Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Low Frequency Sound Absorber Based On Micro Slit
Low Frequency Sound Absorber Based On Micro Slit
Low Frequency Sound Absorber Based On Micro Slit
Physics
REGULAR PAPER
Recent citations
Low-frequency sound absorber based on micro-slit - Sound absorption metasurface with
entrance and space-coiling channels symmetrical coiled spaces and micro slit of
variable depth
Gildean do N. Almeida et al
To cite this article: Wenyuan Chen et al 2020 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 59 045503 - Control the structure to optimize the
performance of sound absorption of
acoustic metamaterial: A review
Yan Du et al
We designed a low-frequency (<500 Hz) sound attenuation absorber based on micro-slits and space-coiling channels. The absorber provides
near-perfect absorption at an extremely low-frequency of 137 Hz, simultaneously featuring a deep sub-wavelength thickness down to λ/85
(29.5 mm). It is proved that the excellent absorption is mainly caused by the friction losses of acoustic waves in micro-slits and the increase of the
effective propagation length. By adjusting folding numbers and partition panels, the resonance frequency of the absorber is easily tuned and near-
total absorption is obtained under fixed thickness. We further broadened relative absorption bandwidth to 54% by coupling two unit cells exhibiting
different properties. The absorption mechanism is investigated utilizing acoustic impedance together with the reflection coefficient in the complex
frequency plane. The absorption properties were demonstrated analytically, numerically and experimentally. The high-efficiency absorption, sub-
wavelength thickness, and easy fabrication suggest that the absorber could have potential applications in acoustic engineering.
© 2020 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 2. (Color online) (a) Theoretical absorption distribution at different loss and leakage factors, the dashed line indicates perfect absorption, where A and B
are two cases with loss and leakage factors, respectively. (b) The relationship of loss and leakage factors with geometric parameters of absorber. (c) Absorption
coefficient of the case A (bA = 0.6 mm, pA = 0.98%, single slit), B (bB = 0.3 mm, pb = 2.9%, multi-slits, the number of silt is 6). (d) The distribution of
acoustic pressure and velocity at 312 Hz.
Fig. 3. (Color online) (a) The Absorption coefficient of micro-slits (correspond case B) and wide-slit (1.8 mm). (b) The absorption coefficient of with space-
coiling channels and non-space-coiling channels.
form unequal-sections space-coiling channels. For instance, we compared the relative impedance zs/z0 for different w1.
fix w1 + w2 = 18 mm and vary w1, all other parameters are Generally, perfect absorption indicates a perfect match between
given in the caption of Fig. 5, and the corresponding absorption the surface impedance of absorbers and the characteristic
coefficient tuned by adjusting w1 is illustrated in Fig. 5(a). The impedance of the surrounding medium (air). It means that the
near-perfect peak frequency occurred at 137 Hz, 177 Hz, and imaginary parts of the relative impedance are equal to zero,
210 Hz for w1 = 2, 4, and 9 mm, with relative absorption while the real parts become unity. Imaginary and real parts of
bandwidth of 16.8%, 21.0%, and 27.6% respectively. Here the the relative impedance of the absorber are plotted in Figs. 5(b)
theoretical (line), numerical (circle) and CMT (dashed) solu- and 5(c). When the imaginary parts reach zero at the peak
tions are in good agreement. Compared with the uniform cross- frequency, corresponding real components are 1.08, 1.15 and
section (w1 = 9 mm), the resonance frequency clearly shifts to 1.47 for w1 = 2, 4, 9 mm. A slight deviation of real parts from
lower frequency with decreasing w1, while maintaining near- unity here answers for the defective absorption of resonance.
perfect sound absorption under constraint thickness. To under- To gain further insight into the mechanism underlying the
stand the near-perfect sound absorption characteristic, we absorption, we investigate the reflection coefficient r in
4. Experimental verification
To verify the accuracy of the proposed structure, we
implemented experiments employing the B&K 4206 A im-
pedance tube based on the two-microphone method.41) The
experimental setup for the sound absorption measurement is
shown in Figs. 6(a). Both the sketch of the structure and three
experimental samples are illustrated in Fig. 6(b). The metal
micro-slits panel fabricated by laser and space-coiling
channels fabricated using the photosensitive resin by 3D
printing technology. The detailed parameters of the three
samples are listed in Table II (see supplementary). Samples A
and B is a single absorbing peak structure with different
resonance frequency. And sample C is an integrated unit by
Fig. 4. (Color online) (a) Absorber with folding numbers n = 4, 6 and 8,
respectively. (b) The absorption coefficient curve with folding numbers paralleling samples A and B, for broadening the sound
n = 4, 6 and 8, respectively. absorbing bandwidth. As shown in Figs. 6(c) and 6(e), the
experimental results are consistent with the theoretical
complex plane by employing the graphic method. The predictions for three samples. The peak frequency of samples
distributions of log10∣r∣2 in complex frequency plane for A, B occurred at 370 Hz and 420 Hz, with the relative
w1 = 2, 4, 9 mm were plotted in Figs. 5(d) and 5(f). bandwidth being 34%, 39% respectively. And the bandwidth
Generally, in the lossless case, a pair of zero-pole point of sample C is broadened up to 54%. We also plotted the
appears symmetrically distributed on two sides of the real log10∣r∣2 of the sample C in complex frequency panel, in
axis. Perfect absorption occurs when the zero point reaches which two zeros and poles could be observed, as shown in
the real axis, and thus, the critical coupling condition met Fig. 6(f). There is some deviation between the experimental
(The impedance match). For the w1 = 2, 4, 9 mm, their zeros and theoretical results of the sample C, which may arises
are close to the real axis and achieve near-perfect absorption from the fabrication inaccuracy and manufacturing errors.
even with a slightly impaired coupling condition.
