Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MUNRO The Emptiness
MUNRO The Emptiness
MUNRO The Emptiness
Chapter Title: “The Emptiness in Place of Her”: Space, Absence, and Memory in Alice
Munro’s Dear Life
Chapter Author(s): Ailsa Cox
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Boydell & Brewer and Camden House are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Space and Place in Alice Munro's Fiction
Ailsa Cox
Train
“Train,” the story of a drifter in rural Ontario, is a reminder of Munro’s
debt to Southern Gothic writers, so evident in her first collection, Dance
Time, as it were, fuses together with space and flows with it (form-
ing the road); this is the source of the rich metaphorical expansion
on the image of the road as a course: “the course of a life,” “to set
out on a new course,” “the course of history” and so on; varied and
multi-leveled are the ways in which a road turns into a metaphor,
but its fundamental pivot is the flow of time.2
Jackson is on course “to where he’s supposed to be” (DL, 177); we are
not told why he abandons his predetermined course for the open road,
the site of random encounters. He launches himself into a space which,
for him, represents contingency, but in fact consists of a different kind
Over the hill came a box on wheels, being pulled by two quite small
horses. Smaller than the one in the field but no end livelier. And in
the box sat a half dozen or so little men. All dressed in black, with
proper black hats on their heads.
The sound was coming from them. It was singing. Discreet high-
pitched little voices, as sweet as could be. They never looked at him
as they went by. (DL, 180)
and daughter that prompts the father’s theft of the rose and her sub-
sequent atonement in his place. Belle’s father fictionalizes Belle as
“Pussycat” in his Toronto column, reserving for his wife the nickname
“Princess Casamassima, out of a book whose name, she said, meant noth-
ing anymore” (DL, 184). There are other princesses in this story, fan-
tasized figures from the English royal family. The cow, Margaret Rose,
is named after the younger of the British princesses, Elizabeth and
Margaret Rose (the adult Princess Margaret abandoned the second part
of her name). Belle’s father has been working on a historical novel about
another royal figure, Matilda. Nonetheless, it is Jackson who plays the
role of Beauty, lingering in a realm where time seems to be suspended;
and it is Belle who, like the Beast, makes a startling revelation when she is
close to death.
As we have seen in the opening section of the story, much is with-
held from the reader. Although we are granted access to Jackson’s interior
consciousness, aspects of his thoughts and memories are excluded. The
story frequently alludes to that which is unknown or forgotten, from the
names of the trees to the book “whose name . . . meant nothing any-
more” (DL, 184). Charles E. May’s chapter on Munro in his recent vol-
ume of criticism, I Am Your Brother, restates his long-held view that in
the short story reality is ineffable, and motivation inherently obscure.4 In
an article on Richard Ford’s story “Optimists,” Joe Frank takes this point
a little further, arguing that the mysterious and indeterminate aspects of
the modern short story may be related to nescience, “the human condi-
tion of being bound by limited and imperfect knowledge.”5 The gaps in
Jackson’s knowledge are linked to its willful suppression, and also a failure
to recognize that which is at least partially familiar.
In his discussion of the chronotope of the open road in novels by
Petronius, Cervantes, Gogol, and other writers, Bakhtin argues that in
these examples “the road is always one that passes through familiar ter-
ritory, and not through some exotic alien world.”6 As we have seen, the
anachronistic rural world Jackson experiences when he jumps from the
train does, indeed, appear as alien as the forest where Beauty’s father finds
himself lost “within thirty miles of his own house.”7 When he drives Belle
to a medical appointment in Toronto, she is struck by the changes she
sees on the way: “Are you so sure we are still in Canada?” (DL, 190).
Yet she also maps her own memories onto the city, identifying her old
school and the church where her parents were married, and imagining
her father’s newspaper just as it was, with his photograph at the head of
the column. Despite the length of his sojourn, stretching into the 1960s,
Jackson has never intended to stay with Belle on a permanent basis. His
sudden resumption of his journey appears, at first sight, to be a random
decision, but is in fact linked to the impossibility of escape from the famil-
iar territory he has tried to leave behind.
There was a big mirror over the sink, you see it had a sink like a real
bathroom, only you had to pull out the plug and let the water back
into the pail when you were finished. . . . It must have been around
nine o’clock at night so there was plenty of light. It was summer, did
I say? That little room facing the west?
