Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

86 Book Reviews

was put out of business. The stories then move from


celebrities (e.g., Roddy McDowell who had an infa-
mous archive of classic films, Turner Classic Movies’ Understanding Jim Crow: Using Racist
Robert Osborne, and critic Leonard Maltin) to the Memorabilia to Teach Tolerance and
dealers who provided obscure prints to wealthy
patrons. Those who traded in classic films were sud-
Promote Social Justice.
David Pilgrim. PM Press, 2015.
denly pushed underground due to fear of FBI raids and
seizure of their treasured possessions. Each interview In Understanding Jim Crow, David Pilgrim pro-
revealed the emotional connection that collectors have vides humanities and social science educators with an
to their artifacts. If a film is lost, that particular reel is ideal text to assist them in addressing both the histori-
gone, and that means something. As Maltin explained, cal and ongoing legacies of antiblack racism in the Uni-
“it’s lost to me. . .that there’s some master copy some- ted States. Based on artifacts housed within the
where in a vault does me no good” (24). collection of the Jim Crow Museum of Racist
The stories of illegal drop-offs of film reels at the Memorabilia, an institution Pilgrim founded in 1996
Playboy mansion and home screenings by Hollywood on the campus of Ferris State University, Understand-
giants like Rock Hudson stand in stark contrast to ing Jim Crow offers readers an unparalleled look at
showings by collectors in basements and darkened material culture’s role in manifesting and perpetuating
back rooms covered in old movie posters with dingy antiblack stereotypes from the Antebellum era to the
ambiance and endless snack foods. The recurring present day. Highlighting a vast array of commonplace
theme is an unabating love for film, Hollywood specif- objects, such as postcards, commercial advertising,
ically, and a never-ending sense of anxiety (i.e., the risk sheet music, photo albums, fishing lures, crockery, par-
of being found out). Whether embracing criminal ele- lor games, household cleaners, and children’s picture
ments of the illegal film trade or treading lightly books, all of which stand emblazoned with antiblack
around them, each collector expressed a tinge of nos- messages and demeaning stereotypes, Pilgrim takes
talgia and lingering worry. Like the people they inter- readers on a grim yet edifying tour through America’s
viewed, Bartok and Joseph are collectors. This book is racist detritus in order to demonstrate that not only
a touching tribute and essential archive of first-person was Jim Crow “more than a series of ‘Whites Only’
accounts that ensures their salvation for future genera- signs,” it was a longstanding institution of oppression
tions. The authors carefully craft descriptions with a which defied the geographical boundaries of North
deep appreciation for the art that has survived. Collec- and South to permeate every facet of American life and
tors are to thank for the historical records of many foster a culture of bigotry whose ramifications con-
early works, such as “John Barrymore’s stage produc- tinue to reverberate within our national consciousness
tion of Hamlet” that would certainly be lost “were it well into the twenty-first century (5).
not for the possessive fingers of a handful of film A profoundly personal work, Understanding Jim
collectors” (xiv). Crow begins with an autobiographical account of Pil-
As the use and very existence of physical media grim’s journey as a curator, scholar, and educator
continues to dwindle in the modern era, A Thousand whose vast trove of racist objects constituted the initial
Cuts reminds us that many movies would be lost today holdings of the Jim Crow Museum. As a black child
if not for the obsessive archiving of reels of film by coming of age in Mobile, Alabama during the 1970s,
often fascinating individuals. The familiar and detailed Pilgrim became fascinated with racist objects and,
ways in which the authors describe their subjects solid- while still in middle school, he purchased his first piece
ifies the connection between aging technology and the of racist memorabilia, a mammy saltshaker. Although
aging people who appreciate it. As explained early in Pilgrim promptly smashed the saltshaker, his interest
the text, this book is “not just about the inevitable in the material culture of antiblack racism only grew as
decay and death of the film medium itself,” but also he continued his education, first as an undergraduate
the “often strange. . .film collectors and dealers, many student at Jarvis Christian College then as a graduate
of whom are dealing with their own issues of aging and student at the Ohio State University. Scouring antique
mortality” (ix). shops and flea markets, Pilgrim amassed his collection
–-Sara M. Cole throughout the 1980s and in the mid-1990s he donated
Johns Hopkins University the entirety of it to Ferris State, where he served as a
Book Reviews 87

