Proposal For Consulting Services For: Campus Security Analysis (RFP 638)

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 38

Proposal for Consulting Services

for
Campus Security Analysis (RFP 638)

April 12, 2019

Prepared for:
Routt County, Colorado

Prepared by:
Ron Bundy, ron.bundy@tncg.com, (651) 705-1241
140 Third Street South, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
888.650.4580  651.430.2772  www.tncg.com

April 12, 2019


Ms. Julie Kennedy, Purchasing Agent
Routt County Commissioners Office
522 Lincoln Avenue
Steamboat Springs, CO 80487
jkennedy@co.routt.co.us
Dear Ms. Kennedy:
True North Consulting Group, LLC (TNCG) is pleased to provide this proposal to Routt County for a
Campus Security Analysis (RFP 638). TNCG acknowledges receipt of Addendum 1.
True North Consulting Group services include assessments, programming, security and technology
master planning, emergency management planning and training, detailed design, bidding and
negotiations, and contract administration. As a vendor-neutral, ASIS credentialed, security consultant,
we focus on the best fit and best practices for our clients.
Not only do our services fit the process, but our expertise is more diverse than any other consulting firm
– security assessments and planning, emergency management planning and response training,
suspicious indicators and other security staff training, evaluation of security departments, training, and
SOPs, structured cabling for indoor and outside plant; audio/visual systems; multimedia; safety
surveillance, access control, and intrusion; wired and wireless networking technologies; network
security; server and desktop virtualization; disaster recovery technology; and data center design.
TNCG’s representatives are:
Authorized Representative: Proposal Questions to:
Will Craig | Director of Operations Ron Bundy, Sales Consultant
140 Third Street South 140 Third Street South
Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 705-1242 (651) 705-1241
will.craig@tncg.com ron.bundy@tncg.com
We have submitted our response electronically via email, as requested. We look forward to the
opportunity to work with you. If you have any questions or if we can be of assistance in any way, please
feel free to give Ron Bundy a call at (651) 705-1241 or ron.bundy@tncg.com.
Sincerely,

Will Craig, Director | Operations


2
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

SECTION A: APPROACH TO THE PROJECT .............................................................................................. 4


UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................................................... 4
OPTIONAL SERVICES .................................................................................................................................... 12

SECTION B: COMPANY INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 13


ABOUT TRUE NORTH CONSULTING................................................................................................................. 13
AFFIDAVIT OF NON-ALLIANCE & INDEPENDENCE .............................................................................................. 17
STAFF ........................................................................................................................................................ 18
PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................................ 18

SECTION C: ABILITY TO COMPLETE A THOROUGH AND DETAILED REPORT .......................................... 27

SECTION D: KNOWLEDGE OF LOCAL CONDITIONS AND PHYSICAL PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT .......... 28

SECTION E: REFERENCES..................................................................................................................... 29

SECTION F: AGREEMENT TO USE THE ROUTT COUNTY CONTRACT ...................................................... 36

SECTION G: ABILITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT ACCORDING TO PROJECT SCHEDULE .............................. 37

SECTION H: OVERALL COST AND VALUE OF PROJECT .......................................................................... 38

3
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION A: Approach to the Project

Understanding of the Project


True North Consulting Group, LLC (TNCG) understands that the Board of County Commissioners of Routt
County is seeking qualified firms to provide an analysis with recommendations regarding the security
systems and security operations at the Routt County Campus located in Steamboat Springs, Colorado.
The sites included are the Historic Courthouse, the Annex, the Department of Human Services, and the
Log Cabin Buildings.

TNCG understands the importance and challenges of this project. We have a reputation for bringing
projects in on time and under budget. We will use all necessary resources and staff to meet or exceed
the completion dates agreed to with County Leadership.

Scope of Work
TNCG understands the scope of work will include (but may not be limited to):
• Conduct Project Kick-Off Meeting to review scope and present schedule.
• Conduct onsite security risk assessment for buildings/sites (during and after hours of operation)
resulting in a comprehensive security risk report including:
o Detailed assessment of employee security
o Detailed assessment of physical security including access control
o Assessment of emergency response, policies, processes, and procedures
o Review of security staffing models and levels
o Review existing training in place for training of staff and faculty
• Develop and deliver a draft Security Risk Assessment Report including cost estimates for
recommendations including:
o Post-assessment findings
o Technical and physical security measures to mitigate threats
o Policies, processes, and procedures
• Conduct findings and recommendations review meeting.
• Update and deliver final Security Risk Assessment Report including cost estimates to the
Routt County Board of County Commissioners.
4
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Methodology for Conducting Risk Assessment
The Process
To provide our clients with the best possible end-product, we have developed our proprietary,
multi-phased methodology for information gathering, risk analysis, and reporting.

Asset Threat Vulnerability Risk Recommendations

Analysis Assessment Assessment Assessment


• Occurs prior to • Occurs prior to • Occurs prior to, • Occurs after on- • Occurs after on-
and during on- and during on- during, and after site assessment. site assessment.
site assessment. site assessment. on-site • Analysis of • Recommended
• Identification of • Definition of assessment. probability and actions
organizational target profile. • Review of consequence for addressing
assets. • Identification of physical and relevant PMAs physical,
• Rating of assets relevant PTE technological based on current technological,
based on motivations. security security program. and human
potential • Review of measures, security
consequence of security incidents security staffing, measures.
loss. targeting similar and security • Designed to
sites. protocols. reduce or
• Identification and • Analysis of eliminate the
rating of relevant current levels of probability and
PMAs based on protection for consequence of
probability and high-value relevant PMAs.
consequence. assets against
relevant PMAs.

TVA Methodology and Process Summary


We assess security risk based on threat, consequences of loss/negative impact to most critical assets and
identified vulnerability in all three domains of security (technology, physical measures/design/layout, and
human factor/operations/protocol/training and procedures). Our recommendations are prioritized by
their ability to reduce most critical risk across the entire organization.
While this is not an exclusive list, our typical assessments address identification of security vulnerabilities
and appropriate holistic recommendations in the following domains:
• Physical Infrastructure:
o Utilities, Communication, Data
o Standoff Distance, Perimeter Protection
o Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design and other exterior security design
strategies
o Building Envelope
o Vehicular Traffic, Parking, and Commercial Deliveries, to include:
• Hardening and protection of ingress/egress.
o Separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic
• Technology:
o Video Surveillance Camera, Access Control, Duress Alarm, Magnetometers, and
Lighting Deployment and Utilization
o Building Access Control Systems, including card reader and credentialing technologies
o Identity and Credential Management Systems
o Video Management Systems to include analytics
o Duress Systems
o Crisis Notification and Communication Systems
o Integration of Physical Security Systems
5

o Overall Communications Systems (Radio, Cellular, Public Address, First Responder)


Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


• Operations:
o Organization and Resourcing of Operations
o Evaluation of the adequacy of staffing and resource levels for organizations
responsible for the delivery of security
o Evaluation of the organizational structure(s) for delivery of security

Risk Assessment Matrix


The Threat and Vulnerability Risk Analysis Matrix allows stakeholders the opportunity to assess
consequences regarding the severity of impact and probability of occurrence for a given threat. The
matrix is further color-coded, indicating and organizing the resulting consequences into categories of
High, Serious, Medium, and Low. The matrix will enable the decision‐makers to prioritize the most
serious threats/vulnerabilities requiring resolution and is serving as the basis for prioritizing our
recommended solutions.

This matrix is being used not only to assess the current risk based on identified deficiencies but also to
provide POST implementation risk rate, i.e., after implementing our recommended mitigating measures.

We can also provide a method for tracking implementation of measures included in the comprehensive
safety and security plan and the impact of the implementation on the County’s overall level of risk.
6
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Detailed Step-by-Step Approach
TNCG will provide an independent security risk assessment and analysis for each of the listed sites/buildings
from the perspectives of architecture, operational guidelines, technical security, culture and environment,
processes, handling procedures, and organizational structure.
Phase I – Project Initiation

TASK 1- Our work would begin with a Project Initiation Meeting with the following subtasks:
A. Introduce TNCG team members and County key personnel and reiterate their roles.
B. Review the Scope of Work with the County to ensure a full and mutual understanding.
C. Discuss and present schedule of project.
D. Set up periodic progress meetings (or communication procedure), and determine who
should attend, how long meetings should be, and what is expected from attendees.

TASK 2- Formulate checklists of needed information and provide those to the County for completion.
(We realize that this information may not exist.) Checklists may include requests such as:
A. Organizational policies
B. Written security policies and procedures
C. Existing emergency management plans
D. Existing security mechanisms
E. Crime reports and incident reports
F. Listings of key contact personnel
G. Building floor plans
H. Description of existing security infrastructure by building and location/area

TASK 3- Work with key County personnel to review current policies, processes, and procedures
and identify security objectives for each building type and for the County.
A. Assess current readiness levels.
B. Identify and classify violence risks.
C. Define triggers.
D. Analyze gaps.

