditions at the production site,
Lycra fiber will not be chosen.
A practical guide distributed by DuPont to answer questions about elastane in general and
Lycra in particular.
Figure 2.5 - Second target: distributors, supporting the differentiation policy of Lycra
The third possible level of intervention is the end consumer. How should the
latter be convinced of the qualities of Lycra? What arguments should be made to
allow him/her to distinguish between Lycra and other competing fibers?
MEANS USED The first channel of information is the product itself and its
packaging. The Marketing department will try to obtain the presence of the
Lycra logo on the packaging, next to the logo of the manufacturer brand. The
presence of the logo, the size of letters, their color and position relative to other
printed information will be negotiated with the product manager.
Other vectors for informing the consumer include traditional media forms such as
women’s magazines, billboards and television, essentially for Invista.
Desire to use allied marketing: Apart from the technical qualities of Lycra
bought from Invista, the manufacturer-customer will seek to take advantage
of the different marketing actions related to Lycra brand, which will in turn
strengthen his own marketing strategy.
Fear that his own product will become banal: The manufacturer might be
afraid that consumers will confuse the intrinsic qualities of his products with
those of Lycra. Exclusivity is not possible on a competitive market such as
hosiery. Isn’t there a genuine risk that the image of the customer will be
absorbed by that of Lycra? The consumer will find Dim-Lycra, Well-Lycra,
Chesterfield-Lycra hosiery at the same sales outlet...
The consumer might end up thinking that the most important thing is for the
pantyhose to contain Lycra and that ultimately the different brands are all about
the same since they all contain Lycra. The risk comes from a reduction of the
perceived difference between brands, products become banal.
Action 1: The first advantage that a supplier can propose in the framework of a
new product launch is to be the first to have an upstream innovation. The
industrial customer who is the first to choose a particular process or material of
the supplier contributes to the latter being adopted by other manufacturers, and
therefore to its development. In exchange, the supplier can agree to an
exclusivity guarantee, generally limited to six months or a year. Thus the
customer manufacturer will be the first to use the process and depending on the
effectiveness of his marketing strategy, the end customer will associate his
product with a new advantage, thus strengthening his brand value. Other brands
will be perceived as followers rather than leaders or even as imitations.
Nothing prevents the customer-manufacturer, Dim for example, from using one
or more of these arguments. The two campaigns reinforce each other, increasing
coverage and the frequency with which the consumer perceives the brand of the
end product.
Action 3: The third advantage for the manufacturer-customer is the Lycra media
planning, in other words:
the choice of media (women’s magazines, etc.) and supports (Elle, Biba…)
the calendar for magazine or television ads
Thus if the manufacturer is flexible and attentive in his own media
planning, he will be able to strengthen his own launch by the juxtaposition
of his own campaign with that of his supplier in Lycra fiber.
Example taken from a women’s magazine. Invista presents nine creations in very wide
ranging areas: from furniture to jewelry and even shoes. This gives a little boost to a
selection of his customers, while inciting greater creativity.
Presentation of the consumer campaign to show the synergy effect of Lycra for the different
professional actors, manufacturers and distributors
Action 5: The fifth advantage offered by the supplier does not directly concern
Marketing. In fact, technical assistance can be provided to the technical,
functional and production departments to ensure the first productions including
the material or the new process. Depending on the case, a middle sized
manufacturer customer can greatly value technical assistance, especially when
acquiring new know-how.
The various interactions between participants as well as their respective social roles
have been investigated by several authors including Robinson, Faris and Wind.
From a theoretical point of view, the buying center structure has a lateral and
vertical dimension:
The lateral dimension (or "width") of the buying center refers to the number
of departments concerned by the decision;
The vertical dimension (or "depth") deals with the number of levels within the
hierarchy concerned by the decision.
The greater the risk for product quality and company profitability, the larger the
"width" and "depth."
The realization that many participants play a role in the buying decision has
undermined the belief that rationality is the only guiding factor in the process.
