Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ahmad I 2017
Ahmad I 2017
www.elsevier.com/locate/physe
PII: S1386-9477(17)30021-8
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2017.05.009
Reference: PHYSE12809
To appear in: Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures
Received date: 5 January 2017
Revised date: 12 May 2017
Accepted date: 16 May 2017
Cite this article as: M. Ahmadi, R. Ansari and H. Rouhi, Multi-scale bending,
buckling and vibration analyses of carbon fiber/carbon nanotube-reinforced
polymer nanocomposite plates with various shapes, Physica E: Low-dimensional
Systems and Nanostructures, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2017.05.009
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for
publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of
the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form.
Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which
could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Multi-scale bending, buckling and vibration analyses of carbon fiber/carbon
nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposite plates with various shapes
a
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Guilan, P.O. Box 3756, Rasht, Iran
b
Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, East of Guilan, University
of Guilan, P.C. 44891-63157, Rudsar-Vajargah, Iran
*
Corresponding author. Tel. /fax: +98 13 33690276. E-mail address: r_ansari@guilan.ac.ir (R. Ansari)
Abstract
Using a finite element-based multi-scale modelling approach, the bending, buckling and free
vibration of hybrid polymer matrix composites reinforced by carbon fibers and carbon nanotubes
(CF/CNT-RP) are analyzed herein. Thick composite plates with rectangular, circular, annular
and elliptical shapes are considered. First, the equivalent material properties of CF/CNT-RP are
calculated for different volume fractions of CF and CNT. To accomplish this aim, a two-step
procedure is presented through which the coupled effects of nano- and micro-scale are taken into
account. In the first step, modelling of dispersion of CNTs into the polymer matrix is done with
considering interphase formed by their chemical interaction with the matrix, and the equivalent
properties of resulting composite material are determined accordingly. CFs are then dispersed
into CNT-RP which is considered a homogenous material in this step. Both distributions of
CNTs and CFs are assumed to be random. After computing the equivalent properties of
CF/CNT-RP for different volume fractions of its constituents, the bending, buckling and free
vibration analyses of plates with different shapes are performed. It is shown that the
reinforcement of the polymer matrix with both CF and CNT significantly affects the bending,
buckling and free vibration characteristics of plates.
1
1. Introduction
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are ideal candidates for using in the reinforcement phase of composite
materials owing to their outstanding mechanical properties [1-6]. Their Young’s modulus and
tensile strength are about 1 TPa and 150 GPa, respectively, which are very larger than those of
steel. Moreover, their lightness is another advantage for using in composite materials. One can
find several works in which the applications of CNTs in composite materials have been reported
[7-11]. CNT-reinforced composites (CNTRCs) with ceramic, metal and polymer matrices can be
used in different cases [12-14].
A literature review shows that the mechanical properties of CNTRCs have been widely
studied. For example, Hu and co-workers [15] evaluated the elastic properties of polymeric
CNTRCs by means of a three-phase representative volume element (RVE) subjected to various
loading conditions. Their RVE consists of CNT, a transition layer between the nanotube and
polymer matrix and an outer polymer matrix body. A micromechanical analysis on the effective
elastic properties of CNTRCs was presented by Seidel and Lagoudas [16]. Joshi and Upadhyay
[17] analyzed the elastic behavior of CNTRCs with considering the interphase effect using a
three-phase continuum model. Bradbury et al. [18] measured the hardness of CNTRCs with Al
matrix by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman
scattering. Nouri et al. [19] predicted the elastic modulus of CNT-reinforced Al nanocomposites
using the finite element method (FEM). Arash et al. [20] investigated the fracture behavior of
CNT-reinforced poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) matrix composites under tension using
molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Ansari and Hassanzadeh Aghdam [21] studied the
viscoelastic response of CNT-reinforced polyimide nanocomposites subjected to the action of
uniaxial and biaxial loads via the micromechanical-based simplified unit cell (SUC) model. The
influence of CNT waviness on the elastic behavior of polymer nanocomposites was explored
based on a three-dimensional unit cell-based micromechanical model by Ansari and his
associates [22]. Also, the bending, buckling and free vibration of CNTRC plates, beams and
shells have been extensively studied within the framework of continuum mechanics [23-31].
