Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Satisfaction On Millennials: Examining The Relationship Between Financial Knowledge, Digital Financial Knowledge, Financial Attitude, and Financial Behavior
Financial Satisfaction On Millennials: Examining The Relationship Between Financial Knowledge, Digital Financial Knowledge, Financial Attitude, and Financial Behavior
Abstract: It is essential to know the financial satisfaction of the millennials because they
are prone to experiencing financial problems due to their characteristics and the complexity
of Digital Financial Services (DFS). Millennials are responsible for their financial decisions
to increase financial satisfaction, so the meaning of financial attitudes, and financial knowl-
edge, coupled with digital financial knowledge, is significant for financial decisions and
behavior. This study examines the factors that predict financial satisfaction and examine the
mediated effect of financial behavior on the relationship between financial knowledge,
digital financial knowledge, financial attitude, and financial satisfaction. A sample of 306
millennials on Surabaya was selected. A quantitative analysis technique using PLS was
applied. The final model showed financial knowledge, digital financial knowledge, and
financial attitudes positively influence financial behavior. Financial behavior significantly
moderates the relationship between financial knowledge, digital financial knowledge, finan-
cial attitude, and financial satisfaction.
Journal of Applied Keywords: Financial Satisfaction, Financial Knowledge, Digital Financial Knowledge, Fi-
Management (JAM) nancial Attitude, Financial Behavior
Volume 20 Number 2,
June 2022
Indexed in DOAJ -
Cite this article as: Normawati, R. A., S. M. Rahayu, and S. Worokinasih. 2022. Financial
Directory of Open Access Satisfaction On Millenials: Examining the Relationship between Financial Knowledge, Digi-
Journals, ACI - ASEAN tal Financial Knowledge, Financial Attitude, and Financial Behavior. Jurnal Aplikasi
Citation Index, SINTA - Manajemen, Volume 20, Number 2, Pages 354–365. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya. http://
Science and Technology
Index, and Google
dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2022.020.02.12.
Scholar.
A recent study has also examined the relation- Currently, the millennial generation, with all its
ship between financial satisfaction, financial behav- characteristics, is financially in a vulnerable posi-
ior, and financial knowledge (Arifin, 2018; Joo and tion. Millennials not only face the increasing com-
Grable, 2004; Falahati et al., 2012; Xiao and Porto, plexity of digital financial services, but they will also
2017; Saurabh and Nandan, 2018; Arifin, 2018; face more significant financial risks in the future.
Ramalho and Forte, 2019; Scheresberg, 2013). How- Concerns about the conditions have led to measur-
ever, none of these studies has discussed digital fi- ing and explaining the personal financial satisfac-
nancial knowledge in their research. This area is tion of millennials. The current financial satisfac-
critically not widely presented in the scientific lit- tion can represent the financial conditions. Finan-
erature. Even though strengthening digital financial cial satisfaction can predict financial prosperity in
knowledge is currently considered necessary, even the future.
becoming one of the global policy agendas and the By a better understanding of the factors that
agenda of many countries globally (Morgan et al., affect the financial satisfaction of millennials, it can
2019; OECD, 2018). This agenda also being one of be a consideration for researchers and policymakers
the Indonesian government’s action plans through to develop more effective education to increase the
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), from 2020 to 2024 millennials’ life satisfaction in the future. It is unde-
(OJK, 2020). Therefore, digital financial knowledge niable that millennials will be the largest population
will also be investigated more deeply to fill this gap. compared to other generations. Based on the ex-
Digital financial knowledge is needed to complete planation, this study examines whether financial
financial knowledge. Amid the rapid development knowledge, digital financial knowledge, and finan-
of Digital Financial Services (DFS), digital financial cial attitude affect financial behavior. Other exami-
knowledge is required to ensure that the financial nations are financial knowledge, digital financial
decisions taken are sound financial decisions. Digi- knowledge, and financial attitude affect financial
tal financial knowledge is essential because DFS satisfaction directly or indirectly through mediating
provides many benefits, but on the other hand, it factors and financial behavior.
creates new risks that previously might not exist in
conventional financial services (OECD, 2018; OJK, LITERATURE REVIEW
2020). Financial Knowledge
The discussion about the current use of DFS
Financial knowledge refers to a basic under-
reminds us of a generation to be closest to technol-
standing of financial concepts. Financial knowledge
ogy and is earlier in contact with DFS, the millennial
is one of the critical dimensions of financial literacy,
generation (Ali et al., 2017). Millennials have tre-
and in line with the developments, financial knowl-
mendous potential in using technology compared to
edge is equated with financial literacy (Huston,
previous generations. Millennials also have unique
2010). Herd in Garg and Singh (2018) stated that
characteristics (MacKenzie and Scherer, 2019).
financial knowledge is the knowledge that a person
They are experience-seekers who prefer to con-
has of his financial situation and is a prerequisite for
sume experience and prioritize lifestyle (Yuswohady,
effective individual financial decision making.
