Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Landau-Stanyukovich Rule and The Similarity Parameter of Converging Shock
Landau-Stanyukovich Rule and The Similarity Parameter of Converging Shock
中国物理快报
Chinese
Physics
Letters
Volume 28 Number 9 September 2011
It is interesting to analyze the self-similar mo- Also, the distribution of flow parameters behind the
tion of converging cylindrical shock waves in an ideal shock wave is obtained.
plasma of varying density. The plasma is assumed Assuming the electrical conductivity to be infinite
to be an ideal gas with infinite electrical conductiv- and the direction of the magnetic field to be orthogo-
ity and permeated by an axial magnetic field orthog- nal to the trajectories of the gas particles, the govern-
onal to the trajectories of the gas particles. The ing equations for a one-dimensional cylindrically sym-
medium is initially uniform and at rest. In the fi- metric motion in magnetogasdynamics can be written
nal stages of the collapse the shock becomes stronger in the form[18−22]
and the pressure ahead of the shock is neglected
in comparison with the pressure behind the shock, 𝜌𝑡 + 𝑢𝜌𝑟 + 𝜌𝑢𝑟 + 𝜌𝑢𝑟−1 = 0, (1)
leading to a similarity formulation for the problem. −1
𝑢𝑡 + 𝑢𝑢𝑟 + 𝜌 (𝑝𝑟 + ℎ𝑟 ) = 0, (2)
The similarity variable, which is the ratio of distance 2
𝑝𝑡 + 𝑢𝑝𝑟 − 𝑎 (𝜌𝑡 + 𝑢𝜌𝑟 ) = 0, (3)
to a particular power of time, is unknown a pri-
ori. Chisnell[1] has examined this particular power, ℎ𝑡 + 𝑢ℎ𝑟 + 2ℎ(𝑢𝑟 + 𝑢𝑟−1 ) = 0, (4)
known as the similarity exponent, from the solution
of a single ordinary differential equation. Many au- where 𝜌 is the density, 𝑢 is the particle velocity, 𝑝 is
thors, e.g., Guderley,[2] Butler,[3] Sedov,[4] Landau– the pressure; 𝑎 = (𝛾𝑝/𝜌)1/2 is the speed of sound with
Stanyukovich,[5] Zeldovich and Raizer,[6] Welsh,[7] 𝛾 being the constant specific heat ratio; ℎ = 𝜇𝐵 2 /2 is
Lazarus,[8] Hirschler and Gretler,[9] Taylor and the magnetic pressure with 𝐵 and 𝜇 being the mag-
Cargill,[10] Landau and Lifshitz,[11] and Gurovich et netic field strength and the magnetic permeability, re-
al.[12,13] have described the methods for determination spectively; 𝑟 is the single spatial coordinate and 𝑡 is
of the similarity exponent in uniform medium. The the time. The subscripts denote partial differentiation
similarity exponent in non-uniform media has been de- unless stated otherwise.
termined by many researchers including Whitham,[14] The system of Eqs. (1)–(4) is supplemented with
Hafner,[15] Radha and Sharma,[16] and Toque.[17] an equation of state, i.e.
Korobeinikov[18] has studied the problem of a point ex- 𝑝 = 𝜌𝑅𝑇, (5)
plosion in gases. Lock and Mestel[19] analyzed the flow
behaviour in an ideal magnetogasdynamics regime. where 𝑇 is the temperature and 𝑅 is the gas constant.
Singh et al.[20] studied the problem of an exponen- We now introduce the non-dimensional variables
tial cylindrical shock wave in non-ideal magnetogas- 𝐺, 𝑉, 𝑍 and 𝐻 so that the flow variables are written
dynamics. Singh et al.[21] analyzed the numerical so- with these new variables in the form
lution of imploding shocks in non-ideal magnetogas-
dynamics. Singh et al.[22] determined the analytical 𝑟 𝑟2 𝑟2
𝜌 = 𝜌0 𝐺, 𝑢 = 𝑉, 𝑎2 = 𝑍, 𝑏2 = 𝐻, (6)
solution of converging shock waves in magnetogasdy- 𝑡 𝑡2 𝑡2
namics.
where 𝑏 = (2 ℎ/𝜌)1/2 is the Alfvén speed.
