Proiect Beton3

TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY GHEORGHE ASACHI - IAȘI
FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SERVICES
1. TECHNICAL BRIEF
1. General aspects
1.1 Object of the project
Beneficiary Iasi City

Location Decebal Street, No. 5, Negres� ti City, Vaslui
County
General Designer S.C. Infographics S.R.L.
Project Number 01/2023
1.2 Placement characteristics
Classification in the locality & area

The objective of the investment is an ofiice building located in the built-up area of Iasi
city, the land has an area of 19,899 m2, has an irregular, polygonal shape and belongs to the
public domain of Iasi. The land is located with a long side parallel to the access road on
Decebal Street, with a secondary access from Vasile Alecsandri Street.
Land description
Category of use constructions & yards
Surface Sc =19 899m2
Shape Irregular, polygonal shape
Neighborhood - at North East - privately owned land (Nr. Cad 70489);

- at South - Decebal street;
- at East - Vasile Alecsandri street;
- at West - privately owned land
Public road access - Decebal street;

- Vasile Alecsandri street;
Topographic features The land location is favorable from the point of view of both
pedestrian & private/public transport accesibility.
Land use P.O.T. = 3.49%

C.U.T. = 0.17
Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

Public road access - Decebal street;
- Vasile Alecsandri street;
FACULTY OF CIVIL
Topographic features TheENGINEERING
land locationAND
is BUILDING SERVICES
favorable from the point of view of both
pedestrian & private/public transport accesibility.
Land use P.O.T. = 3.49%

C.U.T. = 0.17
Climate conditions
Snow
The characteristic value of the snow load on the ground on the studied site is Sk = 2.5 kN/m2
according to “Design code. Evaluation of the action of snow on constructions ”, indicative CR
1-1-3 / 2012
Wind
The reference wind pressure is qb = 0.7 kPa according to “Design code. Evaluation of the
wind action on constructions ”, indicative CR 1-1-4 / 2012
Geology

Geology
Frost depth = 1.0 m;
The studied location has the general and local stability ensured in compliance with the
recommendations of this study. Considering that the land is located on a flat area that cannot
be flooded in the conditions of long-term rains.
How the utilities are insured
Power supply Public network
Natural gas supply Public network
Water supply Public network
Wastewater and rainwater Public network
1.3 Building characteristics
The main function Office building
Height regime P+3E
Sc (build area) 260.23 m2;
Scd (build-up area) 1040.00 m2;
P.O.T. 5,94%
C.U.T. 0,29
Categoria de importață a clădirii C - deosebită conf. HG nr. 766/1997
Clasa de importață a clădirii II- conform P100-1/2013
Degree of fire resistance II
Conform P 100-1/2013 rezultă pentru accelerația pentru cutremure ag = 0.3 g

amplasament:
perioada de control (colț) Tc =0.7 sec

2. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
L ≔ 5 + 0.05 ⋅ 23 = 6.15 (2 spans of 6.15m each)
T ≔ 6 - 0.05 ⋅ 23 = 4.85 (4 bays of 4.85m each)
a) Plate
1
hp ≔ ― ⋅ min ((4.85 , 6.15)) = 0.121 => hp ≔ 12 cm
40
b) Beams, Girders
L L
― < hg < ― => 0.512 < hg < 0.615 => hg ≔ 55 cm
12 10
1
bg ≔ ―⋅ hg => bg = 27.5 modulated at bg ≔ 30 cm
2
c) Stairs
1
hs ≔ ― ⋅ L = 0.154 => hs ≔ 15 cm
40
2. Loads
Dead loads
a) Roof

b) Floor
c) Stairs
d) Exterior walls
e) Interior walls
It is taken aprox. 1 kN/m^2.
Live loads
In case of office destination: 2.5 kN/m^2
Snow loads

Snow loads
Column predesign
N ≔ 48.95 kN (corresponding to the Mymax)
20
fcd ≔ ―― = 13.333
1.5
N ⋅ 1000
Ac.req ≔ ―――= 9.178 ⋅ 10 3 mm 2
0.4 ⋅ fcd
Ac ≔ 500 ⋅ 500 = 2.5 ⋅ 10 5 mm 2