2017), tend to be consumptive (Utomo, 2019), and
like freedom (Yuswohady, 2017). They prefer to
Digital Financial Knowledge
choose the emergence of temporary jobs with short-
term contracts made directly to each individual (also Digital financial knowledge is a multi-dimen-
known as the gig economy trend) (McCue, 2018; sional concept that includes financial and digital
Widodo, 2019; BPS, 2020). So, this trend should be knowledge (OECD, 2018). Digital financial knowl-
followed by greater responsibility in financial plan- edge has the same basis as financial literacy and
ning for the future (Morgan et al., 2019). adds digital aspects (Tony and Desai, 2020). The
OECD in Morgan et al. (2019) stated that digital
ACCREDITED by Ministry of Research and Technology Republic of Indonesia, No 200/M/KPT/2020 ISSN: 1693-5241 355
Rani Arifah Normawati, Sri Mangesti Rahayu, Saparila Worokinasih
of future spending behavior and saving behavior showed that financial behavior directly or indirectly
among millennials in Indonesia. The results show affects financial satisfaction. Hasibuan and Lubis
that DFL positively affects current saving behavior (2018) and Arifin (2018) showed that financial be-
and current spending behavior. In addition, current havior influences financial satisfaction. Falahati et
saving behavior and spending behavior contribute al. (2012) also have similar results. Financial be-
to future spending behavior and saving behavior havior is the primary determinant variable that af-
(Setiawan, 2020). fects financial satisfaction, with the highest results
H2. Digital financial knowledge has a significant compared to other variables. In contrast, Co (2016)
effect on financial behavior revealed that financial behavior is not the primary
determinant factor affecting financial satisfaction.
Individuals’ financial decisions are influenced H6: Financial behavior has a significant effect on
by a financial attitude, although the individual has financial satisfaction
sufficient knowledge and skills to behave in a cer-
tain way. Thus, financial attitudes are considered METHOD
an essential element in financial literacy, consider- This paper uses quantitative data obtained
ing that individual preferences determine financial through a questionnaire distributed online. The num-
behavior (OECD, 2016). Falahati et al. (2012) ex- ber of samples obtained is 306 millennials. Collect-
amined the variables of financial attitude and finan- ing and selecting the samples uses the purposive
cial behavior and stated that financial attitude di- sampling technique, as particular qualifications need
rectly relates to financial behavior. It is similar to to be fulfilled to participate in the study. Respon-
Arifin (2018), which showed that financial knowl- dents are millennials in Surabaya, with a birth span
edge and financial attitude positively affect finan- between 1981 and 1996, according to the classifi-
cial behavior. cation carried out by Frey (2018) and BPS (2020).
H3. Financial attitude has a significant effect on fi- Millennials in Surabaya were chosen because
nancial behavior millennials prefer to live in big cities due to the eco-
nomic slowdown in suburbs and millennials’ prefer-
Financial knowledge influences financial satis- ences to develop their lives in terms of creativity,
faction (Arifin, 2018). Hasibuan and Lubis (2018), technological sophistication, career opportunities, and
using the term financial literacy in their research, lifestyles (Frey, 2018). Based on empirical studies,
also show the same results. Meanwhile, the study the millennial generation in Surabaya, especially
results conducted by Falahati et al. (2012) showed employees, face problems related to finances. They
that financial literacy significantly influences finan- feel that they do not have enough money for living,
cial satisfaction. are not satisfied with their salary, worry about debt,
H4: Financial knowledge has a significant effect on and are not satisfied with retirement savings and
financial satisfaction. the overall financial situation (Angelica et al., 2019).