TASK 4- Discuss status/development of policies and procedures and effectiveness of implementation.


A. Review existing emergency/crisis management plans for the County as well as each
location.
B. Review and discuss effectiveness and use of Emergency Notification and Warning
System.
C. Meet with local law enforcement personnel to discuss security.
D. Review response alternatives.
7

TASK 5- Clarify and redefine security objectives as appropriate for the individual locations as
Page

well as the system as a whole.

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Phase II – On-site Security Risk Assessments
Upon completion of data collection, TNCG will proceed to conduct on-site security risk assessments
and security systems assessments to identify security-related threats from internal and external
sources for each location. The assessments will include observation (both during hours of operation
and after hours of operation), data collection, and interviews with necessary staff. These
assessments will be done concurrently, and the information collected as part of the security systems
assessment will be incorporated into a comprehensive security report.

TASK 6- Conduct stakeholder discussions to update them on the current industry standards, best
practices, policies, and available system functionality. Based on the outcome of these
meetings, TNCG will develop a list of the stakeholders, desired system performance
requirements, and functional expectations.
TASK 7- Conduct staff interviews with key stakeholders.

TASK 8- Create and finalize a customized, quantifiable risk metric for the County security risk
assessment process based on the data collection and interview process as well as the
initial site analysis.

TASK 9- Conduct on-site security risk assessment. This assessment will include observation (both
during hours of operation and after hours of operation), data collection, and interviews
with necessary staff for physical security for locations:
A. Visit sites to examine and document existing conditions, equipment, and
infrastructure, and determine device locations. Observations will include, but not be
limited to:
i. Description of site
ii. Description of the physical properties
iii. Description of the surrounding area (neighborhood, adjacent structures, local
businesses)
iv. Pertinent crime data for surrounding area
v. Historical data concerning behavioral trends at each location, if available.
B. Conduct assessment of the general security for the buildings, including door lock
mechanisms, lock & key control, P.A., access control, cameras, intrusion detection,
fire detection systems, and other security equipment or systems.
C. Discuss recent security incidents, and identify threats, risks, and the likelihood of
future security incidents based on input from the County and local law enforcement
personnel.
D. Identify security-related threats from internal and external sources.
E. Identify critical assets to pair most likely threats to most likely security scenarios.

TASK 10- Conduct assessment of existing network connectivity for security systems.
A. Review communications and security systems and configuration.
B. Assess capability to handle additional security systems.
8

C. Provide findings and recommendation.


Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


TASK 11- Develop recommendations based on the information collected, stakeholder interviews,
and industry best practices including:
A. ASIS Protection of Assets Manual
B. FEMA
C. National Crimes Prevention Council
D. National Institute of Justice

TASK 12- Identify existing Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) and provide
alternatives, as necessary.

TASK 13- As part of the security systems assessment, provide recommendations to replace,
repurpose, or enhance existing systems.

TASK 14- Review and discuss:


A. Organizational emergency response, policies, and processes
B. Overall findings from the building security risk assessments
C. How existing physical and security technologies and location placement(s) meet
County requirements
D. Current security systems and/or equipment functionality, including both legacy and
networked systems
E. Alert and notification systems
F. Alarm Monitoring Center operations
G. Mass notification capabilities
H. Existing systems for replacement, repurpose, or enhancement
I. ‘Standards’ for future system expansion and implementation based on the following
criteria:
i. Locations in building(s), i.e., ingress, egress, halls, stairwells, etc.
ii. System types recommended for same by performance specifications
1. Application standards (EN 50132-7)
2. CENELEC guidelines
3. FEMA
a. Building modification needs
b. Staffing qualifications and training 9
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Phase III – Analysis and Recommendation
TASK 15- Evaluate all data collected through the security risk assessment process and prepare a
Security Risk Assessment Report for the County. The plan will provide prioritized risk
analysis and estimated costs to implement recommendations by each location including:
A. Executive Summary
B. Findings
i. Background
ii. Assets
iii. Threat Overview
iv. Threat Analysis
C. Vulnerability
i. Description of Physical Vulnerability
ii. Description of Security Technology Vulnerability
iii. Description of Human Assets Vulnerabilities
iv. Potential Methods of Action Probability Analysis
v. Vulnerabilities Analysis
vi. Impact of Loss Analysis
D. Risk Assessment
i. Level of Risk Associated with Each Threat
ii. Mitigation Measures
E. Other Elements
i. Building Construction
ii. SHIPO Guidelines
iii. Building Hardening Recommendations
iv. Barrier Design/Perimeter Fence, etc.
v. Exterior Doors
vi. Security Awareness
vii. Utilization of Multi-Layer Access Control
viii. Information Technology Elements
ix. Utilities
x. Location Identification of Emergency Response Assets/Backups (including both
initial and operational cost estimates)
xi. Existing Personnel:
1. Number
2. Qualifications
3. Training
F. Detailed Prioritized Recommendations for Prevention, Mitigation, and Response
with cost estimates
i. Physical & Technological Security
10

ii. Additional Security Technology Enhancement Options


iii. Human Assets Improvements – Levels, Training & Exercises, SOP’s, and
Page

interaction with other agencies

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


iv. Initial incident response measures
v. Lines of Communications
vi. Policies & Procedural Changes
G. Protective Measures Analysis
i. Physical Security Measures
1. Existing staffing levels
2. Parking barrier gates systems
3. Lighting systems
4. Traffic patterns
5. Environmental design issues
6. Others
ii. Security Technology Measures
1. Public safety alarm control and reporting systems
2. Burglar alarm systems/intrusion detection systems
3. Fire alarm systems
4. Alert & notification systems
5. Video surveillance/clandestine camera systems
6. Access control systems
7. Two-way communications systems
8. Emergency telephones
9. Command center/card access
10. Management systems
iii. Human Assets Enhancements
H. Plans for Training of Faculty and Staff to respond to potential threats
i. Training Goals and Objectives
ii. Training Topics
iii. Training Outline and Proposed Methods of Delivery

TASK 16- Review the Security Risk Assessment Report and recommendations with the County.

TASK 17- Revise the Security Risk Assessment Report and recommendations as needed and
prepare cost estimates for solution(s).

TASK 18- Present the final Security Risk Assessment Report and recommendations to the
Routt County Board of County Commissioners.
11
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Optional Services
SIRA® THREAT INFORMATION PROTECTION SYSTEM

SIRA® THREAT INFORMATION PROTECTION SYSTEM (TIPSsm) is a proprietary software system that
provides organizations with the tools and capabilities necessary to proactively handle threat
information. This unique system conducts real-time trend analysis and generates an immediate alert on
possible connections between current and previously reported suspicious activities, regardless of where,
when, and by whom these activities were reported. This collaborative system enables the reporting field
officer, management, and Analyst, to “connect the dots” between past and new suspicious activities
across all clients’ locations thus increasing the ability to identify and address evolving threats in real
time.

In addition to its analytical and alert features, TIPS provides subscribers with a comprehensive tool to
report, log, track, and manage observed suspicious activities, threats, and other types of cases.

12
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION B: Company Information

About True North Consulting


Years in Business: 35+ years

Office Locations: Minnesota, Texas, South Carolina, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Tennessee

Number of Full-time Staff: 47

The primary purpose of True North Consulting


Group is to provide the benefits of experienced,
OUR PHILOSOPHY:
unbiased security and technology consulting that
includes comprehensive building security review. • Disciplined Professional Service
TNCG’s philosophy starts with a disciplined • Sincere Client Interest
professional service process and sincere client
• Security & Technical Excellence
interest blended with the ability to listen to our
• Proven Concepts
client’s needs and goals. Combining this philosophy
with security and technical excellence, proven • Holistic Approach to Security
concepts, on-time delivery, adherence to budgets,
and dedication to team communications makes for a
quality result.

