See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/330881506

A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT & CONFLICT

MANAGEMENT STYLES STRATEGIES TO MANAGE WORKPLACE CONFLICT IN
THE CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS SCENARIO

Article · September 2018

CITATIONS READS

3 2,634

2 authors, including:

Kathiravan C.
Annamalai University
90 PUBLICATIONS   73 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Kathiravan C. on 05 February 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Available online at https://www.ijasrd.org/

International Journal of Advanced Scientific

Research & Development e-ISSN: 2395-6089
p-ISSN: 2394-8906
Vol. 05, Spl. Iss. 03, Ver. I, Sep’ 2018, pp. 01 – 07

A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT &

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES STRATEGIES TO MANAGE
WORKPLACE CONFLICT IN THE CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN
BUSINESS SCENARIO
Dr. C. Kathiravan1* and A. Rajasekar2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University,
Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Doctorial Research Scholar (F.T), Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University,
Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu, India.

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article History: This Paper is the review paper sources taken from various
Received: 01 Sep 2018; articles. This paper is focus about conflict Management styles
Accepted: 06 Sep 2018; in corporate and scholarly associations Managers today are
Published online: 12 Sep 2018.
formulating creative taking care of strategies as conflict
represents an incredible test for them. This paper can
Key words:
encourage the management professionals in understanding
Conflict Management,
Conflict Management Styles, the idea and its suggestions. Administrators today are
Scenario, conceiving imaginative dealing with procedures as conflict
Workplace Conflict. represents an extraordinary test for them. This paper can
encourage the management specialists in understanding the
idea and its suggestions in Global Scenario; it will make good
socioeconomic relationship.
Copyright © 2018 IJASRD. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Common Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.

INTRODUCTION
A conflict normally happens when at least two individuals impart. At the point when
individuals consider conflict in straightforward terms, they surmise that happens when
difficult issues and outrage is summoned in correspondence process. Conflict is
misconstruing one's words or esteem. Improper, poor conveyed data and choosing the wrong
channel to transmit the data emerge in the gatherings. There are various conflict
management styles, for example, passive aggressive style, forcing style, avoiding style,
accommodating style, compromising style, and collaborating style.. There are two distinct
sorts of conflict; one of it is undertaking conflict and spotlights on the approaches to
determine issues. The other kind of conflict is called relationship conflict and spotlights on
Cite this article as: Kathiravan, C., & Rajasekar, A., (2018, September). A Global Perspective of Conflict Management &
Conflict Management Styles Strategies to Manage Workplace Conflict in the Contemporary Issues in Business Scenario. Paper
presented at the International Conference on Contemporary Issues in Business – A Global Perspective (CIBAGP–18), held in
Swami Dayananda College of Arts & Science, Manjakkudi, 05 (03/I), pp. 01 – 07. Nedungadu, PY, IND, International Journal
of Advanced Scientific Research & Development (IJASRD).
* Corresponding Author: Dr. C. Kathiravan, kathirc@gmail.com
 A Global Perspective of Conflict Management & Conflict Management Styles Strategies to Manage
Workplace Conflict in the Contemporary Issues in Business Scenario

faulting different gatherings instead of determination the conflict. Relationship conflict is

contrary in the vast majority of the general population's recognitions. Conflict in an
association influences the dedication and non-attendance of representatives. These days,
workers have solid convictions. As per Pygmalion's Hypothesis, the chiefs' state of mind and
desires for workers and how they treat them to a great extent decide the representatives'
execution. At the point when a conflict emerges amongst boss and subordinates, and the
workers believe that the directors has low desire for them, the representatives will be
submitted and may utilize non-attendance to circumvent (maintaining a strategic distance
from style) from the conflict. Managers, chiefs, bosses and pioneers should utilize diverse
sort of conflict management styles when confronting distinctive sort of subordinates,
representatives and colleagues. In the event that an administrator (business or pioneer)
just uses one kind of conflict management style in taking care of all conflict in the working
environment, it may not fill in as they anticipate that it will. In conflict reaction, a manager
isn't just influencing the connection between the boss subordinate, it additionally influences
the trust and dependability of subordinate that apparent an administrator as a delegate of
the association. Regardless of that, there are a few factors that can trigger a conflict. By
understanding the sorts of conflict, chiefs can utilize proper conflict goals styles. In the
event that a conflict is left uncertain, it might cause genuine results. In the present
globalization time, the web is a broadly utilized specialized apparatus. In spite of the fact
that web correspondence has expanded the proficiency and efficiency of associations, it has
additionally made new kinds of conflicts. Conflict through web has turned out to be more
regular.