Well-designed questionnaires were distributed
Falahati et al. (2012) stated that financial atti- online using the Google Forms application. Further-
tude is one variable that affects financial satisfac- more, the google form link is disseminated through
tion, although it has a smaller value than other vari- social media (WhatsApp Group, Telegram,
ables. Arifin (2018) showed that all exogenous vari- Instagram, and Facebook). Forty-four questions
ables, including financial attitude, significantly influ- need to be answered. In addition, the anonymity and
ence financial satisfaction. confidentiality of respondents will also be guaran-
H5: Financial attitude has a significant effect on fi- teed. There are two parts to the data collection in-
nancial satisfaction. strument. The first part is the respondents’ demo-
graphic characteristics, including age, education
Financial behavior can affect financial satisfac-
level, gender, marital status, profession, and income.
tion. Research conducted by Joo and Grable (2004)
ACCREDITED by Ministry of Research and Technology Republic of Indonesia, No 200/M/KPT/2020 ISSN: 1693-5241 357
Rani Arifah Normawati, Sri Mangesti Rahayu, Saparila Worokinasih
The second part includes closed questions on a 5- especially on financial literacy (Lyons et al., 2019).
points Likert scale, where 1 = “strongly disagree” So, digital financial knowledge is measured through
and 5 = “strongly agree.” dimensions that adopt the policy guidelines presented
The financial knowledge variable was measured by the OECD to achieve financial inclusion in G20
using the dimensions of Dai et al. (2021). That di- countries. These dimensions include trust in DFS,
mensions are knowledge, ability regarding budget- the financial system, innovations, personal informa-
ing, loans, savings, and investments. There is no tion risk, dependency risk, and digital crimes (OECD,
generally accepted standard, and very few studies 2018). Financial attitude represents thoughts, opin-
have investigated the impact of digital knowledge, ions, and judgments about finance. Mien and Thao
X1.1.1
X1.1.2
X1.1
X1.2.1 X1.2
X1.3.1 X1
X1.3.2
X1.3
X1.4.1
X1.4.2 X1.4 H1 H4
X1.4.3
X3.1.1
X3.1.2
X3.1
X3.2.1 X3.2 Description:
X1 = Financial Knowledge
X3.3.1 X3 X2 = Digital Financial Knowledge
X3.3.2 X3.3 X3 = Financial Attitude
X3.3.3 Z 1 = Financial Behaviour
X3.4.1 Y 1 = Financial Satisfaction
X3.4.2
X3.4
(2015) adopted the measurement of financial atti- (2015) stated that an indicator is declared valid if
tude. Financial behavior variables are measured the loading factor is positive and greater than 0.5
from saving behavior, planning for retirement, set- because it is an early stage of development research.
ting financial goals, budgeting, and loans (Joo and The 1st-order result test shows that all the indica-
Grable, 2004). Financial satisfaction was adopted tors have a loading factor of more than 0.5.
from Arifin (2018), which includes savings, loans, The AVE test results will reflect each latent
current financial condition, ability to meet long-term factor in the reflective model. AVE values in this
needs, funding for emergencies, and financial man- research have above 0.5 and are higher than the
agement skills. The analytical technique used in this cross-loading correlation value. Discriminant valid-
study is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), car- ity is calculated using the cross-loading value. In
ried out using the WarpPLS. this test, the cross-loading value is greater than the
correlation between the indicator and other variables.
RESULTS The criteria of composite reliability in all dimensions
Regarding the demographics of the respondents are greater than 0.7. Thus, all of these indicators
who have participated in filling out the questionnaire, are declared reliable. The Cronbach’s alpha in all
female respondents dominate (57.5%). The most dimensions is greater than 0.6.
recent education is D4/S1, with as many as 127
respondents or 41.5%, almost half of the total re- Assessing Structural Model
spondents. The distribution of respondents based on The Goodness of Fit Model in the PLS analysis
occupation is dominated by respondents who work uses the coefficient of determination (R-Square).
in the private sector (53.92%). Based on marital The R-Square value for the financial behavior is
status, married respondents, as many as 159 respon- 0.472, which indicates the moderate model. This
dents or 52%. Meanwhile, the number of unmar- value implies that the diversity of financial behavior
ried respondents was 147 respondents or 48%. can be explained by the variables of financial knowl-
edge, digital financial knowledge, and financial atti-
Inferential statistics tude of 47.2%. The contribution of the three vari-
The first step in the PLS analysis is to design ables, financial knowledge, digital financial knowl-
the outer and inner models. The next step is to con- edge, and financial attitude towards financial be-
struct the path diagram. Analysis using path aims to havior, is 47.2%. The rest, or 52.8%, is the contri-
determine the direct or indirect effect of financial bution of other variables not discussed in this study.
