Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chartroom Management
Chartroom Management
4 CHARTROOM MANAGEMENT
4 CHARTROOM MANAGEMENT_____________________________________________________________________1
4.1 Introduction___________________________________________________________________________________2
4.2 Electronic Charts & ECDIS____________________________________________________________________2
4.2.1 Vector chart format electronic charts______________________________________________________2
4.2.2 Raster chart format electronic charts______________________________________________________2
4.2.3 Electronic chart display systems___________________________________________________________2
4.2.3.1 Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS)_______________________________3
4.2.3.2 Raster Chart Display System (RCDS)_____________________________________________________3
4.2.3.3 Electronic Chart System (ECS)___________________________________________________________3
4.3 Introduction to the Electronic Navigational Chart (ENC)___________________________________3
4.4 Operation of ECDIS and Precautions to be taken___________________________________________3
4.5 Electronic Charts Corrections_________________________________________________________________4
4.6 Chart Information_____________________________________________________________________________5
4.6.1 Licenses and Permits______________________________________________________________________5
4.6.2 Ordering and Updating Electronic Charts__________________________________________________5
4.6.3 Temporary and Preliminary (T&P) NTM____________________________________________________6
4.6.4 ENC Preliminary Notices (EPNMs)_________________________________________________________6
4.6.5 Navigational warnings (NAVAREA)________________________________________________________6
4.6.5.1 NAVAREA, NAVTEX and locally broadcasted Warnings: Nav.____________________________7
4.6.6 AIS Safety Messages_______________________________________________________________________7
4.6.7 Manual Corrections________________________________________________________________________7
4.6.8 Deleting Charts____________________________________________________________________________7
4.6.9 Operating Anomalies______________________________________________________________________7
4.1 Introduction
With the mandatory carriage of ECDIS on board vessel, Bridge Team needs to meet new challenges
that arise with the safe navigation of the vessel. The introduction of an ECDIS is a fundamental change
to the navigation and significantly changes many of the existing decision-making processes. An ECDIS
provides the Bridge Team with a highly flexible system which, if correctly configured, offers a
significant increase in situational awareness and safety. This can contribute greater efficiency of
operations allowing the Bridge Team sufficient time to maintain a proper visual and radar watch.
Prerequisite, is the correct configuration from the user, coupled with competency and vigilance during
all the processes.
The present procedures, in conjunction with the ECDIS makers’ manuals, as well as the electronic
charts’ service providers and the international and statutory applicable requirements, provide
guidance on the use of ECDIS on board, including instructions for training / familiarization of the crew
and about the framework for using ECDIS as navigational means.
a. the ECDIS mode when ENCs (vector charts) are used; and
b. the RCDS mode when ENCs are not available and RNCs (raster charts) are used instead.
Awareness of differences between the two types of chart formats is of utmost importance.
Factors that will determine to what extent an electronic chart display system can be used will include
the type of system that has been fitted, the ability of that system to display official nautical charts, and
whether the flag state administration allows its use for navigational purposes. Electronic chart displays
systems can be categorized as ECDIS, RCDS, or ECS.
a. Be type approved.
b. Be maintained to the latest applicable International Hydrographic Organization (IHO)
standards.
c. Use official Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC)
Have adequate, independent back-up arrangement that provide:
a. Independent facilities enabling a safe take-over of the ECDIS functions in order to ensure that
a system failure does not result in a critical situation; and
b. A means to provide for safe navigation for the remaining part of the Passage in case of ECDIS
failure.
Practically the back-up arrangement may be either an independent fully compliant second ECDIS unit,
or adequate and up-to-date paper charts (incl. relevant large-scale charts) necessary for the intended
Passage. Away from major shipping routes, ENCs may be limited to small scale coverage; if greater
detail is required, it may be necessary to use RNCs. Where any significant area needs to be traversed
using ECDIS in RCDS mode, the Bridge Team should critically consider their ECDIS to provide an
adequate “look-ahead” capability and, if necessary, acquire appropriate paper charts. In all cases,
RNCs and paper charts should be maintained up to date.