In this Letter, we attempt to determine the simi-
The motion of the shock takes place for 𝑡 < 0, ar-
larity exponent for the problem of converging cylindri-
riving at the origin O at time 𝑡 = 0. Equations (1)–(4)
cal shock waves in magnetogasdynamics regime. The
in terms of new non-dimensional variables 𝐺, 𝑉, 𝑍 and
similarity exponent is computed for different values
𝐻 are written as
of the adiabatic heat exponent 𝛾 and the parameter
𝑘, signifying a change in the magnetic field strength. 𝑡𝐺𝑡 + 𝑟𝑉 𝐺𝑟 + 𝑟𝐺𝑉𝑟 = −2𝑉 𝐺, (7)
094701-1
CHIN. PHYS. LETT. Vol. 28, No. 9 (2011) 094701
𝑟𝑍𝑟 𝑟𝑍𝐺𝑟 𝑟𝐻𝑟 𝑟𝐻𝐺𝑟 hand sides of Eqs. (11)–(14),
𝑡𝑉𝑡 + 𝑟𝑉 𝑉𝑟 + + + +
𝛾 𝛾𝐺 2 2𝐺
2𝑍
(︁ 2(1 − 𝛼) )︁
=𝑉 −𝑉2− − 𝐻, (8) Δ1 = −Δ 2𝑉 − − (𝛼 − 𝑉 )𝑄(𝑉 )
𝛾 𝛾
(︁ 2 )︁
𝑡𝑍𝑡 𝑟𝑉 𝑍𝑟 (𝛾 − 1) + 𝐻(1 − 𝛼) −1 , (17)
+ − (𝑡𝐺𝑡 + 𝑟𝑉 𝐺𝑟 ) = 2 − 2𝑉, 𝛾
𝑍 𝑍 𝐺 (9) 2Δ(1 − 𝛼)
𝑡𝐻𝑡 𝑡𝐺𝑡 𝑟𝑉 𝐻𝑟 𝑟𝑉 𝐺𝑟 Δ2 = − 𝑄(𝑉 )
+ + + + 2𝑟𝑉𝑟 = 2 − 6𝑉. 𝛾(𝛼 − 𝑉 )
𝐻 𝐺 𝐻 𝐺 (10) 𝐻 (︁ 2 )︁
+ (1 − 𝛼) −1 , (18)
(𝛼 − 𝑉 ) 𝛾
𝑍 [︁ (︁ 1−𝛼 )︁
Self-similar solutions to Eqs. (7)–(10) are sought in Δ3 = 2Δ 𝛼−𝑉 + +(𝛾 −1)(𝛼−𝑉 )𝑄(𝑉 )
terms of the variable 𝜂 = 𝑟/𝑋(𝑡), where 𝑋(𝑡) is the 𝑉 −𝛼 𝛾
(︁ 2 )︁]︁
distance of the shock from the origin at time 𝑡 (<0); − (𝛾 − 1)𝐻(1 − 𝛼) −1 , (19)
𝐺, 𝑉, 𝑍 and 𝐻 are functions of 𝜂 alone. Changing the 𝛾
independent variables from (𝑟, 𝑡) to (𝜂,𝑡) and using 𝐻 [︁ (︁ (︁ 1 − 𝛼 )︁)︁
Δ4 = 2Δ 1 − 𝑉 −
𝑉 −𝛼 𝛾
(︁ 2 )︁]︁
𝜕 1 𝜕 𝜕 𝜕 𝑋˙ 𝜕 + (𝛼 − 𝑉 )𝑄(𝑉 ) − 𝐻(1 − 𝛼) −1 , (20)
= , = −𝜂 , 𝛾
𝜕𝑥 𝑋 𝜕𝜂 𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑡 𝑋 𝜕𝜂
where
(︂ )︂
2(1 − 𝛼) 2𝛼(1 − 𝛼)
where 𝑋˙ = 𝑑𝑋/𝑑𝑡. 2
𝑄(𝑉 ) = 𝑉 + 1 − 2𝛼 − 𝑉 + .
