Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07-Cus Rec
07-Cus Rec
07-Cus Rec
(a) That while passing the Order-in-Original No.47, dated 07.03.2022 the
Hyderabad has miserably failed to consider that the seized cigarettes are
the Trade Mark registry, Karachi whereas produced Sales Tax Invoice No.07
Company Bawalnagar and M/s Muzafar Saeed Enterprises Juranwala. The plain
reading above documents show that the there is clear contradiction in the sam.
Thus there is valid reason to believe that M/s Saleem & Company Bawalnagar
counterfeit products.
(b) That, the department/ seizing agency made out seizure case on the basis of
the counterfeit product which is notified item vide Serial No. (9) of
health further read with SRO 499(1)/2009 dated 13.06.2009, punishable under
clause 89 of Section 156(1) of the Customs Act,1969 and Section 157 (2) of the
Customs Act,1969.
Hyderabad has miserably failed to consider that the seized vehicle was exclusively
Quetta @ Hyderabad while passing the impugned order has failed understand that
vehicle i-e Toyota Shehzore Truck 06 wheeler Bearing Registration No. KM-7232
injurious for health furher read with S.R.O 499(1)/2009 dated 13.06.2009,
for exclusively for transportation of counterfeit Cigarettes clearly the spirit and
In light of above fact, the seizing agency is opinion of that the Appeal
against No. H-810 and H-811.dated.13.09.2022 may be filed before the Honorable
High Court Karachi, as the seized goods are counterfeit and smuggled one and vehicle
However the law committee may evaluate legal aspects of the Order-in-
Original and may decided whether to file appeal against the Order-in-Original or
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR
CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE)
SUKKUR