Odegard et al. [32] have revealed that the direct use of continuum micromechanical models
may lead to inaccurate results in the analysis of CNTRCs because of not taking the lattice
structure of CNTs into account. Moreover, Tsai et al. [33] has found that CNT/polymer matrix
2
interphase region is one of the most important factors in the analysis of polymeric CNTRCs
which significantly affects the mechanical behavior of the composite. The interphase is formed
by non-bonded van der Waals (vdW) interaction between the CNT and surrounding matrix.
Hence, multi-scale modeling approaches to consider the coupled micro- and nano-scale effects
have been proposed by a number of researchers. For example, Shokrieh and Rafiee [34]
developed a stochastic multi-scale modeling method in order to obtain the mechanical properties
of CNT-reinforced polymers. Joshi et al. [35] proposed a multi-scale approach to study the
chirality effects on the behavior of CNTRCs. Furthermore, Vu-Bac et al. [36] developed a multi-
scale model to analyze the effect of uncertain model inputs on the elastic properties of polymer
nanocomposites.
Recently, carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hybrid multi-scale composites have attracted the
attention of researchers due to their excellent properties [37-43]. To authors’ best knowledge, the
important mechanical behaviors (i.e. bending, buckling and free vibration) of plates made of
such composite materials have not been studied up to now. Since providing reliable results on the
mechanics of CF/CNT-reinforced composite plates can be of great importance in their
applications, the present work is devoted to study their bending, buckling and free vibration. To
this end, a multi-scale FEM is employed. The adopted multi-scale modeling approach consists of
two steps. As the first step, a three-phase RVE model is considered which includes the polymer
matrix, randomly distributed CNTs and interphase region between CNTs and the polymer
matrix. After calculating the equivalent properties of CNT-reinforced polymer (CNT-RP),
another RVE model is considered in which CFs are dispersed into CNT-RP with the properties
determined in the previous step. It should be noted that the distribution of CNTs as well as that
of CFs are assumed to random from the viewpoints of orientation and coordinates. Also, the
polymer matrix and interphase region are considered isotropic, while CFs and CNTs are modeled
as transverse isotropic materials. From the aforementioned dual-step multi-scale modeling, the
macroscopic elastic properties of CF/CNT-RP are first obtained for various volume fractions of
CFs and CNTs. Then, thick clamped rectangular, circular, annular and elliptical composite plates
are considered whose bending, buckling and free vibration are investigated.
3
2. Multi-Scale FEM
Based on a two-step finite element-based multi-scale modeling approach, the elastic properties of
CF/CNT-RP are obtained. In order to accomplish this aim, a three-phase RVE model (including
CNT, polymer and interphase) is first used in which CNTs are dispersed into the polymer matrix.
It is assumed that CNTs are distributed with random orientation and without any overlap with
each other. Also, two-dimensional unit cells are employed to model the nanocomposite RVE.
