Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exposé Anglais
Exposé Anglais
****************
GNELE Mauriac
HOUENOU Ruben
HOUNFODJI Hospice
KIKI Esther
2
Introduction
War is a major fact of societies, a "fact total social", as Marcel Mauss writes.
But war is also " a trash ". It separates men and destroys their world. And
however, she keeps starting over again, nourished by this death instinct of which
Freud speaks, who concluded that man not seek to do his good. The war, should
we be saddened by it, is an almost universal topic. With the exception of rare
companies’ pacifists (called war free) like some aboriginal groups of Malaysia,
there is no universal culture that does not be affected by the conflict. But what is
war? What causes war these days?
3
1. Definitions and general information on war
War represents human violence in its most intensive form. It is a state of
armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country.
4
2.1 Economic Gain
Often wars are caused by one country's wish to take control of another country's
wealth. Whatever the other reasons for a war may be, there is very often an
economic motive underlying most conflicts, even if the stated aim of the war is
presented to the public as something more noble. In pre-industrial times, the
gains desired by a warring country might be precious materials such as gold and
silver, or livestock such as cattle and horses.
In modern times, the resources that are hoped to be gained from war take the
form of things like oil, minerals, or materials used in manufacturing. Some
experts believe that as the world’s population increases and basic resources
become scarce, wars will be fought more often over fundamental essentials,
such as water and food.
2.3 Religion
Religious conflicts often have very deep roots. They can lie dormant for
decades, only to re-emerge in a flash at a later date.
Religious wars can often be tied to other reasons for conflict, such as
nationalism or revenge for a perceived historical slight in the past.
While different religions fighting against each other can be a cause of war,
different sects within a religion (for example, Protestant and Catholic, or Sunni
and Shiite) battling against one another can also instigate war.
5
2.4 Revenge
Seeking to punish, redress a grievance, or simply strike back for a perceived
slight can often be a factor in the waging of war. Revenge also relates to
nationalism, as the people of a country which has been wronged are motivated to
fight back by pride and spirit.
Unfortunately, this can lead to an endless chain of retaliatory wars being set in
motion which is very difficult to stop. Any distinction between the victim and
aggressor can often become blurred, with all participants perceiving themselves
as fighting a just war to right historic wrongs.
6
These defensive wars can be especially controversial when they are launched
preemptively, the argument essentially being that: “We are attacking them
before they inevitably attack us.”
3.1 Unaccountable
A personalized autocrat, Putin doesn’t have to weigh the interests of his soldiers
and citizens. He can pursue whatever course helps him preserve his regime’s
control. When leaders go unchecked and are unaccountable to their people, they
can ignore the costs of fighting that ordinary people bear. Instead, rulers can
pursue their own agendas. That is why dictators are more prone to war.
3.2 Ideological
Consider Putin again. Most accounts of the current war dwell on his nationalist
obsessions and desires for a glorious legacy. What costs and risks he does bear,
Putin is willing to pay in pursuit of glory and ideology. This is just one example
of intangible and ideological incentives for war that so many leaders possess—
God’s glory, freedom, or some nationalist vision.
Societies have ideological incentives too. Unlike the people of Belarus or
Kazakhstan, the Ukrainians refused to accept serious restrictions on their
sovereignty despite what (at first) seemed to be relative military weakness. Like
liberation movements throughout history—including the American
revolutionaries—they have been willing to undertake the ruin and risks of
fighting partly in pursuit of an ideal.
3.3 Biased
Most accounts of Russia’s invasion stress Putin’s isolation and insulation from
the truth. He and his advisors grossly underestimated the difficulty of war. This
is a story of institutional bias—a system that is unwilling to tell its leader bad
news.
Autocrats are especially prone to this problem, but intelligence failures plague
democracies too. Leaders can be psychologically biased as well. Humans have
7
an amazing ability to cling to mistaken beliefs. We can be overconfident,
underestimating the ruin of war and overestimating our chances of victory. And
we demonize and misjudge our opponents. These misperceptions can carry us to
war.
3.4 Uncertain
Too much focus on bias and misperception obscures the subtler role of
uncertainty. In the murky run-up to war, policymakers don’t know their enemy’s
strength or resolve. How unified would the West be? How capably would
Ukrainians resist? How competent was the Russian military? All these things
were fundamentally uncertain, and many experts were genuinely surprised that
Russia got a bad draw on all three—most of all, presumably, Putin himself.
But uncertainty doesn’t just mean the costs of war are uncertain, and invasion a
gamble. There are genuine strategic impediments to getting good information.
You can’t trust your enemy’s demonstrations of resolve, because they have
reasons to bluff, hoping to extract a better deal without fighting. Any poker
player knows that, amid the uncertainty, the optimal strategy is never to fold all
the time. It’s never to call all the time, either. The best strategy is to approach it
probabilistically—to occasionally gamble and invade.
3.5 Unreliable
When a declining power faces a rising one, how can it trust the rising power
to commit to peace? Better to pay the brutal costs of war now, to lock in one’s
current advantage. Some scholars argue that such shifts in power, and the
commitment problems they create, are at the root of every long war in history—
from World War I to the US invasion of Iraq.
This is not why Russia invaded Ukraine, of course. Still, it may help to
understand the timing. In 2022, Russia had arguably reached peak leverage
versus Ukraine. Ukraine was acquiring drones and defensive missiles. And the
country was growing more democratic and closer to Europe—to Putin, a
dangerous example of freedom nearby.
Putting the five together and the reasons cited above, fallible, biased leaders
with nationalist ambitions ignored the costs of war and drove their societies to
violent ruin. But the explanation doesn’t end there. There are strategic roots as
well.
8
Conclusion
In conclusion, war is an act of violence, a much more common phenomenon
these days. Its causes are multiple. We can cite for example economic gain,
territorial gain, religion, revenge and many others. However, realistic and
achievable solutions must be implemented to limit wars today.
9
References
• https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/war
• https://mwi.usma.edu/the-five-reasons-wars-happen/
10