Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Individual Assessment

Cover page

Unit Name XXX


Details Code XX####
Year, Trimester YYYY, Trimester 1, 2, 3

Assessment Name XXX


Details Due Date and Week DD / MM / YYYY, Week ##

Individual Student Number


Student First Name
Details Family Name

Submission Integrity Declaration I have read and understand academic integrity policies
Declaration and practices and my assessment does not violate these.
Full Name
Submission Date

HI5029 – T1 - 2023
Instructions

Academic Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All
Integrity assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic
Information integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract
cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity
and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is
serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of
the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or
cancellation of course enrolment.
Format • Most assessments must be in MS Word format with no spacing, 11-pt Calibri
Instructions font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section
headings and page numbers.
• You must name your file with the Unit Code and Student ID (e.g. “HI5003-
GWA1995”).
• Check that you submit the correct document as special consideration is not
granted if you make a mistake.
• Student ID needs to be indicated on the cover page.
Penalties • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time along
with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted
Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and
referencing.

HI5029 – T1 - 2023
Assignment Description:

You are expected to complete a critique and conduct a literature review to discuss a contemporary issue
which an IS professional may experience and identify appropriate approaches to address thisissue.
The topic is “The project management trends that lead to its success” You need to search in the
literature and find at least ten (10) academic research papers (references) related to this topic. (Academic
papers can be found in ProQuest. ProQuest instruction can be found in below. Please contact Liberian
if you have further question).
A draft of the research paper (key points/headings) will be submitted initially (refer the draft due date)
whereby students can receive feedback. Then students should submit the final research paper in the
Blackboard by the last week of the trimester (refer the draft due date).

ProQuest login:
Go to: http://www.holmes.edu.au/ > Login >
ProquestUSERNAME: holmes2004
PASSWORD: holmes

The Draft report submission structure is as follows:


What you need to submit for Draft submission:
1. Assignment File: You need to submit the draft version of your assignment in session 8. You need
to introduce your 10 references and, in few sentences, describe why you have selectedthat
reference and why it is relevant to topic.
DRAFT STRUCTURE:

Introduction: State the purpose and objectives of the report.


Discussion: Site the references, and the reason you have selected that reference:
1. Reference No 1: <Cite it thoroughly>
Why it is relevant to the topic
2. Reference No 2: <Cite it thoroughly>
Why it is relevant to the topic

HI5029 – T1 - 2023
3. Reference No 3: <Cite it thoroughly>
Why it is relevant to the topic
.
.
.
10. Reference No 10: <Cite it thoroughly>
Why it is relevant to the topic

Conclusion: Summarise your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the main
points of the report.
Referencing: reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.

2. Academic References: A the academic papers and references that are used in the
assignmentneed to be cited in the report under the following rules:

Holmes has been implementing as a pilot program using a revised/adapted Harvard approach to
referencing. The following guidelines apply:

• Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources which provide full text access to the source’s
content for lecturers and markers.
• The Reference list should be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled: References.
• It should include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged alphabetically A-Z by author
surname. In addition, it MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source.
For example;
P Hawking, B McCarthy, A Stein (2004), Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information
Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf

• All assignments will require additional in-text reference details, which will consist of the surname of the
author/authors or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of content,
paragraph where the content can be found.
For example;
“The company decided to implement a enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies
(Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).”

Non-Adherence to Referencing Guidelines


Where students do not follow the above guidelines:

1. Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the referencing guidelines will
receivea 10% penalty.
2. Students who submit assignments in which the citations are “fake” will be reported for
academicmisconduct.

HI5029 – T1 - 2023
The final report submission structure is as follows:
What you need to submit for final submission:
1. Assignment File: You need to submit the final version of your assignment in session 13. The
final submission must comply with the draft structure and draw heavily from the key references.
The structure of the final submission is headings and in discussion critically analyse each
reference and discuss how these references reflecting the proposed topic.

REPORT STRUCTURE:

Introduction: State the purpose and objectives of the report.


Discussion: Discuss the references, and critically analyse them and discuss how they
reflect the proposed topic.
Conclusion: Summarise your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the main
points of the report.
Referencing: reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.

PLEASE NOTE:

• All assignments must be submitted electronically ONLY, uploaded to Blackboard and


Submission of SafeAssign. Submission deadlines are strictly enforced and a late
submission incurs penalties.
• DO NOT SHARE YOUR ASSIGNMENT WITH OTHER STUDENTS under nocircumstances
even after the deadline and after you submitted it in the Blackboard oreven after you
have marked. If there will be any similarity detected by SafeAssign orthe marker, it is
an academic misconduct case and BOTH of the students will not be marked and
reported to the institution for further investigation.
• Your document should be a single word or OpenOffice document containing your
report.
• All submissions will be submitted through the safeAssign facility in Blackboard.
Submission boxes linked to SafeAssign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell.
Assignments not submitted through these submission links will not be considered.
• Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session
detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after
the due date and time will be penalized per day late (including weekend days)
according to Holmes Institute policies.
• The SafeAssign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of

HI5029 – T1 - 2023
plagiarism. SafeAssign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web
and your own class members submissions for plagiarism. You can see your
SafeAssign similarity score (or match) when you submit your assignment to the
appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your
assignment and resubmit. However, resubmission is only allowed prior to the
submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your
assignment will be graded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level
of plagiarism will be penalized according to the Holmes Academic Misconduct
policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan early and submit early to take
advantage of the resubmission feature. You can make multiple submissions, but
please remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you
submitted will be taken from that submission.

Marking Criteria Weighting


Draft
5 marks
Presentation quality
5 marks
Report structure, Layout, Grammar and spelling, Written style and expression
5 marks
Quality of evaluation and critically exploring the references 15 marks
Recommendations and justification 5 marks
Referencing
5 marks

TOTAL Weight for this assignment marking


40 marks

HI5029 – T1 - 2023
Marking Rubrics

Grades Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory


Professional Professional Professional Professional Poor presentation
Presentation presentation with presentation withpresentation presentation and
excellent writing very good writingwith good well written
skills skills writing skills
Assessed Assessed Assessed well Assessed and Argument is
Evaluation Quality critically in depth critically and and suggested suggested confused and
and suggested suggested strategies strategies disjointed.
excellent strategies logically and
strategies logically and presented in
logically and presented in well
presented in very convincing
convincing manner
manner
Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrate Demonstrated Did not
Discussion excellent excellent d ability to ability to think demonstrate
ability to think ability to think think critically critically and ability to think
critically and critically but and sourced did not source critically and did
sourced did not source reference reference not source
reference reference material material reference material
material material appropriately appropriately appropriately
appropriately appropriately
Logic is clear Consistency Mostly Adequate Argument is
Conclusion and easy to logical and consistent cohesion and confused and
follow with convincing logical and conviction disjointed
strong convincing
arguments
Clear styles Clear Generally Sometimes Lacks consistency
Referencing with excellent referencing good clear with many errors
source of style referencing referencing
references. style style

HI5029 – T1 - 2023

You might also like