QUALITY ASSURANCE

MAZDA LIMITED

Ejector Performance Test Procedure

Mazda Job No. VO-22-14664

Client Name JORD International Pty. Ltd.

Project Name North Field East Project Onshore Facilities (Nfe)

Ref. PO # C7751-PO-010 Dtd. 25.03.2022

Jord Doc. # C7751-010-Q-PRC-00-0011 Rev 2.7

VENDOR DOCUMENT RETURN STATUS

Mazda Document # VO-22-14664-PFT ✔ Code 1 Approved
Approved with Comments
Code 2 Revise & Re-submit, Work may proceed in acc. & to extend as commented

Rejected
Document Revision (Mazda / Jord) 1/1 Code 3
Revise & Re-submit, Work NOT to proceed

Not Reviewed
Code 4
Document accepted for information only, Work may proceed
Document Title
Pls. revise the Document Title &
EJECTORS - FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TEST Numbers as shown:

Document Title Ejector Performance Test Procedure (FAT) PROCEDURES

Jord Document Number Jord Revision

C7751-010-Q-PRC-00-0011 1_JMU_1
Customer Document Number Customer Revision

Category of Submission Review Vendor Document Number Vendor Revision

VO-22-14664-PFT 1_JMU_1
The Purchasers document review, comment, approval, or lack thereof shall not discharge the Vendor
Signature
from its obligation to comply with all Purchaser Order requirements. The Vendor must obtain formal
written approval via TQ's (Technical Queries) for any changes or deviations from the Purchaser Order Electronically signed by Manan Gajjar

Document type QUALITY ASSURANCE requirements. The Vendor obligations shall only be altered, by the Purchaser formally approved TQ's
or issued Variations Orders (VO's).
on 25-05-2023, 04:31 pm

REVIEW CODES
Date. :
A No Comments, Work may Proceed.

B Work may Proceed with taking care of and incorporating comments.

C Major non-conformance and deviation and the document is rejected. Resubmit for review after incorporating comments.

D Document/Drawing Retained for Information

Name -

1 23-03-23 Revised as per Comment H. Sutariya S. Shah

0 14-06-22 Issued for Review M. Patel S. Shah
Prepared Checked
Rev Date of Issue Description Approved By
By By

Page 1 of 8
 PERFORMANCE TEST MAZDA JOB #.: VO-22-14664
PROCEDURE OF STEAM MAZDA DOC. #.: VO-22-14664-PFT
REVISION #: 1

JET EJECTORS
CLIENT : M/s. JORD INTERNATIONAL PTY. LIMITED
REF. PO# : C7751-PO-010, DTD. 25.03.2022
JORD PROJECT : NORTH FILED EXPANSION PROJECT ONSHORE FACILITIES (Nfe)
JORD PROJECT # : C7751
JORD DOC# : C7751-010-Q-PRC-00-0011
SYSTEM : VACUUM PACKAGE 62-E9211/63-E9211/72-E9211/73-E9211 & 65-E9211/E912/E9213

1. PURPOSE OF TEST
This test procedure provides method of factory testing Individual Holding Steam Jet Ejectors. Calculation
used in this procedure are based on H.E.I standard for steam jet ejector system, which are result of great
many years of accumulated experience within the industry. They are sufficiently reliable and accurate to
provide both the customer and Mazda with assurance that each Holding Ejector tested in accordance with
HEI specified method will meet the performance determined by the test and these ejector have been
tested under condition that will tend to obviate any possible difficulties after the ejectors have been
installed in the customer’s plant.

1.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

Piping & Instrument Diagram

Datasheet of Ejector Package
HEI (Standards for Steam Jet Vacuum System)-7TH Edition.
Inspection and Test Plan For Vacuum Package

1.2 ALTERNATE METHODS

This test procedure permits alternate method of testing. *For Example, while single jet and multi jet none
condensing ejector shall be tested as a complete unit, while multi stage condensing ejectors shall be
tested or may at the Mazda’s option. If stage tested, MAZDA shall provide the necessary test equipments
for each test. MAZDA has satisfied himself concerning the accuracy of these alternate testing methods by
virtue of vast long experience.
(* In case of single ejector, testing shall be done as a complete unit. But in case of Multi-stage ejector,
testing shall be done as a stage wise as the Mazda does not have the facility for testing multi ejectors
using all the numerous entrained gas Mixtures.)

1.3 UNNECESSARY TESTING

This procedure is not intended to encourage unnecessary testing. Test on duplicate unit is eliminated
without prejudice to the purchaser when operating parameters remains unchanged.

2.0 SCOPE OF TEST

2.1 TEST ITEM

To test a steam jet ejector adequately, it is necessary to establish the correct operating values like suction
capacity, suction pressure, discharge pressure etc. when the ejector operating at the design point at the
specified motive steam pressure and equivalent temperature.

Page 2 of 8
 PERFORMANCE TEST MAZDA JOB #.: VO-22-14664
PROCEDURE OF STEAM MAZDA DOC. #.: VO-22-14664-PFT
REVISION #: 1

JET EJECTORS
2.2 TEST GASES
Since MAZDA cannot be expected to maintain facilities for testing ejectors using all the numerous
entrained gas mixture and at all the many entrained gas temperatures for which ejectors are used, it shall
suffice in all cases to test ejectors with dry air at normal room temperature at Ejector suction with Dry &
Saturated Steam as Motive Fluid.

2.3 EQUIVALENT LOADING

Steam jet ejector shall be tested to meet 21 ˚C (70° F) Air equivalent calculated as per H.E.I standard
calculation for Air flow through nozzle shall be calculated as per H.E.I Figure 15.

3.0 PROCEDURE OF TEST

3.1 TEST ARRANGEMENT Comment given in previous revision
not incorporated properly.
Test arrangement should be such to take accurate reading. Test arrangement for "Suction
piccolo tube or flow
capacity, Suction pressure
nozzle used to measure capacity point shall be as per normal practice. and discharge pressure shall be
variable parameters,"
3.2 PARAMETERS – VARIABLE AND UNVARIABLE
As per this project Suction capacity and suction pressure shall be variable parameters, whereas
motive pressure, discharge pressure and motive flow shall be invariable parameters (if steam
pressure is superheated, steam pressure shall be corrected to corresponding saturated temperature.
performance test shall be conducted with dry and saturated steam pressure.) . Discharge Pressure
shall be measure simultaneously after altering each capacity point.

3.3 Allowable Tolerance (Acceptance Criteria)

The test results of this performance standard shall be compared to the agreed upon design point and will
be found to be acceptable providing they are within the following limits as specified in HEI Standard
(Reference page from HEI Standard attached in this procedure)

Variable Unit Tolerance

Capacity lb/hr. (-) 3%
Steam Consumption lb/hr. (+) 3%

4.0 TYPE OF TESTING

Curve after conducting the test shall be plotted for Suction capacity V/s. Suction Pressure keeping motive
steam pressure and discharge pressure constant.

5.0 DOCUMENTATION
Plotting these 21 ˚C (70° F) equivalent load values V/S. suction pressure and drawing a curve through
them indicating design capacity point. (Reference format of Report attached in this procedure)

Prepared by, Reviewed By, Approved by,

( Hitesh Sutariya – R&D and (Satish Shah - Q.C. Manager ) (Satish Shah - Q.C. Manager )
Testing department) Mazda Limited Mazda Limited
Mazda Limited

Page 3 of 8
Page 4 of 8
Page 5 of 8
Page 6 of 8
Page 7 of 8
Page 8 of 8