Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad

Academic Year – 2022-2023 (Batch of 2020-25)

BA/BBA LLB COURSE HANDOUT (Semester – VI)

Course : Public International Law

Course Code : 010323602, 010324602 No. Credits 04
Catalog Code : T1045 No. Hours 60
Faculty Incharge: Ms. MunagantiAnnapurna Devi Ms. Shruti Singh (Co-
Faculty Name :
Faculty)
Consultation Hours : Students can meet during official hours with prior appointment
Ms. Annapurna annapurnadevi.m@slsh.edu.in
9963166950/ Ms.
Mobile : Email ID shruti.singh@slsh.edu.in
Shruti:
9810986785

Program Objective:-
1. By Studying law in the particular context of humanities and social sciences the students are groomed
to respond to governance, administration and human behavior.
2. Students gain an edge over other peers to lead and shape social and public enterprises such as the
State, Community organization, and Social Enterprises.
3. Course curriculum facilitates learning Law in a profound way in response to contemporary
development with hands-onn experience in legal knowledge and skills in value framework in afast-
changingg India set in a deglobalizing worldd.
4. The Student will be groomed in intellectual integrity,ethics.
5. The Student will improve cognitiveproblem-solvingng skills, independent critical thinking
withresearchcapabilitiess
6. Studentswillbeabletocultivatetheabilitytoappreciateroleoflawyers injustice education in
Globalisingworld, sustainability, povertandvulnerabilityty.

Course Objectives: -
The course intends to focus on the following issues:
CO(1) - To expose the students to the emerging trends and contemporary issues in International Law
CO(2) - To provide necessary details of each aspect of international Law explaining the basic
concepts and fundamental principles involved in it.
CO(3) - To generate sufficient interest and understanding of the subject, enabling the students to opt
for further specialization in their future academic or professional career
CO(4)- To understand the relationship of domestic and international law with international
organisations.
CO(5)- To understand statutes of the States andindividuals under the international law
Recommended Text Book: -
 Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Cambridge University Press, 1stSouth Asian Edition, (Reprinted
2013).
 S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human rights, Central Law Agency, (2004).

1
Suggested Books: -
Books Recommended
 Agarwal, H. O., International Law, Allahabad Law Agency (1992)
 S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human rights, Central Law Agency, (2004).
 Charlotte, K.U., and Diehl, F. Paul, International Law: Classic and Contemporary Reading, Lynne
Rienner Publishers (2009)
 Dixon Martin and MaccorouodaleRobort, Cases and Materials on International Law, Lawmann OUP
(2003)
 Gray Christine, International Law and the Use of Force, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, (2004)
 Green, L. C., Cases and Materials on International Law, Sweet and Maxwell, 6th edition, (2004)
 Harris D. J., Cases and Materials on International Law Sweet & Maxwell, (2004)
 Jan Klabbers, International Organizations, Dartmouth Publishing Co., 5th edition, (2005)
 J. G. Starke, An Introduction to International Law, Butterworth-Heinemann; 7th edition (1972)
 J. G. Starke, Starke’s International Law, Butterworth-Heinemann (1994)
 Kapoor, S. K., International Law and Human Rights, Central Law Publication, 17th edition, (2007)
 Malcolm, Evans D., International Law (Edited), Oxford University Press, London, (2006)
 Patel Bimal N., India and International Law (Edited), MartinusNijhoff Publishers, (2005)
 Shaw, Malcolm, International Law, Cambridge University Press, 5th edition, (2006)
 Slomanson William R., Fundamental Perspective of International Law, Thomas, 22nd edition, (2003)
 Werle, Gerhard, Principles of International Criminal Law, T. M. C. Asser Press, (2005)

Research Papers/Articles/Cases/Acts recommended for reading:

1. Indian Journal of International Law
2. British Year Book of International Law
3. American Journal of International Law

2
 Course Map: -
The following table shows how the Course Learning Outcomes relate to the overall Program Learning Goals
and Outcomes and indicates where these are assessed:

Course Description Learning Outcomes Assessments

LO (1) Thorough understanding of

theoretical and Conceptual knowledge of
Assignment / Test
Public International Law and its various
developments

LO (2) Aquire ability to identify contentious

Subject : Public International Law

This course aims to

issues and relate them to the scope of Public
provide students with Assignment / Test
the fundamental Interational Law by applying relevant legal
doctrines to solve the issues.
understanding relating
to vatioustheory of LO (3) Appreciate the significance of
international Law. The binding effectofInternational law in
couse help students to Assignment / Test
globalised world and its demarcation with
understand relevence municipal law
of the Public
International Law and LO (4) Students will understand the major
domestic and and their Project
legal aspects of international law
interdependecs
LO (5) Enhance capacity in constructing
International arguments and inculcate
research abilities and make productive Term End Examination
contributions to class debate and discussion.

3
 Delivery Schedule

Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Essential Reading:

Essential Readings:
1. I.A. Shearer, Stark’s International Law
Oxford University Press,11th edition (2018)
p. 01-27,

Further Reading:
2. James Crawoford, Browniles Public Lecture & CO (1)
Definition of &LO(1)-S
1 International Law, Oxford University simulation
international law
Press, 8th Edition, (2008) pp 01-19 exercise Project Report

Research Articles
3. Hugh Handeyside, The Lotus Principle in
ICJ Jurisprudence: Was the Ship Ever
Afloat?, 29 MICH. J. INT'L L. 71 (2007).
4. Philip Allot, The Concept of International
Law, EJIL (1999) Page 31-50,
http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/10/1/577.pdf
Essential Reading:

1. James Crawoford, Browniles Public

International Law, Oxford University
Press, 8th Edition, (2008) p. 20-47
Further Reading:

1.1 1. I.A. Shearer, Stark’s International Law

Oxford University Press,11th edition (2018) Lecture & CO (1)
Nature of &LO(1) – S,
2 p. 28-50 Class
International
Discussion
Law 2. Scott, James Brown. “The Legal Nature of
International Law.” The American Journal
of International Law, vol. 1, no. 4, 1907,
pp. 831–866.
3. Foulke, Roland R. “Definition and Nature
of International Law.” Columbia Law
Review, vol. 19, no. 6, 1919, pp. 429–466

3-4 1.2Sources of Essential Reading: Lecture&Illustr CO (1)

International ation &LO(1) – S
1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Law
Cambridge University Press, , Lucknow,

4
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)

PP 69-123 (1st Edition, (2013)

2. S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human
rights, Central Law Agency, pp61-
78(2004).

Suggested Reading
3. Hugh Thirlway, The Sources of
International Law 2nded, Oxford University
Press
Research Articles
4. Bisschop, W. R. “Sources of International
Law.” Transactions of the Grotius Society,
vol. 26, 1940, pp. 235–260

5 1.3 Relationship Essental reading Lecture CO (1) &LO

of international 1. S.K Kapoor, International Law and &Reflective (1) – M
law and domestic Human rights, Central Law Agency, study Case Analysis
law pp99-116 (2004).