1.1 Literature Review

Conflict is characteristic and typical marvel in all circles of life. It is an unavoidable
segment of human movement (Messman and Mikesell, 2000; Brahnam et al., 2005; Gerami,
2009) that might be seen as a circumstance in which the worries of at least two people seem,
by all accounts, to be contradictory (Dear and Fogliasso, 1999; Pruitt dan Rubia, 1986;
Putman dan Poole, 1987; Rhoades, 1999; Thomas, 1976), and which has a tendency to
happen when people or gatherings see that others are avoiding them accomplishing their
objectives (Antonioni, 1998). All the more extensively, conflict is an intuitive procedure
showed in contradiction, difference, or cacophony inside or between social elements i.e.
singular, gathering, association and so forth. (Rahim, 2002; Sander, 2009; Thomas, 1992).
Within associations conflicts are unavoidable, and emerge in the event of contradictions
over workloads, issues in correspondence, singular contrasts in needs, needs, objectives,
values, suppositions, inclinations or conduct, and in addition if there should be an
occurrence of conflict amongst representatives and managers (Augustine, 2000; Bisno,
1998). Unequivocally, as people interface in associations, varying qualities and
circumstances make strain and conflict (Dear and Walker, 2001; Stimec & Poitras, 2009).
Today, each fruitful management depends vigorously on capacity to deal with conflict
viably, as Mintzberg (1975) saw more than 35 years prior, when he said that each director
must spend a decent piece of his opportunity reacting to high-weight aggravations and
considered that administrative part the unsettling influence handler, and McShulskis
(1996) reaffirmed with his discoveries that administrators invest 18 percent of their energy
Volume 05, Special Issue 03, Version I | 12th September’ 2018 2
International Conference on Contemporary Issues in Business - A Global Perspective (CIBAGP–18) |
Jointly organized by PG & Research Department of Commerce, Business Administration, Commerce
(Bank Management), Commerce (CA), Swami Dayananda College of Arts & Science, Manjakkudi

settling representative identity conflicts, while ten years previously the time spent on
worker intervention was half of that sum. In this way, the preeminent administrative
undertaking now-a-days progressed toward becoming to make an atmosphere where conflict
is overseen; not maintained a strategic distance from (Bagshaw, 1998; Jarrett, 2009), and to
allow conflict to serve a profitable capacity (Phillips and Cheston, 1979). As such,
contemporary managers are called upon to determine contrasts in needs and inclinations,
and utilize conflict in a way that advantages their association (Friedman, Tidd, Currall and
Tsai, 2000)

1.2 Objectives of this Paper

The paper main objective is to analyse conflict overall in the organization and all the
more particularly:
 To find out the degree to which arrangement as a conflict management
system impacts organization execution.
 To build up the degree to which outsider intercession as a conflict
management system impacts organization execution
 To decide the degree to which correspondence as a conflict management
technique impacts organization execution
 To recognize the causative components of conflict in the assembling
organization
 To analyse the sorts of conflict that is predominant in the foundation.
 To get to the conflict management methodologies embraced for use in the
organization.
 To decide the impact of workplace conflict management on organizational
execution in the foundation.

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES

Conflicts can emerge whenever. How you use conflict management procedures relies
upon both your conflict style and your conflict management aptitudes. There are a wide
range of approaches to react to conflict circumstances; some conflict styles include a
circumspect or agreeable approach while others include either a focused or aloof approach.