It is noted from Eqs. (7)–(10) that the 𝑡-variable 𝛾 𝛾
enters into the equations only in the combination (21)
˙
𝑡𝑋/𝑋 arising from the 𝑡𝜕/𝜕𝑡 term. Thus, the con- In Eq. (15), 𝜂 occurs as the coefficients of its deriva-
dition for the self-similar solution to exist is tives and 𝐺 does not occur in the determinants, the
˙
𝑡𝑋/𝑋 = 𝛼 or 𝑋 = 𝐴(−𝑡)𝛼 , where 𝛼 and system of equations could be decoupled to provide a
𝐴 are constants. Equations (7)–(10) in terms of pair of ordinary differential equations:
𝑉 (𝜂), 𝐺(𝜂), 𝑍(𝜂) and 𝐻(𝜂) yield 𝑑𝑍 Δ3
= , (22)
𝑑𝑉 Δ1
𝐺′ 𝑑𝐻 Δ4
𝜂𝑉 ′ + (𝑉 − 𝛼)𝜂 = −2𝑉, (11) 𝑑𝑉
=
Δ1
, (23)
𝐺
(︁ 𝑍 𝐻 )︁ 𝐺′ 𝑍′ 𝐻′ with two supplementary equations
(𝑉 − 𝛼)𝜂𝑉 ′ + + 𝜂 +𝜂 +𝜂
𝛾 2 𝐺 𝛾 2
2𝑍 1 𝑑𝐺 Δ2
=𝑉 −𝑉2− − 𝐻, (12) = , (24)
𝛾 𝐺 𝑑𝑉 Δ1
1 𝑑𝜂 Δ
𝐺′ −2𝑍(1 − 𝑉 ) = . (25)
(𝛾 − 1)𝑍𝜂 − 𝜂𝑍 ′ = , (13) 𝜂 𝑑𝑉 Δ1
𝐺 𝑉 −𝛼
𝐺′ 𝐻′ The system of Eqs. (22)–(25) can be evaluated after
2𝜂𝑉 ′ + (𝑉 − 𝛼)𝜂 + (𝑉 − 𝛼)𝜂 = (2 − 6𝑉 ).
𝐺 𝐻 determining 𝑍(𝑉 ) and 𝐻(𝑉 ) from (22)–(25), respec-
(14)
tively. To describe the flow behind the shock, a solu-
tion of Eq. (14) is required, which, at the shock 𝜂 = 1,
The system of Eqs. (11)–(14) can be solved for the satisfies the Rankine–Hugoniot conditions for a strong
derivatives 𝑉 ′ , 𝐺′ , 𝑍 ′ and 𝐻 ′ as follows: shock:
𝛾+1 2 ˙ 2𝛾(𝛾 − 1) ˙ 2
𝜌= 𝜌0 , 𝑢 = 𝑅, 𝑎2 = 𝑅 ,
𝛾−1 𝛾+1 (𝛾 + 1)2
Δ1 𝜂𝐺′ Δ2 Δ3 Δ4
𝜂𝑉 ′ = , = , 𝜂𝑍 ′ = , 𝜂𝐻 ′ = , (︁ 𝛾 + 1 )︁2
Δ 𝐺 Δ Δ Δ 𝑏2 = 𝑅˙ 2 . (26)
(15) 𝛾−1
where
Substituting 𝑋˙ = 𝐴(−𝑡)𝛼 in Eq. (6) the flow variables
may be written in the terms of 𝜂, 𝑡 in the form
Δ = −𝑍 − 𝐻 + (𝑉 − 𝛼)2 , (16)
𝑋˙ 𝜌0 𝑋˙ 2 2
𝜌 = 𝜌0 𝐺, 𝑢= 𝜂𝑉, 𝑝 = 𝜂 𝐺𝑍,
𝛼 𝛾𝛼2
which is the determinant of the left-hand side coeffi-
cients and Δ𝑖 , (𝑖 = 1, 2, 3, 4) are the determinants 𝜌0 𝑋˙ 2 2 2 𝑋˙ 2 2 2 𝑋˙ 2 2
ℎ= 𝜂 𝐺𝐻, 𝑎 = 𝜂 𝑍, 𝑏 = 𝜂 𝐻.