Further Readings:
2. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Cambridge University Press, ,
Lucknow, 1st Edition, (2017) PP 129-
178
3. James Crawford ,Brownlie's
Principles of Public International Law
8th Ed. Oxford University Press PP 48
to 110.
Research Articles
4. Pierre-HuguesVerdier, and Mila
Versteeg. “International Law in
Domestic Legal Systems: An
Empirical Perspective.” Proceedings
of the Annual Meeting (American
Society of International Law), vol.
108, 2014, pp. 376–382.
5. Borchard, Edwin. “The Relation
between International Law and
Municipal Law.” Virginia Law
Review, vol. 27, no. 2, 1940, pp. 137–

5
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
148.

Essential Reading ,
1. MALCOLM N. SHAW QC,
International Law, Cambridge
University Press p: 629-631
Suggested Reading:
1. United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea ,
https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_a
greements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf CO (1)
2.1 Convention Research Articles Lecture/ &LO(1) -M
on the Law of 2. Boyle, Alan. “Further Development of the Discussion Reseach
6
Sea, 1982 Project
Law of the Sea Convention: Mechanisms
for Change.” The International and
Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 3,
2005, pp.
3. Tomlinson, Margaret L., and Michael A.
Becker. “International Law of the Sea.”
The International Lawyer, vol. 42, no. 2,
2008, pp. 797–809

7 Essential Reading: Lecture/ CO (2)

2.2 Territorial Discussion &LO(2) – S
1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Research
Sea (Maritime
Belt) Cambridge University Press, , Lucknow, 1st Project
Edition, (2017) PP 553-556pp

Suggested Reading:
1. Yoshifumi Tanaka,The International Law
of the Sea, 2nd edition Cambridge
University Press (2018)pp (263-278)

Research Articles:

2. Balch, Thomas Willing, and Edwin M.

Borchard. “The Marine Belt and the
Question of Territorial Waters.”
Proceedings of the American Society of
International Law at Its Annual Meeting
(1907-1917), vol. 6, 1912, pp. 132–142.
3. Mani, V.S. “INDIA'S MARITIME ZONES
6
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
AND INTERNATIONAL LAW : A
PRELIMINARY INQUIRY.” Journal of
the Indian Law Institute, vol. 21, no. 3,
1979, pp. 336–381.
4. WADSWORTH, LAWRENCE W. “The
Changing Concept of the Territorial Seas.”
World Affairs, vol. 123, no. 3, 1960, pp.
67–69.

Essential Reading:

1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,

Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
(2017) PP 578-580

Suggested Reading:

5. Yoshifumi Tanaka,The International Law

of the Sea, 2nd edition Cambridge
University Press pp 124 (2018).
CO (2) & LO
Lecture & (2) – M
2.3 Contiguous Articles
8 Class Research
Zone
Discussion Project/Assign
ment
1. Fell, Lloyd C. “Maritime Contiguous
Zones.” Michigan Law Review, vol. 62,
no. 5, 1964, pp. 848–864.
2. Symonides, Janusz, Contiguous Zone,
Polish Yearbook of International Law, Vol.
16, pp. 143-154
3. Oda, Shigreu , The Concept of the
Contiguous Zone, International and
Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 11, Issue
1 (1962), pp. 131-153

9 2.4 High Sea Essential Reading: Lecture & CO (1) & LO

Class (1) – S
1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Discussion Research
Cambridge University Press 1st Edition, Project
(2017), PP 609-610

Further Reading
7
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
1. Yoshifumi Tanaka,The International Law
of the Sea, 2nd edition Cambridge
University Press pp 154-173 (2018).

Articles
1. Van Zwanenberg, Anna. “Interference with
Ships on the High Seas.” The International
and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 10,
no. 4, 1961, pp. 785–817.
2. Anderson, D., 2008. Freedoms of the high
seas in the modern law of the sea (pp. 229-
249). Brill Nijhoff.
3. Berlin, Donald L. “INDIA IN THE
INDIAN OCEAN.” Naval War College
Review, vol. 59, no. 2, 2006, pp. 58–89.
4. Varma, Ravindra. “STRATEGIC
IMPORTANCE OF THE INDIAN
OCEAN.” The Indian Journal of Political
Science, vol. 28, no. 1/2, 1967, pp. 51–61

10 2.5 Continental Essential Reading: Lecture& Class

Shelf 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, activity CO (3)
Cambridge University Press, 1stEdition, &LO(3) –S
(South Asian Print 2013) PP 584-590 Research
2. Project

Further Reading

1. Khan, Makhdoom Ali. “THE JURIDICAL

CONCEPT OF THE CONTINENTAL
SHELF.” Pakistan Horizon, vol. 38, no. 2,
1985, pp. 19–40
2. Kunz, Josef L. “Continental Shelf and
International Law: Confusion and Abuse.”
The American Journal of International
Law, vol. 50, no. 4, 1956, pp. 828–853
3. Gutteridge, J. A. C. “The Regime of the
Continental Shelf.” Transactions of the
Grotius Society, vol. 44, 1958, pp. 77–89

8
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
4. Karl, Donald E. “Islands and the
Delimitation of the Continental Shelf: A
Framework for Analysis.” The American
Journal of International Law, vol. 71, no. 4,
1977, pp. 642–673

2.6 North Sea

Continental shelf Essential Reading:
Case 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
(2017), PP 77- 593

Further Reading:
2. North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal
Republic of Germany/Denmark), 26 April
1968,
https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-
related/52/052-19690220-JUD-01-00-
EN.pdf
CO (3)
3. Evans, Alona E. “North Sea Continental Lecture/Case &CO(3) –S
11 Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Study/Guest Research
Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Lecture Project/Case
Germany/Netherlands.” The American Analysis
Journal of International Law, vol. 63, no. 3,
1969, pp. 591–636
4. Friedmann, Wolfgang. “The North Sea
Continental Shelf Cases--A Critique.” The
American Journal of International Law,
vol. 64, no. 2, 1970, pp. 229–240.
5. Nelson, L. D. M. “The North Sea
Continental Shelf Cases and Law-Making
Conventions.” The Modern Law Review,
vol. 35, no. 1, 1972, pp. 52–56.