faculty member in the Sociology Department, with the nature of antiblack racism, in all of its terrible and
expressed purpose that his collection be displayed pub- manifold aspects, Understanding Jim Crow would
licly and utilized as a teaching aid to enhance the diver- make a valuable and inimitable addition to their cur-
sity of the university’s general education curriculum. riculum.
Predicated “on the belief that open, honest, even –-Buddy Avila
painful discussions about race are necessary to avoid Bowling Green State University
repeating yesterday’s mistakes,” Pilgrim’s work under-
scores the distressing ordinariness of antiblack racism
which motivated and, sadly, continues to motivate the
creation, distribution, and consumption of the luridly Women’s Suffrage Memorabilia: An
prejudicial artifacts at the center of his study (17). Illustrated Historical Study.
Delving into the historical origins and cultural trans-
Kenneth Florey. McFarland, 2013.
mission of enduring antiblack stereotypes such as the
mammy, the Tom, the picaninny, the Jezebel, the Sap- On 18 August 2020, Americans will celebrate the
phire, the coon, and the brute, Pilgrim describes how one hundredth anniversary of the ratification of the
black women and men, of all ages, became the focus of Nineteenth Amendment to the US Constitution,
white fear and ridicule through the propagation of the which granted women the right to vote. With the pub-
aforementioned racist caricatures. Widely dissemi- lication of Women’s Suffrage Memorabilia: An Illus-
nated by way of consumer goods and media entertain- trated History, Kenneth Florey, professor emeritus,
ments, from vaudeville minstrel acts and radio Southern Connecticut State University, and long-time
programs to network television shows and blockbuster specialist in woman suffrage memorabilia, has made a
feature films, Pilgrim illustrates how, over the course significant contribution to the literature on the woman
of generations, racist beliefs became ever more firmly suffrage movement. Using a popular culture perspec-
rooted within the American psyche via the perennial tive, he writes that Women’s Suffrage Memorabilia will
usage of stereotypical caricatures deployed to dehu- “provide the historian not only with a detailed survey
manize people of color in an effort to bolster and pre- of the various types of memorabilia and artifacts that
serve a national culture of white supremacy. Moreover, were produced during the suffrage period, but also
Pilgrim emphasizes that the racist iconography ende- with a discussion of the context and history of those
mic to American folk, mass, and popular cultures does types, including their significance and meaning to the
more than merely circulate and enshrine attitudes of suffragist movement” (1). Florey comments that
antiblack bigotry, it also allows for, and ultimately “memorabilia,. . .whether sent through the mails, pre-
excuses, even the most extreme acts of violence served at home, displayed at conventions, or worn at
inflicted upon black people. marches and demonstration, tells us something about
Like the collections of the Jim Crow Museum from the basic character of the suffragists themselves and of
which Pilgrim draws his primary source material, the the organizations that manufactured and distributed
educational potential of Understanding Jim Crow is these objects” and states that “The eagerness to buy,
vast and worthy of note. Although Pilgrim blends ele- display, and collect specific memorabilia indicates that
ments of autobiography, historical analysis, ethnic many suffrage sympathizers wanted,. . .to have it
studies, and cultural criticism, his amalgamation of become part of them in a tangible way that was not
those constituent parts never seems incongruous. In otherwise possible through campaign literature and
fact, his skillful use of such modes of inquiry only adds speeches alone” (2).
to the strength of this truly interdisciplinary study. Many of the collectibles that are still in existence
While Pilgrim’s investigation of antiblack caricatures were manufactured between 1908 and 1917. With
and the messages of white supremacy which they America’s entry into World War One in 1917, Florey
espouse confronts readers with the uncomfortable and says that “Many suffragists. . .found the pageantry,
often intellectually challenging realities of racism in the colorful artifacts, and excitement of marches to
America, neither his prose nor his conclusions are be both inappropriate and, perhaps, unpatriotic, even
beyond the realm of understanding for students at any as they still continued to pursue their efforts to attain
number of grade levels from middle school onward. a national franchise amendment” (5). As a result,
For educators seeking a text that helps to elucidate the many of them refocused their energies in order to

You might also like