knowledge, digital financial knowledge, financial The value of Q² predictive relevance to endog-
attitude, financial behavior, and financial satisfac- enous variables is declared if the value is > 0. Q-
tion variables. The design of the model and path square variable financial behavior is 0.472. Its shows
diagram is as follows (Figure 1) that financial knowledge, digital financial knowledge,
and financial attitude have solid predictive power
Assessing Measurement Model on financial behavior. Then the financial satisfac-
tion Q-square is 0.304. It shows that financial knowl-
Convergent validity 2nd order is intended to
edge, digital financial knowledge, financial attitude,
determine whether the dimensions are valid in mea-
and financial behavior have reliable predictive power
suring variables. A measurement is declared valid if
on financial satisfaction.
the loading factor is positive and greater than 0.5.
The validity test results of all sizes that measure the
Direct Effect
variables have a loading factor value > 0.5. Thus,
these dimensions are declared valid in measuring From the direct effect test, it is known that the
the variables. Convergent validity 1st -order is in- value of the entire path coefficient is positive, which
tended to determine whether or not the indicator is means that the whole hypothesis can be accepted.
valid in measuring dimensions. Abdillah and Hartono Meanwhile, the whole p-value shows a p-value <
ACCREDITED by Ministry of Research and Technology Republic of Indonesia, No 200/M/KPT/2020 ISSN: 1693-5241 359
Rani Arifah Normawati, Sri Mangesti Rahayu, Saparila Worokinasih
significance level (alpha = 5%), so all effects are behavior (Joo and Grable, 2004; Falahati et al., 2012;
significant. The result of the direct effect is indi- Klapper et al., 2013; Scheresberg, 2013; Santos and
cated in Table 1. Abreu, 2013; Mien and Thao, 2015; Arifin, 2017;
Hasibuan and Lubis 2018; Arifin, 2018; Saurabh and
Indirect Effect Nandan, 2018).
The indirect effect shows a positive and sig-
nificant on all relationships. Overall direct effect, as The Effect of Digital Financial Knowledge on
mentioned before, shows positive and significant too. Financial Behavior
The result of the indirect effect is indicated in Table Significant and positive between digital finan-
2. cial knowledge and financial behavior show that digi-
tal financial knowledge affects financial behavior.
DISCUSSION The analysis results between digital financial knowl-
The Effect of Financial Knowledge on Finan- edge and financial behavior empirically support the
cial Behavior research conducted by Setiawan (2020). Setiawan
(2020) said that DFL positively affects current sav-
The first hypothesis that financial knowledge
ing and spending behavior. In addition, current sav-
has a significant effect on financial behavior is ac-
ing behavior and spending behavior contribute to
ceptable. It follows the review submitted by Ozmete
future spending behavior and saving behavior. An-
and Hira (2011). Someone who has financial knowl-
other study found that education level is an essen-
edge applies these in their daily behavior. When a
tial determinant of awareness about digital platforms
person has specific knowledge regarding what can
(Prasad et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2018). So, it is as-
and should not be done, the harm or benefit of some-
sociated with the results of this study that strength-
thing, they will consider the behavior carried out
ening digital financial knowledge can positively im-
based on the knowledge disclosed. Empirically, these
pact financial behavior, especially related to utiliz-
results strengthen Ramalho and Forte (2019). The
ing DFS. Based on this, strengthening digital finan-
results also support the conclusion that there is an
cial knowledge, especially for the millennial genera-
influence between financial knowledge on financial
tion with all its characteristics, needs to be carried nant influence on financial satisfaction (Joo and
out under the global policy and many countries’ agen- Grable, 2004). The test results on the financial knowl-
das. edge variable on financial satisfaction also strengthen
the research results conducted by Co (2016). Fur-
Effect of Financial Attitude on Financial Be- thermore, this study supports research conducted
havior by Xiao and Porto (2017), Arifin (2018), and
The analysis results show that financial attitude Hasibuan and Lubis (2018).