12 2.7 Exclusive Essential Reading: Lecture & CO (3) & CO

Economic Zone 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Class (3) –S
Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, Exercise/Illustr Research
(2017) PP 580-583 ation/Problem Project
Further reading solving
2. Puri, Rama. “EVOLUTION OF THE
9
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
CONCEPT OF EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC
ZONE IN UNCLOS III : INDIA'S
CONTRIBUTION.” Journal of the Indian
Law Institute, vol. 22, no. 4, 1980, pp.
497–525.
3. Phillips, J. C. “The Exclusive Economic
Zone as a Concept in International Law.”
The International and Comparative Law
Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, 1977, pp. 585–
618.
4. Pendley, William Perry. “Development of
the Exclusive Economic Zone.” Natural
Resources & Environment, vol. 2, no. 1,
1986, pp. 29–32
5. The Exclusive Economic Zone Of The
Seas Around India,
https://geographyandyou.com/exclusive-
economic-zone-seas-around-india/
#:~:text=The%20article%20defines%20an
%20area,the%20rights%20and
%20freedoms%20of

2.8 Essential Reading:

Establishment of Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Cambridge
Sea Bed University Press, 1st Edition, (2017) PP 638-644
Tribunal
Further Reading:
1. THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT
(ITALY v. INDIA) List of cases: No. 24,
https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/docu
ments/cases/case_no.24_prov_meas/
Lecture & CO(1) & LO
24_published_texts/ (1)-S
Reflective
12 2015_24_Ord_24_Aug_2015-E.pdf study/problem Research
solving Project
2. Rosenne, Shabtai. “Establishing the
International Tribunal for the Law of the
Sea.” The American Journal of
International Law, vol. 89, no. 4, 1995, pp.
806–814.
3. Rosenne, Shabtai. “Establishing the
International Tribunal for the Law of the
Sea.” The American Journal of
10
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
International Law, vol. 89, no. 4, 1995, pp.
806–814.
4. Mensah, Thomas A. “The Jurisdiction of
the International Tribunal for the Law of
the Sea.”
RabelsZeitschriftFürAusländisches Und
InternationalesPrivatrecht / The Rabel
Journal of Comparative and International
Private Law, vol. 63, no. 2, 1999, pp. 330–
341
5. Jagota, S. P. “India and the Law of the
Sea.” Archiv Des Völkerrechts, vol. 22, no.
1, 1984, pp. 49–68.

4.1 International Essential Reading:

Criminal Law 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Introduction to Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
international (2017) PP 397-399
Criminal Law-
2. S.K Verma, Public International Law,
Genesis
Satyam Law International, pp426-441(2nd
Edition, reprint 2017)
Further readings
1. Warbrick, Colin. “International Criminal
Law.” The International and Comparative
Law Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, 1995, pp.
466–479.
CO (3)
2. “Developments in the Law: International Lecture &LO(3)-S
13-15 Criminal Law.” Harvard Law Review, vol. &Discussion/G
114, no. 7, 2001, pp. 1943–2073 uest Lecture Assignment //
Written Test
3. Cryer, Robert. “THE BOUNDARIES OF
LIABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL
CRIMINAL LAW, OR 'SELECTIVITY
BY STEALTH'.” Journal of Conflict &
Security Law, vol. 6, no. 1, 2001, pp. 3–31.
4. Ferencz, Benjamin B. “The Evolution of
International Criminal Law: A Bird's-Eye
View of the Past Century.” Sicherheit Und
Frieden (S F) / Security and Peace, vol. 18,
no. 1, 2000, pp. 25–29.

11
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Essential Reading:
4.1 Rome James Crawoford, Browniles Public
Convention International Law, Oxford University
Press, 8th Edition, (2008) 671-690

Furthere reading
1. UNITED NATIONS: ROME STATUTE
OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CO (3)
&LO(3)-S
COURT.” International Legal Materials, Lecture/
16 vol. 37, no. 5, 1998, pp. 999–1069. Discussion/ Research
Guest Lecture Project/
2. K. P. Prakash. “International Criminal Assignment //
Court: A Review.” Economic and Political Written Test
Weekly, vol. 37, no. 40, 2002, pp. 4113–
4115
3. Warbrick, Colin. “International Criminal
Law.” The International and Comparative
Law Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, 1995, pp.
466–479.

17 4.2 Composition Essential Reading: Lecture & CO (3)

and functions of 1. James Crawoford, Browniles Public Class &LO(3)-S
International International Law, Oxford University Exercise/Simul Assignment /
Criminal Court Press, 8th Edition, (2008) 687-690 ation Written Test

Further reading

1. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. "The

International Criminal Court: An
Overview." Beyond Intractability. Conflict
Information Consortium, University of
Colorado, Boulder. December, 2012.
<http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay
/international-criminal-court-overview>.
2. Joshi, K.C. “THE INTERNATIONAL
CRIMINAL COURT – A HOPE
AGAINST HOPE?” Journal of the Indian
Law Institute, vol. 45, no. 2, 2003, pp.
239–252
3. Economides, Spyros. “The International
Criminal Court: Reforming the Politics of
International Justice.” Government and

12
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Opposition, vol. 38, no. 1, 2003, pp. 29–51
4. Rome Statute of the International Criminal
Court, https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-
library/documents/rs-eng.pdf
5. Olympia Bekou, and Robert Cryer. “The
International Criminal Court and Universal
Jurisdiction: A Close Encounter?” The
International and Comparative Law
Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 1, 2007, pp. 49–68

4.2 Jurisdiction
of ICC Essential Reading:
1. James Crawoford, Browniles Public
International Law, Oxford University
Press, 8th Edition, (2008) 687-690

Furthere reading
1. Scheffer, David. “The International Criminal
Court: The Challenge of
Jurisdiction.” Proceedings of the Annual
Meeting (American Society of International
Law), vol. 93, 1999, pp. 68–72
2. Stahn, Carsten, et al. “The International
Criminal Court's Ad Hoc Jurisdiction CO (3)
Lecture/
Revisited.” The American Journal of Discussion/ &LO(3)-S
18
International Law, vol. 99, no. 2, 2005, pp. Guest Lecture Assignment //
Written Test
421–431.
3. Scharf, Michael P. “The ICC's Jurisdiction
over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A
Critique of the U.S. Position.” Law and
Contemporary Problems, vol. 64, no. 1,
2001, pp. 67–117.
4. Ryngaert, Cedric. “The International
Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction:
A Fraught Relationship?” New Criminal
Law Review: An International and
Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 12, no. 4,
2009, pp. 498–512.