This RVE model is indicated in Fig. 1. As it is observed, an interphase is considered which is a
layer developed around the CNT embedded in the polymer matrix. The interphase is formed by
non-bonded vdW interaction between the CNT and surrounding polymer matrix. In the next step,
CFs are randomly distributed into CNT-RP to obtain the properties of hybrid CF/CNT-RP
composite. The RVE model of this step is shown in Fig. 2. It is worth mentioning that after the
dispersion of CNTs into the polymer, the equivalent properties of resulting material are
computed. Then, CFs are distributed in that material which is considered to be homogenous with
the properties calculated in the first step. Moreover, the reinforcement is performed for different
volume fractions of CNTs and CFs (fifteen states, see Table 2). In each case, 50 particles (CNTs
with the diameter of 0.78 nm and aspect ratio of 100, or CFs with the diameter of 10 µm and
aspect ratio of 10) are dispersed into the polyimide matrix. In the two-dimensional modeling, the
particles are modeled as rectangles. The shorter side length of the particles is considered as their
diameter. Moreover, the longer side length of the particles is calculated based on the particles
aspect ratio (the ratio of length to diameter). The side length of the square RVEs are computed
via the geometrical parameters of the particle and particles volume fraction in the polymer
matrix. For instance, a CNT-reinforced RVE with volume percentage of 3% has a side length
equal to 318.4 nm.
According to previous studies [33, 44-46], it has been revealed that CNTs are transversely
isotropic materials. Hence, CNT is modeled as a transversely isotropic material herein. Also, the
polymer matrix and interphase are considered as isotropic, while CFs are considered as
transversely isotropic.
A uniaxial tensile test was done on the RVE to compute the elastic modulus. Fig. 3 shows a
schematic view for boundary and loading conditions in obtaining the elastic modulus of
composite. One side of the RVEs is constrained and the strain of the 0.02 is applied to the
4
opposite side. It is assumed that the effective properties of the nanocomposite to be similar to the
properties of the RVE. By measuring the fixed boundary reaction force and calculating stress
value (σ), the equivalent elastic modulus ( of nanocomposite RVE is calculated using Hooke’s
law as follows
(1)
in which denotes the RVE strain in the load direction. It should be noted that for each
reinforcement type, the results are obtained using average values of three analyses with different
random microstructures so as to reduce the influence of chance as a result of random dispersion
on the results.
Fig. 4 presents examples of the meshed RVEs for CNT-RP and CF-RP. After calculating the
equivalent elastic properties of CF/CNT-RP, the bending, free vibration and buckling of plates
made of such composite material are analyzed considering the obtained Young’s modulus results
in the previous simulation as homogenous materials. For the structural analysis, three-
dimensional FE modeling is performed. Thick plates with various shapes including circular,
rectangular, elliptical and annular are considered whose meshed configurations are shown in Fig.
5. The plates are assumed to be under clamped boundary condition. At the micro-scale, an 8-
node biquadratic plane stress quadrilateral element is used. Furthermore, a 20-node quadratic
brick element is employed at the macro-scale.
In order to validate the present multi-scale approach, a comparison is made between the present
results and those reported in [47] for the elastic modulus of CNT-reinforced polypropylene with
randomly oriented reinforcements. Fig. 6 depicts the variation of normalized elastic modulus of
polypropylene reinforced by CNTs versus CNT volume fraction. The results of Ref. [47] are
based on experimental tests, two-level model and two-step model. It is seen that there are good
agreements between the present results and those given in [47]. Difference percentages between
the predictions of present FEM and those of experiment are equal to 2.4, 2.2 and 9.8
corresponding to 1.6%, 3.2% and 4.8% CNT volume fractions, respectively.
5
To generate the rest of results, polyimide is considered as the polymer matrix whose
properties together with those of CNT, CF and interphase are presented in Table 1. In this table,
longitudinal elastic modulus, transverse elastic modulus, longitudinal Poisson’s ratio, transverse
Poisson’s ratio, longitudinal shear modulus and mass density are denoted by , , , ,
and , respectively. The aspect ratio of CFs is assumed to be equal to 10 with a diameter equal to
10 . Besides, the aspect ratio and diameter of CNTs are selected as 100 and 0.78 nm,
respectively. The thickness of interphase is also taken as 0.3333 nm.