3. CHECKING OF THE DISPLACEMENTS

SLS
q ≔ 6.75 Hl ≔ 3000 mm
ν ≔ 0.5 draSLS ≔ 0.005 ⋅ Hl = 15 mm
dre ≔ 3 mm
drSLS ≔ dre ⋅ q ⋅ ν ⋅ 2 = 20.25 mm
drSLS < draSLS = 0 => increase the section of the columns to 55x55cm
it becomes dre ≔ 2 mm
drSLS ≔ dre ⋅ q ⋅ ν ⋅ 2 = 13.5 mm
drSLS < draSLS = 1 it checks!!
ULS
T1 ≔ 0.51
Tc ≔ 0.7
T1
c ≔ 3 - 2 ⋅ ― = 1.543
Tc
drULS ≔ dre ⋅ c ⋅ q ⋅ 2 = 41.657
draULS ≔ 0.025 ⋅ Hl = 75
drULS < draULS = 1 it checks!!

4. DESIGN OF GIRDERS
Computation of longitudinal reinforcement
Support
c ≔ 25 hg ≔ 550 mm fyk ≔ 500 fctm ≔ 2.2
ϕ ≔ 20 bg ≔ 300 mm
fyk
fyd ≔ ―― =?
1.15
from the computer software Msmax ≔ 127.47 ⋅ 10 6 N*mm

ϕ
d ≔ hg - c - ―= 515
2
Msmax
μ ≔ ―――― = 0.12
bg ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd
ω ≔ 1 - ‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 - 2 ⋅ μ = 0.128
fcd
As.supp ≔ ω ⋅ bg ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 608.337 mm 2
fyd
⎛ fctm ⎞
Asupp.min ≔ max ⎜0.26 ⋅ bg ⋅ d ⋅ ―― , 0.0013 ⋅ bg ⋅ d⎟ = 200.85 mm 2
⎝ fyk ⎠
=> 4 bars 14mm ϕ
Asupp.eff ≔ 616 mm 2
Asupp.eff ⋅ fyd
xr ≔ ――――= 66.957
bg ⋅ fcd
MRb2 ≔ Asupp.eff ⋅ fyd ⋅ ⎛⎝d - 0.5 ⋅ xr⎞⎠ = 1.29 ⋅ 10 8 N*mm => MRb2 ≔ 129.8 kN ⋅ m
Mid-span
b1 ≔ 2955
L ≔ 6150
beff1 ≔ min ⎛⎝0.2 ⋅ b1 + 0.1 ⋅ 0.7 ⋅ L , b1⎞⎠ = 1.022 ⋅ 10 3
beff2 ≔ beff1

FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND
3 BUILDING SERVICES
beff1 ≔ min ⎛⎝0.2 ⋅ b1 + 0.1 ⋅ 0.7 ⋅ L , b1⎞⎠ = 1.022 ⋅ 10
beff2 ≔ beff1
beff ≔ bg + beff1 + beff2 = 2.343 ⋅ 10 3
hp ≔ 120
⎛ hp ⎞
Mspan.max ≔ beff ⋅ hp ⋅ fcd ⋅ ⎜d - ―⎟ = 1.706 ⋅ 10 9 N ⋅ mm
⎝ 2⎠
Mspan.max ≔ 1717 kN ⋅ m
From the computer software => Mmidspan.max ≔ 60.22 kN ⋅ m
Mmidspan.max < Mspan.max = 1 Mmidspan.max ≔ 60.22 ⋅ 10 6 N ⋅ mm
Mmidspan.max
μspan ≔ ―――― = 0.007
beff ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd
ωspan ≔ 1 - ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 - 2 ⋅ μspan = 0.007
fcd
As.span ≔ ωspan ⋅ beff ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 269.928
fyd
⎛ fctm ⎞
Asmin.span ≔ max ⎜0.26 ⋅ bg ⋅ d ⋅ ―― , 0.0013 ⋅ bg ⋅ d , 0.5 ⋅ Asupp.eff⎟ = 308
⎝ fyd ⎠
=> As.span ≔ 308 mm 2
=> 3 bars of 12 mm ϕ
Aspan.eff ≔ 339 mm 2
Aspan.eff ⋅ fyd
xr ≔ ――――= 4.718
beff ⋅ fcd
MRb1 ≔ Aspan.eff ⋅ fyd ⋅ ⎛⎝d - 0.5 ⋅ xr⎞⎠ = 7.556 ⋅ 10 7 N*mm => MRb1 ≔ 76 kN*m
SHEAR FORCE COMPUTATION
1. The design value of shear force VEd will be considered the maximum value from:
a) shear force provided by the static and seismic analysis;