19-20 4.3International Essential Reading: Lecture/ CO (3)

Tribunal for Discussion/ &LO(3)-S
13
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Rwanda 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
(2017) PP 407-410,
Further reading,
1. Akhavan, Payam. “The International
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: The Politics
and Pragmatics of Punishment.” The
American Journal of International Law, vol.
90, no. 3, 1996, pp. 501–510. 
2. De Z. Gunawaradana, Asoka. Assignemtn//
Guest
“Contributions by the International Written
Lecture/Docum
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to Test/Research
entary
Development of the Definition of Project
Genocide.” Proceedings of the Annual
Meeting (American Society of
International Law), vol. 94, 2000, pp. 277–
279
3. Thornton, Brenda Sue. “The International
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: A Report
from the Field.” Journal of International
Affairs, vol. 52, no. 2, 1999, pp. 639–646.

21-22 4.3International Essential Reading: Lecture/ CO (3)

Tribunal for 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Discussion/ &LO(3)-S
Yugoslavia Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, Guest Lecture Assignment //
(2017) PP 402-407 Written
Further reading Test/Research
Project
1. Greenwood, Christopher. “The
International Tribunal for Former
Yugoslavia.” International Affairs (Royal
Institute of International Affairs 1944-),
vol. 69, no. 4, 1993, pp. 641–655.
2. Shenk, Maury D., et al. “International
Criminal Tribunals for the Former
Yugoslavia and for Rwanda.” The
International Lawyer, vol. 37, no. 2, 2003,
pp. 551–564
3. O'Brien, James C. “The International
Tribunal for Violations of International
Humanitarian Law in the Former

14
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Yugoslavia.” The American Journal of
International Law, vol. 87, no. 4, 1993, pp.
639–659.

23-24 4.4 Relevant Essential Reading: Lecture/ CO (3)

Trials 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Discussion/ &LO(3)-S
Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, Guest Lecture Assignment //
(2017) PP 418-429 Written
Further reading Test/Research
1. Gberie, Lansana. “Briefing: The Special Project
Court of Sierra Leone.” African Affairs,
vol. 102, no. 409, 2003, pp. 637–648.
2. Wigglesworth, Gillian. “The End of
Impunity? Lessons from Sierra Leone.”
International Affairs (Royal Institute of
International Affairs 1944-), vol. 84, no. 4,
2008, pp. 809–827.
3. Kent, Lia. “Interrogating the ‘Gap’
Between Law and Justice: East Timor's
Serious Crimes Process.” Human Rights
Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 4, 2012, pp. 1021–
1044.
4. Harper, Erica. “DELIVERING JUSTICE
IN THE WAKE OF MASS VIOLENCE:
NEW APPROACHES TO
TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE.” Journal of
Conflict & Security Law, vol. 10, no. 2,
2005, pp. 149–185
5. Jacobsen, Carl Gustav. “BOSNIAN WAR
CRIMES: PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION
AND PROSECUTION.” Security
Dialogue, vol. 25, no. 2, 1994, pp. 238–
240.
6. Dimitrijevic, Vojin, et al. Domestic War
Crimes Trials in Serbia, Bosnia-
Herzegovina and Croatia. Edited by Judy
Batt and JelenaObradovic-Wochnik,
European Union Institute for Security
Studies (EUISS), 2009, pp. 83–100, War
Crimes, Conditionality and EU Integration

15
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
in the Western Balkans

Essential Reading:
1. UNGAR 3201/1974, DECLARATION ON
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW
5.1 Evolution INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC
and
ORDER,
Development,
Significance and https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/interna
Implications tional-investment-agreements/treaty-files/
UN Charter and 2775/download
UN Declaration
onthe Further Reading:
Establishment of 1. “General Assembly Declaration on the
NewInternationa Establishment of a New International
l Economic Economic Order.” The American Journal of
Order International Law, vol. 68, no. 4, 1974, pp.
798–801.
2. Gosovic, Branislav, and John Gerard Ruggie.
CO (3)
“On the Creation of a New International &LO(3)-S
Economic Order: Issue Linkage and the Lecture
Assignment //
25 /Discussion/Gu
Seventh Special Session of the UN General Written
est Lecture
Assembly.” International Organization, vol. Test/Research
30, no. 2, 1976, pp. 309–345 Project
3. Robin C. A. White. “A New International
Economic Order.” The International and
Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 3,
1975, pp. 542–552
4. HAIGHT, G. W. “The New International
Economie Order and the Charter of
Economic Rights and Duties of States.”
The International Lawyer, vol. 9, no. 4,
1975, pp. 591–604
5. VANASSE, ROBERT B. “The UN New
International Economic Order: A Brief
Analysis.” World Affairs, vol. 150, no. 4,
1988, pp. 233–238

5.2 UN Charter Essential Reading: CO (3)

and UN 1. UN Charter, https://digital- Lecture/
26-27 Declaration Discussion/ &LO(3)-S
commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? Assignment //
ontheEstablishm Guest Lecture
referer=https://www.google.com/ Written
16
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
ent of &httpsredir=1&article=1426&context=ils
NewInternationa 2. Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of
l Economic States, GA Res. 3281(xxix), UN GAOR, 29th
Order Sess., Supp. No. 31 (1974) 50,
5.3 Charter of https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/SRHR
Economic Rights L/PDF/IHRDArticle15/Charter_of_Economic_
and Duties some Rights_and_Duties_of_States_Eng.pdf
Fundamental
Principles Further reading
1. REID, HELEN DWIGHT. “Review of UN
Charter.” World Affairs, vol. 117, no. 3,
1954, pp. 70–72
2. Alfred Verdross. “General International
Law and the United Nations Charter.”
International Affairs (Royal Institute of
International Affairs 1944-), vol. 30, no. 3,
1954, pp. 342–348.
3. BROWER, CHARLES N., and JOHN B.
TEPE. “The Charter of Economic Rights
and Duties of States: A Reflection or
Rejection of International Law?” The Test/Research
International Lawyer, vol. 9, no. 2, 1975, Project
pp. 295–318.
4. Chatterjee, S. K. “The Charter of
Economic Rights and Duties of States: An
Evaluation after 15 Years.” The
International and Comparative Law
Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3, 1991, pp. 669–
684.
5. Rubin, Seymour J., et al. “The Charter of
Economic Rights and Duties of States.”
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting
(American Society of International Law),
vol. 69, 1975, pp. 225–246
6. BROWER, CHARLES N. “The Charter of
Economic Rights and Duties of States and
the American Constitutional Tradition: A
Bicentennial Perspective on the ‘New
International Economic Order.’” The
International Lawyer, vol. 10, no. 4, 1976,
pp. 701–709
17
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
5.4 Significance Essential Reading:
of UNCTAD VII 1. UNCTAD secretariat, UNITED NATIONS
and UNCTAD CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND
VIII DEVELOPMENT, Short Note Avialabe on
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-
document/gds20061_en.pdf
2. Proceedings of the United Nations
Conference on Trade and Development, PP
3- 69-
https://unctad.org/system/files/official-
document/td352vol1_en.pdf
3. UNCTAD VIII Analytical report by the
UNCTAD secretariat to the Conference,
UNITED NATIONS New York, 1992
Page no 43 - 98
4.