2.1 Accommodating
This is the point at which you collaborate to a high-degree, and it might be at your
own cost, and really neutralize your own objectives, targets, and wanted results. This
approach is powerful when the other party is the master or has a superior arrangement. It
can likewise be viable for saving future relations with the other party.

2.2 Avoiding
This is the point at which you basically maintain a strategic distance from the issue.
You aren’t helping the other party achieve their objectives, and you aren’t self-assuredly
seeking after your own. This works when the issue is inconsequential or when you have no
possibility of winning. It can likewise be successful when the issue would be expensive. It's
3 Volume 05, Special Issue 03, Version I | 12th September’ 2018
 A Global Perspective of Conflict Management & Conflict Management Styles Strategies to Manage
Workplace Conflict in the Contemporary Issues in Business Scenario

additionally extremely successful when the climate is sincerely charged and you have to
make some space. Some of the time issues will resolve themselves, yet “trust isn't a
procedure”, and, by and large, staying away from is certainly not a decent long haul
technique.

2.3 Collaborating
This is the place you accomplice or combine up with the other party to accomplish
both of your objectives. This is the means by which you break free of the "win-lose"
worldview and look for the "win-win." This can be compelling for complex situations where
you have to locate a novel arrangement. This can likewise mean re-confining the test to
make a greater space and space for everyone's thoughts. The drawback is that it requires a
high-level of trust and achieving an agreement can require a considerable measure of time
and push to get everyone on load up and to blend every one of the thoughts.

2.4 Competing
This is the "win-lose" approach. You act in an exceptionally confident manner to
accomplish your objectives, without trying to collaborate with the other party, and it might
be to the detriment of the other party. This approach might be suitable for crises when time
is of the embodiment, or when you require brisk, unequivocal activity, and individuals know
about and bolster the approach.

2.5 Compromising
This is where neither gathering truly accomplishes what they need. This requires a
direct level of confidence and participation. It might be fitting for situations where you
require a transitory arrangement, or where the two sides have similarly essential
objectives. The trap is to fall into trading off as a simple way out, when teaming up would
deliver a superior arrangement.

2.6 Suggestions
The examination work of Kenneth Thomas and Ralph Kilmann in the 1970's directed
to the recognizable proof of five styles of conflict and the advancement of a generally utilized
self-evaluation called the Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, or TKI. Their work
recommended that we as a whole have an essential, favoured approach to manage conflict,
which serves us well in a few circumstances, yet not all. The way to progress for us is to
build up an adaptable toolbox of methodologies and utilize the one that best fits the
circumstance. The more you can get settled with every method for managing conflict, the
more viable you will be.

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLE STRATEGIESTO MANAGE WORKPLACE

CONFLICT
3.1 Collaborating
With the Collaborating approach, you work with the person(s) to build up a win-win
arrangement. In this approach, the attention in on finding a win-win arrangement that
addresses everybody's issues.
Volume 05, Special Issue 03, Version I | 12th September’ 2018 4
International Conference on Contemporary Issues in Business - A Global Perspective (CIBAGP–18) |
Jointly organized by PG & Research Department of Commerce, Business Administration, Commerce
(Bank Management), Commerce (CA), Swami Dayananda College of Arts & Science, Manjakkudi

This style is proper when:

 The circumstance isn't dire
 An essential choice should be made
 The conflict includes a substantial number of individuals or individuals
crosswise over various groups
 Previous conflict goals endeavours have fizzled
This style isn't proper when:
 A choice should be made earnestly
 The matter is unimportant to all included

3.2 Competing
With aCompeting approach, the individual in conflict takes a firm stand. They
contend with the other individual for power, and they regularly win (except if they're up
against another person who is contending). This style is regularly observed as forceful, and
can frequently be the reason for other individuals in the conflict feeling exploited.
This style is proper when:
 A choice should be made rapidly (i.e., crises)
 An disliked choice should be made
 Someone is endeavouring to exploit a circumstance
This style isn't fitting when:
 People are feeling touchy about the conflict
 The circumstance isn't earnest
 Buy-in is critical

