Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Staad FEMfdn 5
Staad FEMfdn 5
Element Analysis
DRAFT COPY
April 2020
ii
Contents
iii
iv CONTENTS
Chapter 1
From the current staad model of superstructure, we can model the finite element of our mat foundation
by deleting elements above the support and retaining the supports.
Below is the isometric model of staad file with almost whole superstructure is deleted.
Figure 1.1
1
2 CHAPTER 1. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
Figure 1.2
Proceed to front view to easily delete remaining superstructure elements like shearwall and columns.
Figure 1.3
This should be the final output once all superstructure elements are deleted.
1.1. STAAD BUILDING MODEL 3
Figure 1.4
1. Click on Geomety Parametric Modeling to generate automesh for the mat foundation.
Figure 1.5
4 CHAPTER 1. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
2. Click Add.Fill in name for the mesh and click use nodes and beams that occur on or inside the
outer boundary.
Figure 1.6
1.1. STAAD BUILDING MODEL 5
3. Start your rectangular boundary at x=-3,y= -3 offset from the topleft most corner. Create your
boundary in counterclockwise direction.
Figure 1.7
4. Once you finished creating 4 node boundary, a dialog box will appear below. Follow parameters
shown below and staad will generate mesh for finite element model considering the internal nodes from
the supports.
6 CHAPTER 1. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
Figure 1.8
Observe that supports from original superstructure are still present in the model. We will delete this later.
This node support location will become location of loadings which are applied in our mat foundation.
1.3. ASSIGNING PROPERTY 7
Figure 1.9
Figure 1.10
8 CHAPTER 1. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
Subgrade modulus according to our geotech report is 18000 KN/m3 . Create foundation support shown
below.
Figure 1.11
Apply this to the plate model. Make sure cursor is Plates cursor to select the slab.
10 CHAPTER 1. FINITE ELEMENT MODELING
Figure 1.12
Chapter 2
Shown below is the reactions from our superstructure in STAAD. We will postprocess this to create new
set of forces to be applied in our mat foundation.
Figure 2.1
2. In the spreadsheet, fill up blank cells with node numbers corresponding to the node as shown. This
is important to quickly filter all load cases applied at each node support.
11
12 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTING FORCES AND LOAD APPLICATION TO STAAD
Figure 2.2
3. As shown below, apply the formula to create concatenated text of forces to be applied in each node
supports. Remember staad editor is like a notepad that can recognize text strings.
Figure 2.3
2.2. LOAD APPLICATION IN STAAD USING STAAD EDITOR AND EXCEL 13
Figure 2.4
14 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTING FORCES AND LOAD APPLICATION TO STAAD
Below is the staad editor of current file, notice the format of joint load we initially applied. This
should be the format of concatenated text you will create from the excel file.
Figure 2.5
5. Once done, you can now copy paste the concatenated text from excel directly to staad editor.
2.2. LOAD APPLICATION IN STAAD USING STAAD EDITOR AND EXCEL 15
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.7
16 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTING FORCES AND LOAD APPLICATION TO STAAD
Figure 2.8
2.2. LOAD APPLICATION IN STAAD USING STAAD EDITOR AND EXCEL 17
6. Take note, all reactions from superstructure should be in the opposite direction once applied to the
mat foundation. That is, the vertical reaction from support in superstructure is now downward applied
to the mat foundation. Thus, notice that for first row, Fy is -1749KN in the cell M5 while is is 1749KN
in cell F5.
Figure 2.9
7. To easily copy the concatenated text in excel, use data filter for each load case. Below shows
filtered result for Load case 302. Simply copy these set of forces and paste to our staad editor under Load
case 302.
18 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTING FORCES AND LOAD APPLICATION TO STAAD
Figure 2.10
Figure 2.11
Figure 2.12
Figure 2.13
20 CHAPTER 2. IMPORTING FORCES AND LOAD APPLICATION TO STAAD
Chapter 3
1. After applying load forces edited in our excel spreadsheet, Click Perform Analysis and Add.
2. Run the STAAD.
Figure 3.1
21
22 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
Once you click on post processing tab, you can investigate the result according to the load case or member
number you wanted. To do this quickly, right click at the results window and click Result Setup shown
below and choose Load cases you wanted. Remember that for serviceability load case is needed to check
bearing capacity and settlement while ultimate load case is selected to design the mat foundation.
