This document provides a critical analysis of the poem "Thrushes" by Ted Hughes. It summarizes Hughes' background and career as a poet. It then analyzes the poem in detail, noting how Hughes uses imagery and metaphors to contrast the efficient, instinct-driven behavior of thrushes with human behavior. He questions if the thrushes' actions are due to evolution, learning, or some survival instinct. The analysis explores how Hughes uses the thrushes as a metaphor to examine what defines humanity versus animals. It concludes that Hughes aims to contemplate what motivates human actions through observing the thrushes.
This document provides a critical analysis of the poem "Thrushes" by Ted Hughes. It summarizes Hughes' background and career as a poet. It then analyzes the poem in detail, noting how Hughes uses imagery and metaphors to contrast the efficient, instinct-driven behavior of thrushes with human behavior. He questions if the thrushes' actions are due to evolution, learning, or some survival instinct. The analysis explores how Hughes uses the thrushes as a metaphor to examine what defines humanity versus animals. It concludes that Hughes aims to contemplate what motivates human actions through observing the thrushes.
This document provides a critical analysis of the poem "Thrushes" by Ted Hughes. It summarizes Hughes' background and career as a poet. It then analyzes the poem in detail, noting how Hughes uses imagery and metaphors to contrast the efficient, instinct-driven behavior of thrushes with human behavior. He questions if the thrushes' actions are due to evolution, learning, or some survival instinct. The analysis explores how Hughes uses the thrushes as a metaphor to examine what defines humanity versus animals. It concludes that Hughes aims to contemplate what motivates human actions through observing the thrushes.
This document provides a critical analysis of the poem "Thrushes" by Ted Hughes. It summarizes Hughes' background and career as a poet. It then analyzes the poem in detail, noting how Hughes uses imagery and metaphors to contrast the efficient, instinct-driven behavior of thrushes with human behavior. He questions if the thrushes' actions are due to evolution, learning, or some survival instinct. The analysis explores how Hughes uses the thrushes as a metaphor to examine what defines humanity versus animals. It concludes that Hughes aims to contemplate what motivates human actions through observing the thrushes.
Ted Hughes is consistently described as one of the twentieth century's greatest English poets. Born August 17th, 1930 in Mytholmroyd, Yorkshire,his family moved to Mexborough when he was seven to run a newspaper and tobacco shop. He attended Mexborough grammar school, and wrote his first poems from the age of fifteen, some of which made their way into the school magazine. Before beginning English studies at Cambridge University (having won a scholarship in 1948), he spent much of his National service time reading and rereading all of Shakespeare. According to a report, he could recite it all by heart. At Cambridge, he spent most..time reading folklore and Yeats poems,' and switched from English to Archaeology and Anthropology in his third year. Hughe's first book of poems, Hawk in the Rain, was published in 1957 to immediate acclaim,winning the Harper publication contest. Over the next 41 years, he would write upwards of 90 books, and win numerous prizes and fellowships. In 1984, he was appointed England’s poet laureate.Hughes is what some have called a nature poet. A keen countryman and hunter from a young age, he viewed writing poems as a continuation of his earlier passion. The subjects he prefers to write on are, however, several: man in relation to the animal world, man and nature, war and death. Let us now explore Hughes’s treatment of these subjects in some detail. Right from his childhood, Ted Hughes has been interested in animals. When his parents lived in theCalder valley, Ted Hughes had a chance to see the world of the animals from close quarters. Hughes learnt the first lesson that animals were by and large victims.The wild world of the animals was at the mercy of the ordered human world. Yet, as Hughes realized and emphasized in his poetry, the human world was fascinated by the world of the animals because it had pushed into the unconscious what the animal world still possessed,vast,untapped energies.