3.3 Compromising
With the Compromising approach, every individual in the conflict surrenders
something that contributes towards the conflict goals.
This style is proper when:
 A choice should be made within the near future (which means the
circumstance is critical however not pressing)
 Resolving the conflict could easily compare to having every person "win."
 Power between individuals in the conflict is equivalent
This style isn't suitable when:
 A wide assortment of essential needs should be met
 The circumstance is amazingly earnest
 One individual holds more power than another

3.4 Accommodating
The Accommodating style is a standout amongst the most latent conflict goals styles.
With this style, one of the people surrenders what they need so the other individual can
have what they need. As a rule, this style isn't extremely successful, yet it is suitable in
specific situations.
5 Volume 05, Special Issue 03, Version I | 12th September’ 2018
 A Global Perspective of Conflict Management & Conflict Management Styles Strategies to Manage
Workplace Conflict in the Contemporary Issues in Business Scenario

This style is fitting when:

 Maintaining the relationship could really compare to winning
 The issue close by is vital to the next individual however isn't critical to you
This style isn't fitting when:
 The issue is vital to you
 Accommodating won't forever tackle the issue

3.5 Avoiding
The last approach is to maintain a strategic distance from the conflict completely.
Individuals who utilize this style have a tendency to acknowledge choices undeniably, stay
away from encounter, and delegate troublesome choices and undertakings. Maintaining a
strategic distance from is another aloof approach that is regularly not compelling, but
rather it has its employments.
This style is suitable when:
 The issue is minor
 The conflict will resolve itself all alone soon
This style isn't suitable when:
 The issue is essential to you or those near you, (for example, your group)
 The conflict will proceed or deteriorate without consideration

CONCLUSION
Conflict in organization isn't really horrible when appropriately oversaw. A few
points of interest have been distinguished, for example, expanding self-improvement and
assurance, upgrading correspondence, and delivering better undertaking results. In any
case, conflict can be the decay of an organization in the event that it isn't successfully
overseen. The test for organizational pioneers and venture managers is to attempt to keep
up the correct adjust and force of conflict in venture management. By using venture
management standards, understanding the elements of conflict, and learning ways to deal
with conflict goals, managers will have the capacity to build up a situation in which
inventiveness and development is energized and venture objectives are expert.

REFERENCES
[1] Antonioni, D. (1999). Relationship between the Big Five Personality Factors and Conflict
Management Styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4): 336-355.
[2] Armstrong, M. (2003). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. (9th ed.).
London: KoganPage
[3] Blake, R.R. and Mouton, J.S. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Houston, Texas: Gulf
Publishing Co.
[4] Brian, S. (2006). Thoughts on Leadership, Certification magazine.
http://web.ebscohost.com
[5] Follett, M.P. (1940). Constructive Conflict. In H.C. Metcalf and L. Urwick (Eds.),
Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follet (pp. 1 – 20),
New York: Harper.
Volume 05, Special Issue 03, Version I | 12th September’ 2018 6
 International Conference on Contemporary Issues in Business - A Global Perspective (CIBAGP–18) |
Jointly organized by PG & Research Department of Commerce, Business Administration, Commerce
(Bank Management), Commerce (CA), Swami Dayananda College of Arts & Science, Manjakkudi

[6] Gary, Y. (2008). Leadership in Organisations. 6th Edition. Prentice Hall: India
[7] Gross, M. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively:
An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles. The
International Journal of Conflict Management, 11 (3), 200 – 226.
[8] Kenneth, W.T., & Gail, F.T. (2008). Conflict styles of Men and Women at Six
Organization Levels, International Journal of Conflict Management, 14(2), 1 – 38.
[9] Kilmann, Ralph; Kenneth W. Thomas (1977). “Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of
Conflict-Handling Behavior: The “MODE” Instrument”. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 37 (2): 309 – 325. DOI: 10.1177/001316447703700204.
[10] Locke, E.A. (1976). The Nature and Cause of Job Satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (ed.).
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

7 Volume 05, Special Issue 03, Version I | 12th September’ 2018

View publication stats