From security assessments and technology systems, to design, bid, and implementation, TNCG works
with you to develop and implement a comprehensive security program and supporting systems. Our
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) expert co-authored the original CPTED
concept. TNCG has continually updated and improved our CPTED approach, spanning over a decade of
work with government agencies. TNCG has a working knowledge of DHS/FEMA guidelines and
regulations. TNCG has worked with multiple cities and counties throughout the country and has
provided security assessments to the City of Santa Cruz (CA), Anoka County (MN), Denver Public Schools
(CO), and Colorado Mountain College. TNCG has also provided security consulting services to state and
regional agencies, including the State of Minnesota, the Chicago Office of Emergency Management and
Communication, and the City of St. Paul as well as private entities such as U.S. Bank Stadium.
13
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


TNCG security consultants have been providing security/public safety consulting to our clients
throughout our 35+ year history. Our firm employs individuals with Physical Security Professional (PSP),
Certified Protection Professional (CPP), Emergency Number Professional (ENP), Certified Business
Continuity Professional (CBCP), Project Management Professional (PMP), Certified Technology Systems
Designer (CTS-D), Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD), and past law enforcement
personnel.
We approach our security consulting from an
integrated, holistic approach, addressing physical
security measures, security technology measures,
and human factor or operational security measures
(policies and procedures, human resource
utilization, etc.) and the interplay between these
three critical areas of security. The goal of our
security consulting services is to assist our clients
in enhancing the ability to deter, detect, prevent,
and respond to all hazards and threats they may
face.
True North Consulting Group is not just another
safety, security and emergency management consulting
firm. TNCG’s consultants have the training and field experience from the Israeli government security
agencies and US Federal & State law enforcement agencies. Most importantly, TNCG has
demonstrated unparalleled expertise in safety and security assessments of critical infrastructure,
including assessments meant to ensure compliance with federal mandates, laws, rules, and
regulations.
The TNCG staff has developed and implemented various emergency exercises, emergency response
plans, and various emergency response and safety/security courses for the National Transit Institute.
True North Consulting Group specializes in creating operationally relevant emergency and security
plans, assessments, compliance reviews, and training to increase and improve organization’s security
and preparedness posture.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITY CONSULTING SERVICES PROVIDED BY TRUE NORTH CONSULTING GROUP
Security Risk Assessments Comprehensive, risk-based assessments of facilities and security
programs utilizing DHS, FBI, and Israeli Shin Bet methodology.
Assessments include risk analysis, threat assessment, vulnerability
assessments, and mitigation recommendations. The goal of the
assessment is to increase our client’s ability to prevent, detect, deter,
and respond to man-made threats
Threat Assessments Comprehensive, community-specific threat assessments utilizing DHS
and FBI methodology and incorporating up-to-date threat information
from local and regional law enforcement, including regional FBI Fusion
Center data and information.
CPTED Assessment and True North security and vulnerability assessments and mitigation
Mitigation recommendations include and address Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) principles.
14

Lighting Assessments True North can assess outside lighting levels for facilities and sites to
ensure adequate levels of lighting for both prevention of threats as well
Page

as effective response to potential situations.

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


All Hazards Mitigation True North provides best-practice all hazard mitigation
recommendations addressing based on security and vulnerability
assessments. Mitigation recommendations are prioritized and address
all three areas of security programs: physical, technology, and human
factor/organizational security. True North will provide cost estimates as
part of the mitigation recommendations if desired. Mitigation
strategies are designed to address identified risks and threats. This
service is typically included in our security assessments.
Security Master Planning True North consultants provide security master planning services,
providing our clients with a comprehensive, long-term strategy that
covers all aspects of a security operation and provides sequential
planning over a period of years to provide a safe, secure environment.
Physical Security & True North provides these services in the following technologies:
Supporting Technology o Video Surveillance/CCTV
Infrastructure Design and o Identity Management
Engineering, Acquisition o LAN (including Wireless LAN)
& Project Management o Access/Entry Control
o Video Management Systems (VMS)
o Biometric Technologies
o Video Analytics
o Alarm Systems/Intrusion Detection
o Communications and Dispatch Systems
o Notification Systems
o Response and Dispatch Systems (command center)
Command Center Design True North designs Emergency Operations Centers, including physical
equipment and technology. True North also designs technology to
integrate with EOCs and Dispatch Centers.
All Hazards Emergency True North will review emergency management plans, policies, and
Management Planning procedures, assist in updating plans and policies, and write all-hazards
emergency management plans for our educational clients. True North
follows DHS and FEMA guidelines for emergency management
planning, as well as ensures emergency management plans meet any
local and state requirements.
Business Impact Analysis True North assists our clients in determining and evaluating the
potential effects of an interruption to critical business operations as a
result of a disaster, accident or emergency, including IT functions.
Business Continuity With knowledge of the threats and risks faced by our clients, True
Planning North consultants work with them to create strategies and a plan to
ensure that personnel and assets are protected and able to function in
the event of an emergency both in the short-term and long-term.
Continuity of Operations True North works with our clients to develop a robust Continuity of
Plan Operations Plan (COOP) that delineates how a division or department
will perform essential operations during an emergency or long-term
disruption. The plan identifies mission-critical functions, departmental
communication methods, and alternate personnel, systems, and
15

locations. Each department or division needs a COOP to ensure our


clients can respond effectively in emergency situations.
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Training and Exercises True North assists our clients with training for staff, students, and
faculty in the areas of emergency response, suspicious behaviors
indicators, and effective policies and procedures for security personnel.
Trainings range from two-hour to all-day workshops. Formats for
training include tabletop exercises, drills, and full-scale emergency
response exercises.
Program Implementation True North consultants will work with our clients on an ongoing basis to
assist in the implementation of recommended mitigation strategies and
the enhancement of security programs.

Certifications & Professional Affiliations


♦ AICP American Institute of Certified Planners
♦ APCO Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials
♦ ASIS American Society for Industrial Security
♦ BICSI Building Industry Construction Services International
♦ CBCP Certified Business Continuity Planner
♦ CHS-III Certified Homeland Security Professional
♦ CISM Certified Information Security Manager
♦ CISSP Certified Information System Security Professional
♦ CPO Crime Prevention Officer
♦ CPP ASIS Certified Protection Professional
♦ CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Certification
♦ CRISC Certification in Risk and Information Systems Controls
♦ CSS Certified Security Supervisor
♦ Ed.M. Master of Education
♦ EE Electrical Engineer
♦ ENP-911 Emergency Number Professional
♦ FCC General Class Radiotelephone License
♦ HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program
♦ ICIA International Communications Industries Association, Inc.
♦ ICT Institute for Counter-Terrorism
♦ IEEE Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers
♦ ISA Israeli Security Academy
♦ ITIL V3 Foundations
♦ LEED AP Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, Accredited Professional
♦ MEP Master Exercise Practitioner
♦ PE Professional Engineer (selected states)
♦ PMP Project Management Professional
♦ PSP Physical Security Professional
♦ RCDD Registered Communications Distribution Designer
♦ RTBAV Certified Instructor in “Refuse To Be A Victim” Training Program
♦ USGBC U.S. Green Building Council Membership
♦ Sandia Labs Vulnerability Assessment Methodology
16
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Affidavit of Non-Alliance & Independence
True North Consulting Group, LLC states:

1. We are an independent security and technology-consulting group.

2. We sell no hardware or software or any tangible products, including but not limited to locks,
alarms, fencing, bollards, doors, window coverings, security systems, networking devices,
wireless equipment, telecommunications equipment, cabling, multimedia displays or projection
systems/devices.

3. We are not aligned with any manufacturers of the above-listed products or any products.

4. We are not aligned with any vendors, or distributors, or representative firms who sell, market,
install, program or subcontract work for the above-listed products, or any products or services.

5. We are paid only on a fee (hourly) basis by our clients for whom we are contractually committed
to providing independent consulting and design engineering services.

6. We receive no commissions, salaries, or payoffs of any kind from any business entity for services
we perform on behalf of our clients, or for products that we may from time to time recommend
to our clients on their behalf.

17
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Staff
True North Consulting Group, LLC (TNCG) is uniquely qualified to perform all aspects of the services
requested from our ASIS-certified and internationally trained security personnel, technology integration
specialists, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) experts, and ASIS certified
Professional PSP personnel. Our highly motivated staff of over 47 consultants is dedicated to security
and technology consulting.

Personnel
∙ Tony Chojnowski, COO, Project Executive

∙ Michael Rozin, Principal Project Consultant

∙ Mindy Sitton, Project Coordinator

∙ Zvi Kremer, Senior Security Consultant

∙ Ariel Cohen, Security and Threat Intelligence Analyst

∙ Joe DeLopez, Senior Security Consultant

∙ Ross Greves, Senior Security Consultant

∙ Brian Mattson, Senior Security Consultant

Please see individual resumes on the following pages.


18
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Tony Chojnowski, RCDD/OSP, RTPM
Chief Operating Officer
Significant Projects
Midlothian Independent School District
Performed a comprehensive districtwide facilities technology and security
assessment and long-term technology visioning, strategy, and planning.

Southlake Carroll Independent School District


Complete design and owner’s representation for $40M in technology/security
system upgrades and replacements. The project started with a district-wide
assessment in 2009, included 14 facility design and detailed project
management effort.