Furthermore, the distance between the zero and the pole is 5. Conclusion
positively related to the absorption bandwidth of the In summary, a deep sub-wavelength sound absorber based
absorber. As shown in Figs. 5(d) and 5(f), the distance on micro-slits entrance and space-coiling channels are
between the zero and the pole increases with increasing w1, proposed, which can efficiently absorb the incident acoustic
which means a broader bandwidth. wave energy at low-frequency. We revealed that the low-
Fig. 5. (Color online) (a) Absorption coefficient of w1 = 2, 4, and 9 mm, the dimension of the structure is L = 60 mm, m = 22 mm, a = 10 mm, T = 2 mm,
b0 = 1 mm, n = 3, w3 = 9 mm, h = 30 mm, t = 0.5 mm, b = 0.3 mm and the number of micro-slit is 5. (b)–(c) Imaginary parts and real parts of relative
impedance. The arrows indicate the position of the absorption peak frequency. (d)–(f) Reflection coefficient in complex frequency planes for w1 = 2, 4, and
9 mm, respectively.
Fig. 6. (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. (b) Experiment samples A, B and C, sample A (multi slits, d = 0.3 mm, the number of
silt is 4, pA = 2.6%), sample B (single slit, d = 0.5 mm, pB = 1.1%); sample C is an integrated structure of sample A and B; (c)–(e) Experimental and
simulation results of the three samples; (f) log10∣r∣2 in the complex frequency plane for the sample C.
12) Y. Cheng, C. Zhou, B. G. Yuan, D. J. Wu, Q. Wei, and X. J. Liu, Nat. Mater. 24) Y. Wang, H. G. Zhao, H. B. Yang, J. Zhong, D. Zhao, Z. L. Lu, and
14, 1013 (2015). J. H. Wen, J. Appl. Phys. 123, 185109 (2018).
13) L. Ye, C. Qiu, J. Lu, K. Tang, H. Jia, M. Ke, S. Peng, and Z. Liu, AIP Adv. 25) H. Zhao et al., “A double porosity material for low frequency sound
6, 085007 (2016). absorption,” Compos. Struct. 239, 111978 (2020).
14) H. Zhang, Y. Xiao, J. Wen, D. Yu, and X. Wen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 26) Z. Liang and J. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 114301 (2012).
141902 (2016). 27) X. Cai, Q. Guo, G. Hu, and J. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 121901 (2014).
15) Z. Yang, J. Mei, M. Yang, N. H. Chan, and P. Sheng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 28) C. Chen, Z. Du, G. Hu, and J. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 221903 (2017).
204301 (2008). 29) Y. Li and B. M. Assouar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 063502 (2016).
16) S. H. Lee, C. M. Park, Y. M. Seo, Z. G. Wang, and C. K. Kim, Phys. Rev. 30) F. Wu, Y. Xiao, D. Yu, H. Zhao, Y. Wang, and J. Wen, Appl. Phys. Lett.
Lett. 104, 054301 (2010). 114, 151901 (2019).
17) C. M. Park, J. J. Park, S. H. Lee, Y. M. Seo, C. K. Kim, and S. H. Lee, Phys. 31) K. Donda et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 173506 (2019).
Rev. Lett. 107, 194301 (2011). 32) C. Zhang and X. Hu, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 064025 (2016).
18) X. Wu, C. Fu, X. Li, Y. Meng, Y. Gao, J. Tian, L. Wang, Y. Huang, 33) L. Liu, H. Chang, C. Zhang, and X. Hu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 083503 (2017).
Z. Yang, and W. Wen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 043501 (2016). 34) H. Chang, L. Liu, C. Zhang, and X. Hu, AIP Adv. 8, 045115 (2018).
19) Y. Tang, S. Ren, M. Han, F. Xin, L. Huang, T. Chen, C. Zhang, and T. Lu, 35) H. Long et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 103503 (2019).
Sci. Rep. 7, 43340 (2017). 36) Y. Shen et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 083501 (2019).
20) V. Romero-García, G. Theocharis, O. Richoux, A. Merkel, V. Tournat, and 37) V. Romero-García et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 3395 (2016).
V. Pagneux, Sci. Rep. 6, 19519 (2016). 38) C. Qu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 235503 (2015).
21) N. Jiménez, W. Huang, V. Romero-García, V. Pagneux, and J.-P. Groby, 39) Y. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. E 62, 7389 (2000).
Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 121902 (2016). 40) K. Y. Bliokh et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1201 (2008).
22) M. Yang, S. Chen, C. Fu, and P. Sheng, Mater. Horiz. 4, 673 (2017). 41) ISO-10534-2, Determination of Sound Absorption Coefficient and
23) Y. Wang, H. Zhao, H. Yang, J. Zhong, and J. Wen, Europhys. Lett. 120, Impedance in Impedance Tubes (International Organisation for
54001 (2017). Standardisation, Geneva, 1998).