Table 2 presents the equivalent elastic modulus and density of CF/CNT-reinforced polyimide
for several states of reinforcement. According to Table 2, the considered reinforcements can be
classified into three main groups: reinforcement with CNTs (1%, 3% and 5% CNT),
reinforcement with CFs (5%, 10% and 20% CF), hybrid reinforcement with CNTs and CFs. The
third group also consists of nine types of hybrid reinforcement for 5%, 10% and 20% CF. The
properties of polyimide [50] are also given in the table to better show the effect of reinforcement
on the elastic properties. It is observed that the elastic moduli of reinforced polyimides are
significantly larger than that of neat polyimide. For example, the elastic moduli of 5% CNT-RP,
20% CF-RP and 4% CNT- 20% CF-RP are 88.1%, 63.5% and 192.5% larger than that of
polyimide, respectively. Also, one can find that the elastic moduli of polyimide reinforced by the
combination of CFs and CNTs are larger than those of CF-RP and CNT-RP. For example, the
elastic modulus of 4% CNT- 20% CF-RP is respectively 55.5% and 78.8% larger than that of 5%
CNT-RP and 20% CF-RP.
Now, the free vibration, buckling and bending of thick clamped plates made of materials with
properties given in Table 2 are analyzed using FEM. Before embarking on the results, the
validity of the present approach is verified in Table 3. This table shows the first ten frequencies
of an annular plate computed in [51] and by the present FEM. It is observed that there is a good
agreement between two sets of results.
In the following results, the thickness of plates is considered as 10 mm, and other geometrical
parameters are as follows:
6
( and : semi-minor axis and semi-major axis of elliptical plate)
First, the bending results are presented. It is assumed that the plates are subjected to a
uniformly distributed load with the magnitude of ⁄ . The maximum deflections of
plates with different shapes for various states of reinforcement are given in Table 4. The
deflected plates are also graphically shown in Fig. 7. Table 4 clearly shows that the maximum
deflection of plates decreases as they are reinforced with CFs and CNTs.
The results related to buckling analysis are also tabulated in Table 5. This table gives the
critical buckling loads of plates with different shapes for various volume fractions of CFs and
CNTs. The loading conditions and buckled configurations are also given in Figs. 8 and 9,
respectively. As expected, the critical buckling load is affected by the type of reinforcement.
Finally the results of free vibration analysis are presented. Table 6 shows the first five natural
frequencies of plates with different shapes for various types of reinforcement. The corresponding
mode shapes are also given in Fig. 10. It should be noted that there are some missing modes
based on the plate theories when the thickness of plate becomes relatively high (due to transverse
shear deformation and coupled bending-shear deformation) especially for some numerical
methods [52-55]. However, since the 3D finite element method (based on the 3D elasticity
theory) is used herein, all modes are captured.
4. Conclusion
Based on a multi-scale modeling approach, hybrid CF/CNT-RP was analyzed in this paper by
FEM. To obtain the macroscopic elastic properties of CF/CNT-RP, an RVE model of randomly
dispersed CNTs in the polymer matrix was first considered, and the properties of CNT-RP were
calculated. In the mentioned RVE, three phases including CNTs, polymer matrix and interphase
were taken into account. Then, an RVE model of randomly dispersed CFs into the CNT-RP
(second reinforcement) was considered, and the properties of CF/CNT-RP corresponding to
different volume fractions of CNT and CF were determined. Polymer matrix/interphase and
CF/CNT are considered to be isotropic and transverse isotropic, respectively. In the next step, the
free vibration, buckling and bending of plates made of CF/CNT-RP were studied. The FEM
results were presented for clamped plates with rectangular, circular, annular and elliptical shapes.
7
It was indicated that by reinforcing the polymer matrix with both CF and CNT, the elastic
modulus is considerably improved. Moreover, the results revealed that such reinforcement has
important effects on the bending, buckling and free vibrations characteristics of plates.
References
[1] Yu, M. F., Lourie, O., Dyer, M. J., Moloni, K., Kelly, T. F., and Ruoff, R. S., Strength and
Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load, Science, 287
(2000) 637–640.