Aledo Independent School District


Education
District-wide 10-year technology and security assessment for 2014 bond
North Central University, Minneapolis, MN
planning effort. The project included assessing and making recommendations
for all facilities and meeting with sub-committees to help determine priorities
Areas of Expertise
and estimated system costs across the district.
• Technology Systems Project
Management Aldine Independent School District
• Premise physical security systems Provide E-rate project management and contract administration services for
o Electronic access control the 2015 FY. Systems included structured cabling - telecom room build-out,
o Intrusion detection pathway installation, backbone and horizontal installation, and demolition of
o Video surveillance systems abandoned system per NEC code; local area network (LAN) - MDF/MC campus
• Voice, data, and video cabling network systems, IDF/IC edge network systems, and management systems;
infrastructure and wireless networks – controllers, wireless access points, and coverage and
• Fiber optic systems performance.
• Data center planning and design
• Program management Manor Independent School District
Provided a districtwide technology assessment and scope preparation for a
Training and Certifications 2014 technology bond package. TNCG’s design services included districtwide
• American Clearinghouse for Educational upgrades including structured data cabling, PA/bell/clock, AV multimedia,
Facilities – Developed 2-part Webinar local sound reinforcement (LSR), and security: intrusion, video surveillance,
for Security on Educational Facilities and access control.
• BICSI Registered Communications
Distribution Designer (RCDD) Round Rock Independent School District
• BICSI Certified Outside Plant (OSP) Provided design, specifications, bidding & negotiations, and contract
Designer Certification administration for several campuses at Round Rock ISD that included
• BICSI Registered Telecommunications complete audio-visual systems – bell, clock, public address, classroom
Project Manager Certification (RTPM) localized control, classroom emergency notifications override, and large
• Genetec A&E Security Design Summit venue sound systems.
• BICSI PM125 Telecommunications
Project Management Experience
• BICSI OSP200 Outside Plant Design 2014 – Present True North Consulting Group
• BICSI Grounding & Bonding • Chief Operating Officer
• BICSI Outside Plan Design 2001 – 2014 Elert & Associates
• ASIS STAM – Video Surveillance Design • 2011 – 2014 Executive Vice President
Certification • 2001 – 2011 Senior Technology Consultant
• Systimax Design Specialist 1993 – 2001 Metro Communication Services, Inc.
• Corning Fiber Optic Design, • Senior Account Manager
Installation/Inspection Certification
19

• Annual ASIS Security Conference Memberships/Affiliations


Participant • BICSI (Building Industry Consulting Service International)
Page

• Annual ISC West Annual Security • ASIS International (American Society for Industrial Security)
Participant • IPVM (IP Video Management & Access Control)

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Michael Rozin
Security & Threat Intelligence Analyst
Significant Projects and Achievements
Washington Metro Area Transit Authority
Serving as Principal Consultant for System-wide Security Assessment
Project, assessing 96 facilities.

Connecticut State Colleges and Universities


Senior Security Consultant and Team Lead for system-wide security
assessment project, including security staffing review.

West Linn Wilsonville School District, Oregon


Principal Consultant for district-wide security assessment.
Education
International Institute of Counter-Terrorism Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority
• Counter-Terrorism Studies Security training. Principal Consultant for system-wide security
Ma’agan Michael assessment.
• Hebrew Studies
Israeli Defense Forces Chicago Office of Emergency Management and Communications
• Combat Sergeants School Security Assessment.
Israeli Security Academy
• Specialized Security Agent City of Garland, Texas
*Fluent in Russian, Bulgarian, Hebrew, English and Principal Consultant for city-wide security assessment.
basic level in Arabic*
Developed Behavior Recognition Training (Suspicious Indicators
Memberships Recognition and Assessment (SIRA™).
• American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS)
• Twin Cities Security Partnership (TCSP) Developed Counter-Terrorism program for Mall of America, along with
• International Association of Bomb Technicians additional procedural and technological solutions.
and Investigators (IABTI)
• Institute for Counter Terrorism (ICT) – Young Presented program to the US Congress, House of Representatives –
Professionals Committee on Homeland Security (8/2008) as a security model for
private sector.
Strategic Skills
• National Improvised Explosives Familiarization, Granted “Award for Creative Excellence” (highest employee
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) recognition across all departments), Mall of America (2008).
• Understanding Islamist Terrorism,
Counter Terrorism Operations Center (CTOC) Experience
2009 – Present True North Consulting Group
• Terrorism Awareness: Protecting Soft Targets,
Department of Homeland Security • Security Consultant
2009 – Present Rozin Security Consulting
• Terrorism as it relates to Critical Infrastructure,
Joint Analysis Center (MNJAC) with • Security Consultant
Department of Justice (DOJ) 2004 – 2005 Ben Gurion International Airport
• Explosives Detection Dog Team- Supervisor • Specialized Security Agent / Field Supervisor
and Instructor, Global Training Academy Israeli Airport Authority
2003 – 2004 Tel Aviv
• Krav Maga (Israeli Defensive Tactics), Law-
Enforcement Instructor, Krav Maga Worldwide • Security Officer, Ministry of Finance/Modiyin Ezrahi LTD
2001 – 2003 Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)
• ASP Baton & Handcuffing--Law-Enforcement
Instructor, Armament Systems and Procedures • Sergeant
20
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Mindy Sitton
Education Consultant
Significant Projects
City Colleges of Chicago, IL
Reviewed existing security systems and developed a security plan and risk
assessment for the City Colleges system-wide, along with individual
security plans for all seven colleges. Site-specific plans were developed
addressing the unique characteristics and physical parameters of each of
the seven campuses, as well as training plans enabling the system as a
whole and each campus to provide the highest level of security. In addition,
we designed system-wide all hazards safety and security plans and
conducted training for public safety personnel.
Education
Connecticut Community Colleges, CT
Harvard University Cambridge
Reviewed and assessed the technology infrastructure and AV systems
• Master of Education
throughout its 12 campuses. These assessments also included network
University of Texas
electronics, network performance, staffing, and network management. We
• Bachelor of Science, Elementary
also developed system-wide technology infrastructure and AV multimedia
Education
standards for all CCC facilities. Scope from 2006-2014 has included
numerous campus upgrades, a new science building at the Norwalk
Areas of Expertise
Community College campus, and the new Gateway campus, located in New
Training and professional development for
Haven, CT.
clients on the effective integration of
technology into the learning environment
• Program evaluation Denver Public Schools, CO
• Strategic planning Conducted a review of building security for Denver Public Schools. After
reviewing and establishing district-wide standards, we were retained to
• Policy evaluation and development
assist in the implementation of recommendations including preparing
• Personnel appraisal systems
construction documents for recommended security enhancements.
• Grant management and coordination
School District Five of Lexington and Richland Counties, SC
Training and Certifications
Provided a complete technology design, as well as rough and detailed
• Harvard Project on Negotiation
drawings and specifications for all systems, developed bidding packages,
• Texas Educator Certificates: Elementary developed budgets, and provided system software and hardware
Self-Contained (Grades 1-8); Elementary recommendations.
History (Grades 1-8); Generic Special
Education (Grades PK-12) Experience
2009 – Present True North Consulting Group
Presentations
• Security Consultant
• State-level Presentations on topics such 2004 – 2008 Lake Travis Independent School District.
as:
• Special Education Teacher/Project Specialist
o State Board of Education Task Force
1999 – 2002 Region XIII Education Service Center
Report on Students with Disabilities
Division of Statewide Initiative
o Qualitative Research on High-
• Coordinator of Statewide Initiatives
Performing Schools
1997 – 1999 Texas Education Agency
• Educator Appraisal Process (PDAS)
Division of Continuing Education and School
• Administrator Development and Training Improvement Initiatives
(ILD) District and campus-level
• Director of School Improvement Initiatives
Presentations on topics such as:
o SHARS (Medicaid) Billing Policies and
Community Involvement
Procedures
• Austin School for the Performing and Visual Arts
o Implementing and Evaluating
Member, Advisory Board
21

Behavior Improvement Plans


• CASA of Travis County
Court-appointed Special Advocate
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Zvi Kremer
Security Consultant
Significant Projects
Managed security operations at large scopes, multiple-locations,
labor-intensive, regulated, international and high-risk environments including
Moscow and O’Hare International Airports.

Developed and implemented security concepts, SOP’s, manuals, and training


programs for security operations.

Managed multidisciplinary teams (technology, operations, and business) in


the process of development and implementation of security technologies and
Education solutions.
Loyola University
• Master of Science, Management, Assembled and managed experts’ teams for complex airport security
International Business, I.S./ consulting projects.
Marketing
Tel Aviv University Worked with local and foreign Government agencies to create, coordinate,
• Bachelor of Science, Economics and and implement security programs.
Labor Studies
Graduate of the “Advanced Security & Anti-Terrorism Management Course”,
Areas of Expertise Israeli General Security Agency.
• Strategic & Operations Planning
• Security Planning & Management Conducted security assessments and audits for airports, airlines, service
• Multi-site Operations providers, and more.
• Business Development
• Budget Planning, P&L Planned and supported implementation of clients’ security programs and
• Project Management services.
• Training Development
• Coaching & Training Developed and delivered advanced and customized security training programs
• Problem Solving for employees and clients.
• Presentation, Public-Speaking
Initiated and executed development and implementation of state-of-the-art
Computer-Based-Training programs for security operations and awareness in
various industries.

