Republic of the Philippines

CATANDUANES STATE UNIVERSITY

Virac, Catanduanes
College of _____________________
EVALUATION OF FACULTY
_________ Semester, School Year ____________
Name of Faculty: __________________________________ Rating Period: ________________________
Course(s) Taught: _________________________________ Day/Time: ____________________________
Evaluator (Please Check): Self Student Peer Supervisor

Instructions: This instrument is used to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of faculty. Encircle the number that
corresponds to your rating for the faculty concerned using the scale coded as follows:
5 - Outstanding 4 - Very Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 2 - Fair 1 - Poor

Commitment (25%) Scale

1 Demonstrates sensitivity to students' ability to attend and absorb content information. 5 4 3 2 1

2 Integrates sensitivity his/her learning objectives with those of the students in collaborative 5 4 3 2 1
process.
Shows concern for the welfare of students by making himself available beyond official time
3 referring their need to other concerned units/ persons/authorities. 5 4 3 2 1

4 Comes to class on time. 5 4 3 2 1

5 Shows enthusiasm for teaching and learning and for subject being taught. 5 4 3 2 1
Total Score
Mean
B. Knowledge of Subject-Matter (25%)
1 Demonstrate mastery of subject-matter. 5 4 3 2 1
2 Draws and share information on the state of the art of theory and practice in his/her discipline. 5 4 3 2 1
3 Integrates subject to practical circumstances and learning purposes of students. 5 4 3 2 1
Explains the relevance of present topics to the previous lessons; relates the subject-matter to
4 relevant issues and daily life activities. 5 4 3 2 1

5 Demonstrate up-to-date knowledge and/or awareness on current trends and issues of the 5 4 3 2 1
subject.
Total Score
Mean
C. Teaching for Independent Learning (25%)
Creates teaching strategies that allow students to practice using concepts they need to
1 understand (interactive discussion). 5 4 3 2 1

2 Enhances students' self-esteem and recognizes their abilities and performance. 5 4 3 2 1

Allow students to create their own course with objectives and realistically defined student-
3 professor rules and makes them accountable for their performance. 5 4 3 2 1

Allows students to think independently and make their own decisions and holding them
4 accountable for their performance based largely on their success in executing decisions. 5 4 3 2 1

5 Encourage students to learn beyond what is required and provides activities that develop 5 4 3 2 1
analytical thinking.
Total Score
Mean
D. Management of Learning (25%)
Creates opportunities for intensive and/or extensive contribution of students in the class
1 activities (e.g. breaks class into dyads, triads to buzz/task groups). 5 4 3 2 1
Assumes roles as facilitator, resource person, coach, inquisitor, integrator, referee in drawing
2 students to contribute to knowledge and understanding of the concepts at hand. 5 4 3 2 1

3 Designs and implements learning conditions and experience that promotes healthy exchange 5 4 3 2 1
and/or confrontations.
Structures/re-structure learning and teaching-learning context to enhance attainment of
4 collective learning objectives. 5 4 3 2 1
 Uses instruction materials such as audio-video materials, films/computers, multimedia, etc. to
5 reinforce learning process. 5 4 3 2 1

Total Score _____ _____ _____ _____ ______

Mean _____ _____ _____ _____ ______
Grand Mean _____ _____ _____ _____ ______

Signature of Evaluator: _____________________________ Position of Evaluator: ___________

Name of Evaluator: ________________________________ Date: ________________________

CSU-F-ACAD-18 Rev. 0 Effectivity Date: June 1, 2015