Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15 07 21 PDF
15 07 21 PDF
15 07 21 PDF
15 0 07 21
Notes
SL. THE HINDU
TOPICS
NO. PAGE NO.
UPSC Syllabus: Prelims: Polity & Governance | Mains: GS Paper II – Polity & Governance
Context: Uttar Pradesh government recently released the draft population Policy. The policy seeks to
provide not only a series of incentives to families that adhere to a two-child norm, but also intends on
disentitling families that breach the norm from benefits and subsidies. This is seen as a coercive step
which is likely to impact the most vulnerable sections of the society. Further such a policy also restricts the
right to reproductive freedom recognised by Supreme Court as an extension to Right to privacy in the
famous Puttaswamy judgement 2017.
So let us understand
Why is making Welfare benefits conditional upon Family planning goes against internationally accepted
practices and also the Right to reproductive freedom.
UP govt. objective – The State’s ecological and economic resources are limited. Unless population
growth is regulated, the State will be unable to guarantee the provision of basic rights to all citizens.
Incentives for those adopting two - Child policy: Two increments during their service, subsidy towards
the purchase of a house, maternity, or paternity leave, with full salary and allowances, as the case may be,
for up to 12 months, and free health care and insurance coverage for the spouse.
Disincentives for those not following the Policy: Such person will be debarred from securing the
benefit of any government-sponsored welfare scheme and will be disqualified from applying to any
State government job. Existing government employees who infringe the rule will be denied the benefit of
promotion. And last, transgressing individuals will be prohibited from contesting elections to local
authorities and bodies.
Is demographic target the only way ? Central Government in Supreme court had said that “international
experience shows that any coercion to have a certain number of children is counter-productive and
leads to demographic distortions”. India was committed to its obligations under international law,
including the principles contained in the International Conference on Population and Development
Programme of Action, 1994. Under this programme the nations pledged that they would look beyond
demographic targets and focus instead on guaranteeing a right to reproductive freedom.
Right to reproductive freedom: In Suchita Srivastava & Anr vs Chandigarh Administration (2009),
the Court found that a woman’s freedom to make reproductive decisions is an integral facet of the right to
personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21. “It is important,” the Court wrote, “to recognise that
reproductive choices can be exercised to procreate as well as to abstain from procreating”. This right was
Date: 15-July-21 DNS Notes - Revision
further endorsed as an extension to Right to privacy under the Puttaswamy Judgement. Right to
privacy provides for decisional autonomy which provides liberty over intimate personal choices such as
those governing reproduction.
Further Right to procreation was an important constituent of “the privacy of the home.
2. UPSC Current Affairs: Rs 9800 crore support for livestock development | Page 09
The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs has recently approved implementation of special livestock sector package
amounting to Rs.9800 crores over the 5 years.
The Special Livestock sector package has been formed by merging different schemes of the Department of Animal
Husbandry & Dairying into 3 different categories related to Dairy Development, Livestock health and Infrastructure
development.
The Topic of Livestock sector is directly related to syllabus of GS Paper III- Allied sector of Agriculture. In this regard, let
us take this opportunity to holistically cover the Livestock Sector from the perspective of Mains Exam.
Animal husbandry output constitutes about 30 percent of the country’s agricultural output. Women constitute 70 per cent
of the labour force in livestock sector as against 35 per cent in crop farming. Further, most of the livestock is concentrated
in dry land areas and with small and marginal farmers. Hence, development of animal husbandry is considered to be more
egalitarian and inclusive.
• Social Security: The families especially the landless which own animals are better placed than those who do not.
• Agriculture: The farmers, depend upon bullocks for ploughing, carting and transport of both inputs and outputs.
• Dung: In rural areas dung is used for several purposes which include fuel (Dung cakes), fertilizers (farmyard manure),
and plastering materials (poor man’s cement)
Strategies needed
Expand Coverage of Artificial Insemination (AI): E PashuHaat portal has to be expanded to connect breeders with farmers
and necessary information about availability of quality bovine germplasm should be
provided.
Address Shortage of Male Germplasm/Breeding Bulls by identifying more high genetic merit bulls
Address Acute Shortage of feed and fodders by effectively implementing National Livestock Mission (NLM)
Skilled Human Resource Development to enhance extension service
Development of Dairy Entrepreneurs by providing cheaper access to credit, handholding support etc.
Effective implementation of Rashtriya Gokul Mission and Rashtriya Kamdhenu Aayog for development and conservation
of indigenous bovine breeds
Organizing farmers into FPOs and focus on diversification towards low-cholesterol ghee, low fat butter, flavoured milks,
ice-creams etc.
Promotion of Contract farming: Contract farming in Poultry sector and Dairy sector have been successful in some of the
states such as Punjab. For example, NESTLE’s association with the farmers in the Punjab for the procurement of milk has
been responsible for socio-economic transformation. There is a need to adopt such models across India.
3. UPSC Current Affairs: Drop cases filed under Section 66A: Centre | Page 09
UPSC Syllabus: Prelims: Polity & Governance | Mains: GS Paper II – Polity & Governance
Sub Theme: Disabling unconstitutional provisions| Section 66A of IT Act | Navtej Singh Johar
Context:
• The Union Home Ministry asked the States and the Union Territories to withdraw immediately
the cases registered under the repealed Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, days
after the Supreme Court expressed shock that it was being invoked even six years after it
struck down the legislation.
• The Supreme Court found it “distressing”, “shocking” and terrible” that the provision was still
being used to book people, though the court held it as unconstitutional and a violation of free
speech in the Shreya Singhal judgment authored by Justice Rohinton F. Nariman on March 24,
2015.