Further Reading: CO (1)

1. Peter E. Temu. “UNCTAD: Its Role and Lecture/ Class &LO(1)-S
28 Prospects.” The Journal of Developing Exercise/Discu Assignment //
Written
Areas, vol. 8, no. 3, 1974, pp. 355–362 ssion
Test/Research
2. Anis, Zeenat. “THIRD WORLD VERSUS Project
THE WEST: THE FAILURE OF
UNCTAD.” Pakistan Horizon, vol. 25, no.
4, 1972, pp. 27–39.
3. Wells, Sidney. “The Developing Countries
Gatt and Unctad.” International Affairs
(Royal Institute of International Affairs
1944-), vol. 45, no. 1, 1969, pp. 64–79
4. Bhattacharya, Anindya K. “The Influence
of the International Secretariat: UNCTAD
and Generalized Tariff Preferences.”
International Organization, vol. 30, no. 1,
1976, pp. 75–90.
5. Ramsay, Robert. “UNCTAD's Failures:
The Rich Get Richer.” International
Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, 1984, pp.
387–397

29 5.5 Essential Reading: Lecture/ Class CO (1)

Establishment of 1. Amrita Narlikar, THE WORLD TRADE Exercise/Discu &LO(1)-S
WTO General ssion
18
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Features ORGANIZATION, 1st ed Oxford
University Press 2005, pp 1-42

Further Reading:
1. Parlin, C. Christopher, et al.
“[Introduction].” Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting (American Society of
International Law), vol. 89, 1995, pp. 316–
Assignment //
326
Written
2. Baldwin, Richard. “The World Trade Test/Research
Organization and the Future of Project
Multilateralism.” The Journal of Economic
Perspectives, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 95–
115.
3. Ostry, Sylvia, et al. “The Future of the
World Trade Organization [with
Comments and Discussion].” Brookings
Trade Forum, 1999, pp. 167–204

30 INTERNAL COMPONENT I 20 Marks(25-02-2023) Mrs. Annapurna Devi M

31-32 3.Law relating to Essential Reading: Lecture CO(1) & LO
Air Space 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, &Illustrative (1)-S
3.1Theories Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, Class Exercise Research
(2017) PP 543- 553 Project/Proble
m based
Further readings evaluation
1. S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human
rights, Central Law Agency, pp 307-
317(2004).
2. Goedhuis, D. “Sovereignty and Freedom in
the Air Space.” Transactions of the Grotius
Society, vol. 41, 1955, pp. 137–152.
3. McMahon, J. F. “The Legal Aspects of
Outer Space.” The World Today, vol. 18,
no. 8, 1962, pp. 328–334
4. Jacobini, H. B. “Problems of High Altitude
or Space Jurisdiction.” The Western
Political Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 4, 1953, pp.
680–688
5. Catledge, Burton “Ernie,” et al. Space
Power Theory. Air University Press, 2009,

19
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
pp. 29–42, AU-18 Space Primer
6. Stuart Banner , Who Owns the Sky?: The
Struggle to Control Airspace from the
Wright Brothers On, 1st edi, Harvard
University Press, PP- 261-277

33-35 3.2 International Essential Reading: Lecture &Class CO (1)

Conventions 1. Convention for the Unification of Certain Exercise &LO(1)-M
Rules Relating to International Carriage by Written Test/
3.3 Warsaw Air, Signed at Warsaw on 12 October 1929 Assignment
Convention,
- Warsaw Convention
Chicago
Convention, 1929,https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/air.carriag
Montreal e.warsaw.convention.1929/portrait.pdf
Convention 2. CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL
CIVI L AVIATION,
https://www.icao.int/publications/documen
ts/7300_orig.pdf
3. Convention for the Unification of Certain
Rules for International Carriage by Air -
Montreal, 28 May 1999,
https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/air.carriage.unifi
cation.convention.montreal.1999/
portrait.pdf

Further Readings:
1. Orr, George W. “The Warsaw
Convention.” Virginia Law Review, vol.
31, no. 2, 1945, pp. 423–437.
2. Kuhn, Arthur K. “The Warsaw Convention
on International Transportation by Air.”
The American Journal of International
Law, vol. 24, no. 4, 1930, pp. 746–748
3. Hill, Adams Sherman. “The Chicago
Convention.” The North American
Review, vol. 107, no. 220, 1868, pp. 167–
186
4. Cheng, Bin. “The Right to Fly.”
Transactions of the Grotius Society, vol.
42, 1956, pp. 99–131
5. Cheng, Bin. “A New Era in the Law of
International Carriage by Air: From

20
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Warsaw (1929) to Montreal (1999).” The
International and Comparative Law
Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 4, 2004, pp. 833–
859
6. Gardiner, Richard. “Revising the Law of
Carriage by Air: Mechanisms in Treaties
and Contract.” The International and
Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 2,
1998, pp. 278–305.
7. Sand, Peter H. “The International
Unification of Air Law.” Law and
Contemporary Problems, vol. 30, no. 2,
1965, pp. 400–424

36-38 3.4 Freedom of Essential Reading: Lecture & CO (1)

Air Class Exercise &LO(1)-S
Aerial Hijacking 1. CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL
Written Test/
Tokyo, Hague, CIVI L AVIATION, Assignment
and Montreal https://www.icao.int/publications/documen /Project
Conventions: ts/7300_orig.pdf
Basic Principles
2. CONVENTION FOR THE
SUPPRESSION OF UNLAWFUL
SEIZURE OF AIRCRAFT 1970,
https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/terrorism
/Commonwealth_Chapter_3.pdf
3. CONVENTION ON OFFENCES AND
CERTAIN OTHER ACTS COMMITTED
ON BOARD AIRCRAFT, SIGNED AT
TOKYO, ON 14 SEPTEMBER 1963,
https://www.mcgill.ca/iasl/files/iasl/tokyo1
963.pdf