Identified market needs and opportunities for clients’ new business


development.

Planned and managed the process of responding to solicitations, initiation of


unsolicited proposals, pricing, negotiating, and closing of various consulting
and operational business opportunities.

Experience
2014 – Present True North Consulting Group
• Contributing Security Consultant
2013 – 2014 Rozin Security Consulting
• Security Consultant
2006 – 2007 Acxiom / Harbinger Airport Technologies Group Inc.
• Director of Strategic Initiatives, Senior Consultant
2001 – 2005 Huntleigh / ICTS USA
22

• Director of Special Projects, Regional Manager


1995 – 1998 El-Al Israeli Airlines
Page

• Security Manager

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Ariel Cohen
Security & Threat Intelligence Analyst
Significant Projects
Colorado Mountain College
Description: TNCG conducted a security risk/threat and vulnerability
assessment including operational and security policy reviews for the
College’s 12 locations. True North Consulting Group, LLC. reviewed security
staffing, operations, and all physical and technological aspects of security.
The operations assessment included policy review and identified prioritized
alternatives to mitigate identified vulnerabilities.

Chicago Office of Emergency Management & Communications (OEMC)


Education Description: Threat & Vulnerability Assessment for the 2nd largest
International Institute of Counter-Terrorism Emergency Dispatch Center in the United States.
• Master of Science, Counter-
Terrorism City Colleges of Chicago
Washington University Description: All-Hazards Planning, Security & Risk Assessment
• Bachelor of Science, Political Science
Denver Public Schools
Areas of Expertise Description: Security Assessment for Denver Public Schools
• Military Leadership and Command
• Translation of Sensitive Documentation Rockford Public Schools
• Logistical Coordination and Support Description: Security Threat & Vulnerability Assessment True North
• Responsible for Fund Allocation and Consulting Group, LLC. completed a security assessment for all 49 schools.
Management A detailed report, including text and photos of dozens of areas for each
• Squad and Platoon Commander school was provided.
• On-Going Threat Monitoring
• Terrorist Incident Chronicling Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA)
• Terrorism and Violence Trend Analysis Description: RFP for new systems for BCA’s move to a new building including
• High-Level Terrorism Threat Assessments data cabling, wireless, security, data center, telephones, audio & video.
TNCG guided technology from Schematic Design through Detailed Design,
Strategic Skills Bidding, Construction Documents, and Contract Administration.
• SIRA™ (Suspicious Indicators Recognition
and Assessment) Experience
2014 – Present True North Consulting Group
• Intelligence Collection, Analysis &
Reporting • Contributing Security Consultant
• Quantitative Crime and Terrorism • Security & Threat Intelligence – Analyst
Analysis 2013 – 2014 Rozin Security Consulting
• Public Speaking • Security Consultant
2007 – 2008 The Institute for Counter-Terrorism
• Military and Security Leadership and
Deployment • Open Source Intelligence Monitor
• Facility Security Benchmarking Analysis
• Security Risk Assessments
• Data Compilation, Manipulation,
Analysis, and Presentation
• Threat Intelligence Analysis & Reporting
23
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Joseph DeLopez
Security Consultant
Significant Projects
Chicago Housing Authority
Description: Police Department Superintendent in charge of developing
security alternatives for the Authority.

Connecticut Community Colleges


Description: Security Assessment - in progress

City Colleges of Chicago


Description: All-Hazards Planning, Security & Risk Assessment

Education Waterbury Public Schools - Connecticut


Criminal/Social Justice Description: Security & Risk Assessment, Security Design Standards
• M.S. Criminal Justice
Senior Management Institute for Police Glastonbury Public Schools - Connecticut
• Certificate, Executive Strategies Description: Video Surveillance Assessment & Design Standards
Management
Northwestern University Traffic Institute Experience
• Certificate, Traffic Police • 2012 – Present True North Consulting Group
Administration Training Program • Contributing Security Consultant
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle 2011 – 2012 City Colleges of Chicago
• B.S. in Management • Safety and Security
DePaul Academy 2002 – 2011 Village of Winnetka
• Pre-Engineering Prep Program • Chief of Police
1980 – 2002 Chicago Police Department
Areas of Expertise • 1980-2000 Numerous Positions
• Security & Vulnerability Assessments • 2000-2002 Deputy Superintendent
• Program Evaluation 1998 – 2000 Patrol Administration
• Strategic Planning • Deputy Chief
• Policy Evaluation and Development
• Personnel Appraisal Systems
• Dispatch Center Integration
• Multi-cultural Relationships

Certificates
• Executive Strategies Management
• Northwestern University, Traffic Police
Administration Training Program
• Certificate of Appreciation, Logan Square
Lions
• Chicago Police Department Youth Division
Role Model Recognition Award
• 2 Chicago Police Department Unit
Meritorious Awards
• 2 Chicago Police Department
Commendations
24
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Ross I. Greves, CPP
Senior Technology Consultant
Mr. Greves most recently served as the Director of Security for Austin
Community College in Austin, Texas. For nearly a decade, he worked to
implement a robust and resilient security program to contribute to student
safety and overall success in the Central Texas region.

Mr. Greves participated in two Persian Gulf deployments, and one counter-
narcotic deployment to Central and South America. His early experience is
derived from his installation and maintenance of shipboard RADAR and RF
Communications systems. He has served as flight deck fire-fighter/medical
corpsman during helicopter evolutions. He gained extensive experience in the
design, installation and maintenance of integrated security systems while
Education employed by large security contractors, end-users, and independent
Bellevue University, Bellevue, Nebraska consulting firms.
• Bachelor of Science in
Significant Projects
Security Management
Bates University – Lewiston, Maine
Lead a security assessment effort of Campus Facilities and Off-Campus Housing
Areas of Expertise
facilities. Provided technology consulting, design and management to deploy
• Public Safety
enterprise security systems on and off campus.
• 2-Way Radio Systems
• Physical Security Systems;
Raleigh-Durham International Airport – Cary, North Carolina
o Video Management
Terminal A, Terminal C, General Aviation
o Electronic Access Control
o Intrusion Detection
Provided consulting services for comprehensive hot-redundant premise access
• Emergency Mass Notification control system upgrade and initial deployment of an enterprise video
o Public Marquee Display surveillance system.
o Workstation, Social Media, Text,
Email notification Federal Reserve Bank - Districts 11 & 12
o Fire Alarm Integration System Design and Implementation
• Technology Consulting
• Masterkey Systems – Facility Keying District 11: Provided consulting services to upgrade FRB Dallas cash vault
• Emergency Management solution. Subsequent projects included an upgrade to District 11’s premise
• Emergency Response access control, video surveillance, and intercom systems.
• Business Continuity
• Risk Assessment District 12: Provided security consulting, design and implementation oversight
• Central Station Design services to expand and enhance a multi-phase security program.
• Security Control Room Design
Sowwah Square Hotel – Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Training and Certifications Provided consulting and design services for hotel operations and premiere
• ASIS International Certified Protection guest accommodations. Coordinated security interface requirements with
Professional (CPP) Ministry of Information.
• Software House C-Cure – Enterprise
Access Control Experience
• Salient CompleteView – Enterprise Video 2018 – Present True North Consulting Group
Surveillance • Senior Technology Consultant
• Morsewatchman Keywatcher 2009 – 2018 Austin Community College – Austin, Texas
• Homeland Security Threat Liaison • Director of Security
Officer 2001– 2009 Various Consulting
• Annual ASIS Security Conference • Senior Security Consultant
25

Participant 1999 – 2001 Security Solutions


• FEMA: ICS 100, 200, 700, and 800 • Project Manager
Page

1991-1999 United States Navy


• Electronics Technician, 2nd Class, Surface Warfare

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


Brian Mattson
Technology Consultant
Significant Projects
Hennepin County
10+ year project to integrate all access control, video surveillance and
intercom systems in one operation center for all 100+ County buildings and
43 libraries. Oversaw design and implementation of all relevant systems on
existing county network infrastructure. Worked with stakeholders to ensure
design elements met needs and complied with standards. Designed and
implemented a number of customized integrations between systems.