The Navigation Officer’s attention is therefore drawn to the following limitations of the RCDS
mode:
a. Unlike ENC, where there are no displayed boundaries, RNCs are based on paper charts and as
such have boundaries which are evident in ECDIS.
b. RNCs will not trigger automatic alarms (e.g. anti-grounding). However, alarms and indications
can be generated with the manual addition, during Passage planning, e.g. of clearing lines,
ship safety contour lines, isolated danger markers and danger areas to mitigate these
limitations.
c. Horizontal datums and chart projections may differ between RNCs. Navigation Officers should
understand how a chart’s horizontal datum relates to the datum of the position fixing system
in use. In some instances, this may appear as a shift in position. This difference may be most
noticeable at grid intersections.
d. A number of RNCs cannot be referenced to either WGS-84 or PE 90 geodetic datums. Where
this is the case, ECDIS should give a continuous indication.
e. The display of RNCs features cannot be simplified by the removal of features to suit a
particular navigational circumstance or task at hand. This could affect the superimposition of
radar/ARPA.
f. Without selecting different scale charts, the look-ahead capability may be limited. This may
lead to inconvenience when determining range and bearing or the identity of distant objects.
g. Orientation of the RCDS display to other than chart-up, may affect the readability of chart text
and symbols (e.g. course-up, route-up).
h. It is not possible to interrogate RNC features to gain additional information about charted
objects. Whether using ENC or RNC, in the planning process a OOW should consult all
relevant publications (such as sailing directions, etc.).
i. With RNC it is not possible to display a ship’s safety contour or safety depth and highlight it
on the display unless these features are manually entered during route planning.
j. Depending on the source of the RNC, different colours may be used to show similar chart
information. There may also be differences in colours used during day and night-time.
k. An RNC is intended to be used at the scale of the equivalent paper chart. Excessive zoom in or
zoom out can seriously degrade the displayed image. If the RNC is displayed at a larger scale
than the equivalent paper chart, the ECDIS will provide an indication; and
l. ECDIS provides an indication in the ENC which allows a determination of the quality of
hydrographical data. When using RNCs, OOW are invited to consult the source diagram or the
zone of confidence diagram, if available.
These Raster Navigational Charts (RNCs) must never substitute the use of a portfolio of conventional
up-to-date paper charts for navigational purposes. They must be treated as aids which can be used to
assist in the coning and navigation of the vessel. The judicious use of guard zones and off-track
alarms is particularly valuable in this respect.
importance that all Masters and navigational Officers to know how to update and maintain the
onboard ECDIS, and not leaving to the designated navigation Officer the sole knowledge on the
updating Procedure and Process.
a. Some systems only permit updating to take place if safety monitoring is turned off.
b. Updating utilizes capacity of the computer and therefore is diverting from its primary task.
c. All extant routes will need to be re-checked following an update.
Therefore, a Risk Assessment should be conducted prior to updating while underway. However, if it is
deemed safe to do so, it is recommended that the ECDIS is updated one at a time to ensure the OOW
retains an operational system. Once the update is complete, the OOW should ensure that the updated
ECDIS is performing correctly with the new data prior to conducting the update on the next ECDIS or
synchronizing across the LAN. To aid with the Risk Assessment process, the Navigation Officer should
record approximately how long it takes to update all systems.
Once all ECDIS have been updated, a Spot Check should be conducted of a random selection of charts
in both ENC and RNC formats to check that Corrections, New Editions and New Charts have updated
correctly on all systems. The OOW are responsible for ensuring that all ECDIS are updated correctly.
The OOW are responsible for safeguarding the latest Update disc, Permit file, License file and the last
set of ENC and RNC Base discs.
It is of importance that all Masters and navigational Officers to know how to update and maintain the
on board ECDIS, and not leaving to the designated navigation Officer the sole knowledge on the
updating procedure and process. For specific advice on the chart updating functions handling, the
responsible Officer should refer to the Makers’ Operating Instructions, as well as to instructions issued
by the ENCs service provider (when applicable).
a. In case of all systems being affected, this might indicate possible issue with standards
(misinterpretation of standards).
b. In case of just one system being affected, this might indicate potential implementation error
(implementation issues).
c. In some cases, multiple systems being affected, this might indicate a combination of factors.
d. Systems being incorrectly displayed or failure to activate an alarm (insufficient clarity of alarm
requirements causes inconsistency between display and alarm behaviour).
The results will be collated and used to inform the IMO, national Hydrographic Offices and others, so
that they can take any corrective action that may be necessary.
In any case, anomalies should become known to the Company for conducting appropriate corrective
activities, from its end, as being applicable. In the above context, Company should be in contact with
the ECDIS manufacturer to rule out any anomalies on their installed system(s). Moreover, feedback on
any other type of identified anomalies on board on the system (hardware, software and electronic
charts) should be also immediately reported to the Company, in order further publicity action to be
conducted.