[2] Peng, B., Locascio, M., Zapol, P., Li, S., Mielke, S. L., Schatz, G. C., and Espinosa, H. D.,
Measurements of near-ultimate strength for multiwalled carbon nanotubes and irradiation-
induced crosslinking improvements, Nature Nanotech., 3 (2008) 626–631.
[3] Filleter, T., Bernal, R., Li, S., and Espinosa, H. D., Ultrahigh Strength and Stiffness in Cross-
Linked Hierarchical Carbon Nanotube Bundles, Adv. Mater., 23 (2011) 2855–2860.
[4] Bellucci, S., 2005, “Carbon nanotubes: Physics and applications,” Physica Status Solidi (c),
2, pp. 34–47.
[5] Ansari, R., Mirnezhad, M., and Rouhi, H., Torsional buckling analysis of chiral multi-walled
carbon nanotubes based on an accurate molecular mechanics model, Acta Mech., 226 (2015)
2955-2972.
[6] Ansari, R., Mirnezhad, M., and Sahmani, S., An accurate molecular mechanics model for
computation of size-dependent elastic properties of armchair and zigzag single-walled carbon
nanotubes, Meccanica, 48 (2013) 1355–1367.
[7] Thostenson, E. T., Ren, Z., and Chou, T. W., Advances in the Science and Technology of
Carbon Nanotubes and Their Composites: A Review, Compos. Sci. Technol., 61 (2001) 1899-
1912.
8
[8] Lau, K. T., Gu, C., Gao, G. H., Ling, H. Y., and Reid, S. R., Stretching Process of Single-
and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Nanocomposite Applications, Carbon, 42 (2004)
426-428.
[9] Veedu, V. P., Cao, A., Li, X., Ma, K., Soldano, C., Kar, S., Ajayan, P. M., and Ghasemi-
Nejhad, M. N., Multifunctional Composites Using Reinforced Laminae with Carbon-
Nanotube Forests, Nat. Mater., 5 (2006) 457-462.
[10] Kim, M., Park, Y-. B., Okoli, O. I., and Zhang, C., Processing, Characterization, and
Modeling of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Multiscale Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol.,
69 (2009) 335-342.
[11] Sun, K., Yu, J., Zhang, C., and Zhou, X., In Situ Growth Carbon Nanotube Reinforced
SiCf/SiC Composite, Mater. Lett., 66 (2012) 92-95.
[12] Ashrafi, B., Hubert, P., and Vengallatore, S., Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Composites as
Structural Materials for Microactuators in Microelectromechanical Systems,
Nanotechnology, 17 (2006) 4895.
[13] Esawi, A. M. K., and Farag, M. M., Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Potential and
Current Challenges, Mater Des., 28 (2007) 2394-2401.
[14] Tjong, S. C., 2009, “Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites: Metal and Ceramic
Matrices,” Wiley, Verlag.
[15] Hu, N., Fukunaga, H., Lu, C., Kameyama, M., and Yan, B., Prediction of elastic properties
of carbon nanotube reinforced composites, Proc. R. Soc. A, 461 (2005) 1685–1710.
[16] Seidel, G. D., and Lagoudas, D. C., Micromechanical analysis of the effective elastic
properties of carbon nanotube reinforced composites, Mech. Mater., 38 (2006) 884–907.
[17] Joshi P., and Upadhyay, S. H., Effect of interphase on elastic behavior of multiwalled
carbon nanotube reinforced composite, Comput. Mater. Sci., 87 (2014) 267-273.
9
[18] Bradbury, C. R., Gomon, J., Kollo, L., Kwon, H., and Leparoux, M., Hardness of Multi Wall
Carbon Nanotubes reinforced aluminium matrix composites, J. Alloys Compd., 585 (2014)
362–367.
[19] Nouri, N., Ziaei-Rad, S., Adibi, S., and Karimzadeh, F., Fabrication and mechanical
property prediction of carbon nanotube reinforced Aluminum nanocomposites, Mater. Des.,
34 (2012) 1–14.