Then I heard steps and of course it was Daddy. My father. (DL,
195)
Once again, the sounds are heard from beyond a character’s imme-
diate proximity—offstage, as it were—announcing the imminent arrival
of something unseen, mysterious and disturbing. The steps are “not like
usual. Very deliberate” (DL, 196). The door opens and the father gazes
at her with a stare that is not “in any sense a normal look” and then says
“Excuse me . . . in a funny kind of voice” (DL, 196).
Belle’s exact reconstruction strains for the accuracy of a witness state-
ment, but it is also infused with a profound ambivalence. Traumatic or
violent incidents often occur in Munro’s stories, especially in the later
collections, but their significance lies not so much as plot devices as in
the way they are perceived or recollected. Belle herself downplays these
events: “It was nobody’s fault”; “It is just the mistakes of humanity” (DL,
198). Her motive for sharing her secret with Jackson is to communicate
something else, indirectly, as we shall see.
Belle’s description of “my face looking into the mirror and him look-
ing at me in the mirror and also what was behind me and I couldn’t
see” (DL, 196) leaves the reader to imagine what her father might be
doing, partially glimpsed on the threshold—perhaps masturbating.
Bakhtin ascribes an especially potent emotion charge to the threshold, as
“the chronotope of crisis and break in a life.”8 This charge is channeled
through the mutual gaze, caught in multiple reflections and refractions.
In the tale of Cupid and Psyche, which is an antecedent of “Beauty and
the Beast,” Psyche is banished by her husband, Cupid, when she defies his
order not to look at him. I am also reminded of Beauty’s magic mirror
in Cocteau’s film, which functions as a type of surveillance camera, keep-
ing Beauty informed of events in her absence. To look is to know, and to
exchange glances necessitates acknowledgment.
However the young Belle does not understand what she sees; she
is blind to a crucial element in this whole scenario, the word the older
Belle pronounces for Jackson’s benefit. The word is “sex” (DL, 198).
Munro displays the utterance as a single sentence paragraph, creating a
dramatic pause in Belle’s lengthy speech, and foregrounding the break-
ing of taboos. Her revelation, dramatic yet also banal, is intended to sig-
nal complicity in male sexual needs: “There should be acknowledgement,
that’s all I mean, places where people can go if they are in a situation. And
not be all ashamed and guilty about it. If you think I mean brothels, you
are right. If you think prostitutes, right again. Do you understand?” (DL,
198). Jackson says he does, but significantly does not meet her gaze.
Bakhtin emphasizes the subtlety of the threshold chronotope as the site
of sudden breaks and crises, which may operate implicitly through imagery.
The causal link between Belle’s uncalled for intimacy and Jackson’s depar-
ture is underplayed. Once again he embraces contingency, allowing random
events to carry him once more along the open road. Taking a walk from the
hospital, he wanders the streets of Toronto, finally joining a small crowd
gathered outside an apartment block whose caretaker is being taken away
by ambulance: “Jackson was one of those who didn’t bother to walk away.
He wouldn’t have said he was curious about any of this, more that he was
just waiting for the inevitable turn he had been expecting, to take him back
to where he’d come from” (DL, 200–201).
He takes on the caretaker’s job, once again seeming to settle down
into a routine existence until another seemingly random event brings even
more narrative disruption. This event parallels the incident between Belle
and her father, in that much of it takes place “offstage.” Jackson overhears
a woman enquiring after her runaway daughter, who has been staying in
the apartment block. He is outside his office, where the conversation is
taking place, but recognizes her just by her voice as his wartime sweet-
heart, Ileane Bishop. It was Ileane he was supposed to be meeting before
he jumped the train. Further analeptic passages chart their romance and
his failed attempt at sexual consummation while on leave. That failure
explains Jackson’s first disappearance, and its memory triggers his next
departure on a train heading north.
The chronotope of the threshold is invoked symbolically through the
many references to doors opening and closing during Ileane’s fruitless
visit to the apartment block as Jackson keeps himself out of sight. In an
interview with the New Yorker, Munro has said that this story is “all about
the man who is confident and satisfied as long as no sex gets in the way.
I think a rowdy woman tormented him when he was young.”9 In the
Harper’s version the form these torments take at the hands of Jackson’s
stepmother is more explicitly sexual than in the final version: “what she
called her fooling or her teasing when she gave him a bath” (emphasis
added). This final clause is removed from the Dear Life version.
And I said to the man who stood at the gate of the year,
“Give me a light that I may tread safely into the unknown.”