For a long time, the buying process and the act of industrial buying have been
thought of as rational compared to the more emotionally dictated behavior of
individual consumers.
This view comes from the economic reasoning underlying the act of buying in
industry and in particular, the search for minimum cost, the production
organization (Material Requirements Planning system, MRP, Materials
Management) etc. However, this attitude clearly varies depending on the
situation. For example, tailor-made goods for a company, those sold to other
companies, or those sold directly to the public as well as companies, will not be
evaluated by buyers in the same way.
The buyer must therefore offer his own judgments on buying decisions, taking into
account the opinions of the buying center members. Generally speaking, the
latter use the same evaluation criteria but not the same weighting. It must be said
that such detailed evaluation systems represent a great advantage for the supplier
who is already on the books and who gives complete satisfaction: the unknown
supplier does not have such convincing arguments to allow comparisons to be
made.
Among the criteria generally taken into account, it is possible to cite some
examples of arguments and classify them as to their ‘rationality’.
Table 2.1 - Main rational and non rational criteria informing the buying decision
However, the dividing line between rational and non rational reasoning is not
always as clear. For example, in terms of geographical location, the proximity of a
supplier can be at the same time a rational and non rational factor whether he
represents a potentially better service (quicker and less expensive) or has
“cultural” affinities with the buyer (regional economy).
Involving several managers, rational arguments are worthy so that all decisions
must be justified. The weight of non-rational arguments is greater in companies
where the buying department manager is alone or has a certain standing.
The work of Cardozo and Cagley, as well as that of Cunningham and White,
demonstrates that economic reasoning is not the sole determining factor in the
The notion of perceived risk occupies an important and ambiguous place in the
buying behavior analysis. This can be explained through perceived risks for:
Figure 2.8 - The main components of the perceived risk in an individual buying situation
The decision style of buyers depends on their behavior towards risks, behavior
which is dependent on individual characteristics, previous experiences and risk’s
perception.
The members of the buying center can be grouped into four main blocks.
Person or persons who make the final decision. A look at large companies shows
that most decisions are made collectively, i.e. even a CEO who is strongly involved
in technical decisions will prefer the decision to gat a collective vote from the
management board committee instead of unilaterally imposing it. Only after the
different propositions have been studied and the analysis of the different
opinions, both in-house and external, will the final decision be made.
Actually, in terms of complex buying, the importance of decision makers has been
strongly reduced when there is a consensus within the buying center. However,
they remain important in case of non consensus. Then, they can have an influence
on the final choice, impose to the buying center members to gat a consensus, or
take two suppliers for the same purchase. This choice generally leads to
additional cost of maintenance and training but commercial pressure can be
maintained on the two selected suppliers.
In a small or medium sized business, the director often makes the decision aided
by a manager, seen as trustworthy and competent for that particular project.
The buyers
This is basically the buying department, which in general yields its prerogatives to
the profit of various prescribers for the purchase of goods and complex services.
Their main functions are:
This dual function necessitates close, wide-ranging contacts with the market
above and beyond the suppliers used and known by the company.
The other main function consists of taking in charge the pre-selection (make a
short-list) and then participating to the final selection of competing suppliers.
Having picked out the acceptable and possible solutions, it is then a question of
selection and acceptance of the best solution for the company. The purchases
often represent more than 60% of the turnover of industrial companies: it is the
case for Air Liquid which is the third industrial buyer in France of electricity
behind Alcan and Arcelor. The buying post has greatly evolved these years in
companies, taking a more strategic dimension because of:
Focus 2.1
Ethics in purchase at the Suez Group
The Suez Group defined an ethical Charter of buying. Indeed, the buyer conveys
the company image: his personal ethics, his integrity, his professionalism and his
firmness prove the efficiency of his actions. These are some principles:
Among these obligations, the buyer must justify the decisions he has taken and
respect the confidentiality level of information passed on. The Charter also applies
to all colleague likely to influence the buying act (the other members of the buying
center). Suppliers relationship must be outstanding by integrity, honesty,
impartiality, equity, courtesy, loyalty and respect of interlocutors and agreements.