State of Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA)


Provided design and implementation services including video surveillance,
access control and intercom systems for the headquarters building in
Education
St. Paul, Minnesota.
Hamline University, St. Paul, MN
• Bachelor of Arts Technical Theater Travelers Insurance Company
Provided design and implementation services including video surveillance,
Areas of Expertise access control and intercom systems.
• Enterprise Class Access Control &
Intrusion Control Systems Independent School District # 192 – Farmington, Minnesota
• Analogue Video Surveillance Provided design services for structured cabling and video surveillance
• IP Video Surveillance systems.
• Analogue Intercom
• IP Intercom Minnesota Department of Corrections - St. Cloud
• Large Scale Systems Integration Designed new video management system for recording of all video
• Network Systems surveillance for the Minnesota Department of Corrections in St. Cloud, MN.

Training and Certifications Thomson Reuters


• Axis Certified Professional - License Provided design and implementation services for video surveillance and
19847607 access control systems.
• Power Limited Technician - License
PL009373 Experience
• Andover Controls Continuum 2018 – Present True North Consulting Group
• Andover Controls Plain English • Technology Consultant
• Genetec Omnicast 2017 – 2018 Elert & Associates
• Genetec Synergis • Technology/Security Systems Designer
• Pelco Advanced Systems Programming 1999 – 2017 VTI Security
• Pelco Digital Sentry • 2004 – 2017 Field Engineer
• Pelco Matrix Switchers • 2003 – 2004 Technician - Level 6
• SQL Database Administration • 1999 – 2003 Field Operations Systems Coordinator
• Vingtor/Stentofon Intercoms & AlphaPro 1998 – 1999 Allied Security
• Background checks passed annually at • Site Manager, Piper Jaffrey Tower, St. Paul, MN
State and 1993 – 1998 CSM, ABM, ASSC and Allied Security
• Federal (FBI) level • Security Shift Supervisor
• Security Officer
1990 – 1993 Hamline University
• Patrol Sergeant
• Security Officer
26
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION C: Ability to Complete a Thorough and Detailed Report

True North Consulting Group, LLC strives to understand your organization and its mission fully, and what
is most important to you. We believe that for a comprehensive safety and security plan to be successful,
we must have in-depth knowledge of your operations, systems and personnel, environment and culture,
and stakeholders. This approach allows our team to deliver tailored security solutions to your
organization that leverages your existent resources and support your cultural and operational strengths
while meeting nationally-accepted best practices. Our recommendations have proven effective and will
create stronger security operations meeting the required level of protection for your organization. Our
master security plans include recommendations for all aspects of a security program in the three
domains of security: physical security, security technology, and human factor/operations.

True North has extensive experience in providing phased implementation plans with cost estimates for
recommendations included in the plan based on our knowledge of systems and installation costs
typically charged by vendors in the geographic area. Because we are involved with the bidding and
negotiation process for many of our clients, we have current, up-to-date market costs for items included
in security program recommendations. Our cost estimates include item, system, and maintenance costs
as appropriate.

Our name is only as good as what our clients say. The overwhelming majority of our clients become our
biggest advocates and repeat customers, which we feel is a tribute to our reputation of providing the
highest quality of service in all aspects of what we do. TNCG considers all current operations, future
growth, blended academic content delivery, and alignment of information technology resources with
the overall teaching and learning goals of the institution.

We have successfully completed security and technology assessments throughout our 35 years without
any complications. We encourage the County to check our references.

27
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION D: Knowledge of Local Conditions and Physical Proximity to the Project

True North Consulting Group, LLC has worked with clients from coast to coast in the U.S. Our
consultants prepare for each project by reviewing all pertinent data and geographic data as thoroughly
as possible to ensure we are familiar with local conditions.

TNCG has worked with many clients in Colorado including the City of Arvada, Colorado Mountain
College, Denver Public Schools, and both the City and School District of Durango.

We would provide our services from our Minnesota branch office.

28
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION E: References

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, DC


Project Description: TNCG was contracted to provide Threat and Vulnerability Assessments (TVA) for all
Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (WMATA) facilities and infrastructure. In Phase I of the
project, TNCG verified the presence or absence of security design standards and mitigation
recommendations from previous TVAs for facilities and infrastructure under construction. In Phase II of
the project, which was just completed, TNCG conducted TVAs for all existing WMATA facilities. TNCG is
currently discussing additional scope of work with WMATA.
Capacity on the project: Prime
Original contract amount: $56,000+ (multiple project – presently working)
List any liquidated damages assessed or threatened on any project: None
List any debarments or agreements not to bid work for other owners: None
List any criminal charges, OSHA or EPA violations: None
Contact: Capt. Brian Heanue, Metro Transit Police, (202) 345-0809, BHeanue@wmata.com
____________________________________________________________________________________
Colorado Mountain College
Project Description: TNCG (formerly Elert & Associates) conducted a security risk/threat and vulnerability
assessment including operational and security policy reviews for the College’s 12 locations. We reviewed
security staffing, operations, and all physical and technological aspects of security. The operations
assessment included policy review and identified prioritized alternatives to mitigate identified
vulnerabilities.
Capacity on the project: Prime
Original contract amount: $70,000 +
List any liquidated damages assessed or threatened on any project: None
List any debarments or agreements not to bid work for other owners: None
List any criminal charges, OSHA or EPA violations: None
Contact: Mr. Steve Rozanski, Director of Risk Management, (970) 384-8533, srozanski@coloradomtn.edu
____________________________________________________________________________________
City of Arvada, Colorado – 2014-2015
Project Description: The City of Arvada retained TNCG (formerly Elert & Associates) to assess security and
prepare a security master plan including reviewing and establishing one point vs. multiple points of
entrance, installation of passive or active screening methods, reviewing and establishing budget for
upgrades of video surveillance, access control, intrusion detection, and all physical security measures
(i.e., door locks, bollards, x-ray, magnetometers) along with passive screening and policy & procedures
change and review.
Capacity on the project: Prime
Original contract amount: $82,000 + (multiple projects)
List any liquidated damages assessed or threatened on any project: None
List any debarments or agreements not to bid work for other owners: None
List any criminal charges, OSHA or EPA violations: None
29

Contact: Mr. Kim Vagher, Manager of City Facilities, (720) 898-7681, kvagher@arvada.org
Page

____________________________________________________________________________________

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


City of Santa Cruz, California – 2016-2017
Project Description: TNCG (formerly Elert & Associates) was retained to provide an assessment of city
security camera, video management, and access control systems for City Water Department facilities,
oversee implementation at City Water Department facilities, and create a master plan for system
implementation across all City facilities.
Capacity on the project: Prime
Original contract amount: $68,965
List any liquidated damages assessed or threatened on any project: None
List any debarments or agreements not to bid work for other owners: None
List any criminal charges, OSHA or EPA violations: None
Contact: Ms. Kimberly Ramirez, IT Manager, (831) 420-5030, kramirez@cityofsantacruz.com

CITY, COUNTY, & STATE GOVERNMENT CLIENT LIST

AITKIN COUNTY, BREVARD COUNTY, CHIPPEWA COUNTY,


Aitkin, Minnesota Viera, Florida Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin
ALLAMAKEE COUNTY, BROWN COUNTY, CHISAGO COUNTY,
Waukon, Iowa New Ulm, Minnesota Center City, Minnesota
ASHLAND COUNTY, BUFFALO COUNTY, CITY AND COUNTY OF
Ashland, Wisconsin Alma, Wisconsin LEAVENWORTH,
AUDUBON COUNTY, BUREAU OF CRIMINAL Leavenworth, Kansas
Audubon, Iowa APPREHENSION, CITY OF ALBERTVILLE,
AUSTIN PUBLIC UTILITIES, St. Paul, Minnesota Albertville, Minnesota
Austin, Minnesota BURNETT COUNTY, CITY OF ALLEN,
BARRON COUNTY, Siren, Wisconsin Allen, Texas
Barron, Wisconsin BUTLER COUNTY, CITY OF ALTOONA,
BAYFIELD COUNTY, Allison, Iowa Altoona, Pennsylvania
Washburn, Wisconsin CALHOUN COUNTY, CITY OF AMES,
BEADLE COUNTY, Marshall, Michigan Ames, Iowa
Huron, South Dakota CAMPBELL COUNTY, CITY OF ANKENY,
BELTRAMI COUNTY, Rustburg, Virginia Ankeny, Iowa
Bemidji, Minnesota CARROLL COUNTY, CITY OF ANOKA,
BENTON COUNTY, Carroll, Iowa Anoka, Minnesota
Vinton, Iowa CARVER COUNTY, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,
BLACKHAWK COUNTY, Chaska, Minnesota Apple Valley, Minnesota
Waterloo, Iowa CASS COUNTY, CITY OF ARVADA,
BLUE EARTH COUNTY, Fargo, North Dakota Arvada, Colorado
Mankato, Minnesota CASS COUNTY, CITY OF AUSTIN,
BOONE COUNTY, Virginia, Illinois Austin, Texas
Belvidere, Illinois CEDAR COUNTY, CITY OF BATTLE CREEK,
BREMER COUNTY, Tipton, Iowa Battle Creek, Michigan
30