obtained by replacing the 𝑖th column of Δ by the right- 𝛾𝛼2 𝛼2 𝛼2 (27)
094701-2
CHIN. PHYS. LETT. Vol. 28, No. 9 (2011) 094701
Substituting Eq. (33) into Eq. (34) yields a quadratic accelerating. The computed results indicate that an
equation in terms of similarity exponent 𝛼 and the increase in the specific heat ratio 𝛾 or 𝑘 causes the
roots of this quadratic equation become similarity exponent 𝛼 to decrease. In fact, the pres-
ence of the magnetic field ahead of the shock has an
𝛼 = 4(1 − 𝛾) + 2𝑘(3𝛾 − 4) − 𝛾 2 (1 + 𝑘) ± 4𝛾 2 (1 − 𝑘)2
{︀ [︀
important effect on the conditions at the shock and
− 4𝛾 3 (1 − 4𝑘 + 𝑘 2 ) + 𝛾 4 (5 − 6𝑘 + 𝑘 2 )
]︀1/2 }︀ everywhere behind it.
{︁ }︁−1 Table 1. The values of similarity parameter 𝛼 for different val-
· − 4𝑘 2 (𝛾 − 1) + 4𝑘𝛾 + 5𝛾 2 − 𝑘𝛾 2 (2 − 𝑘) . ues of 𝑘 and 𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑚𝑎.
(35) 𝑘 𝛼 (𝛾=1.2) 𝛼 (𝛾=1.4) 𝛼 (𝛾=1.67)
0.1 0.806341 0.804740 0.803164
The similarity parameter 𝛼 is also obtained as a func- 0.2 0.808342 0.807607 0.803335
tion of 𝑉0 from Eq. (33) in the form 0.3 0.812322 0.810403 0.804777
0.4 0.816178 0.813129 0.806200
2𝑘 + 𝛾 + (2𝑘 − 𝛾 − 𝑘𝛾)𝑉0 ) ± 𝐹 (𝑉0 ) 0.5 0.819913 0.815789 0.807604
𝛼(𝑉0 ) = , (36) 0.6 0.823529 0.818384 0.808988
2(2𝑘 + 𝛾 − 𝑘𝛾)
0.7 0.827032 0.820916 0.810354
where 0.8 0.830423 0.823386 0.811702
0.9 0.833707 0.825797 0.813032
𝐹 (𝑉0 ) ={[2𝑘 + 𝛾 + 𝑉0 (2𝑘 + 𝛾 − 𝑘𝛾)]2
The similarity solutions of converging cylindrical
− 4(2𝑘 + 𝛾 − 𝑘𝛾)(2𝑘 − 𝑘𝛾𝑉0 − 𝛾𝑉02 )}1/2 , shock waves in ideal plasma with varying density have
(37) been studied. The plasma is considered to have infi-
nite electrical conductivity and to be permeated by an
0.8 axial magnetic field orthogonal to the trajectories of
κ/⊲֒ γ/⊲ the gas particles. The methods suggested by Chisnell
κ/⊲֒ γ/⊲
0.6 κ/⊲֒ γ/⊲
and the Landau–Stanyukovich shooting method are
κ/⊲֒ γ/⊲ used to determine the similarity exponent appearing
in the problem. It has been observed that the value
Z⊳Zs
0.4
of the similarity exponent increases when value of 𝑘
increases and decreases with an increase in the specific
0.2 heat ratio 𝛾. Also, the flow field profiles for the ve-
locity, density, pressure and magnetic pressure behind
0.0 the wave front is presented.