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
24 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
3. Notice that maximum base pressure is 141 Kpa. Thus, we did not exceed our maximum bearing
pressure of 300kpa.
Figure 3.6
26 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
4. Do this investigation for each serviceability load case and make sure you did not exceed maximum
bearing pressure of 300 kpa.
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.8
3.2. BEARING CAPACITY CHECK 27
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.10
28 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.12
3.2. BEARING CAPACITY CHECK 29
Figure 3.13
30 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
Figure 3.14
3.4. SETTLEMENT CHECK 31
Figure 3.15
32 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
Figure 3.16
Figure 3.17
3.4. SETTLEMENT CHECK 33
Figure 3.18
34 CHAPTER 3. RUN ANALYSIS AND VIEWING RESULT
Chapter 4
After getting Mx and Mz moment from STAAD FEM analysis, prepare a program for mat foundation
using SMATH. It is a free software which is very similar to Mathcad.
1. To view maximum moment for design purpose, choose ultimate load combinations in the result setup.
Use Global Moment. Below shows result in Load case 401.
Figure 4.1
35
36 CHAPTER 4. MAT FOUNDATION DESIGN USING SMATH
Figure 4.2
Notice that for LC 401= 1.4DL maximum negative moment occurs at the support and this is expected.
Green colors all the way to red colors indicate positive moment which occurs midway between supports
or columns.
Figure 4.3
4.1. MAX/MIN MX AND MZ MOMENT 37
Thus, we will design our mat slab for negative moment near support and positive moment between
the columns or supports.
38 CHAPTER 4. MAT FOUNDATION DESIGN USING SMATH
1.4
ρmin = fy
As := ρ · 1000 · d
Abar
s := As · 1000
Figure 4.4
4.2. SMATH CODE FOR DESIGN 39
2. According below, spacing of 180mm is enough for slab thickness of 800mm with moment of 659Knm.
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.6
40 CHAPTER 4. MAT FOUNDATION DESIGN USING SMATH
Figure 4.7
4.3. GLOBAL MOMENT CHECK 41
After copying table above, paste to excel like below and by data filtering, you can get maximum
moment negative and positive for each load case.
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.9
42 CHAPTER 4. MAT FOUNDATION DESIGN USING SMATH
Figure 4.10
Chapter 5
Shown below is a sample project I did with FEM model and corresponding results.
Figure 5.1
43
44 CHAPTER 5. SAMPLE PROJECT AND TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT DRAWING
STAAD Editor of support condition showing the spring assignment to the pile foundation location
and the rest of plates supported by soil.
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.3
5.2. VIEWING RESULT 45
Figure 5.4
46 CHAPTER 5. SAMPLE PROJECT AND TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT DRAWING
And the local moment as shown below shows that it experiences 208KN*m consistent with the Global
Moment. This is because the selected plate element is quadrilateral whose axis coincides with the global
axis.
Figure 5.5
The spreadsheet here shows the result of each pilecap maximum Mx and Mz moment with corre-
sponding top and bottom bars calculation which is reflected in the shop drawing shown in 5.3 .
5.2. VIEWING RESULT 47
Figure 5.6
48 CHAPTER 5. SAMPLE PROJECT AND TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT DRAWING
Figure 5.7
5.3. REINFORCEMENT DRAWING 49
Pilecaps are seen below which is installed to improve soil condition and to support the superstructure.
Figure 5.8
50 CHAPTER 5. SAMPLE PROJECT AND TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT DRAWING
In this picture, I want you to recall the result of FEM we were looking at above in 5.1 . Notice the
color gradients near and at the support. In the actual condition, several rebars are installed at the column
region. Thus, it is customary to average the moments at the column location because FEM model has
tendency to give high stress concentration at support because we idealize the support as a single joint
only whereas in this picture below the support below may actually cover 2x2 mesh region.
Figure 5.9