Waverly, Iowa CHEROKEE COUNTY, CITY OF BELOIT,


Page

Cherokee, Iowa Beloit, Wisconsin

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


CITY OF BISMARCK, CITY OF EDINA, CITY OF LINCOLN,
Bismarck, North Dakota Edina, Minnesota Lincoln, Nebraska
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF FARGO, CITY OF MADISON,
Bloomington, Minnesota Fargo, North Dakota Madison, Wisconsin
CITY OF BURNSVILLE, CITY OF FARMINGTON, CITY OF MANKATO,
Burnsville, Minnesota Farmington, New Mexico Mankato, Minnesota
CITY OF CASPER, CITY OF FORNEY, CITY OF MAPLE GROVE,
Casper, Wyoming Forney, Texas Maple Grove, Minnesota
CITY OF CEDARBURG, CITY OF FORT ATKINSON, CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
Cedarburg, Wisconsin Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin Maplewood, Minnesota
CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, CITY OF MARSHALLTOWN,
Cedar Rapids, Iowa Fort Collins, Colorado Marshalltown, Iowa
CITY OF CERES, CITY OF GAINESVILLE, CITY OF MCHENRY,
Ceres, California Gainesville, Georgia McHenry, Illinois
CITY OF CHAMPAIGN, CITY OF GARLAND, CITY OF MINNETONKA,
Champaign, Illinois Garland, Texas Minnetonka, Minnesota
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, CITY OF GERMANTOWN, CITY OF MINOT,
Charlotte, North Carolina Germantown, Tennessee Minot, North Dakota
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, CITY OF GOODYEAR, CITY OF NEW HOPE,
College Station, Texas Goodyear, Arizona New Hope, Minnesota
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, CITY OF GRAND FORKS, CITY OF NIXA,
Columbia Heights, Minnesota Grand Forks, North Dakota Nixa, Missouri
CITY OF COLUMBUS, CITY OF GRESHAM, CITY OF OAK GROVE,
Columbus, Wisconsin Gresham, Oregon Cedar, Minnesota
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, CITY OF GROSSE POINTE FARMS, CITY OF OCONOMOWOC,
Cottage Grove, Minnesota Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan Oconomowoc, Wisconsin
CITY OF DAYTON, CITY OF HAM LAKE, CITY OF OLIVETTE,
Dayton, Ohio Ham Lake, Minnesota Olivette, Missouri
CITY OF DECORAH, CITY OF HASTINGS, CITY OF ORONO,
Decorah, Iowa Hastings, Minnesota Orono, Minnesota
CITY OF DES MOINES, CITY OF HERMANTOWN, CITY OF OTTUMWA,
Des Moines, Iowa Hermantown, Minnesota Ottumwa, Iowa
CITY OF DUBUQUE, CITY OF HURST, CITY OF OWATONNA,
Dubuque, Iowa Hurst, Texas Owatonna, Minnesota
CITY OF DULUTH, CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, CITY OF PINGREE GROVE,
Duluth, Minnesota Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota Pingree Grove, Illinois
CITY OF DURHAM, CITY OF IOWA CITY, CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
Durham, North Carolina Iowa City, Iowa Plymouth, Minnesota
CITY OF EAGAN, CITY OF JANESVILLE, CITY OF PORTLAND,
Eagan, Minnesota Janesville, Wisconsin Portland, Oregon
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, CITY OF KANSAS CITY, CITY OF RALEIGH,
31

Eden Prairie, Minnesota Kansas City, Missouri Raleigh, North Carolina


Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


CITY OF RICHMOND HEIGHTS, CITY OF WAHPETON, DAKOTA COUNTY,
Richmond Heights, Missouri Wahpeton, North Dakota Hastings, Minnesota
CITY OF ROBBINSDALE, CITY OF WATERTOWN, DAKOTA COUNTY HRA,
Robbinsdale, Minnesota Watertown, Wisconsin Rosemount, Minnesota
CITY OF ROCKFORD, CITY OF WAUSAU, DANE COUNTY,
Rockford, Illinois Wausau, Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin
CITY OF ROCKWALL, CITY OF WEBSTER GROVES, DANE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT,
Rockwall, Texas Webster Groves, Missouri Madison, Wisconsin
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, CITY OF WESTLAND, DANE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES,
Roseville, Minnesota Westland, Michigan Madison, Wisconsin
CITY OF ROUND ROCK, CITY OF WILLISTON, DAVIS COUNTY,
Round Rock, Texas Williston, North Dakota Bloomfield, Iowa
CITY OF ST. CLOUD, CITY OF WOODBURY, DECATUR COUNTY,
St. Cloud, Minnesota Woodbury, Minnesota Leon, Iowa
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, CLARK COUNTY, DELAWARE COUNTY,
St. Louis Park, Minnesota Neillsville, Wisconsin Manchester, Iowa
CITY OF ST. PAUL, CLAY COUNTY, DES MOINES COUNTY,
St. Paul, Minnesota Spencer, Iowa Burlington, Iowa
CITY OF SALEM, CLAY COUNTY, DODGE COUNTY,
Salem, Oregon Vermilion, South Dakota Juneau, Wisconsin
CITY OF SALINA, CLAYTON COUNTY, DODGE COUNTY,
Salina, Kansas Elkader, Iowa Mantorville, Minnesota
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, CLINTON COUNTY, DOOR COUNTY,
Santa Cruz, California Clinton, Iowa Sturgeon Bay, Minnesota
CITY OF SAVANNAH, CODINGTON COUNTY, DOUGLAS COUNTY,
Savannah, Georgia Watertown, South Dakota Alexandria, Minnesota
CITY OF SEGUIN, COLLIN COUNTY, DOUGLAS COUNTY,
Seguin, Texas McKinney, Texas Douglasville, Georgia
CITY OF SHOREVIEW, COLORADO STATE PATROL, DUBUQUE COUNTY,
Shoreview, Minnesota Alamosa, Colorado Dubuque, Iowa
CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL, COLUMBIA COUNTY, DUNKLIN COUNTY,
South St. Paul, Minnesota Portage, Wisconsin Kennett, Missouri
CITY OF STATESBORO, CONVENTION AND VISITORS DUNN COUNTY,
Statesboro, Georgia BUREAU OF GREATER KANSAS CITY, Menomonie, Wisconsin
CITY OF SUPERIOR, Kansas City, Missouri EASTSIDE SUBURBAN EMERGENCY
Superior, Wisconsin COOK MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER,
CITY OF TAMARAC, DISTRICT, Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Tamarac, Florida Libertyville, Illinois EAU CLAIRE COUNTY,
CITY OF TOPEKA, CRAWFORD COUNTY, Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Topeka, Kansas Prairie Du Chien, Wisconsin FAYETTE COUNTY,
CITY OF VADNAIS HEIGHTS, CROW WING COUNTY, West Union, Iowa
32