[20] Arash, B., Wang, Q., and Varadan, V. K., Mechanical properties of carbon
nanotube/polymer composites, Sci. Rep., 4 (2014) 6479,
[21] Ansari, R., and Hassanzadeh Aghdam, M. K., Micromechanics-based viscoelastic analysis
of carbon nanotube-reinforced composites subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading,
Compos. Part B, 90 (2016) 512-522.
[22] Ansari, R., Hassanzadeh Aghdam, M. K., and Mahmoodi, M. J., Three-dimensional
micromechanical analysis of the CNT waviness influence on the mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposites, Acta Mechanica, 227 (2016) 3475–3495.
[23] Yas, M. H., and Heshmati, M., Dynamic analysis of functionally graded nanocomposite
beams reinforced by randomly oriented carbon nanotube under the action of moving load,
Appl. Math. Model., 36 (2012) 1371–1394.
[24] Zhu, P., Lei, Z. X., and Liew, K. M., Static and Free Vibration Analyses of Carbon
Nanotube-Reinforced Composite Plates Using Finite Element Method with First Order
Shear Deformation Plate Theory, Compos. Struct., 94 (2012) 1450-1460.
[25] Shen, H-. S., and Zhu, Z. H., Postbuckling of Sandwich Plates with Nanotube-Reinforced
Composite Face Sheets Resting on Elastic Foundations, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 35 (2012)
10-21.
[26] Malekzadeh, P., and Shojaee, M., Buckling Analysis of Quadrilateral Laminated Plates with
Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Composite Layers, Thin-Walled Struct., 71 (2013) 108-118.
[27] Shen, H-. S., and Xiang, Y., Nonlinear Analysis of Nanotube-Reinforced Composite Beams
Resting on Elastic Foundations in Thermal Environments, Eng. Struct., 56 (2013) 698-708.
10
[28] Alibeigloo, A., Free Vibration Analysis of Functionally Graded Carbon Nanotube-
Reinforced Composite Cylindrical Panel Embedded in Piezoelectric Layers by Using Theory
of Elasticity, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 44 (2014) 104-115.
[29] Ansari, R., Faghih Shojaei, M., Mohammadi, V., Gholami, R., and Sadeghi, F., Nonlinear
forced vibration analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite
Timoshenko beams, Compos. Struct., 113 (2014) 316–327.
[30] Mehar, K., and Panda, S. K., Geometrical Nonlinear Free Vibration Analysis of FG-CNT
Reinforced Composite Flat Panel under Uniform Thermal Field, Compos. Struct., 143
(2016) 336-346.
[31] Lei, Z. X., Zhang, L. W., and Liew, K. M., Parametric analysis of frequency of rotating
laminated CNT reinforced functionally graded cylindrical panels, Compos. Part B: Eng., 90
(2016) 251-266.
[32] Odegard, G. M., Gates, T. S., Wise, K. E., Park, C., and Siochi, E. J., Constitutive modeling
of nanotube-reinforced polymer composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 63 (2003) 1671–87.
[33] Tsai, J. L., Tzeng, S. H., and Chiu, Y. T., Characterizing elastic properties of carbon
(2010) 106–115.
[34] Shokrieh, M. M., and Rafiee, R., Stochastic multi-scale modeling of CNT/polymer
composites, Comput. Mater. Sci., 50 (2010) 437–446.
[35] Joshi, U. A., Sharma, S. C., and Harsha, S. P., A multiscale approach for estimating the
chirality effects in carbon nanotube reinforced composites, Physica E, 45 (2012) 28–35.
[36] Vu-Bac, N., Rafiee, R., Zhuang, X., Lahmer, T., and Rabczuk, T., Uncertainty
quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated
parameters, Compos. Part B: Eng., 68 (2015) 446–464.