The buyer’s position is exposed to suppliers’ entreaties and pressures, in the forms
of gifts, invitations, fringe benefits as well as complex and subtle emotional
blackmail… in order to influence his decision. It is then recalled on the Charter that
operation rules for all Suez colleagues in order to avoid situations of interest
conflict or rigging:
Gifts offered courteously and with low value are accepted only if they are
exceptional and linked to justified occasions (end of the year for instance) or
cultural practices in certain countries.
Finally, the group looks after not abusing of its position, by putting an economic
actor in a situation of dependence, by imposing leonine conditions or by practicing
discriminatory or excessive prices. The buyer must avoid actions that can be
considered as a pressure by the supplier (reciprocity commitment, entreaties for
sponsoring sports clubs or cultural events, to participate to sweepstakes…).
The influencers
The influencers in fact make up the contact group which, from one company to
another, varies the most according to the different sectors and the different types
of company culture. Two types of influencers can be distinguished, in-house and
external.
Influencers in fact have a positive role. The example of the city of Toulouse
which launched a competition for the construction of a library illustrates
the latter’s role. Thus six architects were in competition including Mr. X
who recommended a domed roof made of glass in one piece without any
soddering. However, only Saint-Gobain the company could provide this
product, given the expertise and patents involved. Similarly, Alcan was the
only company able to provide the required structure that holds the dome. If
Mr. X won the competition, the two companies would have won the future
call for tender. They could then congratulate themselves on their upstream
collaboration (cf. The project marketing approach presented in Ch.5) with
the winning architect who could benefit from the information network of
the two companies.
In the Lycra case (cf. Chap. 1), the R&D, Maintenance, Quality, Marketing as
well as Sales department managers were involved. Indeed the latter acted
as an influencer on the Marketing department.
The designer Jean-Paul Gaulthier who accepted to work for Lycra for
the organization of a fashion show (supply of new materials). He in turn
influenced the prêt-à-porter industry which aligns itself with the trends
set by the great fashion houses.
Customers can also play an essential influential role. Thus, an old customer
could accept that new prospective customers visit his installation either
during or after the work has been completed; this practice is especially
common in the building and public works sector. The collaboration of this
reference customer is sometimes obtained via a price reduction, similar to
the practice found in the aeronautics sector with “launching companies”.
Let us suppose that city A has a project for an underground parking lot
downtown: the interested supplier could invite the managers of the
technical departments of city A to visit their homologues in city B, for
which a similar project has already been carried out.
The managers of the « prospective » city cannot help but accept the
invitation especially in light of the difficulty of making the right choice
in terms of technological solutions for such problems as smoke
extraction in case of a fire, the closing system of safety barriers, the
installation of surveillance systems (cf. Chap. 5).
The managers of the city that is already a customer will accept: at the
personal level, the manager in question will show his boss that his past
choices have been good ones and that the project has become a
reference. On the collective level, the city and possibly the municipal
team will be able to show the local population that their choices have
been responsible ones and that public funds have been put to good use.
The users
The prestige of the user: a surgeon rather than nurses, engineers rather
than technicians, pilots rather than bus drivers, etc.
National culture: Scandinavian countries and Japan have a long time taken
into account the opinion of future users of machine tools, cars, etc. This is
not exactly the case in Southern countries and even in the USA (with the
CHAPTER SUMMARY
3. What incidence can the centralization of buying on the head office or its
decentralization on business units have on buying and decision process?
5. “The weight and role of the buyer are highly reinforced when the
purchase is about high risk products or services”. Do you share this opinion?
Why?
9. Why does the sole acquaintance of the buying department not enough to
establish an efficient relationship with the customer company?
11. Can you use information obtained from other customers to convince your
interlocutors that your offer is the most adequate? What are the conditions
that must be respected?