VEd1 ≔ 134.17 kN
b) shear force associated to the plastic failure mechanism, computed as following

1. The design value of shear force VEd will be considered the maximum value from:
TECHNICAL
a) shear force provided UNIVERSITY
by the static andGHEORGHE ASACHI - IAȘI
seismic analysis;
VEd1 ≔ 134.17 kN FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SERVICES
b) shear force associated to the plastic failure mechanism, computed as following

γRd ≔ 1.2
MRb1 = 76 kN*m
MRb2 = 129.8 kN*m
⎛ ΣMRc ⎞
min ⎜1 , ――⎟ equals to 1
⎝ ΣMRb ⎠
Mdb1 ≔ γRd ⋅ MRb1 ⋅ 1 = 91.2 kN*m
=>
Mdb2 ≔ γRd ⋅ MRb2 ⋅ 1 = 155.76 kN*m
lcl ≔ 5.6 m
ψ2 ≔ 0.3
V ≔ 82.82 (from the dead & live loads)
Mdb1 + Mdb2
VEd2 ≔ ――――+ V => VEd2 = 126.92 kN
lcl
VEd ≔ max ⎛⎝VEd1 , VEd2⎞⎠ => VEd = 134.17 kN
2. The shear force carried by concrete VRd,c is computed:

0.15
cRd.c ≔ ―― Asl ≔ Aspan.eff + Asupp.eff = 955
1.5
Asl
η1 ≔ 1 ρ1 ≔ ――= 0.006
d = 515 bg ⋅ d
‾‾‾‾ fck ≔ 20
200
k≔1+ ―― = 1.623 < 2 k1 ≔ 0.15
d
σcp ≔ 0 (because the axial force=0)
3 1
― ―
2 2
νmin ≔ 0.0035 ⋅ k ⋅ fck = 0.032
⎛ 1
― ⎞
VRd.c1 ≔ ⎝cRd.c ⋅ η1 ⋅ k ⋅ ⎛⎝100 ⋅ ρ1 ⋅ fck⎞⎠ + k1 ⋅ σcp⎟⎠ ⋅ bg ⋅ d = 5.799 ⋅ 10 4
⎜ 3
VRd.c2 ≔ ⎛⎝νmin + k1 ⋅ σcp⎞⎠ ⋅ bg ⋅ d = 5.001 ⋅ 10 3
VRd.c ≔ max ⎛⎝VRd.c1 , VRd.c2⎞⎠ = 5.799 ⋅ 10 4 => VRd.c ≔ 58.15 kN
Since the design value of the shear force VEd = 134.17 kN is higher than the shear force
carried by the concrete VRd.c = 58.15 kN , the amount of reinforcement must be computed.
3. Evaluation of the angle θ for shear design start with a preliminary asumption imposing
θ ≔ 22 °

θ ≔ 22 °
With this value, the maximum shear carried by the compressed diagonal of concrete VRd,max is
computed:
ctgθ ≔ 2.475 tgθ ≔ 0.4
αcw ≔ 1
z ≔ 0.9 ⋅ d = 463.5
ν1 ≔ 0.6
αcw ⋅ bg ⋅ z ⋅ ν1 ⋅ fcd
VRd.max ≔ ―――――― => VRd.max = 3.869 ⋅ 10 5 N
ctgθ + tgθ
VEd ≔ VEd ⋅ 10 3 = 1.342 ⋅ 10 5 N
VRd.max > VEd = 1 => the preliminary assumption θ ≔ 22 ° is good.
4. The diameter of stirrups is imposed and the distance between stirrups is computed
It will be used a diameter of 6 mm for the stirrups.
62 ⋅ π
Asw ≔ ――⋅ 2 = 56.549
4
fywd ≔ 0.8 ⋅ fyk = 400
Asw ⋅ z ⋅ fywd ⋅ 2.475

sreq ≔ ―――――― => sreq = 193.398 mm
VEd
It will be considered: s ≔ 150 mm
In the middle of the span it be taken the maximum distance between stirrups which is 250 mm.
Asw = 56.549
Asw
VRd.s ≔ ―― ⋅ z ⋅ fywd ⋅ ctgθ = 1.73 ⋅ 10 5 VEd = 1.342 ⋅ 10 5
s
VRd.s > VEd.max -it checks
5. The minimum transversal reinforcement ratio is checked:

Asw
ρw ≔ ――― = 0.001
s ⋅ bg ⋅ 1
0.08 ⋅ ‾‾‾
fck
ρw.min ≔ ―――― = 7.155 ⋅ 10 -4
fyk
- anchorage length approx. 40*diameter
- lap length approx. 60*diameter

0.08 ⋅ OF‾‾‾
FACULTY fck
CIVIL ENGINEERING
-4 AND BUILDING SERVICES
ρw.min ≔ ―――― = 7.155 ⋅ 10
fyk
- anchorage length approx. 40*diameter
- lap length approx. 60*diameter
5. DESIGN OF COLUMNS
1. Establish of the design moments
γRd ≔ 1.3
Mymax ≔ 172.98 kN*m
Mzmax ≔ 186.43 kN*m
It will be chosen a middle column in which are intersected 4 girders (all of them are reinforced
identically). So, the sum of the capable bending moments in the 4 girders is computed as
following:
As ≔ Asupp.eff = 616
As ⋅ fyd
x ≔ ――― = 66.957
bg ⋅ fcd
⎛ x⎞ 8
MRb ≔ bg ⋅ x ⋅ fcd ⋅ ⎜d - ―⎟ = 1.29 ⋅ 10 N*mm => MRb ≔ 129 kN*m
⎝ 2⎠
ΣMRb ≔ 4 ⋅ MRb => ΣMRb = 516 kN*m
ΣMEd ≔ 79.98 ⋅ 4 => ΣMEd = 319.92 kN*m

ΣMRb
MEdy ≔ γRd ⋅ Mymax ⋅ ―――=> MEdy = 362.7 kN*m
ΣMEd
ΣMRb
MEdz ≔ γRd ⋅ Mzmax ⋅ ―――=> MEdz = 390.902 kN*m
ΣMEd
2. Evaluation of the slenderness:
l0 ≔ 0.6 ⋅ Hl = 1.8 ⋅ 10 3 mm
h ≔ 550 mm
l0
λ0 ≔ ― => λ0 = 3.273 < 35 => the influence of slenderness can be ignored
h
3. Evaluation of the theoretical amount of reinforcement:

3. Evaluation of the theoretical amount of reinforcement:
bc ≔ 550 hc ≔ 550 c ≔ 25
20 ⎛ h ⎞
dc ≔ hc - c - ― = 515 ea ≔ max ⎜― , 20⎟ = 20
2 ⎝ 30 ⎠
NEd.My ≔ 95.97
NEd.My ⋅ 10 3
xy ≔ ――――= 13.087
bc ⋅ fcd
⎛⎝dc - xy⎞⎠
MEdy ⋅ 10 6 + NEd.My ⋅ 10 3 ⋅ ea - bc ⋅ xy ⋅ fcd ⋅ ―――
2
Asy ≔ ――――――――――――――――
⎛ dc 20 ⎞
2 ⋅ fyd ⋅ ⎜―- c - ―⎟
⎝2 2 ⎠
Asy = 1.76 ⋅ 10 3 mm^2
it will be adopted 5 ϕ 22 mm with Asy.eff ≔ 1900 mm^2
NEd.Mz ≔ 95.97
NEd.Mz ⋅ 10 3
xz ≔ ――――= 13.087
bc ⋅ fcd
⎛⎝dc - xz⎞⎠
MEdz ⋅ 10 6 + NEd.Mz ⋅ 10 3 ⋅ ea - bc ⋅ xz ⋅ fcd ⋅ ―――
2
Asz ≔ ―――――――――――――――
⎛ dc 20 ⎞
2 ⋅ fyd ⋅ ⎜―- c - ―⎟
⎝2 2 ⎠
Asz = 1.906 ⋅ 10 3 mm^2
it will be adopted 5 ϕ 22 mm with Asz.eff ≔ 1900 mm^2
The minimum reinforcement ratio for all longitudinal bars must be 1% and the maximum
reinforcement ratio is 4%.
As.column ≔ Asz.eff + Asy.eff = 3.8 ⋅ 10 3 mm^2
As.min ≔ 0.01 ⋅ bc ⋅ hc = 3.025 ⋅ 10 3 mm^2 As.max ≔ 0.04 ⋅ bc ⋅ hc = 1.21 ⋅ 10 4 mm^2
As.min < As.column < As.max = 1
TRANSVERSAL REINFORCEMENT
The maximum distance between stirrups in the node and on the critical length will be:

TRANSVERSAL REINFORCEMENT
The maximum distance between stirrups in the node and on the critical length will be:
⎛ bc ⎞
smax ≔ min ⎜―, 125 , 7 ⋅ 22⎟ smax = 125 mm
⎝3 ⎠
=> in the critical length it will be adopted sc ≔ 100 mm
hcl ≔ 3000 - 120 = 2.88 ⋅ 10 3

⎛ hcl ⎞
lcr ≔ max ⎜1.5 ⋅ h , ― , 600⎟ lcr = 825 mm
⎝ 6 ⎠
The maximum distance between stirrups outside of the critical length will be 200 mm.
The maximum distance between the legs of the stirrups will be 200 mm.
4. Checking on skew bending:

NEd
NEd ≔ 95970 x1 ≔ ―― = 13.087
bc ⋅ fcd
⎛ x1 ⎞ ⎛h 20 ⎞
MRdy ≔ bc ⋅ x1 ⋅ fcd ⋅ ⎜d - ―⎟ + 2 ⋅ As.column ⋅ fyd ⋅ ⎜―- c - ―⎟ - NEd ⋅ ea MRdy = 8.399 ⋅ 10 8
⎝ 2⎠ ⎝2 2 ⎠
⎛ x1 ⎞ ⎛h 20 ⎞
MRdz ≔ bc ⋅ x1 ⋅ fcd ⋅ ⎜d - ―⎟ + 2 ⋅ As.column ⋅ fyd ⋅ ⎜―- c - ―⎟ - NEd ⋅ ea MRdz = 8.399 ⋅ 10 8
⎝ 2⎠ ⎝2 2 ⎠
NRd ≔ bc ⋅ hc ⋅ fcd + As.column ⋅ fyd NRd = 5.686 ⋅ 10 6 N
NEd.My = 95.97
NEd.My
―――― = 0.017 => αn ≔ 1
NRd ⋅ 10 -3
⎛ MEdy ⎞ αn ⎛ MEdz ⎞ αn
⎜―――― -6
⎟ + ⎜―――― -6
⎟ = 0.897 <1 it checks!!
⎜⎝ MRdy ⋅ 10 ⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ MRdz ⋅ 10 ⎟⎠
5. Shear force computation will be similar with the girders designing process
⎛⎝MRdy + MRdz⎞⎠
VEd ≔ ――――― = 5.599 ⋅ 10 5
3000
αcw ⋅ bc ⋅ z ⋅ ν1 ⋅ fcd
VRd.max ≔ ―――――― = 7.094 ⋅ 10 5
ctgθ + tgθ
VRd.max > VEd = 1 it checks!!
6. Node checking

VRd.max > VEd = 1
6. Node checking
γRd ≔ 1.1
Vc ≔ 114.53 ⋅ 10 3 = 1.145 ⋅ 10 5
Vjhd ≔ γRd ⋅ ⎛⎝Aspan.eff + Asupp.eff⎞⎠ ⋅ fyd - Vc bj ≔ min ⎛⎝bc , bg + 0.5 ⋅ hc⎞⎠ = 550
Vjhd = 3.422 ⋅ 10 5 0.3 ⋅ bj ⋅ hc ⋅ fcd = 1.21 ⋅ 10 6
Vjhd < 1.21 ⋅ 10 6 = 1 it checks!!
5. DESIGNING OF STAIRS
1. Structural analysis
2. Computation of the reinforcement
Mid-span
2. Computation of the reinforcement
Mid-span
c ≔ 15 mm
ϕ ≔ 10
bw ≔ 1200 mm
hs ≔ 120 mm
ϕ
d ≔ hs - c - ―= 100 mm
2
Mspan.max ≔ 30.96 ⋅ 10 6 = 3.096 ⋅ 10 7
Mspan.max
μ ≔ ―――― = 0.194
bw ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd
ω ≔ 1 - ‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 - 2 ⋅ μ = 0.217
fcd
Aspan ≔ ω ⋅ bw ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 798.769 mm^2
fyd
=> it will be chosen 8 ϕ 12 mm with Aspan.eff ≔ 908 mm^2
Support
c ≔ 20
ϕ ≔ 10
bw ≔ 1200 mm
hs ≔ 120 mm
ϕ
d ≔ hs - c - ―= 95
2
Msupp.max ≔ 57.57 ⋅ 10 6 = 5.757 ⋅ 10 7
Msupp.max
μ ≔ ―――― = 0.399
bw ⋅ d 2 ⋅ fcd
ω ≔ 1 - ‾‾‾‾‾‾
1 - 2 ⋅ μ = 0.55
fcd
Asupp ≔ ω ⋅ bw ⋅ d ⋅ ―― = 1.922 ⋅ 10 3 mm^2
fyd
=> it will be chosen 10 ϕ 16 mm with Asupp.eff ≔ 2011 mm^2
Because at least 50% from the amount of reinforcement from top side will be disposed
on bottom side, the area of reinforcement in span will be at least 1005 mm^2.