4. S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human

rights, Central Law Agency, pp 309
(2004).
Further Readings:
1. MEHTA, GAGANVIHARI L.
“FREEDOM OF THE AIR.” India
Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, 1946, pp. 361–366
2. RAFAT, AMIR. “CONTROL OF
AIRCRAFT HIJACKING: THE LAW OF
INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION.”
21
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
World Affairs, vol. 134, no. 2, 1971, pp.
143–156.
3. Shubber, Sami. The International and
Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1,
1976, pp. 248–250
4. R. H. Mankiewicz, The 1970 Hague
Convention, 37 J. Air L. & Com. 195
(1971)
https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol37/iss2/6
5. CELINE Y. NOVEMBER, Aircraft Piracy:
The Hague Hijacking Convention,
International Lawyer, Vol. 6, No. 3,pp 642-
656
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/21691378
5.pdf

3.5 Introduction Essential Reading:

to Outer Space 1. I.H.Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor, An
Introduction to Space Law, (Kluwer Law
Outer Space International, 8th ed, 2008 PP 1- 20, PP 23
Treaty, 1967
-31
Further reading
2. Vlasic, Ivan A. “The Space Treaty: A CO (3)
&LO(3)-S
Preliminary Evaluation.” California Law
Lecture & Written Test/
39-40 Review, vol. 55, no. 2, 1967, pp. 507–519.
Class Exercise Assignment
3. Orr, Shannon. “PEACE AND CONFLICT /Project
IN OUTER SPACE.” Peace Research, vol. Report
30, no. 1, 1998, pp. 52–63.
4. Finch, Edward R. “Outer Space for
‘Peaceful Purposes.’” American Bar
Association Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, 1968,
pp. 365–367.

41-43 Essential Reading: Lecture & CO (3)

3.6 International 1. S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human Class &LO(3)-S
Conventions rights, Central Law Agency, pp 646-319- Exercise/Discu Written Test/
relating to Outer 324 (15th Edition 2004). ssion/Guest Assignemtn/R
Space, Lecture esearch
Registration Project
convention, Further Reading:
1. I.H.Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor, An
Introduction to Space Law, (Kluwer Law

22
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
International, 8th ed, 2008 PP 1- 20, PP 44
-47

2. UNITED NATIONS: CONVENTION ON

REGISTRATION OF OBJECTS
LAUNCHED INTO OUTER SPACE.”
International Legal Materials, vol. 14, no.
1, 1975, pp. 43–48.
3. Convention on Registration of Objects
Launched into Outer Space
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/head
quarters_offices/ast/media/
Conv_Regi_Objects_Launched.pdf
4. “Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts,
the Return of Astronauts and the Return of
Objects Launched into Outer Space.” The
American Journal of International Law,
vol. 63, no. 2, 1969, pp. 382–385
5. GOROVE, STEPHEN. “Legal Problems of
the Rescue and Return of Astronauts.” The
International Lawyer, vol. 3, no. 4, 1969,
pp. 898–902

44-45 3.7 Moon Essential Reading: Lecture/ Class CO (3)

Agreement, 1. I.H.Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor, An Exercise/Discu &LO(3)-S
Liability Introduction to Space Law, (Kluwer Law ssion/Guest Assignment
convention International, 8th ed, 2008 PP 1- 20, PP 48- Lecture
/Written Test
3.8 Indian 52 , 34-43
mission to the
moon Suggested Readings
1. Rosenfield, Stanley B., and Delbert D.
Smith. “The Moon Treaty: The United
States Should Not Become A Party.”
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting
(American Society of International Law),
vol. 74, 1980, pp. 162–170
2. Van Bogaert, E. “THE MOON TREATY :
ACHIEVEMENTS AND FUTURE
PROBLEMS.” StudiaDiplomatica, vol. 34,
no. 6, 1981, pp. 655–673
3. Christol, Carl Q. “International Liability

23
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
for Damage Caused by Space Objects.”
The American Journal of International
Law, vol. 74, no. 2, 1980, pp. 346–371
4. Finch, Edward R. “Outer Space Liability:
Past, Present and Future.” The
International Lawyer, vol. 14, no. 1, 1980,
pp. 123–127.
5. Goswami, J. N., and M. Annadurai.
“Chandrayaan-1: India's First Planetary
Science Mission to the Moon.” Current
Science, vol. 96, no. 4, 2009, pp. 486–491.

6. International Essential Reading:

Organizations 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
and Specialized Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
Agencies (2017) PP 982-998

Further Reading:
1. Hoffmann, Stanley. “International
Organization and the International CO (1)
System.” International Organization, vol. Lecture/ Class &LO(1)-S
24, no. 3, 1970, pp. 389–413. Assignment //
46 Exercise/Discu
Written
2. Lent, Ernest S. “International Organization ssion
Test/Research
and the Study of World Politics.” Project
Background on World Politics, vol. 4, no.
4, 1960, pp. 187–190
3. Hoffmann, Stanley. “The Role of
International Organization: Limits and
Possibilities.” International Organization,
vol. 10, no. 3, 1956, pp. 357–372.

47 6.1 Nature Essential Reading: Lecture/ Class CO (5)

of International 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Exercise/Discu &LO(5)-S
& Regional Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, ssion Assignment //
Organizations: (2017) PP 982-998 -1288-1290 Written
Case of EU Test/Research
Project/Simula
2. Carlos Closa Montero, Stefano
tion
PalestiniCéspedes, Pablo Castillo Ortiz,
Regional Organisations and Mechanisms
for Democracy Protection in Latin
America, the Caribbean, and the European
Union, EU-LAC FOUNDATION. PP 31-
24
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
36 , PP 87- 98
Avilabe on
https://eulacfoundation.org/en/system/files/
Democracy_Protection_eng.pdf

Further Reading:
1. Paemen, Hugo, and Jeffrey M. Lang.
“[Introduction].” Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting (American Society of
International Law), vol. 92, 1998, pp. 207–
212
2. Cuyvers, Armin. “The Institutional
Framework of the EU.” East African
Community Law: Institutional, Substantive
and Comparative EU Aspects, edited by
Armin Cuyvers et al., Brill, LEIDEN;
BOSTON, 2017, pp. 79–102.

48 6.2 Lecture/ Class CO (1)

Contributions of Essential Reading: Exercise/Discu &LO(1)-S
ILO, 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, ssion Assignment //
Contributions of Cambridge University Press, 1 Edition,
st
Written
WHO (2017) PP 1213-1216 Test/Research
Project
Further Reading:
1. Van Daele, Jasmien. “The International
Labour Organization (ILO) in Past and
Present Research.” International Review of
Social History, vol. 53, no. 3, 2008, pp.
485–511
2. John Price. “The International Labour
Organization.” International Affairs (Royal
Institute of International Affairs 1944-),
vol. 21, no. 1, 1945, pp. 30–39
3. Collins, John. “FIFTY YEARS OF THE
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR
ORGANISATION.” Pakistan Horizon, vol.
23, no. 1, 1970, pp. 51–61

Essential Reading::
1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,

25
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
(2017) PP 1213-1216

Essential Reading:
1. Chakravarthi, Indira. “Role of the World
Health Organisation.” Economic and
Political Weekly, vol. 43, no. 47, 2008, pp.
41–46.
2. B. C. “The World Health Organization.”
The World Today, vol. 6, no. 9, 1950, pp.
386–394.
3. Shimkin, Michael B. “The World Health
Organization.” Science, vol. 104, no. 2700,
1946, pp. 281–283.