"Thrushes' paints a picture of birds as efficient, instinctive killing machines. Thrushes
are birds usually associated with domesticity and song.The poem is basically about the actions of a bird, a thrush, and how they are contrasted to a human being. The poet uses effective language to paint a picture of the thrushes as superiors and places humans at a disadvantage to the thrushes. The poet is observing some thrushes on his lawn; the observations lead him to contrast them to human beings, such as himself, whose best acts seem produced by the suppression of such energies as the birds display, and at enormous cost. Thrushes are birds usually associated with domesticity and song.The poem is basically about the actions of a bird, a thrush, and how they are contrasted to a human being. The poet uses effective language to paint a picture of the thrushes as superiors and places humans at a disadvantage to the thrushes. Within the first stanza Hughes creates the theme of the poem and goes into even more detail when he writes “No indolent procrastinations and no yawning states, No sighs or head-scratching. Nothing but bounce and stab and a ravening second.” which gives the image of the primitive nature that the thrushes have and compares them to the nature of humans by using words like “procrastination” or “yawning”which would obviously not happen with animals. The quote, “ravening second sums up the instant of devouring and links the thrushes with another bird” which is often associated with death or bad omens.All of the forms of imagery that Ted Hughes uses creates the general theme about the gap found by observing human and animal behavior, and basically how we can learn from the other species.Also, the poet tied in tons of metaphorical statements that help the point get across about the animals to another level. In this stanza the poet uses vivid imagery as well as forceful vocabulary to sort of present as an image of a weapon.He uses words such as tarrying, coiled steel, triggered to produce the image of a powerful weapon. Alliteration “dark deadly”The word “terrifying” shows how the poet sees the birds as nothing but fearful creatures to be feared.The last line represents how the thrushes are instinctively driven and do not overthink their actions.The hyphen represents a change in rhythm the poem to a much faster one preparing the reader for the climax. The author’s observation leads the poet into speculation and into asking questions about the thrushes in stanza two “bullet and automatic purpose”. Thrush becomes a metaphoric way for the audience to view humanity in a different perspective. Unlike the thrush, humans can never be defined purely by what he does, whether acting as the adventurous hero,as the achieving businessman, or as the patient and expert craftsman. The spiritual and psychological drives which make him human and distinguish him from the thrush, the shark, or the super-human, pre-programmed, all of whose essences are defined purely by what they do. In the first stanza when the author was describing the behavior of the thrushes he uses the metaphor “with a start, a bounce, a stab” which describes their drive on instinct opposed to humans. They don’t wait until the last minute like what humans do but instead they are characterized by immense presence of mind. TedHughes used these forms of figurative language to create a better understanding for the contrast between human behavior and animals.The part with “stab”shows the animal’s ability and willingness to kill at any moment to survive without hesitation. The “start”and “bounce” are seen as qualities that humans should definitely pick up from the behavior of animals.Another form of this could be the constant references to guns and knives through the animal’s eyes such as “gives their days this bullet and automatic” or “more coiled steel than living” which is again comparing the ways of killing between humans and animals.The poet Ted Hughes uses personification, colorful imagery, and metaphors in “Thrushes” as a philosophical attempt to differentiate between human and animal behavior. The poet felt this topic is important and that his task in writing this was to help heal the wounding breach that he felt modern humans didn’t fully understand. This poem relates directly to the outside world because we live in a society of waiting until the last moment and not fully living our lives to the fullest! He wonders what motivates this single-minded ruthless purpose. Is it, he asks, the way they are programmed to some point of evolutionary perfection? Have they been taught by equally skillful elders, or is there some survival of the species instinct, driven by “a nestful of brats”? Perhaps it is genius: an almost indefinable term, but one which reminds him of the composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, who seemed to have superhuman ability to produce perfect music apparently without trying. His questioning thoughts turn on the phrase “automatic/ Purpose” toward the shark. The shark’s automatic purpose is to attack the smell of blood, even if it is its own blood pouring from its side. The shark then devours itself. It is “too streamlined for any doubt.” In other words, such efficiency is questionable. The same movement is seen in “Hawk Roosting,” where the hawk’s megalomania is reminiscent of human megalomaniacs such as Adolf Hitler and makes readers withdraw any admiration from the bird. Hughes pushes the poem in a different direction, by explicitly contrasting animals with humans (presumably, Mozart’s genius is somehow seen as inhuman). Mozart was having the same automatic response – reaction when he was writing music to a shark; he was out of the human sphere. In the same way the thrushes do not stop until they reach a level of perfection, kill their prey instantly. It is about the purity and absolute concentration of the action. - The final stanza turns to human preoccupations such as war. In line 18, Hughes Suggests that we need animals to help us become heroes. He further suggests that we all need something to focus on. The unknown, fearful and uncontrollable is waiting outside of our orderly lives. We are constantly being distracted from the things happening in our minds. The thrushes can concentrate, they become one with the action. “With a man it is otherwise,” he starkly begins the third and final stanza. Humans are capable of “Heroisms on horseback,” in the traditional notion of bravery, where any notion of violence is suppressed. Yet such heroic acts are beyond humanity’s usual mode of being, which is bound by daily routine. Such heroisms are, like the carver’s patiently working “at a tiny ivory ornament/ For years,” in a sense outside of people. Such acts achieve worth or value almost impersonally. They are rare, unlike the animals’ daily acts of perfect killing. The final line's question aims and prompts us to reflect on human motivation. Lastly, Ted Hughes uses reputation to emphasize its significance in the entire text. This could be seen in the first stanza when he repeats the phrase “with a start, a bounce, a stab” twice in that very stanza. The purpose of this metaphorical phrase is that it was directly correlated with the author’s comparison of human behavior with the sudden response of Thrushes. In conclusion,Hughes has a holistic view of the universe and of life. He is inspired to contemplate humanity. He reflects on humanity through the thrushes. Inorder for man to be a vital human being, he needs to have the experience to struggle with the knowledge of despair that comes with the awareness of death and mortality. The physical description of the exterior of the thrushes leads to consideration of the essence of the bird which is reduced to “nothing but a stab”.The thrush has been reduced to an act of time that defines the creature. Unlike the thrushes, humans cannot be defined purely by what they do. It is the spiritual and psychological drives that make them human and distinguish them from the thrushes whose essence is purely defined by what they do. The spiritual and psychological dimension of human beings renders them prone to destruction.