Because at least 50% from the amount of reinforcement from top side will be disposed
on bottom side, the area of reinforcement in span will be at least 1005 mm^2.
=> it will be chosen for the mid-span 9 ϕ 12 mm with Aspan.eff ≔ 1018 mm^2

Proiect Beton3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proiect Beton3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY GHEORGHE ASACHI - IAȘI

FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SERVICES

Beneficiary Iasi City

1.2 Placement characteristics

 Classification in the locality & area

Category of use constructions & yards

Surface Sc =19 899m2

Shape Irregular, polygonal shape

Neighborhood - at North East - privately owned land (Nr. Cad 70489);

Public road access - Decebal street;

Land use P.O.T. = 3.49%

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

Land use P.O.T. = 3.49%

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

 How the utilities are insured

Power supply Public network

Natural gas supply Public network

Water supply Public network

Wastewater and rainwater Public network

1.3 Building characteristics

The main function Office building

Height regime P+3E

Sc (build area) 260.23 m2;

Scd (build-up area) 1040.00 m2;

Categoria de importață a clădirii C - deosebită conf. HG nr. 766/1997

Clasa de importață a clădirii II- conform P100-1/2013

Degree of fire resistance II

Conform P 100-1/2013 rezultă pentru accelerația pentru cutremure ag = 0.3 g

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

L ≔ 5 + 0.05 ⋅ 23 = 6.15 (2 spans of 6.15m each)

T ≔ 6 - 0.05 ⋅ 23 = 4.85 (4 bays of 4.85m each)

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

3. CHECKING OF THE DISPLACEMENTS

drSLS ≔ dre ⋅ q ⋅ ν ⋅ 2 = 13.5 mm

drSLS < draSLS = 1 it checks!!

drULS < draULS = 1 it checks!!

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

from the computer software Msmax ≔ 127.47 ⋅ 10 6 N*mm

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

beff ≔ bg + beff1 + beff2 = 2.343 ⋅ 10 3

From the computer software => Mmidspan.max ≔ 60.22 kN ⋅ m

Mmidspan.max < Mspan.max = 1 Mmidspan.max ≔ 60.22 ⋅ 10 6 N ⋅ mm

SHEAR FORCE COMPUTATION

a) shear force provided by the static and seismic analysis;

b) shear force associated to the plastic failure mechanism, computed as following

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

b) shear force associated to the plastic failure mechanism, computed as following

2. The shear force carried by concrete VRd,c is computed:

VRd.c2 ≔ ⎛⎝νmin + k1 ⋅ σcp⎞⎠ ⋅ bg ⋅ d = 5.001 ⋅ 10 3

VRd.c ≔ max ⎛⎝VRd.c1 , VRd.c2⎞⎠ = 5.799 ⋅ 10 4 => VRd.c ≔ 58.15 kN

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

VRd.max > VEd = 1 => the preliminary assumption θ ≔ 22 ° is good.

Asw ⋅ z ⋅ fywd ⋅ 2.475

It will be considered: s ≔ 150 mm

VRd.s > VEd.max -it checks

5. The minimum transversal reinforcement ratio is checked:

Manole Iordana-Paula - Reinforced Concrete Structures project

ΣMEd ≔ 79.98 ⋅ 4 => ΣMEd = 319.92 kN*m

2. Evaluation of the slenderness:

3. Evaluation of the theoretical amount of reinforcement:

Classification in the locality & area

How the utilities are insured