And he replied, “Go out into the darkness and put your hand into
the hand of God. That shall be to you better than light and safer
than a known way.” (DL, 213)
Gravel
Coral Ann Howells begins her 1998 study of Alice Munro with an invi-
tation to study a map of Canada, homing in on Southwestern Ontario,
where most of the stories are set. Howells points out that while these fic-
tional mappings include social observation, they transcend external docu-
mentation, explaining that their narrators “are fascinated by dark holes
and by unscripted spaces.”15 A later Munro story is even entitled “Deep-
Holes” (TMH). “Gravel” takes its title from the unremarkable gravel pit
that serves as the closest thing to a landmark for a homodiegetic narrator
reminiscing about childhood, beginning with the simple statement: “At
that time we were living beside a gravel pit” (DL, 91). Dear Life is full of
such temporal indeterminacies: the previous story, “Leaving Maverley,”
begins with an allusion to “the old days” (DL, 67). Brief references in this
story to the atom bomb, Vietnam, dope-smoking, and Cuba suggest the
nineteen sixties or seventies. Other details, notably the narrator’s name
and gender, are also withheld in a story that is so much concerned with
secrecy, estrangement, and the unfathomable nature of another’s subjec-
tivity—including our own younger selves, concealed within an irretriev-
able past.
“The old gravel pit out the service-station road” (DL, 91) embodies
the notion of a marginal territory at the edge of town, a space that figures
“She gets her dog food,” Caro argued, but Neal said, “Suppose she
didn’t? Suppose some day we all disappeared and she had to fend for
herself?”
“I’m not going to,” Caro said. “I’m not going to disappear, and
I’m always going to look after her.” (DL, 92)
was quite upset by this, and Neal would have a talk with her” (DL,
92)—suggests that this is an ongoing exchange, endlessly replayed by
the two of them.
The irony of Caro’s words will be revealed at the story’s climax,
when she misguidedly stages an attempt to rescue Blitzee from the water-
filled pit. Caro does, indeed, most tragically “disappear,” and our misgiv-
ings about this pit are fulfilled by that denouement. This is far from the
first reference to drowning in Munro’s oeuvre, other examples includ-
ing “Miles City, Montana” (The Progress of Love, 1986), “Pictures of the
Ice” (Friend of My Youth, 1990) and “Child’s Play” (Too Much Happiness,
2009). In “Gravel,” the drowning completes a pattern of disappearances,
both symbolic and real. Neal is himself a spectral figure,17 his acting role
as Banquo’s ghost well suited to his penchant for “giving yourself over,
blending with others” (DL, 95).
Acting and play-acting are also favorite tropes in Munro’s fiction. In
an article on theatricality as distantiation in her earlier work, Lee Garner
and Jennifer Murray note that acting or the recasting of real life as perfor-
mance facilitates an internal split between observer and participant: “The
ironic observing distance is one from which the character/reader may feel
protected from the potential violence of certain moments of excess, but
it is equally one from which the fantastic complexity of the business of
being human may be glimpsed.”18 Neal retreats into the role of observer,
remaining entirely passive, making no effort to save Caro when the alarm
is raised; staying away from her funeral, because he “didn’t believe in
funerals” (DL, 105), and abdicating the role of father when his son is
born shortly after the child’s death. Fittingly, the family snowman is nick-
named “Neal”; we all know that snowmen inevitably melt into nothing.
Before Caro’s last, fatal act of make-believe, she stages several other inci-
dents with the dog, hiding Blitzee under her coat on the school bus and
leaving her on the porch of the old house, as if she had made her way back
of her own accord. Blitzee makes a genuine, if short-lived, disappearance,
when “another dog,” perhaps a wolf, is glimpsed by the mailbox (DL,
98); this phantom wolf also vanishes, and, according to Neal, probably
never existed. Curiously, the name originally chosen for the unborn child
the mother is carrying is rather like a dog’s name—“Brandy” (DL, 98).
This child will make its entry into the world soon after Caro has disap-
peared from it.
The ambiguities, invisibilities, and absences of the story are height-
ened by the winter landscape: “Those short winter days must have
seemed strange to me—in town, the lights came on at dusk. But children
get used to changes. Sometimes I wondered about our other house. I
didn’t exactly miss it or want to live there again—I just wondered where
it had gone” (DL, 96). Landscape, weather, and the seasons evoke a lim-
inal state, in which time is suspended and actions become play-acting,
without serious consequences. As winter reaches its end, the pit fills with
melted snow; it has now become a lake, “still and dazzling under the clear
sky” (DL, 100). The spectacle fascinates Caro. The children’s Saturday
activities with their father have included going to the movies, eating out,
and looking at Lake Huron. Looking at this artificial lake provides the
children with an alternative source of entertainment.