is the most dominant effect on financial behavior. A
higher financial attitude will lead to good financial Effect of Financial Attitude on Financial Satis-
behavior. This study empirically strengthens the re- faction
search results conducted by Falahati (2012). His The significant positive influence relationship
research found that financial attitude affects finan- between the financial attitude variable on financial
cial behavior (Falahati et al., 2012). The results also satisfaction shows that the higher the financial atti-
support the research conducted by Mien and Thao tude of the millennials will positively impact finan-
(2015), (Dai et al., 2021), and Arifin (2018). cial satisfaction. This study indicates that financial
Financial attitude is considered an essential el- attitude is one variable that affects financial satis-
ement in financial literacy, considering that individual faction, supporting research conducted by Falahati
preferences determine financial behavior. Although et al. (2012) and Arifin (2018). Meanwhile, the re-
individuals have adequate knowledge and skills to search undertaken by Dare et al. (2020) supports
behave in certain ways, individual financial decisions one indicator in financial attitude, namely future ori-
are also influenced by one’s financial attitude entation, and does not support indicators in other
(OECD, 2016). Educators and policymakers can financial attitudes, namely attitude toward money.
interpret the importance of financial attitude in shap-
ing one’s financial behavior. Strengthening financial Effect of Financial Behavior on Financial Sat-
knowledge and digital financial knowledge must also isfaction
be accompanied by cultivating an excellent finan- The analysis results show that financial behav-
cial attitude. ior is the most dominant effect on financial satis-
faction. From the result, the higher financial behav-
Effect of Financial Knowledge on Financial ior of the millennials will lead to reasonable finan-
Satisfaction cial satisfaction. This most dominant effect indicates
The hypothesis is declared acceptable based that financial behavior plays an essential role in
on the results obtained. The significant positive in- achieving financial satisfaction. The findings above
fluence relationship between financial knowledge provide insight that financial satisfaction is more
variables on financial satisfaction shows that the shaped by financial behavior, while one’s financial
higher the millennial’s financial knowledge will lead attitude more shapes financial behavior.
to good financial satisfaction. Vice versa, if a This statement is supported by the frequency
millennial has low financial knowledge, they will tend distribution of financial behavior and financial satis-
to have poor financial satisfaction. The test of the faction results. It aligns with Mien and Thao (2015)
effect of financial knowledge on financial satisfac- that good financial behavior can positively improve
tion in this study supports Falahati et al. (2012). financial welfare and satisfaction. Empirically, this
Falahati et al. (2012) showed that financial literacy study supports research conducted by Joo and Grable
significantly affects financial satisfaction. (2004), Falahati et al. (2012), Co (2016), Xiao and
This result is similar to the results by Joo and Porto (2017), Hasibuan and Lubis (2018), and Arifin
Grable (2004). Joo and Grable (2004) found that (2018). In the research conducted by Joo and Grable,
financial knowledge directly influences financial it was found that financial behavior has a direct or
satisfaction. Even financial knowledge has a domi- indirect effect on financial satisfaction. Financial
ACCREDITED by Ministry of Research and Technology Republic of Indonesia, No 200/M/KPT/2020 ISSN: 1693-5241 361
Rani Arifah Normawati, Sri Mangesti Rahayu, Saparila Worokinasih
can be made by providing public services or digital grand theories, such as TRA and TPB, thus enrich-
platforms easily accessible to the millennial genera- ing the results of Behavioral Finance studies. Fi-
tion. However, strengthening these two things is not nally, to get a more accurate measurement, it is pos-
enough because, based on the results of this study, sible to combine subjective and objective measure-
it is also necessary to enhance the financial atti- ment models for the variables of financial knowl-
tude. The cultivation of an excellent financial atti- edge, digital financial knowledge, and financial sat-
tude must be cultivated even earlier and more im- isfaction.
portant than the provision of financial knowledge
and digital financial knowledge because financial REFERENCES
attitudes are allegedly more vital in shaping finan- Abdillah, Willy and Hartono, Jogiyanto. 2015. Partial
cial behavior. Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation
Furthermore, good financial behavior must also Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis.
be formed through a campaign of good financial Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
behavior by influencers close to the millennial gen- Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organi-
eration, considering that financial behavior is also a zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-
substantial variable in financial satisfaction. Other
5978(91)90020-T. Academic Press. Inc.
forms of financial planning assistance to the com- Ali, H., Purwandi, L., Nugroho, H., Ekoputri, A. W., and
munity can also be carried out so that the program Halim, T. 2017. The Urban Middle-Class Indone-
to strengthen financial literacy has a more accurate sia: Financial and Online Behavior. Alvara Re-
impact. search Center. [Online]. From: https://alvara-
strategic.com/wp-content/uploads/whitepaper/
LIMITATIONS The-Urban-Middle-Class-Millenials.pdf.
