IRNewswires Public Corruption

Investigations

Meredith Kammler, International Investigative Journalist

U.S. Department of Justice Lawyer Maria E.

Douvas Caught Committing Perjury

IRNewswires Public Corruption Investigations

May 31, 2023
New York, NY
By: Meredith Kammler, LLB, LLM, Ph.D., summa cum laude

Unmasking DOJ Lawyer Maria E. Douvas: Outrageous Perjury by a DOJ

Lawyer Exposes Deep Rot in Criminal Justice System.

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Prepare to be appalled, for we find ourselves entangled in the web of deceit

spun by none other than former AUSA Maria E. Douvas. In a shocking revelation,
it has come to light that this supposed guardian of justice brazenly committed
perjury in a court document, leaving us in a state of incredulous outrage. How
could someone entrusted with upholding the law stoop so low as to flagrantly
disregard its very principles?

1|Page
31 May 2023
 Douvas' deliberate and fraudulent perjured declaration, as alleged in the
filed pleadings, is a damning indictment of the rot that permeates our justice
system. The audacity displayed by a Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyer, who
should be a paragon of integrity, is nothing short of repugnant. It is a slap in the
face of justice itself, as she willingly subverted the very foundation upon which
our legal system rests.
To think that Douvas, in collusion with her cohorts, had the temerity to
violate the rules of ethics and professional conduct, is enough to make one's
blood boil. This calculated act of deception reveals a callous disregard for the
truth and a blatant attempt to pervert the course of justice. Such behavior
cannot and must not go unchallenged.
The enormity of this transgression demands swift and thorough
investigation by the courts and the DOJ. Douvas' actions strike at the heart of
the legal profession, tarnishing its reputation and undermining the trust of the
public. This gross betrayal of the public's faith in the DOJ demands
consequences, severe enough to deter others from engaging in similar acts of
corruption.
It is a very dark day when those tasked with upholding justice become its
very antithesis. Douvas' perjury is an affront to the principles we hold dear and
erodes the foundation of trust upon which our legal system relies. Let the full
weight of the law descend upon her and all those involved in this deplorable
conspiracy. The integrity of our courts and the honor of the legal profession hang
in the balance.
In conclusion, the actions of Douvas, a DOJ lawyer, have left us seething
with indignation. Perjury, committed with such brazenness, strikes at the core
of our justice system. The public deserves and demands an uncompromising
investigation into this gross violation of trust and a resolute response to restore
faith in our legal institutions. It is time to confront this corruption head-on, for
the sake of justice and the very soul of our nation.

See the attached recent filing in the Manhattan U.S. Federal Courts in the
U.S. v. Ware cases—a true fundamental miscarriage of justice, and the cause
and symptom of the unprecedented judicial and prosecutorial misconduct and
corruption in the NYC federal courts.

2|Page
31 May 2023
 22cv3409 (SDNY)/22cv10566 (SDNY)(CF09)
_____________
In the United States District Court
For the Southern District of New York
Filed on May 31, 2023
Ware v. United States, Garland, Ramos, & Taylor-Swain.
_______________
28 USC 2241(a) actual innocent habeas corpus petition.
___________
Appx. Y (Perjured Declaration of AUSA Maria E. Douvas)1

Notice of Appeals and Omnibus Application for a moot

28 USC 2253 Certificate of Appealability.2
Submitted by:
/s/ Ulysses T. Ware
The Office of Ulysses T. Ware
123 Linden Blvd.
Ste 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
Utware007@gmail.com

1
The DOJ USAO’s lawyers named herein, the Unindicted Coconspirators, all are currently in civil and criminal
contempt of the August 10, 2007, Dkt. 32, 04cr1224 (SDNY) Brady court order (Sweet, J.), 18 USC 401(2), 401(3).

2
The statute 28 USC 2253 is applicable to only a federal or state “prisoner” in the physical custody of the government
of a particular state which is the context the Supreme Court’s precedents all explain that 2253 is applicable only to
“prisoners.”

3|Page
31 May 2023
 The Office of Ulysses T. Ware
123 Linden Blvd.
Suite 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
Utware007@gmail.com
May 31, 2023

Via email to Chambers on Wednesday, May 31, 2023

The Hon. District Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Sq.
New York, NY 10007

Re: Ware v. United States, Garland, Ramos, and Taylor-Swain

22cv3409 (SDNY) and 22cv10566 (SDNY)—2241 actual innocent habeas corpus
petitions.

Judge Ramos:

PLEASE BE ADVISED, TAKE NOTICE, AND BE AWARE.