Vadnais Heights, Minnesota Brainerd, Minnesota FEDERAL RESERVE BANK,


CUMBERLAND COUNTY, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Page

Carlisle, Pennsylvania

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


FOND DU LAC COUNTY, JEFFERSON COUNTY, LEE COUNTY,
Fond du Lac, Wisconsin Fairfield, Iowa Fort Madison, Iowa
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, LESUEUR COUNTY,
Minneapolis, Minnesota Jefferson, Wisconsin Le Center, Minnesota
FRANKLIN COUNTY, JO DAVIESS COUNTY, LINCOLN COUNTY,
Union, Missouri Hanover, Illinois Merrill, Wisconsin
FREMONT COUNTY, JOHNSON COUNTY, LINN COUNTY,
Sidney, Iowa Iowa City, Iowa Cedar Rapids, Iowa
GRAND COUNTY TELEPHONE AUTH. JONES COUNTY, LISLE I-NET CONSORTIUM,
BOARD, Anamosa, Iowa Lisle, Illinois
Winter Park, Colorado JUNEAU COUNTY, LOUISA COUNTY,
GRAND RAPIDS LIBRARY, Mauston, Wisconsin Wapello, Iowa
Grand Rapids, Minnesota KANABEC COUNTY, LOWELL HOUSING AUTHORITY,
GRANT COUNTY, Mora, Minnesota Lowell, Massachusetts
Lancaster, Wisconsin KANE COUNTY, LYON COUNTY,
GREEN LAKE COUNTY, Geneva, Illinois Rock Rapids, Iowa
Green Lake, Wisconsin KANSAS CITY AREA MANATEE COUNTY,
GREENE COUNTY, TRANSPORTATION AUTH. (KCATA), Bradenton, Florida
Springfield, Missouri Kansas City, Missouri MANITOWOC COUNTY,
GRUNDY COUNTY, KANSAS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Manitowoc, Wisconsin
Grundy Center, Iowa Kansas City, Missouri MARATHON COUNTY,
HANCOCK COUNTY, KENOSHA COUNTY, Wausau, Wisconsin
Carthage, Illinois Kenosha, Wisconsin MARQUETTE COUNTY,
HANCOCK COUNTY, KEOKUK COUNTY, Montello, Wisconsin
Garner, Iowa Sigourney, Iowa MAYO CIVIC CENTER,
HARDIN COUNTY, KEWAUNEE COUNTY, Rochester, Minnesota
Eldora, Iowa Kewaunee, Wisconsin MCDONOUGH COUNTY,
HENNEPIN COUNTY, KIT CARSON COUNTY, Macomb, Illinois
Minneapolis, Minnesota Burlington, Colorado MCHENRY COUNTY,
HO CHUNK NATION TRIBAL JUSTICE KNOX COUNTY, McHenry, Illinois
CENTER, Knoxville, Tennessee MCLEOD COUNTY,
Black River Falls, Wisconsin KOOTENAI COUNTY, Glencoe, Minnesota
HOWARD COUNTY, Coeur D’ Alene, Idaho METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS
Cresco, Iowa LACROSSE COUNTY, COMMISSION,
IOWA COUNTY, La Crosse, Wisconsin St. Paul, Minnesota
Dodgeville, Wisconsin LAFAYETTE COUNTY, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL,
IRON COUNTY, Darlington, Wisconsin St. Paul, Minnesota
Hurley, Wisconsin LAKE COUNTY, METROPOLITAN TRANSIT
JACKSON COUNTY, Baldwin, Michigan COMMISSION,
Black River Falls, Wisconsin LANGLADE COUNTY, Minneapolis, Minnesota
JACKSON COUNTY, Antigo, Wisconsin MILLE LACS DRIFTSKIPPERS
33

Maquoketa, Iowa LEE COUNTY, SNOWMOBILE CLUB,


JASPER COUNTY, Dixon, Illinois Isle, Minnesota
Page

Newton, Iowa

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


MILLS COUNTY, PIERCE COUNTY, ROCK RIVER WATER RECLAMATION
Glenwood, Iowa Ellsworth, Wisconsin DISTRICT,
MINNEHAHA COUNTY, PINE COUNTY, Rockford, Illinois
Sioux Falls, South Dakota Pine City, Minnesota RUSK COUNTY,
MINNESOTA CORRECTIONAL PLYMOUTH COUNTY, Ladysmith, Wisconsin
FACILITY, Remsen, Iowa SAINT CROIX COUNTY,
St. Cloud, Minnesota POCAHONTAS COUNTY, Hudson, Wisconsin
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Pocahontas, Iowa SAINT PAUL CIVIC CENTER,
CORRECTIONS, POLK COUNTY, St. Paul, Minnesota
St. Paul, Minnesota Balsam Lake, Wisconsin SAINT PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY,
MITCHELL COUNTY, POLK COUNTY, St. Paul, Minnesota
Osage, Iowa Des Moines, Iowa SAN LUIS VALLEY COUNTY,
MONONA COUNTY, PORTSMOUTH METROPOLITAN Alamosa, Colorado
Onawa, Iowa HOUSING AUTHORITY, SANGAMON COUNTY,
MONROE COUNTY, Portsmouth, Ohio Springfield, Illinois
Tomah, Wisconsin POWESHIEK COUNTY, SARPY COUNTY,
MORRISON COUNTY, Montezuma, Iowa Papillion, Nebraska
Little Falls, Minnesota PRICE COUNTY, SAUK COUNTY,
MOWER COUNTY, Phillips, Wisconsin Baraboo, Wisconsin
Austin, Minnesota PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION OF SAWYER COUNTY,
MUSCATINE COUNTY, CHICAGO, Hayward, Wisconsin
West Liberty, Iowa Chicago, Illinois SEVEN-COUNTY METROPOLITAN
NORTHWEST REGIONAL RADIO PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY OF THE PROJECT,
BOARD, CITY OF SAINT PAUL, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Bemidji, Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota SHEBOYGAN COUNTY,
O’BRIEN COUNTY, RAMSEY COUNTY, Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Primghar, Iowa St. Paul, Minnesota SHERBURNE COUNTY,
OCONTO COUNTY, REDWOOD COUNTY, Elk River, Minnesota
Oconto, Wisconsin Redwood Falls, Minnesota SIOUX COUNTY,
ORANGEBURG COUNTY, RICE COUNTY, Orange City, Iowa
Orangeburg, South Carolina Faribault, Minnesota SOUTH DUNKLIN COUNTY,
OSCEOLA COUNTY, RICHLAND COUNTY, Hornersville, Missouri
Sibley, Iowa Richland Center, Wisconsin ST. LOUIS COUNTY,
OUTAGAMIE COUNTY, RICHLAND COUNTY, Duluth, Minnesota
Appleton, Wisconsin Wahpeton, North Dakota STATE OF COLORADO,
OWATONNA PUBLIC UTILITIES, RICHMOND HEIGHTS, Denver, Colorado
Owatonna, Minnesota Richmond Heights, Missouri STATE OF WISCONSIN,
OZAUKEE COUNTY, ROBBINSDALE POLICE DEPT., Madison, Wisconsin
Port Washington, Wisconsin Robbinsdale, Minnesota STEARNS COUNTY,
PAGE COUNTY, ROCK COUNTY, St. Cloud, Minnesota
Clarinda, Iowa Janesville, Wisconsin STEELE COUNTY,
34

PARK COUNTY, ROCK COUNTY, Owatonna, Minnesota


Fairplay, Colorado Luverne, Minnesota STEVENS COUNTY,
Page

Morris, Minnesota

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


STODDARD COUNTY, VILLAGE OF GURNEE, WEST CENTRAL INTEROPERABILITY
Dexter, Missouri Gurnee, Illinois ALLIANCE (WCIA),
STORY COUNTY, VILLAGE OF WESTON, Wisconsin
Nevada, Iowa Weston, Wisconsin WHITE COUNTY,
TAMA COUNTY, VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, Carmi, Illinois
Toledo, Iowa Winnetka, Illinois WHITESIDE COUNTY,
TAYLOR COUNTY, WALWORTH COUNTY, Morrison, Illinois
Medford, Wisconsin Elkhorn, Wisconsin WILLIAMS COUNTY,
TOWN OF ADDISON, WAPELLO COUNTY, Williston, North Dakota
Dallas, Texas Ottumwa, Iowa WINNEBAGO COUNTY,
TOWN OF GLASTONBURY, WARREN COUNTY, Forest City, Iowa
Glastonbury, Connecticut Warrenton, Missouri WINNESHIEK COUNTY,
TRAVERSE COUNTY, WASHBURN COUNTY, Decorah, Iowa
Wheaton, Minnesota Shell Lake, Wisconsin WINONA COUNTY,
TREMPEALEAU COUNTY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, Winona, Minnesota
Whitehall, Wisconsin Blaire, Nebraska WISCONSIN, STATE OF,
VERNON COUNTY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Viroqua, Wisconsin Stillwater, Minnesota Madison, Wisconsin
VILAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON COUNTY, WOOD COUNTY,
Eagle River, Wisconsin West Bend, Wisconsin Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD, WAUKESHA COUNTY, WOODBURY COUNTY,
Deerfield, Illinois Waukesha, Wisconsin Sioux City, Iowa
VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN, WAUSHARA COUNTY,
Germantown, Wisconsin Wautoma, Wisconsin

35
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION F: Agreement to Use the Routt County Contract

True North Consulting Group, LLC agrees to use the Routt County Contract Agreement as is.

36
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION G: Ability to Complete Project According to Project Schedule

The team members for True North Consulting Group will be ready to begin this project two weeks after
execution of the contract. Our current resources are able to handle this new project. We stand by the
team’s ability to meet or exceed the completion dates for the proposed services outlined in this RFP.
With a variety of expertise in professional technology and security consulting services and over 35 years’
experience, we are well equipped to handle a project of this magnitude.

After careful consideration of our current obligations, TNCG states that we are capable of handling this
project with the resources and staff we included in this response.

37
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas


SECTION H: Overall Cost and Value of Project

Comprehensive, risk-based threat and vulnerability assessments for all facilities listed below:

Facility
Historic Courthouse

Annex

Department of Human Services

Log Cabin Buildings

Role Number of Hours Fees

Administrative Support 10 $1,750

Security Consultants 110 $19,250

Sr. Security Consultants 24 $4,200

*Expenses $4,000

Total: $29,200

*Expenses - All travel, lodging, and meal expenses incurred by consultants will be billed at actual cost.

Security Consulting Services Hourly Rate: $175/hour

38
Page

Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Iowa  Minnesota  South Carolina  Tennessee  Texas

You might also like