6.2 Essential Reading:

Contributions of 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
IBRD Cambridge University Press, , Lucknow, 1st
Edition, (2017) PP 1040-1043pp
Contributions of
(World Bank Further Reading:
1. Zoellick, Robert B. “Why We Still Need
the World Bank: Looking Beyond Aid.”
Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, no. 2, 2012, pp.
66–78.
2. Ravallion, Martin. “The World Bank: Why CO (4)
It Is Still Needed and Why It Still Lecture/ Class &LO(4)-S
49 Disappoints.” The Journal of Economic Exercise/Discu Assignment //
ssion/Guest Written
Perspectives, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 77–
Lecture Test/Research
94. Project
3. “International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development: Report on Financing Export
Shortfalls of Developing Countries.”
International Legal Materials, vol. 5, no. 1,
1966, pp. 81–91
4. “International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development.” International Organization,
vol. 5, no. 1, 1951, pp. 199–202.

50 6.2 Contributions Lecture/ Class CO (4)

of WIPO Essential Reading: Exercise/Discu &LO(4)-S
ssion/Guest
26
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
(2017) PP 924 to 975

Further Reading:
1. May, Christopher. “The World Intellectual
Property Organization and the
Development Agenda.” Global
Governance, vol. 13, no. 2, 2007, pp. 161–
170
2. “WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Assignemtn//
ORGANIZATION-WORLD TRADE Written
Lecture
ORGANIZATION: AGREEMENT Test/Research
BETWEEN WIPO AND WTO.” Project
International Legal Materials, vol. 35, no.
3, 1996, pp. 754–759.
3. Abbott, Frederick M. “WORLD
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
ORGANIZATION: TREATY ON
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN
RESPECT OF INTEGRATED
CIRCUITS.” International Legal Materials,
vol. 28, no. 6, 1989, pp. 1477–1491

51-52 6.3UN Overview, Essential Reading: Lecture/ Class CO (5)

International 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Exercise/Discu &LO(5)-S
Court of Justice Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, ssion/Guest Assignment //
other (2017) PP 803 to 850 – 924-947, 764- 794 Lecture Written
Mechanisms of Test/Research
International Further Reading: Project
Dispute 1. Joan E. Donoghue. “The Effectiveness of
Settlement
the International Court of Justice.”
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting
(American Society of International Law),
vol. 108, 2014, pp. 114–118.
2. Sorensen, Max. “The International Court of
Justice: Its Role in Contemporary
International Relations.” International
Organization, vol. 14, no. 2, 1960, pp.
261–276.
3. FRIEDMANN, WOLFGANG. “The
International Court of Justice and the
27
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
Evolution of International Law.” Archiv
Des Völkerrechts, vol. 14, no. 3/4, 1970,
pp. 305–320.
4. Scott, James Brown. “Aim and Purpose of
an International Court of Justice.” The
Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science, vol. 96, 1921,
pp. 100–107.

53 Use of Force Essential Reading:

7.1 Introduction 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law,
7.2 UN Principles Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition,
of Use of Force (2017) PP 851 to 884
7.3. Prohibition
Further reading
on Use of Force
1. Kilovaty, Ido. “Rethinking the Prohibition
on the Use of Force in the Light of
Economic Cyber Warfare: Towards a
Broader Scope of Article 2(4) of the UN
Charter.” Journal of Law & Cyber
Warfare, vol. 4, no. 3, 2015, pp. 210–244.
2. Baxter, R. R., et al. “THE LEGAL
CONSEQUENCES OF THE UNLAWFUL
USE OF FORCE UNDER THE
CHARTER.” Proceedings of the American
Society of International Law at Its Annual
Meeting (1921-1969), vol. 62, 1968, pp.
68–83
3. Hofmeister, Hannes. “Watch What You
Are Saying: The UN Charter's Prohibition
on Threats to Use Force.” Georgetown
Journal of International Affairs, vol. 11,
no. 1, 2010, pp. 107–114.
4. TARDY, THIERRY. “The UN and the Use
of Force: A Marriage Against Nature.”
Security Dialogue, vol. 38, no. 1, 2007, pp.
49–70.
5. Reisman, W. Michael. “Article 2(4): The
Use of Force in Contemporary
International Law.” Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting (American Society of
28
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
International Law), vol. 78, 1984, pp. 74–
87.
6. Schachter, Oscar. “In Defense of
International Rules on the Use of Force.”
The University of Chicago Law Review,
vol. 53, no. 1, 1986, pp. 113–146.

54 6.4 Military and Essential Reading: Lecture/ Class CO (5)

Para-Military Exercise/Discu &LO(5)-S
Activities in and 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, ssion/Guest Assignment //
against Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, Lecture Written
Nicaragua(Nicar (2017) PP 851 to 884 Test/Research
agua vs United Project
Nations)
Further reading
1. CASE CONCERNING MILITARY
AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES
IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA-
NICARAGUA v. UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA 1984, avialabe on
https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/cas
e-related/70/070-19841126-JUD-01-
00-EN.pdf
2. Leigh, Monroe. “Military and
Paramilitary Activities in and Against
Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States
of America). 1984 ICJ Reports 392.”
The American Journal of International
Law, vol. 79, no. 2, 1985, pp. 442–446.
3. Leigh, Monroe. “Case Concerning
Military and Paramilitary Activities in
and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v.
United States of America). 1984 ICJ
Reports 169.” The American Journal of
International Law, vol. 78, no. 4, 1984,
pp. 894–897.
4. R. L. O'M. “Applying the Critical
Jurisprudence of International Law to
the Case Concerning Military and
Paramilitary Activities in and against
Nicaragua.” Virginia Law Review, vol.