[37] Thostenson, E. T., Li, W. Z., Wang, D. Z., Ren, Z. F., and Chou, T. W., Carbon
nanotube/carbon fiber hybrid multiscale composites, J. Appl. Phys., 91 (2002) 6034.
11
[38] Bekyarova, E., Thostenson, E. T., Yu, A., Kim, H., Gao, J., Tang, J., Hahn, H. T., Chou, T.
W., Itkis, M. E., and Haddon, R. C., Multiscale Carbon Nanotube−Carbon Fiber
Reinforcement for Advanced Epoxy Composites, Langmuir, 23 (2007) 3970–3974.
[39] Al-Haik, M., Luhrs, C. C., Reda Taha, M. M., Roy, A. K., Dai, L., Phillips, J., and Doorn,
S., Hybrid Carbon Fibers/Carbon Nanotubes Structures for Next Generation Polymeric
Composites, J. Nanotech., 2010 (2010) Article ID: 860178.
[40] Tehrani, M., Safdari, M., Boroujeni, A. Y., Razavi, Z., Case, S. W., Dahmen, K.,
Garmestani, H., and Al-Haik, M. S., Hybrid carbon fiber/carbon nanotube composites for
structural damping applications, Nanotechnology, 24 (2013) 155704.
[41] Alipour Skandani, A., and Al-Haik, M., Viscoplastic characterization and modeling of
hybrid carbon fiber/carbon nanotubes reinforced composites, Compos. Part B, 99 (2016) 63–
74.
[42] Zhou, H. W., Mishnaevsky Jr., L., Yi, H. Y., Liu, Y. Q., Hua, X., Warrier, A., and Dai, G.
M., Carbon fiber/carbon nanotube reinforced hierarchical composites: Effect of CNT
distribution on shearing strength, Compos. Part B: Eng., 88 (2016) 201–211.
[43] Pal, G., and Kumar, S., Multiscale modeling of effective electrical conductivity of short
carbon fiber-carbon nanotube-polymer matrix hybrid composites, Mater. Des., 89 (2016)
129–136.
[44] Shen, L., and Li, J., Transversely isotropic elastic properties of single-walled carbon
nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B, 69 (2004) 045414.
[45] Shen, L., and Li, J., Transversely isotropic elastic properties of multiwalled carbon
nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B, 71 (2005) 035412.
[46] Liu, J. Z., Zheng, Q. S., Wang, L. F., and Jiang, Q., Mechanical properties of single-walled
carbon nanotube bundles as bulk materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 53 (2005) 123–142.
[47] Selmi, A., Friebel, C., Doghri, I., and Hassis, H., Prediction of the elastic properties of
single walled carbon nanotube reinforced polymers: A comparative study of several
micromechanical models, Compos. Sci. Technol., 67 (2007) 2071–2084.
12
[48] Tsai, J. L., Tzeng, S. H., and Chiu, Y. T., Characterizing elastic properties of carbon
nanotubes/polyimide nanocomposites using multi-scale simulation, Compos. Part B: Eng.,
41 (2010) 106–115.
[49] Kulkarni, M., Carnahan, D., Kulkarni,K., Qian, D., and Abot, J. L., Elastic response of a
carbon nanotube fiber reinforced polymeric composite: A numerical and experimental study,
Compos. Part B: Eng., 41 (2010) 414–421.
[50] Odegard, G. M., Clancy, T. C., and Gates, T. S., Modeling of the mechanical properties of
nanoparticle/polymer composites, Polymer, 46 (2005) pp. 553–562.
[51] Tornabene, F., Viola, E., and Inman, D. J., 2-D differential quadrature solution for vibration
analysis of functionally graded conical, cylindrical shell and annular plate structures, J.
Sound Vib., 328 (2009) 259–290.
[52] Gorman, D. J., Accurate free vibration analysis of rhombic plates with simply supported and
fully clamped edge condition, J. Sound Vib., 12 (1988) 281–290.