This study has several limitations. The number Angelica, N., Astuti, D., and Evelyn, E. 2019. Hesitancy
to Seek Help Millennial Generation in Surabaya.
of samples and fields studied in this research is lim-
Journal of Accounting, Entrepreneurship and Finan-
ited. In addition, this research bases its conceptual cial Technology (Jaef), 1(1), 49–60. Surabaya : Uni-
model on the SCT by Bandura, where behavior is versitas Ciputra Surabaya.
described as a triadic reciprocal. This study has not Arifin, A. Z. 2017. The Influence of Financial Knowl-
used environmental factors and only focuses on edge, Control and Income on Individual Finan-
personal factors, primarily cognitive and affective cial Behavior. European Research Studies Journal,
aspects. Lastly, further research can be combined XX(3), 635–648. Greece: International Strategic
with subjective and objective measurements of fi- Management Association (ISMA).
nancial knowledge, digital financial knowledge, and Arifin, A. Z. 2018. Influence Factors toward Financial
financial satisfaction to confirm respondents’ an- Satisfaction with Financial Behavior as Interven-
ing Variable on Jakarta Area Workforce. European
swers.
Research Studies Journal, XXI(1), 90–103. Greece:
International Strategic Management Association
RECOMMENDATIONS (ISMA).
For researchers and academics, further re- BPS. 2020. Keadaan Pekerja di Indonesia Februari
search with a similar focus can be developed, for 2020.
example, by expanding the population and sample Co, S. 2016. Understanding Factors Affecting Finan-
or increasing the number of samples so that condi- cial Satisfaction/ : The Influence of Financial Be-
havior, Financial Knowledge and Demographics.
tions are more representative for the millennial.
Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR),
Further research also can develop a more complex
2(5), 377–385. India: Imperial Publishing House.
research model using all the factors in the SCT Dai, R. M., Kostini, N., and Tresna, P. W. 2021. The Influ-
theory, exploring the triadic reciprocal between per- ence of Financial Attitude and Financial literacy
sonal, environmental, and behavioral factors. De- on Behavioral Finance/ : A Study on Leading Small
veloping similar research also be based on other and Medium Enterprises in Cimahi City, Indone-
ACCREDITED by Ministry of Research and Technology Republic of Indonesia, No 200/M/KPT/2020 ISSN: 1693-5241 363
Rani Arifah Normawati, Sri Mangesti Rahayu, Saparila Worokinasih
Scheresberg, C. de B. 2013. Numeracy Advancing Edu- Utomo, W. P. 2019. Indonesia Millennial Report 2019.
cation in Quantitative Literacy Financial Literacy IDN Research Institute, 01, 61. [Online]. From:https:/
and Financial Behavior among Young Adults: Evi- /www.idntimes.com/indonesiamillennialreport2019.
dence and Implications. Numeracy, 6(2), 1–23. Widodo, A. S. 2019. Peran Internet dalam Meningkatkan
https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.6.2.5. Jumlah Pekerja Lepas di Indonesia. NYIMAK/ :
Setiawan, M. 2020. Digital Financial Literacy, Current Journal of Communication, 3(2), 97–202.
Behavior of Saving and Spending and its Future Wilson, W. R. 1960. An Attempt to Determine Some Cor-
Foresight. Economics of Innovation and New Tech- relates and Dimensions of Hedonic Tone (Doctoral
nology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020. Dissertation). Proquest Dissertations & Theses
1799142. database (6006588).
Shen, Y., Hu, W., and Hueng, C. J. 2018. The Effects of Xiao, J. J. and Porto, N. 2017. Financial Education and
Financial Literacy, Digital Financial Product Us- Financial Satisfaction: Financial Literacy, Behav-
age And Internet Usage on Financial Inclusion in ior, and Capability as Mediators. International Jour-
China. MATEC Web of Conferences, 228. https:// nal of Bank Marketing, 35(5), 805–817. https://
doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822805012. doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-01-2016-0009.
Tony, N. and Desai, K. 2020. Impact of Digital Financial Yuswohady. 2017. Millennials and The Fall of Materi-
Literacy on Digital Financial Inclusion. Interna- alism. [Online]. From: https://ekbis.sindonews.com/
tional Journal of Scientific and Technology Re- berita/1266379/39/millennials-the-fall-of-materialism.
search, 9(1), 1911–1915.
ACCREDITED by Ministry of Research and Technology Republic of Indonesia, No 200/M/KPT/2020 ISSN: 1693-5241 365