Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

S.

10(1) Contract Act 1950:


2

The parties entering into a contract should also be


BUSINESS LAW COMPETENT TO CONTRACT.
-CAPACITY-
Parties -- the LEGAL CAPACITY TO CONTRACT:
S 11 CA 1950

Examples: ???
Issue: of ALL APPLICANTS --- QUALIFIED
CANDIDATES only....

S. 11 Contract Act 1950: (i) THE AGE OF MAJORITY


3 4

Who are competent to contract:??


“Every person is competent to contract ... of THE  Q: Why?
AGE OF MAJORITY according to law..., and who  A: A contract is about rights & liabilities -- must be
is of SOUND OF MIND, and is NOT of a rational person – understand:
DISQUALIFIED from contracting by any law to (i) the nature of agreements; and
which he is subject.”
(ii) the legal consequences of all actions.

(i) THE AGE OF MAJORITY (cont.) A Contract by A Minor


5 6

 Q: Legal Effect to a contract entered by a person


 In Malaysia: age of majority: 18 yrs (Child Act 2001); of < 18 yrs/Minor/an Infant?
(Age of Majority Act 1971).  Tan Hee Juan vs. Teh Boon Keat
 Election Act: 21 yrs; Criminal liabilities: 21 etc.  F: The transfers of land-executed by an infant
 Recent issues: ? (voting age in Malaysia?) were void.
 H: A minor cannot make any valid contracts.
 The general rule re. a contract by MINORS:
contracts made by an infant are Void ab initio:
void from the beginning.
A Contract by A Minor (cont.) A Contract by A Minor (cont.)
7 8

 However, there are exceptions to the general  i. Contracts of marriage.


rule:  Rajeswary & Anor. vs Balakrishnan & Ors.
 i. Contracts for necessaries.  F: R + B: A contract of marriage – B breached – A
 ii. Contracts of scholarship. sued B – B’s argument: R was still a minor at the
 iii. Contracts for insurance.
time of contract so she had no capacity to
contract.
 iv. Contracts of marriage.
 H: R had a capacity to contract – c/o/Marriage is
one of the exceptions to the general rule.

A Contract by A Minor (cont.) A Contract by A Minor (cont.)


9 10

 ii. Contracts of scholarship.  ii. Contracts of scholarship (cont.).


 S 4 (a) Contract Act (Amendment 1976):  Govt. of Malaysia vs. Gurcharan Singh &
scholarship - the scholarship contract is valid Ors.
even the recipient is a minor – only for
govt./Fed or State Govt./govt.  F: ?
agencies/educational institutions (exclude
 H:?
private organizations)
 S.5(a): Contract Act (Amendment 1976):
Remedies claimable if minors breach the
contract

A Contract by A Minor (cont.) A Contract by A Minor (cont.)


11 12

 iii. Contracts of insurance  iv. Contracts for necessaries


 Insurance Act 1963 (Revised 1972):  Definition of ‘necessaries’: Govt. of Malaysia
 A Minor can enter into an insurance contract vs. Gurcharan Singh & Ors
for himself/herself and/or for his/her  E.g. Things which are essential to the existence
properties & reasonable comfort of the infant: food,
 A minor: > 10 yrs; < 16: with a written consent clothes, house etc. include education.
of parents/guardians.
A Contract by A Minor (cont.) A Contract by A Minor (cont.)
13 14

 iv. Contracts for necessaries (cont.)  Contracts for necessaries (cont.)


 S. 69 Contract Act 1950: If a person,  5 requirements provided under S. 69
incapable of entering into a contract , or anyone Contract Act 1950:
whom he is legally bound to support, is  i. The contract is made by a minor or at least
supplied by another person with necessaries one party is a minor;
suited to his condition in life, the person who  ii. The minor/anyone whom he is legally bound
has furnished such supplies is entitled to be to support is supplied by another person with
reimbursed from the property of such incapable necessaries;
person.

A Contract by A Minor (cont.) A Contract by A Minor (cont.)


15 16

 Contracts for necessaries (cont.)  Contracts for necessaries (cont.)


 5 requirements provided under S. 69  Anything DEEMED by law as necessaries to
Contract Act 1950: children is legitimate - so the contract is valid
 iii. Necessaries supplied suited to his condition – any breach from the side of a minor: the
in life; see: Nash vs. Inman minor will be liable for any legal
 iv. The reimbursement should not be taken
implications for the contract he/she entered.
from the pocket money of the minor; and,
 v. Necessaries supplied should be charged at a
reasonable price.
 Examples: ???

A Contract by a Minor: Issue 1: MISTAKE OF


FACT OF THE AGE OF MINORS
17 18

 Contracts for necessaries (cont.)  Natesan vs. Thanaletchumi & Anor


 Q: Other groups of incapable person(s) acc. S  F: Children influence / deceive others about
69 CA 1950? their ages.
 A: A mentally disordered person etc.  H: DECEIVED parties may NOT take action
over it because the person was a child when the
contract was made.
A Contract by a Minor: Issue 2: Restitution
A Contract by a Minor: Issue 2: Restitution (cont.)
19 20

 Q: What are the consequences if one of the  S 66 Contract Act 1950 should be read together
contracting parties (adults) has delivered with S. 37 and S.40 Specific Recovery Act 1950.
benefits to the other party (children), but later  S. 37 and S.40 Specific Recovery Act 1950: it is
found the contract void? a discretion of the Court to decide whether to
 A: S.66 CA 1950: Anyone who has received a grant a recovery or not. (Read: Tan Hee Juan
benefit from a contract declared void, shall vs. Teh Boon Keat AND Leha Jusoh vs.
return any benefits received from / to Awang Johari Hashim)
compensate the other party.

(ii) MENTALLY SOUND (S 12) (iii) NO LEGAL DISQUALIFICATION


21 22

 S 12 (1), (2) & (3) Contract Act 1950:


 A person will be disqualified for the contract if
 During the execution of the contract, prohibited by any law in particular.
he/she should be able to understand the  E.g: a bankrupt person cannot apply loans from
contract made. any financial institutions? Blacklisted??
 E.g: intoxicated persons; senile persons;
dementia??

You might also like