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
1/η
Fig. 3. The pressure, normalized by its value at the shock,
versus 1/𝜂 for various values of 𝛾 and 𝑘. References
[1] Chisnell R F 1998 J. Fluid Mech. 354 357
[2] Guderley G 1942 Luftfahrtforschung 19 302
[3] Butler D 1954 Armament Res. Estab. Rep. 54 54
[4] Sedov L I 1959 Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Me-
chanics (New York: Academic)
[5] Stanyukovich K P 1960 Unsteady Motion of Continuous
Media (New York: Pergamon)
[6] Zeldovich Y B and Raizer Y P 1967 Physics of Shock Waves
and High Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomenon II (New
York: Academic)
[7] Welsh R L 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 29 61
[8] Lazarus R B 1981 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18 316
[9] Hirschler T and Gretler W 2001 Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 52
151
[10] Taylor M G G T and Cargill P J 2001 J. Plasma Phys. 66
Fig. 4. The magnetic pressure, normalized by its value at 239
the shock, versus 1/𝜂 for various values of 𝛾 and 𝑘. [11] Landau L D and Lifshitz E M 1976 Course of Theoretical
Physics (New York: Pergamon)
The density, velocity of gas particles, the pressure [12] Gurovich V Ts et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 124503
and the magnetic pressure normalized with respect to [13] Gurovich V Ts and Fel L G 2009 J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 89
14
its value at the shock are computed using Eq. (15) for [14] Whitham G B 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves (New
different values of 𝑘 and specific heat ratio 𝛾. The York: Interscience)
flow field profiles are presented in Figs. 1–4. It may be [15] Hafner P 1988 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 48 1244
[16] Radha Ch and Sharma V D 1993 Phys. Fluids B 5 4287
noted here that the magnetic pressure term enters into [17] Toque N 2001 Shock Wave 11 157
the solution through trial functions with 0 < 𝑘 ≤ 1. [18] Korobeinikov V P 1976 Problems in the Theory of Point
Smaller values of 𝑘 signify the higher magnetic field Explosion in Gases ed Providence R I (New York: Ameri-
effect. The value of similarity exponent 𝛼 correspond- can Mathematical Society)
[19] Lock R M and Mestel A J 2008 J. Plasma Phys. 74 531
ing to different values of the specific heat ratio 𝛾 and [20] Singh L P et al 2011 Astrophys. Space Sci. 331 597
𝑘 are given in Table 1. The fact that 𝛼 is always less [21] Singh L P et al 2011 Meccanica 46 437
than one shows that the shock wave is continuously [22] Singh L P, Singh M and Pandey B D 2010 AIAA 48 2523
094701-4
Chinese Physics Letters
Volume 28 Number 9 September 2011
GENERAL
090201 SubHopf/Fold-Cycle Bursting in the Hindmarsh–Rose Neuronal Model with Periodic
Stimulation
JI Ying, BI Qin-Sheng
090202 Coupled Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations and the Miura Transformation
LOU Yan, ZHU Jun-Yi
090203 Theta-function Solutions to the (2+1)-Dimensional Breaking Soliton Equation
WANG Jun-Min, YANG Xiao