Ulysses T. Ware, (the “Appellant” of “Applicant”), the petitioner in the Ware v. USA,

Garland, Ramos, and Taylor-Swain, 22cv3409 (SDNY) 2241 actual innocent habeas corpus

petition, (the “Petition”), hereby gives notice of the filing of the enclosed pleadings in the United

States District Court (SDNY), to wit:

1. Appendix Y is the knowing and deliberate, fraudulent perjured declaration filed by

former AUSA Maria E. Douvas with the consent of Michael J. Garcia, Preet Bharara,

4|Page
31 May 2023
 and others in the USAO filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in

U.S. v. Ware, 09-0851cr and U.S. v. Ware, 07-5222cr, (the “Perjured Declaration”).

2. The Perjured Declaration violated the Court of Appeals and the DOJ Rules of Ethics

and Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3, 3.4, 8.4, and duty of complete candor to the

tribunal—that is, Douvas knew the Office of the U.S. Attorney (SDNY), (the

“USAO”), had deliberately, intentionally, and maliciously hid, suppressed,

concealed, and lied and committed perjure numerous times in the district court

(SDNY) regarding the “over 15 boxes of records” which the USAO did not properly

search, or inventory with “could have” contained actual innocent Brady

exculpatory and impeachment evidence.

3. Moreover, Douvas personally knew the USAO hid, suppressed, and concealed the

professional misconduct of its FRE 404(b) witness in 04cr1224, disgraced former

SEC lawyer Jeffrey B. Norris.

4. Douvas, Katherine Polk-Failla, Sarah E. Paul, Preet Bharara, Melissa Childs, Jun

Xiang, Damian Williams, John M. McEnany, Audrey Strauss, Daniel Gitner,

Margaret M. Garnett,3 Nicholas S. Goldin, U.S. Attorney Michael J. Garcia, the SEC,

and former District Judge Robert W. Sweet, (deceased), (the “Unindicted

Coconspirators”) all agreed, colluded, acted in concert, and conspired and hid,

suppressed, concealed, and willfully resisted the Brady court orders entered in

U.S. v. Ware, 04cr1224 (SDNY), Dkt. 32 (August 10, 2007, Sweet, J.)

3
Margaret M. Garnett has purportedly been nominated to a federal district court judgeship (SDNY) by NY Senator
Charles Ellis Schumer while in civil and criminal contempt, 18 USC 401(2), 401(3), of Brady court orders entered in
U.S. v. Ware, 04cr1224 (SDNY), Dkt. 32, and U.S. v. Ware, 05cr1115 (SDNY), Dkt. 17.

5|Page
31 May 2023
 5. Douvas, the USAO, and the Unindicted Coconspirators all knew the USAO, and its

agents, proxies, surrogates, and alter-egos all had agreed to obstruct justice,

entered into a malicious, depraved, and evil conspiracy having the express purpose

to fraudulently have Ulysses T. Ware, Esq. convicted as a DOJ retaliatory, racially-

motivated Jim Crow hate crime to retaliate against Mr. Ware for refusing to issue

fraudulent, bogus, and illegal null and void ab initio Rule 144(k) legal opinions to

the DOJ’s clients, the 02cv2219 (SDNY) lawsuit’s plaintiffs, unregistered broker-

dealer, and 15 USC 77b(a)(11) statutory underwriters conducting a criminal,

unregistered criminal public offering of Group Management Corp. securities, GX

1-4, via GX 5, (the “Criminal Usury Illegal Debt Contracts”), in violation of NYS

Penal Law, section 190.40, the criminal usury law, a class E felony, see Adar Bays,

LLC v. GeneSYS ID, Inc., 28 F.4d 379 (2d Cir. 2022), and in violation of federal

criminal law, 15 USC 77e, 77x, 78ff, and 18 USC 2, 157, 371, 1341, 1343, 1349,

1956-57, 1961(6)(B),4 and 1962(a-d).

4
See U.S. v. Grote, 961 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2020) (aff’d conviction, sentence, and +$3.0 billion forfeiture
judgment for unlawful debt collection activities).

6|Page
31 May 2023
Perjured declaration of AUSA Maria E. Douvas, knowingly and willfully lied and
committed a fraud on the court of appeals where she and the USAO knowingly and
in bad faith suppressed the Brady evidence regarding 04cr1224 gov’t trial witness
disgraced former SEC lawyer Jeffrey B. Norris.

7|Page
31 May 2023
Compare Douvas’ and the USAO’s fraudulent and perjured Declaration, Appx. Y, to the EOUSA’s
March 20, 2023, In re Ware, 000907 FOIA response—Douvas and the USAO clearly and
indisputably lied, committed perjury, committed a fraud on the Court of Appeals, and clearly
violated Rules 3.3, 3.4, 8.4, and the duty of complete candor to the tribunal by her submission of
the Perjured Declaration to the Court, and are required to be referred to the DOJ’s Office of
Professional Responsibility, the NYS Bar Association, and the District Court (SDNY) Committee on
Lawyer Discipline.

8|Page
31 May 2023
 End of document

9|Page
31 May 2023