Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOG Act - New Batch
SOG Act - New Batch
Types of Conditions:
1. Express Condition
2. Implied Condition
Types of Implied Conditions:
1. Sec 14: Condition as to Title: When a person sells the goods, it is implied
that he is the owner of the goods. If it is found that he is not the owner,
buyer can repudiate the contract and claim damages.
Case Law: Rowland vs Divall
2. Sec 15: Condition as to Description: When the goods are sold under a
description, it is implied that the bulk goods must correspond with
description else buyer can repudiate the contract and claim damages.
Case Law: Varley vs Whipp:
3. Sec 17: Condition as to Sale by Sample: When the goods are sold by
sample, it is implied that the bulk goods must correspond with sample
else buyer can repudiate the contract and claim damages.
4. Sec 15: Condition as to Sale by sample as well as description: When the
goods are sold by sample as well as description, it is implied that the bulk
goods must correspond with sample and description else buyer can
repudiate the contract and claim damages.
5. Sec 16(1): Condition as to Quality and Fitness: Sec 2(12): Quality: It means
State or Condition of goods.
As per law there is no implied condition as to quality and fitness of the
goods. It is the buyer who must be aware about the quality and fitness of
the goods. This is laid down in “Doctrine of Caveat Emptor” which means
“Let the buyer beware”.
However, if the product can be used only for one purpose, buyer need not
be aware whether the goods are fit for his purpose or not. In case the
goods are not fit for his purpose, buyer can reject the goods and claim
damages. Case Law: Priest vs Last – Hot water bottle
3 Exceptions: In the following cases the buyer cannot return the goods
and cannot claim damages.
a. When the goods are bought under a Brand Name or Trade Name
b. When the goods can be used for number of purposes, buyer must
inform the purpose to the seller else buyer cannot return the goods
and claim damages. Case Law: “Jones vs Padget” – Cloth Purchase
c. When there is an abnormality with the buyer, he must inform the
same to the seller else buyer cannot return the goods and claim
damages. Case Law: “Griffith vs Peterconway Ltd” – Leather Apparel
6. Sec 16(2): Condition as to Merchantability: Merchantable means 100%
good quality or non - defective quality. When a seller is dealing in certain
goods it is implied that those goods are of good quality. In case they are
found to be of defective quality, buyer can reject the goods and claim
damages. Defects may be Patent defect or latent defect. Merchantable
quality is said to be lost in case of Latent defect.
Case Law – “R S Thakur vs HGE Corporation” – Radio Set
7. Condition as to Wholesomeness: This is applicable only to eatables or
consumables. In case of eatables or consumables the goods must be fit for
human consumption else buyer can reject the goods and claim damages.
Case Law: “Frost vs Ayles bury dairy company”
Types of Warranties:
1. Express Warranty: Given in writing only.
2. Implied Warranty
Types Implied Warranty:
1. Warranty as to Quiet Possession: When the goods are sold to buyer it is
implied that they shall be free from disturbances and buyer has the right
to enjoy the possession of goods as against the whole world. If there are
disturbances, buyer can claim damages only.
2. Warranty as to free from encumbrances: Encumbrance means having
charge or lien over the property. When the goods are sold to the buyer, it
is implied that they are free from any encumbrances else the buyer can
claim damages.
3. Warranty as to Quality and Fitness: There is no implied warranty as to
quality and fitness. However, if the buyer and seller wants to put implied
condition or warranty as to quality and fitness, they may annexe it.
4. Disclosure of dangerous nature of goods: When the seller sells the
dangerous goods, it is implied that the dangerous nature must be
informed by the seller to the buyer.
Case Law: “Clarke vs Army & Navy Society” – Disinfectant powder
Doctrine of Caveat Emptor: “Let the buyer beware”. Buyer must be aware about
the goods whether they are of good quality and whether they are fit for his
purpose or not.
Seller is not responsible to inform the defects in the goods to the buyer.
Seller is not responsible for any bad selection of goods made by the buyer.
3 Exceptions: In the following cases the above rule is not applicable:
1. When the goods are bought under a brand name or trade or patent name.
2. When the goods are sold by sample and description
3. When the buyer informs the seller and relies upon seller’s skill and
judgement.
When the specific goods are put in a deliverable state and buyer wants
to do something to the goods like packing, weighing, measuring and if
goods are destroyed, risk of loss falls on buyer even if ownership is not
passed on to the buyer.
Case Law: Simmons vs Swift – Log of wood
Note: In case buyer exercises 2nd option, the contract is still subsisting.
Mixing of goods of inferior quality with that of superior quality does
not amount to mixed delivery
4th Unit: Unpaid Seller
Sec 45(a): Unpaid Seller: The seller to whom either whole or part of the
price is not paid or tendered or
a seller in whose behalf a Bill of Exchange or a negotiable instrument is
drawn but dishonoured is called as Unpaid seller.
An agent of seller also shall be treated as Unpaid only if he has goods and
DOT in his possession.
3. Right of Resale: If seller resells the goods to third party after giving
notice to the buyer, profit on such resale need not be returned to
the buyer. In case there is a loss on resale, such loss can be
recovered from the buyer.
If seller sells the goods without giving notice to the buyer and if
there is a profit on such resale, it must be returned back to the
buyer. In case there is a loss, he cannot recover it from the buyer.