29
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
71, no. 7, 1985, pp. 1183–1210

55-56 6.5 Essential Reading: Lecture/ CO (5)

Humanitarian 1. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Discussion/ &LO(5)-S
Intervention: A Cambridge University Press, 1st Assignment //
Brief Survey Edition, (2017) PP 1155-1158 Written
Test/Research
6.6 Legality Further reading Project
of Use of Force 1. Anderson, Jack. “Kosovo and the Legality
NATO's Action of NATO's Actions.” Irish Studies in
in Kosovo
International Affairs, vol. 11, 2000, pp. 31–
Use of Force and
Self 39.
Determination 2. Chinkin, Christine. “The Legality of
6.7 Use of NATO's Action in the Former Republic of
Force and Self- Yugoslavia (FRY) under International
Defence Law.” The International and Comparative
Law Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 4, 2000, pp.
6.7. Use of Force
910–925.
and Self
Determination 3. Kritsiotis, Dino. “The Kosovo Crisis and
6.8. Use of Force Nato's Application of Armed Force against
and Self-Defence the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.” The
6.9. Legality of International and Comparative Law
the Threat or Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 2, 2000, pp. 330–
Use of Nuclear 359
Weapons
4. MUSTAFA, ZUBEIDA. “The Principle of
6.10. ICJ
Advisory Self-Determination in International Law.”
Opinion, 1996 The International Lawyer, vol. 5, no. 3,
1971, pp. 479–487.
5. Henkin, Louis, et al. “FORCE,
INTERVENTION, AND NEUTRALITY
IN CONTEMPORARY
INTERNATIONAL LAW.” Proceedings
of the American Society of International
Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921-1969),
vol. 57, 1963, pp. 147–173.
6. Bowett, D. W. “The Use of Force in the
Protection of Nationals.” Transactions of
the Grotius Society, vol. 43, 1957, pp.
111–126.
7. Mirza, Muhammad Nasrullah, and
AdilSajid. “Use of Force in Self-Defence

30
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
for Global Peace: A Conceptual
Framework.” Strategic Studies, vol. 39, no.
3, 2019, pp. 1–21

57-58 Essential Reading: Lecture/ CO (3)

8.1 The problem 2. Malcolm N Shaw, International Law, Discussion/ &LO(3)-S
of Disarmament Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, Assignment //
(2017) PP 851 to 884 Written
8.2 UN and Test/Research
Further reading
Regulation of Project
Armaments
Provisions of UN 7. Kilovaty, Ido. “Rethinking the Prohibition
Charter on the Use of Force in the Light of
8.3 Notable Economic Cyber Warfare: Towards a
Treaties in the Broader Scope of Article 2(4) of the UN
Field of Charter.” Journal of Law & Cyber
Disarmament
Warfare, vol. 4, no. 3, 2015, pp. 210–244.
8.4. Role Played
by Superpowers 8. Baxter, R. R., et al. “THE LEGAL
Towards CONSEQUENCES OF THE UNLAWFUL
Reduction or USE OF FORCE UNDER THE
Elimination CHARTER.” Proceedings of the American
of Arms Race Society of International Law at Its Annual
Meeting (1921-1969), vol. 62, 1968, pp.
68–83
9. Hofmeister, Hannes. “Watch What You
Are Saying: The UN Charter's Prohibition
on Threats to Use Force.” Georgetown
Journal of International Affairs, vol. 11,
no. 1, 2010, pp. 107–114.
10. TARDY, THIERRY. “The UN and the Use
of Force: A Marriage Against Nature.”
Security Dialogue, vol. 38, no. 1, 2007, pp.
49–70.
11. Reisman, W. Michael. “Article 2(4): The
Use of Force in Contemporary
International Law.” Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting (American Society of
International Law), vol. 78, 1984, pp. 74–
87.
12. Schachter, Oscar. “In Defense of
International Rules on the Use of Force.”
The University of Chicago Law Review,
31
 Evidence of
Learning
Session Plan
(Mapping CO
with LO)
Topic Assessment /
Alignment (if Evaluation
Sessio Topic/Intended
Resources and learning any) and
n# Learning
Weighting
(S, M, W)
vol. 53, no. 1, 1986, pp. 113–146.

8.5 Main Essential Readings:

CO (1)
features of  S.K Kapoor, International Law and Human
Lecture/ Class &LO(2)-S
Comprehensive rights, Central Law Agency, pp 646-648(15th Exercise/Discu Assignment //
59 Test Ban Treaty Edition 2004). ssion/Guest Written
(CTBT) - Indian
Lecture Test/Research
Position
Project

60 INTERNAL COMPONENT II 20 MARKS (03-04-2023) by Ms. Shruti Singh

Expectations from Students: -
 To indulge in research activities in relevant subject.
 To be punctual and attentive in the class room.
 To participate in paper presentations outside the University.
 To maintain the discipline and refrain from the use of mobile phones.
 To actively participate in class room discussions and raise points of doubt.
 To be consistent in academic activities.
 To understand the basic concepts thoroughly.
 To participate in the simulation exercidses diligently
 To engage in drafting of arbitral agreeemnts as per the expert lecture
 To read the relevant articles in the Magazines and Journals to keep updated with the recent changes.

Evaluation Timeline: -

Keeping in line with continuous evaluation process at SLS, Hyderabad the following schedules have been
drawn. Students are expected to go through the dates / sessions mentioned and prepare accordingly.

The academic year 2022-23, VI Semester commences on 23-Jan-2023 and the last day of instruction is 23-
May-2023.
 
Semester Activity Start Date End Date
(DD-MM-YYYY) (DD-MM-YYYY)
Semester VI Teaching 23-Jan-2023 23-May-2023
Preparatory Leave 24 May-2023 31 May-2023
Tentative Exam Schedule 1st June 2023 8th June 2023

32
 INTERNAL ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

Component Component Name Expected slot / Marks Weightage

Number due date declaration by
1 – Internal Test / MCQ / Open 25-02-2023 05-02-2022 20
Assesment -1 Book / Poster
Presentation / or Any
Other
Internal 10-03-2023 20-03-2023
Assesment -
1(Retest) If any
2 – Internal Research Project 03-04-2022 13-04-2023 20
Assesment - 2
End Term Exam 60
Total 100

Quality Assurance: -
The SI(DU) is actively monitoring student learning and quality of the student experience in all its programs.
A random selection of completed assessment tasks may be used for quality assurance, such as to determine
the extent to which program learning goals are being achieved. The information is required for accreditation
purposes, and aggregated findings will be used to inform changes aimed at improving the quality of SI (DU)
programs. All material used for such processes will be treated as confidential and will not be related to
course grades.
Brief profile of the Faculty Member: -
Ms M. Annapurna Devi is NET qualified and pursuing PhD and working as an Assistant Professor in
Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad.
Ms. Shruti Singh has completed her LLM in Constitutional and Administrative Law from Symbiosis
Law School, Pune. She has also qualified the National Eligibility Test (NET).

33