As I have suggested in my analysis of “Train,” Munro often uses land-
scape to enact the erasure of memory and the absence of knowledge—or
even its suppression. Caro and Neal contest each other’s factual accuracy;
she corrects his claim that wolves hibernate and ignores his other false
assumption, that dogs are immune from drowning. Toward the end of
the story, the narrator’s crucial failure to act is recounted, along with the
various unsatisfactory explanations supplied, much later, in counseling.
Caro orders her sibling to tell the adults “that the dog had fallen into the
water and Caro was afraid she’d be drowned” (DL, 102). But there is
a delay. The moment is reconstructed through that most involuntary of
memories, the dream:
This last phrase, “waited for the next thing to happen,” echoes the final
line of “To Reach Japan,” where another child of an adulterous mother
“just stood waiting for whatever had to come next” (DL, 30). Both
lines imply that the child is a spectator, rather than a participant, in the
events of the story; they suggest disempowerment and fatalism. I am also
reminded of a much earlier story from Munro’s first collection, Dance of
the Happy Shades. In “Boys and Girls,” the narrator recollects disobeying
her father’s instructions to close a gate to stop a horse escaping, opening
it wider instead: “I did not make any decision to do this, it was just what I
did” (DHS, 125). Here too, no rational explanation can be made for the
child’s perverse behavior.
These events are, of course, interpreted through hindsight at some
undetermined point in time, long after their original occurrence. Despite
Isabel was finally gone. They said “gone,” as if she had got up and
left. When some one had checked her about an hour ago, she had
been the same as ever, and now she was gone.
He had often wondered what difference it would make.
But the emptiness in place of her was astounding. (DL, 89–90)
The stories in Dear Life have titles as cryptic as any in the late collec-
tions—most of them consisting of a single word. If we had to choose an
alternative title for “Gravel,” “the emptiness in place of her” would serve.
Many of the stories in this collection, and in Munro’s work as a whole, are
haunted by the dead, or by characters who, like Jackson, withhold them-
selves from others. Silences and absences are made palpable, and although
the past is irretrievable, memory strives to fill both the psychic and the
spatial void.
Notes
1 The following editions of Alice Munro’s works are cited in this chapter: Dance
of the Happy Shades (London: Penguin, 1983), hereafter cited as DHS; Dear Life
(London: Chatto & Windus, 2012), hereafter cited as DL; Friend of My Youth
(New York: Knopf, 1990), hereafter cited as FY; The Progress of Love (New York:
Knopf, 1986), hereafter cited as PL; and Too Much Happiness (London: Chatto &
Windus, 2009), hereafter cited as TMH.
2M. M. Bakhtin, “Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel,” in The
Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist, trans.
Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992),
244.
3 Jean Cocteau, dir. La belle et la bête, DVD, Discina, 1946.
4 Charles E. May, “The Short Story Way of Meaning: Munro,” in I Am Your
Brother: Short Story Studies (Long Beach, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publish-
ing Platform, 2013), 235–57.
5 Joseph Frank, “American Laconic: Nescience and Realism in Richard Ford’s
‘Optimists,’” Short Fiction in Theory and Practice 4, no. 1 (2014): 25.
6 Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 245 (original emphasis).
7 Iona Opie and Peter Opie, eds., The Classic Fairy Tales (London: Oxford Uni-
versity Press, 1974), 140.
8 Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 248 (original emphasis).
9 Deborah Treisman, “On ‘Dear Life’: An Interview with Alice Munro,” New
Yorker, 20 November 2012, http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/
on-dear-life-an-interview-with-alice-munro.
10 Nicholas Royle, “Spooking Forms,” Oxford Literary Review 26, no. 1 (2004):
156.
11 Elizabeth Bowen, “The Faber Book of Modern Short Stories,” in The New Short
Story Theories, ed. Charles E. May, 256 (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1994).
12 Laurent Lepaludier, “Theatricality in the Short Story: Staging the Word?”
Journal of the Short Story in English 51 (Autumn 2008): 17–28.
13 Bowen, “The Faber Book of Modern Short Stories,” 260.
14 Bakhtin, “Forms of Time,” 250.