[53] Lim, C. W., Li, C. R., Xiang, Y., and Wang, C. M., On the Missing Modes When Using the
Exact Frequency Relationship between Kirchhoff and Mindlin Plates, Adv. Vib. Eng., 4
(2005) 221-248.
[54] Gürses, M., Civalek, O., Korkmaz, A. K., and Ersoy, H., Free vibration analysis of
symmetric laminated skew plates by discrete singular convolution technique based on first-
order shear deformation theory, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 79 (2009) 290-313.
[55] Gürses, M., Akgöz, B., and Civalek, O., Mathematical modeling of vibration problem of
nano-sized annular sector plates using the nonlocal continuum theory via eight-node discrete
singular convolution transformation, Appl. Math. Comput., 219 (2012) 3226-3240.
13
List of Tables:
Table 4: Maximum deflections (mm) of plates made of various materials with different shapes
Table 5: Critical buckling loads (GPa) of plates made of various materials with different shapes
Table 6: Natural frequencies (Hz) of plates made of various materials with different shapes
List of Figures:
Figure 1: RVE model of randomly dispersed CNTs into the polymer matrix (interphase region is
specified by red color)
Figure 2: RVE model of randomly dispersed CFs into the CNT-RP (second reinforcement)
Figure 3: Boundary conditions and loading for obtaining the elastic modulus of CF-CNT-
polymer composite
Figure 5: Meshed plates using brick element for (a) rectangular (b) circular (c) annular and (d)
elliptical shapes
14
Table 1: Material properties of CNT, interphase, CF and polyimide
Material
⁄
Polyimide 4.200 1310
1% CNT-RP 4.830 1309.9
3% CNT-RP 6.411 1309.6
5% CNT-RP 7.898 1309.3
5% CF-RP 4.777 1332.5
10% CF-RP 5.314 1355.0
20% CF-RP 6.868 1400.0
0.95% CNT- 5% CF-RP 5.483 1332.4
2.85% CNT- 5% CF-RP 7.242 1332.1
4.75% CNT- 5% CF-RP 8.884 1331.8
0.9% CNT- 10% CF-RP 6.090 1354.9
2.7% CNT- 10% CF-RP 8.015 1354.6
4.5% CNT- 10% CF-RP 9.798 1354.4
0.8% CNT- 20% CF-RP 7.827 1399.9
15
2.4% CNT- 20% CF-RP 10.165 1399.7
4% CNT- 20% CF-RP 12.284 1399.4
16
Table 4: Maximum deflections (mm) of plates made of various materials with different shapes
17
Table 5: Critical buckling loads (GPa) of plates made of various materials with different shapes
18
Table 6: Natural frequencies (Hz) of plates made of various materials with different shapes
19
Mode 4 24118 26721 21533 17416
Mode 5 24118 26721 22133 17433
20
Mode 3 32762 36291 29245 23654
Mode 4 32762 36292 30061 23676
Mode 5
21
Figure 1: RVE model of randomly dispersed CNTs into the polymer matrix (interphase region is
specified by red color)
22
Figure 2: RVE model of randomly dispersed CFs into the CNT-RP (second reinforcement)
23
Figure 3: Boundary conditions and loading for obtaining the elastic modulus of CF-CNT-
polymer composite
24
(a) (b)
25
(a) (b)
(d)
(c)
Figure 5: Meshed plates using brick element for (a) rectangular (b) circular (c) annular and (d)
elliptical shapes
26
Figure 6: Variation of normalized elastic modulus of CNT-reinforced polypropylene with
randomly oriented reinforcements against CNT volume fraction (aspect ratio = 100)
27
Rectangular Circular
Annular Elliptical
28
Rectangular Circular Annular
29
Rectangular
Circular
Annular
30
Mode 1 Mode 2
Mode 3 Mode 4
Mode 5
31
Highlights
32