090204 A Note on the Invariance Properties and Conservation Laws of the Kadomstev–Petviashvili
Equation with Power Law Nonlinearity
A H Bokhari, F D Zaman, K Fakhar, A H Kara
090301 Quantum Correlation Generation in a Damped Cavity
LI Jun-Gang, ZOU Jian, XU Bao-Ming ,SHAO Bin
090302 Quantum Information Transfer in Circuit QED with Landau–Zener Tunneling
LI Jun-Wang, WU Chun-Wang, DAI Hong-Yi
090303 Evolution of the Interference of Bose Condensates Released from a Double-Well Potential
ZHU Bi-Hui, LIU Shu-Juan, XIONG Hong-Wei
090304 Generation of Enhanced Three-Mode Continuously Variable Entanglement
YU You-Bin, WANG Huai-Jun, FENG Jin-Xia
090305 Experimental Realization of Braunstein’s Weight-Decision Algorithm
HOU Shi-Yao, CUI Jing-Xin, LI Jun-Lin
090401 Bianchi Type-I String Cosmological Model with Bulk Viscosity and Time-Dependent Λ term
R K Tiwari, S Sharma
090402 Phantom Accretion onto the Schwarzschild de-Sitter Black Hole
M Sharif, G Abbas
090501 Theoretical Analysis of a Modified Continuum Model
GE Hong-Xia, WU Shu-Zhen, CHENG Rong-Jun, LO Siu-ming
090502 Assessment of Time Series Complexity Using Improved Approximate Entropy
KONG De-Ren, XIE Hong-Bo
090503 Generalized Synchronization of Diverse Structure Chaotic Systems
KADIR Abdurahman, WANG Xing-Yuan, ZHAO Yu-Zhang
090504 Vibrational Resonance in an Overdamped System with a Sextic Double-Well Potential
WANG Can-Jun
090505 Stochastic Multi-Resonance in a Linear System Driven by Multiplicative Polynomial
Dichotomous Noise
ZHANG Lu, ZHONG Su-Chuan, PENG Hao, LUO Mao-Kang
090506 Velocity Distributions in Inelastic Granular Gases with Continuous Size Distributions
LI Rui, ZHANG Duan-Ming, LI Zhi-Hao
090507 Coherence-Resonance-Induced Neuronal Firing near a Saddle-Node and Homoclinic
Bifurcation Corresponding to Type-I Excitability
JIA Bing, GU Hua-Guang, LI Yu-Ye
090508 One-Dimensional w-Component Fermions and Bosons with Delta Function Interaction
WEI Bo-Bo
090701 High-Performance Humidity Sensors Based on Double-Layer ZnO-TiO2 Nanofibers via
Electrospinning
YUE Xue-Jun, HONG Tian-Sheng, XU Xing, LI Zhen
090702 Experiments on Broadband EMP Radiation with an Axial Mode Helix Antenna
SUN Qi-Zhi, FANG Dong-Fan, LIU Wei, LIU Zheng-Fen, CHI Yuan, DAI Wen-Feng, HAN Wen-Hui
THE PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS
091101 Generalized Uncertainty Principle in the Presence of Extra Dimensions
MU Ben-Rong, WU Hou-Wen, YANG Hai-Tang
NUCLEAR PHYSICS
092101 Tensor Coupling Effects on Spin Symmetry in the Anti-Lambda Spectrum of Hypernuclei
SONG Chun-Yan, YAO Jiang-Ming, MENG Jie
092102 The Plateau of Moment of Inertia and the Energy Gap in 161−168 Yb
HUANG Li-Xun, QI Yan-Jun, LI Tao, LIU Shu-Xin
092501 Fission of Weakly Prolate 119 Sn and Weakly Oblate 209 Bi Nuclei Induced by 500 and
672 MeV Negative Pions
Mukhtar Ahmed Rana, Gul Sher, Shahid Manzoor, M. I. Shahzad
092502 Collective Flow of Λ Hyperons within Covariant Kaon Dynamics
XING Yong-Zhong, ZHU Yu-Lan, WANG Yan-Yan, ZHENG Yu-Ming
092503 Centrality in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions and the Random Matrix Approach
Z. Wazir